Player Features and Ideas Discussion

So your solution to make the game more interesting is:

remove
remove
remove
remove
change (no detail)
remove ISK
make things more expensive
boost 1 ship type
nerf
nerf


That doesn't seem very exciting to me. Maybe some more detail about how you think all of these will actually help, since you seem to be blaming falling numbers on just a few ships and mechanics.

Good luck getting CCP to look at any of this.

You've made absolutely no solid argument at all other than 'this is what I think', but what you think is no better than what someone else thinks, even if it's different to yours.

You'll need more credible arguments and details than that.

One of the things I have never understood is why I can fit 3 ASBs but no more than one AAR.

also remove random holes and keep just statics, except thera.

All doubling the mineral requirements on capital ships would do is further cement the power of large groups that already have more of them than they can count. In one swoop you've dramatically increased both the value of their assets and the difficulty of trying to compete with them.

You need to re-name your topic to
Teddy KGB Want This - CCP Make It Happen.

There is nothing on it I agree with.
And for the record the T3 in all forms needs to be removed from the game, there is no way to balance them because the basic concept and/or the implementation is flawed.

I seriously think this is the dumbest thread of all time.



You understand how statics work right?

you mean that if capital price will double up than the loss for big alliance wont be more expansive?

explain them first, which permits need for supers building.

If he adds in:
"remove cyno jammers and system upgrades"
"remove citadel space magic and put the contents of destroyed player made structures in a loot table or scrap heap"

I'd be willing to give it a shot. It looks like a lot of his ideas are about kicking botting in the goji berries and putting some actual risk back into the game. I can see where the average null bear will hate all of his thinking. Killing of the cash cow and all.

Big picture, if they don't get the game back on its original track to success, but keep going with the gimmicky stuff - we're pretty much riding this thing to the fast approaching end of the line. SOV null has been stale and boring for years and just too damn safe. That drives bored players away AND allows a few large power blocks to basically cockblock new groups from entering sov null as independents. So HS is filling up w/ guys who won't live under the SOV null establishments thumb and SOV subscriptions are falling off due to boredom.

Another good idea for the game would be to make the loss rate of supers > production rate of supers. For as long as it takes to remove the APEX fleet reality from the game. I get that some folks get off on it, but the majority of the game would rather do without it (and based on active players logging in they are voting with their feets)


These things may seem like suck for some for the current day, but at some point if you want to be bitching on the Eve forums 10 years from now, some of the bad stuff in the game (even if you currently benefit from it) has to go. CCP needs to throw away the short term goggles and get back to the long game. (alpha clones and ship skins are not going to get this done)