These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Renaming and suggestions

Author
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#21 - 2016-11-19 22:01:58 UTC
Chevexia wrote:
Holy crap, is everyone in this game this hostile? I search how to rename a character and end up here. You all know you can change your name in real life right? Is Caitlyn Jenner a whole new person with no reputation? lol no. Kinda funny how you guys are totally cool with changing your whole body in EVE, having clones, etc. but OH NO SOMEONE WANTS TO CHANGE THEIR NAME? BLASPHEMY!

Welcome to player features and idea's discussion.
Where you propose I seemingly simple change and we show you how it utterly breaks the game.

In here you find the tinfoil hat wearing loonies, afkcloakywhingers and a small but resolute group of regulars weary from calling idiots idiots and explaining for the billionth time why upgrading the server hardware by making it out of cheese may not infact be the wisest of decisions.

We see a lot of repeats here, the solution to this one is to gut the character with sp injectors and rebuild it.
Psichotic
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#22 - 2017-01-18 13:59:05 UTC
The customer is not always right, but the customer is always the customer.

Personally I am happy with my character name, but unhappy with the progress of Eve, and IMHO this is a case-in-point why this has happened. I really think CCP could be doing a lot better if Eve did not attract these kinds of hostile people.

My advice to CCP: Let players rename their characters if they want. Eve is on life support. Let the players redo/undo/change whatever will make them happy.

There aren't going to be a whole lot of drunken player gatherings in CCP's future if you hang your hat on an aging player base. Millennials are used to being catered to. As one person said: "this is 2016, wake up!"; like it or not that's the attitude of the Milennials. With the difficulty of learning the game in the first place they aren't going to stick around if they are treated this way by the company on top of being tricked, swindled, and abused by other players as is the nature of this game. I don't have numbers to back it up but I would not be surprised if Eve had the largest percentage of rage-quitting in the industry.

And with all due respect to the executive team, you should have sold to EA or whomever it was when there was a chance. Now it's too late. Millions of dollars down the drain. Everyone could have made a small fortune. Those are some pretty severe consequences indeed.

Eve Valkyrie, on the other hand, is great! I'd shift my resources in that direction. Once the HW prices come down, which will be very soon, 2D games won't have the appeal they once did. It was a good run but VR is the future.







Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#23 - 2017-01-18 15:39:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Rivr Luzade
Psichotic wrote:
Everyone could have made a small fortune.

Everyone except for the players, of course. And why would you care about the players; they are just cattle meant to be milked for a bit of cash before they get thrown into the next failing cash-grab project.

I leave it with an advice: Don't take your character name too serious when you give into to your necrophilia and unearth a dead topic for no reason. Roll

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Psichotic
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#24 - 2017-01-18 20:54:23 UTC
Rivr Luzade wrote:
Psichotic wrote:
Everyone could have made a small fortune.

Everyone except for the players, of course. Roll


One of us is confused. Investors take on financial risk, and therefore are entitled to a return on that investment when a company goes IPO or is bought by another entity. Players are just customers.

Maybe you meant that if the product is sold to another company the new owner would change the game in some negative way? If so us customers do have the option to buy another product from some other company, but the employees and shareholders don't because this is their livelihood. I do realize that is not going to be very palatable to hear, but these people need to put food on the table.

Besides, I'd be willing to bet EA would be much more responsive to customer demands, so ultimately the customer would benefit.

Eve has lasted a very, very long time. Way beyond the expectations of many people. That is a big success story. CCP is to be congratulated. But obviously all technology eventually becomes obsolete. It's just the nature of the business.

VR is definitely the future of gaming, and they have already come out with two titles: Gunjack and Valkyrie. So CCP is moving forward. BTW if you don't have a Rift or a Vive (I have both) I highly recommend getting one. And if you have any friends who do you have got to try Valkyrie. They did really great with that. It is an EXCELLENT game! I'm not into shooters but for those who are Gunjack is another great title – and you can play that with just a Gear.

I really think CCP can reproduce their success by focusing on VR. In the meantime they should build the millennial user base. If customers want to change their character names or whatever, who cares? Just build up enough revenue over the short term to reinvest in the VR titles and go forward on that front. Hey, if Eve does continue for another few years that's great, but I think they are well aware VR is where it's at now.



ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#25 - 2017-01-18 21:22:01 UTC
*frysquint*

Not sure if trolling, EA spai, or technophiliac with more cash than brains.


Also... customers tend to be short sighted and extremely selfish. While you cannot ignore this, you also should not cave in and give them everything they want (to keep the game overall healthy).

That is partly why EVE is still around. A lot of decisions that have been unpopular with players have been pushed though.
Mind you, if there is too much push back, the DEVs reconsider their positions.

But just giving the customers everything they want without consideration to anything else is lunacy.
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#26 - 2017-01-19 07:58:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Rivr Luzade
Psichotic wrote:
Rivr Luzade wrote:
Psichotic wrote:
Everyone could have made a small fortune.

Everyone except for the players, of course. Roll


One of us is confused. Investors take on financial risk, and therefore are entitled to a return on that investment when a company goes IPO or is bought by another entity. Players are just customers.

Maybe you meant that if the product is sold to another company the new owner would change the game in some negative way? If so us customers do have the option to buy another product from some other company, but the employees and shareholders don't because this is their livelihood. I do realize that is not going to be very palatable to hear, but these people need to put food on the table.

Besides, I'd be willing to bet EA would be much more responsive to customer demands, so ultimately the customer would benefit.

Eve has lasted a very, very long time. Way beyond the expectations of many people. That is a big success story. CCP is to be congratulated. But obviously all technology eventually becomes obsolete. It's just the nature of the business.

VR is definitely the future of gaming...

Thank you for that insightful and ignorant comment, proving my point entirely. Much appreciated.

No, we customers do not have the choice to just buy another product because there is no other product available that is like EVE. That is, in large parts, the fault of companies like EA and customers or investors like you.
Under your scenario, only the shareholders interested in a short term profits may or may not benefit from such a sale. Focus on short term profits without regard for long term benefits, however, is a substantial reason why we live in this overall miserable economic situation, thanks to companies like EA and customers and investors like you. Considering this, among other things, I very much doubt that employees at a CCP sold to EA would appreciate the move. I also strongly doubt that a sale to EA would keep CCP in business, considering long tradition of studio closures after EA bought them.

Customer demands like yours, which are diametral to what makes EVE what it is and supposed to be, just because some whiny wimps can't grasp the game's concept and are overchallenged by the different nature of this game? You just need to look at the latest Alpha Clone "improvement" suggestion to see what kind of terrible players try to join the game and thankfully leave again once they notice they cannot abuse it however they like. EVE does not need these players at all to thrive. As for responsiveness to customer demands: Do I have to really remind you of the latest Sim City iteration, which was a complete disaster and only poor sales figures and massive violent pressure from the community made EA change their mind.

EVE has lasted as long as it has because it was largely independent from terrible companies like EA. The last time CCP tried to do tricks to the community that are akin to what EA does to their games, the game almost crumbled. Not CCP not selling to EA (or any other random bad publisher) makes tech and the game obsolete, selling to these cash milking crap companies does.

The VR that we currently have is just terrible and most current gamers cannot use VR because their computers are not capable of handling it and they are not and will not be able to upgrade to suitable hardware in the near and midterm future, in part thanks to companies like EA and customers and investors like you, who are only interested in short term profits without consideration for long term benefits and effects, causing an overall miserable economic situation.
Valkyrie is nothing like EVE. It may be an excellent game for casuals who are not interested in risk and reward that EVE itself has as founding principle of the game's mechanics and gameplay experience, let alone a long term oriented game play beyond just a useless, non-impacting, non-effecting 10 minute space battle royale with some "friends" (that word is so empty and meaningless these days, by the way). EVE, however, focuses on more than just this.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Psichotic
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#27 - 2017-02-17 12:51:46 UTC
Rivr Luzade wrote:
Psichotic wrote:
Rivr Luzade wrote:
Psichotic wrote:
Everyone could have made a small fortune.

Everyone except for the players, of course. Roll


One of us is confused. Investors take on financial risk, and therefore are entitled to a return on that investment when a company goes IPO or is bought by another entity. Players are just customers.

Maybe you meant that if the product is sold to another company the new owner would change the game in some negative way? If so us customers do have the option to buy another product from some other company, but the employees and shareholders don't because this is their livelihood. I do realize that is not going to be very palatable to hear, but these people need to put food on the table.

Besides, I'd be willing to bet EA would be much more responsive to customer demands, so ultimately the customer would benefit.

Eve has lasted a very, very long time. Way beyond the expectations of many people. That is a big success story. CCP is to be congratulated. But obviously all technology eventually becomes obsolete. It's just the nature of the business.

VR is definitely the future of gaming...

Thank you for that insightful and ignorant comment, proving my point entirely. Much appreciated.

No, we customers do not have the choice to just buy another product because there is no other product available that is like EVE. That is, in large parts, the fault of companies like EA and customers or investors like you.
Under your scenario, only the shareholders interested in a short term profits may or may not benefit from such a sale. Focus on short term profits without regard for long term benefits, however, is a substantial reason why we live in this overall miserable economic situation, thanks to companies like EA and customers and investors like you. Considering this, among other things, I very much doubt that employees at a CCP sold to EA would appreciate the move. I also strongly doubt that a sale to EA would keep CCP in business, considering long tradition of studio closures after EA bought them.

Customer demands like yours, which are diametral to what makes EVE what it is and supposed to be, just because some whiny wimps can't grasp the game's concept and are overchallenged by the different nature of this game? You just need to look at the latest Alpha Clone "improvement" suggestion to see what kind of terrible players try to join the game and thankfully leave again once they notice they cannot abuse it however they like. EVE does not need these players at all to thrive. As for responsiveness to customer demands: Do I have to really remind you of the latest Sim City iteration, which was a complete disaster and only poor sales figures and massive violent pressure from the community made EA change their mind.

EVE has lasted as long as it has because it was largely independent from terrible companies like EA. The last time CCP tried to do tricks to the community that are akin to what EA does to their games, the game almost crumbled. Not CCP not selling to EA (or any other random bad publisher) makes tech and the game obsolete, selling to these cash milking crap companies does.

The VR that we currently have is just terrible and most current gamers cannot use VR because their computers are not capable of handling it and they are not and will not be able to upgrade to suitable hardware in the near and midterm future, in part thanks to companies like EA and customers and investors like you, who are only interested in short term profits without consideration for long term benefits and effects, causing an overall miserable economic situation.
Valkyrie is nothing like EVE. It may be an excellent game for casuals who are not interested in risk and reward that EVE itself has as founding principle of the game's mechanics and gameplay experience, let alone a long term oriented game play beyond just a useless, non-impacting, non-effecting 10 minute space battle royale with some "friends" (that word is so empty and meaningless these days, by the way). EVE, however, focuses on more than just this.


Instead of saying "what EVE is supposed to be", you should say "what EVE could be". You have your idea of what you want, and, coming from someone who says the word friends is "so empty and meaningless these days", I guess EVE is what you want it to be. Your assumption seems to be that all EVE needs is the current player base, and I say you are wrong because the current player base is aging. Expansion into China might prop the game up, but I'm not sure if they can merge those servers because of the way business works in China.

Your assertion that "The VR that we currently have is just terrible" makes it obvious you haven't played with a Vive or a Rift. (Maybe if you left your basement??) You also assume EA or Blizzard or Rockstar would kill off the game and that is just an assumption. They have massive player bases and could bring in millions of more customers. Of course people like you would probably not like a flood of kids and causal gamers coming into the game, but ultimately that may be necessary whether or not any of us likes it.



Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#28 - 2017-02-17 13:55:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Daichi Yamato
Not only is it not necessary but it'd kill the game in a year or so because thats how long the players you're wanting to attract play a game for before looking for the next 'ooh shiny'.

Old players still play eve. Its features allow play and progression whilst offline. We train skills whilst logged off and we can make money whilst logged off. We can make money whilst we do chores around the house. Etc etc. A couple years ago the oldest player was over 50 and the average was 25 with a full time job. True some people leave due to real life, but less than you might think.

Funnily enough these would be the first things the 'new' players would change if they could. They'd have a grinding skill progression. Dailies (ugh) and pay wall shite.


Honestly, having 20% of the playerbase for 10x as long is better than having a game thats last a year and dies.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Wolfgang Jannesen
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#29 - 2017-02-17 14:52:34 UTC
'EVE is dying' is not a topic for this forum, nor is it anything new kids. Bitter people with nothing to argue like to throw it around, it's been that way for over a decade.

If you want to customize characters and names and have MMO elements thrown at you outside of playing a game with a massive amount of other people, you're looking for something else. Cosmetic changes that would require a lot of effort like more in-station content is not a priority for development.
Previous page12