These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why do people assume how we play the game reflects us in real life?

First post
Author
Playne Jayne
Doomheim
#441 - 2016-09-14 20:34:26 UTC
Bing Bangboom wrote:
James has often recommended that CCP add a mission to the tutorial where new players go and read the Code.


And yet, surprise surprise, CCP haven't gone and done that. The group of devs that high-five with you all at Fanfest, whilst getting drunk and laughing at your jokes like girls in front of boys they like, sadly isn't the same devs who make all the real decisions at CCP, you know the kind that might say "who?" when one says "CODE."

Of further note, the recent changes to bumping mechanics would indicate that heeding good ol' father-o-hisec James' advice is the furthest thing from their minds. One thing about being drunk, is you have that crashing-to-reality hangover the next day.

If you haven't noticed, CCP writes its own lore for Eve, and whilst some at CCP may enjoy masturbating to the Goons' emergent shannanigans, they haven't gone so far as to actually write them into lore. Having a mission where you read a group of players' website wouldn't really fit with the game, now would it? The idea itself further proves that the delusions of grandieu possessed by the Almighty James (and possibly yourself) is matched only by the scale of the galactic map in Eve itself.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#442 - 2016-09-14 20:42:59 UTC
Bing Bangboom wrote:
Playne Jayne wrote:

That's the flaw in the CODE's own, well, code, though isn't it. It's like pyramid or get rich schemes, it all sounds great until you hear the 'now pay us this' option.

If a miner took every precaution the Code mentioned, before you'd ever even encountered them in game, was never AFK, tanked his ships as well as could be expected, and treated Code with respect in local...
...you'd still want that 10 mill, wouldn't you?

See.


First of all, there are no flaws in the Code.

Now, as to miners who follow the Code but don't buy permits having never heard of us. You ever seen one? I've seen players adopt all of the precautions of tanking, paying attention in local and even keeping jamming ships on station. They do this BECAUSE they have been ganked, because they've seen their fellows ganked and because they think they are the good guys and have honor and other useless qualities to miners. In any case, there are still plenty of untanked, AFK miners with anger management issues out there. Without permits we consider them all supporters of botting. The permit is how we tell who's on our side and who's on the bot's side.

Besides, you can still be bumped. Its not as common as it was before but for pure rage no gankee has ever matched the miners I used to bump for an hour while demanding that they buy a permit. Old school, best school




Of course there are errors in the CODE, I had a long discussion with one of your agents on the ambiguity of the CODE in terms of it being poorly defined so an agent could interpret the CODE to gank someone. From a legal standpoint its poor law when you can interpret it differently...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Lacori
Doomheim
#443 - 2016-09-14 20:45:05 UTC
Playne Jayne wrote:
Bing Bangboom wrote:
James has often recommended that CCP add a mission to the tutorial where new players go and read the Code.


And yet, surprise surprise, CCP haven't gone and done that. The group of devs that high-five with you all at Fanfest, whilst getting drunk and laughing at your jokes like girls in front of boys they like, sadly isn't the same devs who make all the real decisions at CCP, you know the kind that might say "who?" when one says "CODE."

Of further note, the recent changes to bumping mechanics would indicate that heeding good ol' father-o-hisec James' advice is the furthest thing from their minds. One thing about being drunk, is you have that crashing-to-reality hangover the next day.

If you haven't noticed, CCP writes its own lore for Eve, and whilst some at CCP may enjoy masturbating to the Goons' emergent shannanigans, they haven't gone so far as to actually write them into lore. Having a mission where you read a group of players' website wouldn't really fit with the game, now would it? The idea itself further proves that the delusions of grandieu possessed by the Almighty James (and possibly yourself) is matched only by the scale of the galactic map in Eve itself.


Well I disagree.
Bing Bangboom
DAMAG Safety Commission
#444 - 2016-09-14 20:47:18 UTC
Playne Jayne wrote:
Bing Bangboom wrote:
James has often recommended that CCP add a mission to the tutorial where new players go and read the Code.


And yet, surprise surprise, CCP haven't gone and done that. The group of devs that high-five with you all at Fanfest, whilst getting drunk and laughing at your jokes like girls in front of boys they like, sadly isn't the same devs who make all the real decisions at CCP, you know the kind that might say "who?" when one says "CODE."

Of further note, the recent changes to bumping mechanics would indicate that heeding good ol' father-o-hisec James' advice is the furthest thing from their minds. One thing about being drunk, is you have that crashing-to-reality hangover the next day.

If you haven't noticed, CCP writes its own lore for Eve, and whilst some at CCP may enjoy masturbating to the Goons' emergent shannanigans, they haven't gone so far as to actually write them into lore. Having a mission where you read a group of players' website wouldn't really fit with the game, now would it? The idea itself further proves that the delusions of grandieu possessed by the Almighty James (and possibly yourself) is matched only by the scale of the galactic map in Eve itself.


There can be no debate that CCP has not implemented the considered recommendations of James 315 or we wouldn't be having this discussion. They are, after all, just suggestions. The debate is whether what they HAVE done has improved the game.

We say no. Eventually we'll convince the right people.

Another side note: I'm no Goon. Those black-balling (@)!)_!#s wouldn't take me.

Highsec is worth fighting for.

By choosing to mine in New Order systems, highsec miners have agreed to follow the New Halaima Code of Conduct.  www.minerbumping.com

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#445 - 2016-09-14 20:50:48 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:

EDIT: Another carefully worded insult above, calling a miner a bot aspirant is meant to wind them up, me I just laugh, but for some miners who hate bots they get rather irritated. Like I said CODE have got this wind up approach down to a fine art, but its still taunting...

It is well known and documented that AG are in favour of bots. So no surprise there.
Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#446 - 2016-09-14 20:53:08 UTC
Says on the box you can be anything you like.

Some like to be as$hats.

Because why not, right?
Playne Jayne
Doomheim
#447 - 2016-09-14 20:54:05 UTC
Bing Bangboom wrote:


Another side note: I'm no Goon. Those black-balling (@)!)_!#s wouldn't take me.



I'd always thought that CODE. were either

a) made up of Goons themselves, bored of having-it-all in null, or

b) Goon-wannabes who had been scammed out of a billion or two trying to join them, so decided to form their own corp instead.

Thanks for confirming the latter Big smile
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#448 - 2016-09-14 21:05:54 UTC
Playne Jayne wrote:
Bing Bangboom wrote:


Another side note: I'm no Goon. Those black-balling (@)!)_!#s wouldn't take me.



I'd always thought that CODE. were either

a) made up of Goons themselves, bored of having-it-all in null, or

b) Goon-wannabes who had been scammed out of a billion or two trying to join them, so decided to form their own corp instead.

Thanks for confirming the latter Big smile

There are people in Goonswarm who are part of the New Order, which is a movement that transcends even coalitions. CODE. for example is also part of the New Order, but a completely different entity as are many other corps and alliances. Some of our auto-piloting Freighter inspection crew often joins up with members of Goonswarm to bring justice to smugglers of illegal equipment.

Personally I had never something to do with Goonswarm. I do however respect them as a protected minority under the Code.

Also I would like to take a moment to thank our Goonswarm overlords for making all this possible.
Bing Bangboom
DAMAG Safety Commission
#449 - 2016-09-14 21:07:27 UTC
Playne Jayne wrote:
Bing Bangboom wrote:


Another side note: I'm no Goon. Those black-balling (@)!)_!#s wouldn't take me.



I'd always thought that CODE. were either

a) made up of Goons themselves, bored of having-it-all in null, or

b) Goon-wannabes who had been scammed out of a billion or two trying to join them, so decided to form their own corp instead.

Thanks for confirming the latter Big smile


You overlook the possibility of CODE. members being what we actually are.

Former can-flippers, ninja salvagers, mission invaders, awoxers, highsec wardeccers and various other veterans of highsec pvp who have been forced by the constant changes to highsec safety into one large, organized and frankly a bit annoyed group dedicated to the one remaining form of emergent gameplay left to us. Namely, ganking.

James 315 gave us an organization, a mission and a Code. Because of the type of people we are, in game and in RL, it was all it took.

The miners demands for nerfs created us. And that's what you call ironic.

Highsec is worth fighting for.

By choosing to mine in New Order systems, highsec miners have agreed to follow the New Halaima Code of Conduct.  www.minerbumping.com

Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#450 - 2016-09-14 21:13:05 UTC
Well. I try to keep an open mind, but if you come out and say stuff like "yeah, we're an organization of bored griefers relegated to doing the only thing left for us and we called it The Code", .......

that settles that then I suppose Big smile

You were doing great until you went overboard lad. Better luck next time. Good thing Drac admitted you couldn't be defeated- ...is it any wonder I'm insane?

ThIs CaNnoT bE HaPpENinG! **disbelief reality**
Playne Jayne
Doomheim
#451 - 2016-09-14 21:13:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Playne Jayne
Ima Wreckyou wrote:

There are people in Goonswarm who are part of the New Order, which is a movement that transcends even coalitions. CODE. for example is also part of the New Order, but a completely different entity as are many other corps and alliances. Some of our auto-piloting Freighter inspection crew often joins up with members of Goonswarm to bring justice to smugglers of illegal equipment.

Personally I had never something to do with Goonswarm. I do however respect them as a protected minority under the Code.

Also I would like to take a moment to thank our Goonswarm overlords for making all this possible.


Let's pretend for one moment I believe your cult, cough, corp's 'mantra'.

Firstly, I find it hard to believe that alliances with sov, based most of the time in null, give a damn what goes on in highsec, unless it's an opportunity to up their killboard

Secondly, as there is a production line that essentially supplies null, that at its lower eschelons employs miners, botting or otherwise, then this would also make no sense.

Thirdly, now that CCP are teetering on going into receivership, even the hardiest of HTFU devs is shitting bricks about losing their job, hence semi-F2P (about to go full F2P when the first 'model' fails, I'm guessing say March?) the ONLY consideration on CCP's minds is getting new players into the game - which means they have to not insta-quit.

So I'm guessing the New Order failed to save Hisec in the end. What a pity.

So tell me, what religion are you planning to create next?
Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#452 - 2016-09-14 21:20:02 UTC
Playne Jayne wrote:

So tell me, what religion are you planning to create next?

Why, Alpha Frog of course!

full cargoexpanded Itty V hauling services! Pirate
Bing Bangboom
DAMAG Safety Commission
#453 - 2016-09-14 21:50:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Bing Bangboom
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:
Well. I try to keep an open mind, but if you come out and say stuff like "yeah, we're an organization of bored griefers relegated to doing the only thing left for us and we called it The Code", .......

that settles that then I suppose Big smile

You were doing great until you went overboard lad. Better luck next time. Good thing Drac admitted you couldn't be defeated- ...is it any wonder I'm insane?

ThIs CaNnoT bE HaPpENinG! **disbelief reality**


I suppose you can see it that way but its neither what I said or meant. We were players who loved what we were doing in Eve and it was taken away from us for reasons not justified by any vision of the game. So, we responded in-game and created an organization to fight against what we saw as ruining the game. By CCP's definition we never were and are not now "griefers" as we aren't banned, not most of us anyway and those that have been banned didn't break the actual EULA. They were banned for annoying influential members of the CSM.

Remember the point of this thread is whether or not people like me, are real life dangers to society. People who have suggested that we are have been rightly lampooned. Maybe I did explain too much and its beyond the average highsec miner's ability to understand the underlying issues. I always figured you for someone with more depth. Explain to me which of those professions I listed were griefing.

I've made the same point in other threads. Its not like its a deep dark secret where Agents come from.

Highsec is worth fighting for.

By choosing to mine in New Order systems, highsec miners have agreed to follow the New Halaima Code of Conduct.  www.minerbumping.com

Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#454 - 2016-09-14 21:58:04 UTC
LOOOOOL "we're clearly not griefers -- not all of us were banned"

You, Sir, have a way with words.
Playne Jayne
Doomheim
#455 - 2016-09-14 22:03:39 UTC
Bing Bangboom wrote:
Because of the type of people we are, in game and in RL, it was all it took.



Your honor, I rest my case.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#456 - 2016-09-14 22:39:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Playne Jayne wrote:
Let's pretend for one moment I believe your cult, cough, corp's 'mantra'.

Firstly, I find it hard to believe that alliances with sov, based most of the time in null, give a damn what goes on in highsec, unless it's an opportunity to up their killboard
Of course they give a **** what happens in hisec, many nullsec corp members have hisec alts for trading, industry, logistics etc.

Quote:
Secondly, as there is a production line that essentially supplies null, that at its lower eschelons employs miners, botting or otherwise, then this would also make no sense.
It makes perfect sense to attack your enemy's production capabilities and logistics pipeline in hisec Roll Attacking the supply chain is an age old tactic of war.

Quote:
Thirdly, now that CCP are teetering on going into receivership, even the hardiest of HTFU devs is shitting bricks about losing their job, hence semi-F2P (about to go full F2P when the first 'model' fails, I'm guessing say March?) the ONLY consideration on CCP's minds is getting new players into the game - which means they have to not insta-quit.
Do you know something that the rest of us don't, or have you just pulled that out of your arse? Personally I'm going with the latter.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Railyn Quisqueya
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#457 - 2016-09-14 23:20:44 UTC
Bing Bangboom wrote:
Because of the type of people we are, in game and in RL, it was all it took.

From the horse's own mouth. OP's question has been answered. Thread can now be closed.
radkid10
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#458 - 2016-09-14 23:39:17 UTC
I'm bipolar so I get pissed pretty easily but even then I don't throw a fit over losing something in this damn game seriously

if somebody attacked me and they lose their ship and they throw a fit about it call me an ******* I'll say I'm proud of it if I choose to attack them and I win and they call me an ******* for doing that I'll say I'm proud of it and if I lose then I'll say well played even if I lose something it took me 3 months to get
Playne Jayne
Doomheim
#459 - 2016-09-14 23:43:59 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
It makes perfect sense to attack your enemy's production capabilities and logistics pipeline in hisec Roll Attacking the supply chain is an age old tactic of war.


Riiiight.

And that's why CODE. mainly goes after noob miners in ventures who are mining a box or two of veld....

...and not the heavily pew-protected uber mining fleets that the enemy are using.

Gotcha.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#460 - 2016-09-14 23:54:48 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Playne Jayne wrote:
Let's pretend for one moment I believe your cult, cough, corp's 'mantra'.

Firstly, I find it hard to believe that alliances with sov, based most of the time in null, give a damn what goes on in highsec, unless it's an opportunity to up their killboard
Of course they give a **** what happens in hisec, many nullsec corp members have hisec alts for trading, industry, logistics etc.


Not only that but HS is where very large portion of the economic activity takes place, namely the markets for things like moon goo are hugely important and probably cannot take place anywhere else but HS.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online