These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Holes of Worms

Author
Tsukino Stareine
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#41 - 2016-09-11 08:20:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Tsukino Stareine
March rabbit wrote:
With all these talks about ISK/hour and 'non-profitable' WHs i want to ask wormholers: what do you need all these ISK for? Looking at occasional killmails from WH it's often pretty expensive ships like T3s, etc... And with pimped modules. Do you really must use it there?

Outside of some elitist low-sec alliances it looks like the whole Eve is happy with cheaper doctrines. Some even use t1-fitted cheap-as-chips ships Lol
Yes, Yes, blobs you say. But these blobs do against other blobs. But recently WHers start to talk about fleets of 30-50 pilots already. So yeah, you are not too far from 'blobs' already.

Couldn't it be that thing which holds you down? Need to use (and lose) expensive stuff?


Numbers limitation, you can only take x amount of ships depending on wormhole size which means every ship must punch well above its proverbial and literal weight.

Many people find these expensive ships by, ironically, incursion alts.

Fleets of 30-50 are extremely rare unless it's a system invasion or something like a fortizar bash. Most brawls tend to range from 15 to 30 people

@Toobo you're right that trade has gone down but the commodity (blue loot) orders have disproportionately dried up at a faster rate than the other sectors
Toobo
Project Fruit House
#42 - 2016-09-11 10:45:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Toobo
Yes Tsukino I see your point about blue loot transactions going down 'disproportionally' and it is something CCP should look into.

But I'm more interested with some other points you made - like more stuff to suck up WH supplies, as that would help increase the demand and make some of the material prices go up.

To some extent WH pay outs can be tweaked again with blue loot, so we have maybe less than before the changes but more than now. But ultimately I think it would be the best to balance it with some controlled introduction of new stuff that demands WH resources.

Even not considering economy, we have been on long wait for T3 balance patch together with possibility of some more new subs. Beside the HP nerf T3s are pretty much as they always have been since they first came out while many other ships went through radical changes.

So both from economical point of view and game play point of view, I hope CCP looks into WH end products, not just blue loot pay outs.

Edit: just for record, by balance I don't mean nerf. I'm not 'nerf T3!!!' crowd. At the same time I'm not talking about direct buff to stats. I'm thinking more new subs and tweaks of existing subs.

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Tsukino Stareine
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#43 - 2016-09-11 16:39:10 UTC
I hope the possible t2 boost charges hinted by Fozzie will be made from stuff dropped in wormholes
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#44 - 2016-09-12 04:39:23 UTC  |  Edited by: DeMichael Crimson
Doc Fury wrote:
Nalia White wrote:
Doc Fury wrote:
W-holes and a lot of other space are empty simply because EVE's PCU is back to 2006 player levels.




i blame the new generations with their ****** mobile games... no interest anymore to invest time and effort in a hobby... sad times :(


Doc blames CCP and their inability to deliver on their hype, and years of pants-on-head decisions by their "management". Soooo many missed opportunities.

It's come to the point that they are having to literally beg players to remain subscribed via free swag until their F2P experiment kicks in, so the PCU does not drop to 2003 levels.


Much to my surprise I have to admit I agree with Doc.

For the past couple of years CCP has constantly implemented bad game decisions which is the main reason for the low player count. I blame the Dev's and those in charge for the mass exodus of players. I'll bet they don't even play this game. If they did, a lot of the recent changes wouldn't have been implemented. Hell, they rarely even use their own 'Official Forums' anymore.


DMC
Toobo
Project Fruit House
#45 - 2016-09-12 05:16:18 UTC
CCP as a company is doing reasonably well from what I gather. They have (still somewhat) an excellent and unique game but need to adap to this new era while keeping its core players happy. That's understandably difficult task because what the vets want and what eve virgins want could be very different.

At the moment it feels a bit sitting on the fence, pissing off old vets while not suceeding in attracting lots of new players, so it's pretty much the worst case scenario. :p

EVE has always been a niche game. But it's lost some of its niche appeal while not quite becoming mainstream.

I'm looking forward to next year or so though when CCP adapts new commercial model.

My personal recommendation is on improving PVE side though. It's actually against my vision of EVE as a PVP centric game but I think it will be PVE revamp that will attract players. Although EVE is supposed to be a sandbox game where you make your own content, mainstream gamers do love contents presented to them on a plate.

Cheers Love! The cavalry's here!

Beta Maoye
#46 - 2016-09-12 06:18:04 UTC
The game tends to create difficult PVE contents that players would not go through easily. I think the logic is that if players go through contents easily, players will whine for more contents. As the game company is relatively small, they want to create contents that is hard enough so that players will not eat through faster than that can be created. Sometimes they make it so hard that no one want to do it, e.g. drifter incursion, drifter wormholes. Drifters become a waste of time and money for development.

One single very difficult level is too rigid for gaming. One ring can not rule them all. Sauron has to create nine rings for greedy humans. New contents could be designed with scalable difficulties to cater the interest of different groups of players. Difficulty could be ranged from novice levels to expert levels. The most difficult level will be put at the end of the carrot stick with great rewards.

One way that blizzard extends the life of D3 is introducing set items that grant additional bonuses when equipped at the same time. Many items in EVE can form sets such as weapon and weapon upgrade, shield resistance and shield extender, scan equipment and analyzer. They will be relatively rare and have little impact on game balance. By the way, the game is not balanced anyway because of T3 dessie and possibly more powerful ships upcoming. A new meta layer of faction, officer and deadspace modules could be added to the game as well.

These additions should bring more life to the game with relatively small demand in development resources.
Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#47 - 2016-09-12 06:48:52 UTC
Aren't there six classes of scalable difficulty already?
Tsukino Stareine
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#48 - 2016-09-12 06:51:37 UTC
Indeed there is, and the class I live in c6 is supposedly the hardest with terrible rewards to match the effort needed
Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#49 - 2016-09-12 06:53:38 UTC
I'll try to add something (hopefully) constructive and tell you about this wormhole we live in.

It's empty.

Like, no signatures, barely any anoms. No visitors either (surprise, surprise) because -you guessed it- it's empty.
I do not know how new sigs are created but at one sig every two hour I could live alone in there and still run out of content. We obviously visit other holes but those too are mostly devoid of life.

Is everything happening in the upper class holes, or what's the deal here? Wormbros, fill me in pls!
Beta Maoye
#50 - 2016-09-12 07:12:46 UTC
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:
Aren't there six classes of scalable difficulty already?

I mean what is the point of making new contents that even the most hardcore players don't want it. Not to mention the average players.
Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#51 - 2016-09-12 07:31:40 UTC
Not sure if it's a matter of "don't want it" but before citadels there were POSses which incurred severe trust issues between members and sometimes even leadership (some fags just couldn't be bother to refuel the POS or grant anyone else rights to do so ;-)

We also find ruins of what I imagine were once great corps, but they've been forcefully evicted for the heck of it and nobody settled down in their place. Like scorched earth.
TackyTachy1
Doomheim
#52 - 2016-09-18 06:41:06 UTC
Don't know that much about the WH mechanics but I like scanning down, entering in (remember the BMs!), finding that high grade ore, mine a bit of it then bail before Cinderella passes out. Ain't got a clue about whether I made a profit, but if I get out alive I figure we're good to go. Am I, I wonder, part of the problem? Or is there even a problem?

Forum Rep for a bunch of characters, couple corps and one seriously Lost In Space multiboxer.

Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#53 - 2016-09-18 08:12:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Gogela
Doc Fury wrote:
W-holes and a lot of other space are empty simply because EVE's PCU is back to 2006 player levels.



This.

The game is sick. I've been laughing my as* off at "EvE is dying" threads for over a decade. I'll tell you this though: It really is now. Alpha clones are the only thing I can think of that will save us. Sure, I'll be here when the servers finally shut down. I'm plexed out for a decade. A LOT of you are like that too. But the main problem in EvE right now is that we don't have enough players.

There is a wax and wane to EvE. Some part of the ecosystem is always fracked up, and other parts thrive. As a guy who's been playing for a while, I actually think that's pretty damn sweet. I like to go to the wastelands and find new ways to play. For the first 5 years I played I never empire ganked a soul, if you can believe it. There is a lot of interesting gameplay, and just because your niche is drying up, doesn't mean it won't have another time in the sun when the game shifts yet again. That's what keeps eve alive. I'm actually planning to abandon my highsec d-baggery for a while and go on a long journey through WH space just to see how it's changed since I started playing again (I've been on hiatus). There is always something neat to do in EvE, and the fact that it's constantly changing is part of the draw for me. The takeaway is, don't count on EvE to adjust to your niche or playstyle. Adapt to the changing landscape, instead. It's more fun and rewarding. WH's are awesome, and hard to live in. CCP will give them some love again before too long... and while adding more WH systems is insane, I say enjoy the wasteland while you have it. If the Alpha clone thing works out, you might be posting a "WHs are overpopulated and T3 prices are crashing" thread a year or two from now.

Every ship, item, and system in EvE gets it's time in the sun. It's the circle of life. :p

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Tsukino Stareine
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#54 - 2016-09-18 10:14:04 UTC
TackyTachy1 wrote:
Don't know that much about the WH mechanics but I like scanning down, entering in (remember the BMs!), finding that high grade ore, mine a bit of it then bail before Cinderella passes out. Ain't got a clue about whether I made a profit, but if I get out alive I figure we're good to go. Am I, I wonder, part of the problem? Or is there even a problem?


no you are very much part of the solution, main issue with wormholes atm is just lack of people in them and by source the lack of incentive to actually go inside them
Previous page123