These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

New Rorq boost sucks

Author
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#21 - 2016-09-21 16:45:26 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
March rabbit wrote:
I've heard that fully trained and boosted hulk mining in 0.0 gives above 250mil/hour Shocked
My alt has little above 23 seconds of cycle time on ICE mining (Covetor + T2 equipment + rorq bonuses). Harvesting Krystallos (1.25mil pu in Jita) it gives 3600/23*1.25=195mil/hour Shocked And i'm not talking about 'all V' skills and T2 barge here.....

So yes, guy talking about 80 hours of mining WITH rorq to pay for PLEX ...... What?

Maybe hes real issue is his corps ore buyback program Shocked


maybe he just complaining because the upcoming alpha clones wont really work too well when mining with venture alts

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#22 - 2016-09-21 16:46:14 UTC
I once again have to ask if I can call my activities to collect space resources from asteroids something other than mining because the OP is embarrassing everyone who thinks themselves a miner. So let me see, your Roq is no longer a totally safe thing to make you "boosted". OK, so. Everyone mining today without a Roq raise your hand. Bonus if you are doing it without any "boost". How oh how are so many of us surviving this clearly unfair disadvantage? Seriously, if this is going to drive you all out of Eve, awesome, be gone you lazy whiner miners!

I am going to try again to explain why Eve is special. It is complicated and mostly free form. Instead of the traditional machine based NPC AI driving it all, Eve makes you "compete" with other humans, which sometimes are clever and driven. They will learn to adapt and optimize no matter what changes may be thrown into the sandbox. If you don't like that then Eve is not for you. There is no "easy" setting in Eve. That is why it continues to keep people engaged.

So I might not always like changes in some mechanics but I adapt and realize that is why I like the challenge. To be honest its when I see changes that maybe put us closer to that "easy" setting that I worry. Not that I don't think there should be some places in Eve that can almost be "easy". That should be high sec, not null. Null should be insanely lucrative and very dangerous. So long as risk is partnered with reward and vis versa all is right in the 'verse".

The Roq should not be some sort of "win" gizmo for lazy miners.
Federigo Mondial
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#23 - 2016-09-21 17:06:09 UTC
Well you can use a Command ship :)

Blade Darth
Room for Improvement
Good Sax
#24 - 2016-09-21 17:33:30 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
miner boosting BC
But why.
There's the orca, which is worth something like 3 skiffs... Make the orca cheaper so it can be used in throwaway t1 mining fleets (300m) and use rorq for 10-20 ship strong t2 fleets....


As for OP... idk how many alts or dual character training your corp fuels, apparently a lot. It doesn't take 80 hours for 1 account to get a plex. Including a 2-3b ship (that's gonna multiply fleet value by 3), how often do you lose the whole mining fleet? Once every few months?
Ocean Ormand
Bagel and Lox
#25 - 2016-09-21 17:41:41 UTC
Ares Splinter wrote:
CCP now must listen
the new with rorq on the grid so destroys in it for miners and forcing them to lose their BOOST and being dependent on other player to sit there with them and people have said stop in our corp way introduce this, we lose our mines not only that cheated as do my 80 hours with boost just to get to their gametime so kill them now total ..
our mines have announced they stop eve if in carrying this out and then follow our pvp members and pve with we had a corp meeting about it and said we find a different game all together and play if not in coming up with a better solution for those the miners to mine 150 hours instead of the 70-80 hours they do now .. with boost
we do not know what your plan is, but it sucks to all others who do not have a rorq.



I simply dont understand folk complaining about orca and rorq boosting. Assuming that folk decide that it is too risky to use their boosting ships in belts - that means that (1) those ships will be parked; (2) less ore/ice will be mined; (3) the price of ore/ice will go up. Hence, the relative position of miners is going to be the same - you will mine less but being paid more for it. Of course you may have to compete with folk who do decide to take the risk by boosting from a belt - but those people are seeking greater profit from greater risk. Having miner's have to make choices about how much they are willing to risk to profit is not bad for the game.

Ofc the ones who truly suffer in all of this is ccp. Boosting is usually done from an alt account - frequently an afk alt account. People may very well decide that they dont want to risk their ships or have to actively focus on boosting - as a result they may very well simply close the subscriptions on this accounts. Miners are going to mine regardless of boosting but if enough people decide to close their specialized boosting accounts then ccp is going to take both a financial hit. Most significantly, it will potentially be a drag on online concurrent users. If People see that the ocu numbers are going to down even further - there is the potential it becomes a bitter cycle with folk thinking that the game is dying and therefore not logging in and causing a further spiraling of player loss. IMO ccp should not be introducing mechanisms that make it harder for people to box accounts since that just leads to a loss of the specialized alt accounts and pressure on ocu numbers. But what do i Know? I just play the game.
Piugattuk
Litla Sundlaugin
#26 - 2016-09-21 17:49:18 UTC
You can use a drake in place of a Roc, to me it's for years people have said risk vs rewards well guess CCP has taken that advice and have added more risk for the more juicier rewards of fancy roids.

But they were also benevolent in that instead of only orcas and roc's you could use a battle cruiser, so thank CCP for being nice.
Pandora Carrollon
Provi Rapid Response
#27 - 2016-09-21 17:51:10 UTC
If you're in Sov Null... not sure what the issue is, you should have defenses on site to handle the Rorq being on grid. It's more of a planning and organizational problem now.

If you're in LoSec, it's almost like Sov Null but you have different organizational needs to protect the hardware you have deployed.

HiSec, not much change, it's just Orca mining and the issues that came with that.

So, if this is a big problem, yes, it will bleed miners and I agree with Pedro here, it's not necessarily a bad thing for the game. I think the Alpha clones will more than make up for any losses players.

So, while I don't mind the loss of the infinite boost, I'm still not sure the Rorq was buffed correctly, so jury still out there.
Arronicus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#28 - 2016-09-21 20:39:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Arronicus
Pandora Carrollon wrote:

If you're in LoSec, it's almost like Sov Null but you know not to mine, because you're not a complete fool.


FTFY. The only reason to mine in lowsec is because you are baiting pvpers with pvp-skiffs.

Ares Splinter wrote:
CCP now must listen


no.


It changes the dynamic so that boosts are no longer a given, they are a risk-reward factor. Current mining boost gameplay is unexciting, and has no element of risk/reward, it's simply a must. If you want to make decent money, you must pay for an afk toon to sit afk all day in a safe location giving boosts.

Coming november, there is significant direct incentives for having your boosting pilot in the belt with the miners, and slightly more significant incentives for having a rorq drop into siege there to give out boosts, but also accompanying risks. Orcas and Rorqs WILL be in asteroid belts, (I'm not going to mention the porpoise, nullsec miners considering the porpoise are likely mining out of ventures) so if you want boosts

1) Put your own boosting toon in the belt, and enjoy the extra isk you pull in for the risk it entails
2) Make friends/join corps with other people bringing their boosters. And if you aren't a complete ****/goon, tip them.
3) Cry on the forums until nothing changes. Because nothing will change, CCP is committed to this, and enough miners will embrace it that the world will keep spinning.

The more of your friends who quit mining, the more people that will take their place as prices go up, and the ore market restabilizes. Many people will even continue to mine without good boosts.

Comments of 'have a defence fleet ready are a joke at best, and trolls at worst, ignore them. Most of us know that short of mining boosts causing rats to reliably spawn in the belt (No, CCP, this isn't a request), pvp fleets are not going to sit around for hours at a time babying a mining gang, unless they're doing something important for a particular corp, and if you think more than a small fraction of the rorqual boosters in eve are owned by a corp, I have a Palatine Keepstar to sell you. It's all about putting up scouts, exercising safe mining practices, and ideally, having your own defence ships you can switch your miners into in a hurry, in the event that something that can actually kill your rorqual, tackles it.
Toobo
Project Fruit House
#29 - 2016-09-21 22:19:56 UTC
I think Rorq bait will be a thing. Rorq gets tackled, cyno open, defence fleet jumps in, the attacker opens his own cyno, things can escalate quickly and it will be great. There are many cases where pvp fleet sits idle in a POS with titan ready to bridge while hunters are looking for good hot drop opportunities. Then someone will scream in the comms, "Yes! we got our Rorqual tackled! Enemy cyno open and caps dropping in! jump jump jump!!!"

Then there will be such a joy and people will cyno to Rorqual to get the contents they have been waiting for hours. Everyone will be happy :D think positive, this could be a fun change.

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2016-09-22 05:44:13 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
People who complain abotu the Rorq never seem to mention the new miner boosting BC that will be an alternative.

As for boosts, I'll say it again to CCP: these whines are what happens when you put unbalanced stuff in the game and people get used to them as an entitlement. At this point they feel like you OWE them easy to protect, hyper effective off grid boosts....because that's what you gave them for years.





I still think that its hilarious with all the whining after OGBs have been the boogie man forever.

Reap what you sow bitches.
Serene Repose
#31 - 2016-09-22 07:31:19 UTC
Toobo wrote:
I think Rorq bait will be a thing. Rorq gets tackled, cyno open, defence fleet jumps in, the attacker opens his own cyno, things can escalate quickly and it will be great. There are many cases where pvp fleet sits idle in a POS with titan ready to bridge while hunters are looking for good hot drop opportunities. Then someone will scream in the comms, "Yes! we got our Rorqual tackled! Enemy cyno open and caps dropping in! jump jump jump!!!"

Then there will be such a joy and people will cyno to Rorqual to get the contents they have been waiting for hours. Everyone will be happy :D think positive, this could be a fun change.
You can't be serious! Actually play EVE! Where ever did you get such an idea?!

We must accommodate the idiocracy.

Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#32 - 2016-09-22 15:38:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Vincent Athena
I think the OP's point is that to get boosts in the belt, someone has to be sitting at the computer, controlling the Rorq. That person has to be there, at the keyboard, continuously, to quickly respond to threats. For hours and hours. The problem is not "no security" its that having security makes for an extremely poor gameplay experience for the Rorq pilot. So, the Rorq pilots will not do it, and boosts are lost.

If you think mining is for hours boring gameplay, imagine watching someone else mine for hours.

CCP: this is a valid issue. Having a game mechanic that requires someone sit at a keyboard doing nothing for hours on end is a poor mechanic.

Edit: Suggestion: Allow the Rorq pilot to mine. Super drones, or more high slots for strip miners (with limits to prevent overpowered fits). Then at least the Rorq pilot will have a comparable gameplay experience as the rest of the miners.

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Zanar Skwigelf
HIgh Sec Care Bears
Brothers of Tangra
#33 - 2016-09-22 15:51:28 UTC
Vincent Athena wrote:
I think the OP's point is that to get boosts in the belt, someone has to be sitting at the computer, controlling the Rorq. That person has to be there, at the keyboard, continuously, to quickly respond to threats. For hours and hours. The problem is not "no security" its that having security makes for an extremely poor gameplay experience for the Rorq pilot. So, the Rorq pilots will not do it, and boosts are lost.

CCP: this is a valid issue. Having a game mechanic that requires someone sit at a keyboard doing nothing for hours on end is a poor mechanic.


Who said the rorq won't be actively mining?
Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#34 - 2016-09-22 16:06:07 UTC
Zanar Skwigelf wrote:
Vincent Athena wrote:
I think the OP's point is that to get boosts in the belt, someone has to be sitting at the computer, controlling the Rorq. That person has to be there, at the keyboard, continuously, to quickly respond to threats. For hours and hours. The problem is not "no security" its that having security makes for an extremely poor gameplay experience for the Rorq pilot. So, the Rorq pilots will not do it, and boosts are lost.

CCP: this is a valid issue. Having a game mechanic that requires someone sit at a keyboard doing nothing for hours on end is a poor mechanic.


Who said the rorq won't be actively mining?

CCP?

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Zanar Skwigelf
HIgh Sec Care Bears
Brothers of Tangra
#35 - 2016-09-22 17:25:08 UTC
Vincent Athena wrote:
Zanar Skwigelf wrote:


Who said the rorq won't be actively mining?

CCP?


Where did they say that? I'm curious why they put capital mining drones on SISI if the rorq is only boosting. Also, is there something in the description that says miner iis can't be fit on the rorq?
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#36 - 2016-09-22 17:28:35 UTC
Piugattuk wrote:
You can use a drake in place of a Roc, to me it's for years people have said risk vs rewards well guess CCP has taken that advice and have added more risk for the more juicier rewards of fancy roids.

But they were also benevolent in that instead of only orcas and roc's you could use a battle cruiser, so thank CCP for being nice.


FC can I bring a drake?
Arronicus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#37 - 2016-09-22 17:29:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Arronicus
Vincent Athena wrote:
Zanar Skwigelf wrote:
Vincent Athena wrote:
I think the OP's point is that to get boosts in the belt, someone has to be sitting at the computer, controlling the Rorq. That person has to be there, at the keyboard, continuously, to quickly respond to threats. For hours and hours. The problem is not "no security" its that having security makes for an extremely poor gameplay experience for the Rorq pilot. So, the Rorq pilots will not do it, and boosts are lost.

CCP: this is a valid issue. Having a game mechanic that requires someone sit at a keyboard doing nothing for hours on end is a poor mechanic.


Who said the rorq won't be actively mining?

CCP?


There's been data on new capital sized mining drones in the client info lately. I think many of us are very much under the impression you'll be able to use them to mine with your roq.
Milla Goodpussy
Garoun Investment Bank
#38 - 2016-09-22 18:12:51 UTC
Arronicus wrote:
Vincent Athena wrote:
Zanar Skwigelf wrote:
Vincent Athena wrote:
I think the OP's point is that to get boosts in the belt, someone has to be sitting at the computer, controlling the Rorq. That person has to be there, at the keyboard, continuously, to quickly respond to threats. For hours and hours. The problem is not "no security" its that having security makes for an extremely poor gameplay experience for the Rorq pilot. So, the Rorq pilots will not do it, and boosts are lost.

CCP: this is a valid issue. Having a game mechanic that requires someone sit at a keyboard doing nothing for hours on end is a poor mechanic.


Who said the rorq won't be actively mining?

CCP?


There's been data on new capital sized mining drones in the client info lately. I think many of us are very much under the impression you'll be able to use them to mine with your roq.



those drones will not have a yield that would outperform.. say.. a Capital Mining laser.. which shows just how detached and stupid, yes i said stupid ccp is for not giving the rorqual pilot a chance to finally mine...

its a capital industrial ship and look what they come up with it!!!!!... they have no idea what this ship should do.. they dont know!, all cause they've seen a few battle rorqs in the field.. thats why there's so much lacking in content for the rorqual now.

the rorqual should be the most powerful mining ship in the game.. not some lame booster only asset with funky little drones that are ripoffs from transformers that wont provide enough protection at all for her.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#39 - 2016-09-22 19:06:05 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
I once again have to ask if I can call my activities to collect space resources from asteroids something other than mining because the OP is embarrassing everyone who thinks themselves a miner. So let me see, your Roq is no longer a totally safe thing to make you "boosted". OK, so. Everyone mining today without a Roq raise your hand. Bonus if you are doing it without any "boost". How oh how are so many of us surviving this clearly unfair disadvantage? Seriously, if this is going to drive you all out of Eve, awesome, be gone you lazy whiner miners!

I am going to try again to explain why Eve is special. It is complicated and mostly free form. Instead of the traditional machine based NPC AI driving it all, Eve makes you "compete" with other humans, which sometimes are clever and driven. They will learn to adapt and optimize no matter what changes may be thrown into the sandbox. If you don't like that then Eve is not for you. There is no "easy" setting in Eve. That is why it continues to keep people engaged.

So I might not always like changes in some mechanics but I adapt and realize that is why I like the challenge. To be honest its when I see changes that maybe put us closer to that "easy" setting that I worry. Not that I don't think there should be some places in Eve that can almost be "easy". That should be high sec, not null. Null should be insanely lucrative and very dangerous. So long as risk is partnered with reward and vis versa all is right in the 'verse".

The Roq should not be some sort of "win" gizmo for lazy miners.


Well well, look who's back!

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#40 - 2016-09-22 22:30:36 UTC
Arronicus wrote:
Vincent Athena wrote:
Zanar Skwigelf wrote:
Vincent Athena wrote:
I think the OP's point is that to get boosts in the belt, someone has to be sitting at the computer, controlling the Rorq. That person has to be there, at the keyboard, continuously, to quickly respond to threats. For hours and hours. The problem is not "no security" its that having security makes for an extremely poor gameplay experience for the Rorq pilot. So, the Rorq pilots will not do it, and boosts are lost.

CCP: this is a valid issue. Having a game mechanic that requires someone sit at a keyboard doing nothing for hours on end is a poor mechanic.


Who said the rorq won't be actively mining?

CCP?


There's been data on new capital sized mining drones in the client info lately. I think many of us are very much under the impression you'll be able to use them to mine with your roq.

At one time, a few months before Incarna, there was data for "establishments" in the client. Until its actually announced by CCP and scheduled for deployment, we cannot be sure.
Unless they are very high yield drones, a Rorq will still be a poor miner, and not worth the effort. Adding strips, and still being an effective boost ship in a belt, will need more highs for strips.
It would be nice if a Rorq was at least as effective a miner as a Hulk, and provided boosts on top of that.

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Previous page123Next page