These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Diagnostics Report: Caldari Sociology

Author
Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#21 - 2016-09-06 21:33:32 UTC
Tyrel Toov wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Next time, write about something that you know about. This just makes you look like you took a blow to the head before you wrote it. A blow to the head that took place far away from Caldari space, obviously.

He is an enemy of the State and creates lies for propaganda against us with as much quality as his own mental abilities allow.

Ok, I'm going to have to draw a firm line with you here. Calling this propaganda is an insult to every instance of propaganda that came before it. Please do not associate the ramblings of a poor, insane capsuleer with proper propaganda.

It's the same thing as when Makoto was calling me Provist, or madwoman, or flying ship in a situation where I was in a different ship. These are sort of propaganda still, targeted against Caldari State, just very weak, built on his (or Makoto's in my example) delusions.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Tyrel Toov
Non-Hostile Target
Wild Geese.
#22 - 2016-09-06 22:03:12 UTC
Diana Kim wrote:
Tyrel Toov wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Next time, write about something that you know about. This just makes you look like you took a blow to the head before you wrote it. A blow to the head that took place far away from Caldari space, obviously.

He is an enemy of the State and creates lies for propaganda against us with as much quality as his own mental abilities allow.

Ok, I'm going to have to draw a firm line with you here. Calling this propaganda is an insult to every instance of propaganda that came before it. Please do not associate the ramblings of a poor, insane capsuleer with proper propaganda.

It's the same thing as when Makoto was calling me Provist, or madwoman, or flying ship in a situation where I was in a different ship. These are sort of propaganda still, targeted against Caldari State, just very weak, built on his (or Makoto's in my example) delusions.

No, when Makoto does her thing there is an element of truth (or at the very least a sense coherence) to what she says. Even when she's telling a lie it's believable if you don't dig to far. That's propaganda. What Otto does is ramble, not spread propaganda. The easiest way to tell is this: if people rally behind what you say, it's propaganda. If they edge away when you talk, it's rambling.

I want to paint my ship Periwinkle.

Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#23 - 2016-09-06 22:06:12 UTC
Tyrel Toov wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:
Tyrel Toov wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Next time, write about something that you know about. This just makes you look like you took a blow to the head before you wrote it. A blow to the head that took place far away from Caldari space, obviously.

He is an enemy of the State and creates lies for propaganda against us with as much quality as his own mental abilities allow.

Ok, I'm going to have to draw a firm line with you here. Calling this propaganda is an insult to every instance of propaganda that came before it. Please do not associate the ramblings of a poor, insane capsuleer with proper propaganda.

It's the same thing as when Makoto was calling me Provist, or madwoman, or flying ship in a situation where I was in a different ship. These are sort of propaganda still, targeted against Caldari State, just very weak, built on his (or Makoto's in my example) delusions.

No, when Makoto does her thing there is an element of truth (or at the very least a sense coherence) to what she says. Even when she's telling a lie it's believable if you don't dig to far. That's propaganda. What Otto does is ramble, not spread propaganda. The easiest way to tell is this: if people rally behind what you say, it's propaganda. If they edge away when you talk, it's rambling.


Or, really bad propaganda.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#24 - 2016-09-06 22:09:37 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:
Tyrel Toov wrote:
if people rally behind what you say, it's propaganda. If they edge away when you talk, it's rambling.


Or, really bad propaganda.


Or people just really don't like Kim.
Tyrel Toov
Non-Hostile Target
Wild Geese.
#25 - 2016-09-06 22:16:25 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:

Or, really bad propaganda.

No, just rambling. Poor guy isn't even coherent. Calling what he does propaganda would be like calling my ex's tuna casserole food.... it may have been at one time, but somewhere between the oven and the table it got ruined.

I want to paint my ship Periwinkle.

Tyrel Toov
Non-Hostile Target
Wild Geese.
#26 - 2016-09-06 22:17:31 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Aria Jenneth wrote:
Tyrel Toov wrote:
if people rally behind what you say, it's propaganda. If they edge away when you talk, it's rambling.


Or, really bad propaganda.


Or people just really don't like Kim.

I actually don't think that she was the focus here.... for once.

I want to paint my ship Periwinkle.

Arrendis
TK Corp
#27 - 2016-09-06 22:55:30 UTC
Tyrel Toov wrote:
I actually don't think that she was the focus here.... for once.


No, I just mean about Priano's statements being propaganda.
Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#28 - 2016-09-07 14:24:59 UTC
Tyrel Toov wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:
Tyrel Toov wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Next time, write about something that you know about. This just makes you look like you took a blow to the head before you wrote it. A blow to the head that took place far away from Caldari space, obviously.

He is an enemy of the State and creates lies for propaganda against us with as much quality as his own mental abilities allow.

Ok, I'm going to have to draw a firm line with you here. Calling this propaganda is an insult to every instance of propaganda that came before it. Please do not associate the ramblings of a poor, insane capsuleer with proper propaganda.

It's the same thing as when Makoto was calling me Provist, or madwoman, or flying ship in a situation where I was in a different ship. These are sort of propaganda still, targeted against Caldari State, just very weak, built on his (or Makoto's in my example) delusions.

No, when Makoto does her thing there is an element of truth (or at the very least a sense coherence) to what she says. Even when she's telling a lie it's believable if you don't dig to far. That's propaganda. What Otto does is ramble, not spread propaganda. The easiest way to tell is this: if people rally behind what you say, it's propaganda. If they edge away when you talk, it's rambling.

Both Makoto's and Otto's words have similar amount of truth in them, and believable in the same degree.

I will really doubt mental abilities of those, who would fall for eitther Makoto's or Otto's rambling... if you prefer to call this phenomenon with this word.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Utari Onzo
Escalated.
OnlyFleets.
#29 - 2016-09-07 15:20:43 UTC
Diagnostics Report: OP.

Showing symptoms of delusion, difficulty in communication or keeping thoughts coherent. Appears to have developed an unhealthy obsession for antagonising individuals over the GalNet.

Treatment plan: OP should attend therapy sessions once a week, and set goals to socialise more with outside company to rebuild a support network. Patient should also take care to avoid any clone losses that may further complicate existing mental health issues. If symptoms persist, or worsen, patient is advised to check self in to a rehabilitation centre.

"Face the enemy as a solid wall For faith is your armor And through it, the enemy will find no breach Wrap your arms around the enemy For faith is your fire And with it, burn away his evil"

Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#30 - 2016-09-07 15:35:07 UTC
Tyrel Toov wrote:
Aria Jenneth wrote:

Or, really bad propaganda.

No, just rambling. Poor guy isn't even coherent. Calling what he does propaganda would be like calling my ex's tuna casserole food.... it may have been at one time, but somewhere between the oven and the table it got ruined.


Without completely disagreeing, Mr. Toov, your colleague Ms. Vess has been known to insist that it's propaganda.

... of course, she also recently kind of admitted that she was saying such things mostly to be seen to be backing up an ally, so ... I guess maybe that's not a very good example.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#31 - 2016-09-07 19:44:56 UTC
Since the discussion's turned to Caldari Sociology, I'm moving this over here...

Aria Jenneth wrote:
Thank you for your kind remarks, Ms. Arrendis. But I think you misunderstand a little.


From what you describe... no, I very much don't.

As you say: no-one survives on their own. Ever. Nothing you ever use was something only you had a hand in making, unless you literally pick up a rock and use it to smash another rock to make that first tool - and even then, you ate yesterday. You were helped to get to the point of making that first tool.

Quote:

But making others support you, explicitly, by demand, or implicitly, by showing yourself in need-- that is something shameful (but often necessary). Those who are having difficulties, but muddling through them, often can't very well help the last. So we choose not to shame them by making them burdens.


Why? Why is it shameful to admit that you are no less reliant on others than anyone else? Someone is in need. So what? Help them. Get them back on their feet. They may be the thing that keeps you from suffering similar hardship in the future. And if they cannot, if they are so incapacitated that they cannot recover... then tend to them. The Caldari people may have needed to throw the indigent out into the snow two thousand years ago, but by the Mother, they do not live like that anymore. A nation that can build even one frakking Leviathan needs never treat its people like that.

It definitely doesn't need to enshrine that kind of cruelty and callous disregard for human life as some kind of virtue, or embrace the hypocrisy of claiming it's a kindness.

You and I, we capsuleers, we deal in sums of money and resources that would beggar some planetary civilizations. What's in your 'petty cash' fund is likely the kind of sum entire families never see in their lifetimes. How much could be done, planetisde, with 100 billion ISK? A trillion?

I won't begin to claim that the Matari are always so incredibly good to one another that we've wiped out suffering in the Republic... but at the very least, we don't tell ourselves we're being kind to them. It's taking us time to build up the kind of societal infrastructure the Caldari State has for solving internal problems, but we at least acknowledge that we need to do it.* We're not patting ourselves on the back saying 'we're being so good to those poor bastards by ignoring them'.

Quote:
To struggle is not shameful. To be unable to pull your own weight is.


And the old? The infirm? Those who suffer horrible accidents through no fault of their own at a young age? In a time and a place where we can harness enough raw power to build hundreds of 16+-kilometer long ships that hurl themselves across the cluster at one hundred fifty-seven thousand times the speed of light, the nation with the literal center of interstellar commerce cannot afford to care for its most vulnerable children?

That is shameful. You sing the praises of community, but the purpose of community, of society itself is to protect the weak. Because at some point in our lives, we were all weak. When you were an infant, how much did you contribute? When an infant is aged and suffering from dementia, no longer able to work, and no longer able to advise are they treated with dignity, or are they simply thrown into the reprocessor to become mulch?

Quote:

You speak of survival, of fighting to move foreward and recover, as an admirable, sacred thing, Ms. Arrendis. We agree. We are survivor cultures.

Maybe that sometimes makes us cruel.


There is a difference between survival in harsh conditions, Ms. Jenneth, and needless callousness for the purposes of saving a few ISK. Even slaver hounds try to tend to their sick as long as they can.


* - And yes, I've heard the joke about how Sebiestor solve social problems. Contrary to popular humor, we have figured out that you can't make a hungry child feel better by duct taping more afterburners to their butts. At least not without some Inertial Stabilizers to let them turn better...
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#32 - 2016-09-07 20:43:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Pieter Tuulinen
Put simply, there is usually work if you're willing to do it. If you find yourself booted firmly out of your corporation you normally did something to get yourself there. We don't support those who don't work to support US. That's a slightly different rationale from not helping those who won't help themselves.

All the things you talk about. Medical programs. Infant support. Support of the aged. They all exist in The State - but they exist for those who have earned them. Worked all your life? Your pension will support you. Son of a worker? That worker's employment contract supports you.

Bad things happen, of course. There are companies out there who don't do a good enough job of helping their workforce stay relevant and don't work on outplacement hard enough when closing down a division - but that's short sighted waste of resources, that will hurt that corporation in the long run.

Whose resources, in the meantime, are supposed to support that failing corporations personnel? Some profitable company doing right by their own workers should, perhaps, foot the bill? That should be their reward for making the right decisions? That should be the reward of their employees - to have their community shorted to support a failing one?

I'm not sure The State will ever be 'successful' enough for policies like that.

As for callousness - at least our underclass are there because of some rational reasoning. They aren't condemned there because of their religious faith or the candidate they voted or some other arbitrary standard. And they know what to do if they want out of that situation. It begins with a 'w' and it rhymes with 'irk'.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#33 - 2016-09-07 21:00:55 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Why? Why is it shameful to admit that you are no less reliant on others than anyone else? Someone is in need. So what? Help them. Get them back on their feet. They may be the thing that keeps you from suffering similar hardship in the future. And if they cannot, if they are so incapacitated that they cannot recover... then tend to them. The Caldari people may have needed to throw the indigent out into the snow two thousand years ago, but by the Mother, they do not live like that anymore. A nation that can build even one frakking Leviathan needs never treat its people like that.

It definitely doesn't need to enshrine that kind of cruelty and callous disregard for human life as some kind of virtue, or embrace the hypocrisy of claiming it's a kindness.


The Caldari see life as a crucible, Ms. Arrendis, burning away weakness. Those who fall by the wayside ... in practice, Caldari megacorporations often demonstrate their gratitude to long-serving, loyal citizens by making sure they're provided for. They even often do so for people who have been dismissed for misdeeds.

As you say, resources aren't so hard to come by that they have to be hoarded, right now.

People who become Nonentities, though ... they're people who have lost every single method of support. They're kicked out of the society because they're seen as straight-up liabilities. Their families are estranged or gone, their friendships tapped out, bridges burned.

It's what I would have been (probably very briefly, before being shot) if the Caldari had decided I didn't qualify for this identity. My status as a person is a little tentative, because of how badly damaged I am.

Quote:
I won't begin to claim that the Matari are always so incredibly good to one another that we've wiped out suffering in the Republic... but at the very least, we don't tell ourselves we're being kind to them.


You're reading kind of a lot into my description of what a kind-hearted Achur might do to help, unasked, in a small way.

In general, both Caldari and Achura have a strong tendency not to involve ourselves deeply in things we don't see as being any of our business. Interfering in other people's lives uninvited isn't seen as benevolent. It's seen as rude and intrusive.

Of course, aiding people you know is another matter completely.

I'm sorry if this offends you.

Quote:
That is shameful. You sing the praises of community, but the purpose of community, of society itself is to protect the weak. Because at some point in our lives, we were all weak. When you were an infant, how much did you contribute? When an infant is aged and suffering from dementia, no longer able to work, and no longer able to advise are they treated with dignity, or are they simply thrown into the reprocessor to become mulch?


So, one-- children are a community asset. They are, literally, its future. From what I gather, though, the State's creche program (for raising tube children as well as orphans) wasn't exactly the point of pride it should have been.

Two-- neither Caldari nor Achura discard honored elders, or anyone as long as someone can look after them. Achura also don't normally discard anyone at all (we don't have an equivalent to Nonentities). Even if a certain particularly lonely and infamously abusive person can no longer look after himself, the community (likely in the form of the local monastery) will nevertheless step in. It's seen as an embarrassing and kind of sad situation for the elder, though; that kind of duty normally falls to family.

Depending on circumstances, if an incapacitated or disgraced person chooses to pass from this world, that will often be seen as an honorable and principled act.

Quote:
There is a difference between survival in harsh conditions, Ms. Jenneth, and needless callousness for the purposes of saving a few ISK. Even slaver hounds try to tend to their sick as long as they can.


The Caldari see the universe as a crucible, a test of strength. They're determined to survive it, come what may.

It's not a test of individual strength, though, but of the strength of a people. Individuals come and go; no one person, in principle, is crucial. Everyone's expendable-- and, eventually, expended.

If you insist on looking after absolutely everyone, the Caldari might argue, it's going to be really hard on you when hard times come. You're not prepared, they might argue, to make the hard choice.

As a Wayist might say, "The Winds care about us, not about you or me."

I don't identify as Caldari, though (even if I am half Civire by blood).

We Achura don't see things quite the same; we see the universe as a reality to be explored, more than a trial to be overcome. We don't throw anybody out. ... But people may choose to go, rather than burden their family or communities, when they have no paths left open for them to walk in this world.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#34 - 2016-09-07 21:10:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Arrendis
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
All the things you talk about. Medical programs. Infant support. Support of the aged. They all exist in The State - but they exist for those who have earned them. Worked all your life? Your pension will support you. Son of a worker? That worker's employment contract supports you.


And how is an infant supposed to have earned - or failed to have earned that support? Do you believe it to be just or fair to punish an innocent for their parents' supposed crime against society?

Quote:

Bad things happen, of course. There are companies out there who don't do a good enough job of helping their workforce stay relevant and don't work on outplacement hard enough when closing down a division - but that's short sighted waste of resources, that will hurt that corporation in the long run.

Whose resources, in the meantime, are supposed to support that failing corporations personnel? Some profitable company doing right by their own workers should, perhaps, foot the bill? That should be their reward for making the right decisions? That should be the reward of their employees - to have their community shorted to support a failing one?


And so what about all the people it hurts, right? Because it's better in the long run to leave them as a growing non-productive drain on resources than to accept joint responsibility for the well-being of every member of society? Better to have them picking through refuse than cooperatively chipping in tiny individual amounts to make sure those people remain economically active customers?

Quote:

I'm not sure The State will ever be 'successful' enough for policies like that.


Sure you won't. Because what's the suffering of a hundred million people against building one more Leviathan? What's the suffering of a billion for a year against another thousand Ravens to get blown up by capsuleer forces in Gallente and Republic systems in the space of a week (if that)?

Like I said: we're not perfect. We've got a lot of work to do ourselves. But at least we acknowledge it as society failing its people, and don't try to claim it's a kindness, or 'rational'. Because it's not rational. It's not rational at all. Money spent on social programs is always directly multiplicative. They need to spend that money to provide for their immediate needs. You will always reap far more economic reward by funneling money to the underprivileged than you will by gathering it in the hands of the wealthy.

Always.

Aria Jenneth wrote:

If you insist on looking after absolutely everyone, the Caldari might argue, it's going to be really hard on you when hard times come. You're not prepared, they might argue, to make the hard choice.


If you insist on looking after absolutely everyone, there are more people to share the burden when hard times come, more people to prepare. Hard choices will always face us. Doctors in the most advanced hospitals in the cluster still have to perform triage every day - to decide who gets a chance at life, and who doesn't have enough of a chance to risk delaying care for others. Those choices come to individuals. As a society, however, the decision to directly and fundamentally undermine the very concept of social bonds is hideous and monstrous, especially when it masks its bloodstained maw behind nonsense like 'practicality' in this day and age.

It is Nauplius' vision of the red god, wearing a friendly face and lying about caring about anyone beyond the self.
Neph
Crimson Serpent Syndicate
#35 - 2016-09-07 21:57:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Neph
Quote:
And how is an infant supposed to have earned - or failed to have earned that support? Do you believe it to be just or fair to punish an innocent for their parents' supposed crime against society?


There are innumerable social programs to take care of our children, our future, no matter how neglectful or socially abusive their biological parents are. The success rate for children born into failing families is among the best (if not the best) in the cluster. Besides, with corporate family planning, far fewer children are ever born into broken families than there might be.

Quote:
And so what about all the people it hurts, right? Because it's better in the long run to leave them as a growing non-productive drain on resources than to accept joint responsibility for the well-being of every member of society? Better to have them picking through refuse than cooperatively chipping in tiny individual amounts to make sure those people remain economically active customers?

It's not all about the bottom line. Strong corporate spirit and culture is essential to maintaining a sturdy future, and those who want none of it are free to do their own thing. If they don't contribute, they probably don't want to contribute. In the case that they do but they can't, there are rehabilitation and reassignment programs so they can find their place. If they still don't want to give their haaksekone, it's not because of us or Caldari society that they "hurt". It's because of them.

Quote:
Like I said: we're not perfect. We've got a lot of work to do ourselves. But at least we acknowledge it as society failing its people, and don't try to claim it's a kindness, or 'rational'.


Congratulations, I'm glad you feel good about yourself. And the Republic is obviously doing so much better than the State.

Quote:

Money spent on social programs is always directly multiplicative.

They need to spend that money

always

Always.

Citation needed. It's been working out pretty damn well for us for the past few centuries, thank you.

Quote:
As a society, however, the decision to directly and fundamentally undermine the very concept of social bonds is hideous and monstrous, especially when it masks its bloodstained maw behind nonsense like 'practicality' in this day and age.

It is Nauplius' vision of the red god, wearing a friendly face and lying about caring about anyone beyond the self.


I literally have *no* clue what you are trying to say here.

I just want to point out the obvious influence that Gallentean philophy has had on Republic culture and thought. That's all.

~ Gariushi YC110 // Midular YC115 // Yanala YC115 ~

"Orte Jaitovalte sitasuyti ne obuetsa useuut ishu. Ketsiak ishiulyn." -Yakiya Tovil-Toba-taisoka

Arrendis
TK Corp
#36 - 2016-09-07 22:25:12 UTC
Neph wrote:
There are innumerable social programs to take care of our children, our future, no matter how neglectful or socially abusive their biological parents are.


Well, since another Caldari State loyalist appears to be saying something very different, I'm gonna have to echo your own sentiments: Citation Needed. Please ennumerate all of these programs, and what the requirements are for qualification.

Quote:

Citation needed. It's been working out pretty damn well for us for the past few centuries, thank you.


Exactly which part do you need a citation for? That those who cannot afford to save money must, perforce, spend what money they acquire? That that spending has a stimulative economic effect, and drives demand far more efficiently than saving money drives supply-side forces? That's kind of the entire basis of capitalism. Money sitting idle, be it sitting in your wallet or sitting idle as PLEXes or other commodities that are not being sold, is money that is temporarily out of economic circulation. It is not stimulative. It drives no economic growth. Money being spent, on the other hand, is money that is still circulating. So long as it continues to circulate, it continues to drive growth.

Take an economics course sometime if you don't believe me, this is elementary stuff. As in, you should've learned this by the time you hit third grade, just from someone wanting your lunch money.

Quote:
Quote:
As a society, however, the decision to directly and fundamentally undermine the very concept of social bonds is hideous and monstrous, especially when it masks its bloodstained maw behind nonsense like 'practicality' in this day and age.

It is Nauplius' vision of the red god, wearing a friendly face and lying about caring about anyone beyond the self.


I literally have *no* clue what you are trying to say here.


Then perhaps you should seek to cure your ignorance with some research.

Quote:

I just want to point out the obvious influence that Gallentean philophy has had on Republic culture and thought. That's all.


This is who the Tribes have always been. The Clans look out for their own blood. Collectively, the Clans of a Tribe look out for one another in a more limited fashion, as kin. It's really the basic concept of the social contract. Again, you should consider researching to educate yourself. I suggest 'social contract and the savage garden' as a starting point. Even the Amarr tacitly acknowledge this responsibility through the nominal responsibility a Holder has for their slaves' well-being. To say this is Gallente influence is... well, I was going to say 'ignorant', but you've already admitted to that, now haven't you?

Also, it's clearly not 'all', because you went on a bit before that, too.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#37 - 2016-09-07 22:32:14 UTC
Arrendis wrote:

And how is an infant supposed to have earned - or failed to have earned that support? Do you believe it to be just or fair to punish an innocent for their parents' supposed crime against society?


Anyone is teachable. Children with no support are brought into corporate creche programs and are supported. Children of workers have no need of that support, because their affiliation with a Corporation provides free healthcare and education until they reach the age where it's time to start working.

Children are an investment and despite your ranting, the Caldari know investment.

Arrendis wrote:
And so what about all the people it hurts, right? Because it's better in the long run to leave them as a growing non-productive drain on resources than to accept joint responsibility for the well-being of every member of society? Better to have them picking through refuse than cooperatively chipping in tiny individual amounts to make sure those people remain economically active customers?

Sure you won't. Because what's the suffering of a hundred million people against building one more Leviathan? What's the suffering of a billion for a year against another thousand Ravens to get blown up by capsuleer forces in Gallente and Republic systems in the space of a week (if that)?


Without the Navy the Caldari people wouldn't even exist now. We'd have been conquered by the Federation and we'd have disappeared into their obscene cauldron of a society, where everything gets boiled in the same water but comes out tasting of Garoun.

What price independence? What price self-determination? Sometimes hard decisions need to be made and the truth is that there is only a finite amount of resources. So we have the second-highest standard of living in the cluster, ship for ship we have the nastiest armed forces in the cluster, we have the best healthcare and universal education.

The trade-off for that is that if you don't work, you aren't worth anything. That's the trade-off we picked. I'm sorry if you don't like how we funded our ship building programs, but we didn't have the Gallente paying to build our fleet for us, plus a spare fleet to be thrown away on Military Adventurism.

Arrendis wrote:
Like I said: we're not perfect. We've got a lot of work to do ourselves. But at least we acknowledge it as society failing its people, and don't try to claim it's a kindness, or 'rational'. Because it's not rational. It's not rational at all. Money spent on social programs is always directly multiplicative. They need to spend that money to provide for their immediate needs. You will always reap far more economic reward by funneling money to the underprivileged than you will by gathering it in the hands of the wealthy.

Always.


Go sing that song in the refugee camps, Sister Arrendis. They'd probably enjoy a tranche of investment in infrastructure right now.


Arrendis wrote:
As a society, however, the decision to directly and fundamentally undermine the very concept of social bonds is hideous and monstrous, especially when it masks its bloodstained maw behind nonsense like 'practicality' in this day and age.

It is Nauplius' vision of the red god, wearing a friendly face and lying about caring about anyone beyond the self.


This sort of thing? This is why most Caldari don't even bother to discuss things with Jaijii. How you can climb your tower of garbage to curse me for my dirty yard is beyond me! Poverty exists in all the Empires - in your Republic it is manifested in the refugee camps and the industrial slums. In the Empire it is the province of the Slaves. In the Federation it is the Omega Cities and the gap between the promise of wealth and reality. In the State it is in the slums, not of our workers, but our non-workers.

So who are the biggest liars? Those who promise freedom and then lock people up in gulags? Those who promise redemption but deliver generational slavery? Those who promise Liberty but deliver personal insignificance? Or is it really those who promise and deliver a fair days pay for a fair days work?

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#38 - 2016-09-07 22:41:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Jenneth
Arrendis wrote:
It is Nauplius' vision of the red god, wearing a friendly face and lying about caring about anyone beyond the self.


You're not the first to say such a thing, Ms. Arrendis. The Caldari by this time are pretty accustomed to foreigners finding them horrifying. The original Gallentean uplift mission to Caldari Prime was conducted by an entity called the "Cultural Deliverance Society" or CDS.

That pretty much set the tone for interactions between Caldari and Gallente, since. Gallentean propaganda calls the Caldari barbarians to this day.

For their part, the Caldari don't assume that their way is "right" for anyone else at all. If you have another way to live, and it works for you, or doesn't ... that's kind of your own affair, either way.

Telling the Caldari they're awful people, or trying to make them change, doesn't historically work very well, though. They're clannish, inward-focused, and really, really stubborn. And if you're a foreigner, most Caldari just really don't care what your opinion is as long as you don't try to force your worldview on them.

Sadly, a lot of people who feel like you do have taken it as license to try to change the Caldari, so ... judgments like this have killed a lot of people over the years.

It's a lot of why I try not to judge people. I'm more interested in finding out why they are who they are, than whether I agree with them.

Usually, there'll be something-- the moral relativism, the admiration for mercenaries, the lack of attachment to my own life or belief in myself as a separate being-- people find horrifying.

(Also, if you were referring to me as a State loyalist-- I'm not one. I'm not really "of" any nation anymore, but I'm still culturally an Achur.)
Arrendis
TK Corp
#39 - 2016-09-07 23:03:46 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Children with no support are brought into corporate creche programs and are supported. Children of workers have no need of that support, because their affiliation with a Corporation provides free healthcare and education until they reach the age where it's time to start working.

Children are an investment and despite your ranting, the Caldari know investment.


My ranting? Pieter, I'm not the one who said "Medical programs. Infant support. Support of the aged. They all exist in The State - but they exist for those who have earned them." Though of course, I do add the emphasis now. It's a pretty big shift in your position there. Have to wonder if you misspoke the first time, and simply don't want to say 'I should have been clearer', or if you're backpedaling now because you realize your fly's open.


Quote:

Without the Navy the Caldari people wouldn't even exist now. [. . .] I'm sorry if you don't like how we funded our ship building programs, but we didn't have the Gallente paying to build our fleet for us, plus a spare fleet to be thrown away on Military Adventurism.


Reread what you replied to. No 'spare fleet', but you'll throw away thousands of ships a week. Tens of thousands. I could go into Gallente space right now and get missions to deal with Caldari forces in their systems - outside the 'sanctioned' war zone, no less. I could kill 20 Ravens today, and I wouldn't be even one pilot in a hundred doing it. So maybe you shouldn't talk about 'a spare fleet to be thrown away on Military Adventurism'. All of the Empires do it, constantly. They throw away millions of lives a day like that

Quote:

Go sing that song in the refugee camps, Sister Arrendis. They'd probably enjoy a tranche of investment in infrastructure right now.


Most of my money does go back to the Republic, Pieter. I just don't make a big splashy announcement about how much wonderful stuff is being done by the foundation I slapped my name all over. I leave the administration of it all to my Clan - they're there. They know what needs doing.

Quote:
This sort of thing? This is why most Caldari don't even bother to discuss things with Jaijii. How you can climb your tower of garbage to curse me for my dirty yard is beyond me!


As I said: the Republic needs to do better as well. I'm not castigating you for not having solved all of society's ills, Pieter... I'm taking you and Aria to task for the claim that somehow ignoring the suffering of others, rather than saying 'this is a failing that we need to work on' is rational, and 'a kindness'.

Quote:
Or is it really those who promise and deliver a fair days pay for a fair days work?


The issue, Pieter, is that those who ignore the needy then claim it's their own bloody fault, and they should be happy their misery's ignored. Have I said any of the Empires is flawless? Faultless? That any of them have gotten it right and fixed all their problems?

What use would there be in me telling loyalists of the Caldari State 'You there! Caldari! The Gallente Federation needs get its head out of its rectum!' or 'The Republic needs to live up to the ideals of freedom and respect for our kin that we give lip service to!'? What would be served? Would it even make sense?

I don't hate or despise the State, despite everything certain militia flakes seem to think. I spent years working in the State. I think it's got tremendous potential, and that to a large degree, it makes great strides toward meeting that potential. That's why I say these things, Pieter. I wouldn't tell Progodlegend or Vince where I think their weaknesses are in a tactical situation. I wouldn't tell any of my enemies where I think they're screwing up. I want them to screw up. I want them to not correct their weakneses.

But I would - and do - tell my friends when I think they need to stop lying to themselves and do better. And I'm more than willing to accept their correction, as well. Have I not said, repeatedly, that the Republic needs to do better as well? Have I not said, in the discussion on the Matari, that we need to respect and trust those among us of the Amarr faith?

Economically, politically, right now the State represents the very best the human race has achieved in terms of productivity, security, and unity. That doesn't mean it can't do better. That doesn't mean clinging to the old mindsets born of harsh necessity isn't now cruel, callous, and heartless. And pointing that out doesn't mean 'OMG, YOU ALL SUCK', even if the arguments get a little heated, from time to time. Frankly, if someone was going to tell me I was screwing up, and didn't care enough for things to get a little heated, I think I'd be insulted.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#40 - 2016-09-07 23:25:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Pieter Tuulinen
Right. Now I understand where you're coming from I will dial the invective back a bit, Arrendis.

First of all, I don't think it's hugely inconsistent to view child care as a benefit for the parents as much as the children. I'm aware that I'm something of a special case, here, as I had no parents and therefore the burden of my rearing and education was borne solely by the Corporation. I can only hope that I repaid that, somewhat, in the seven years of service I gave Suvee before taking a better deal with Kaalakiota.

You haven't really 'caught me out' here. No, the infant obviously hasn't earned their food supplements directly, but they will and one could argue that their worker parents HAVE. Of course the Corporations do take orphan children in and raise them - but they raise them to be productive workers. There are strings attached to that benefit.

Could I have been clearer? Maybe. There's a cultural filter here and I have to remember that things which are as logical as 1+2=3 to me won't be to a foreigner.


Secondly. I've never seen a clear picture of the types or amounts of ships that get thrown away on skullduggery between not only the Empires but also the factions. The amounts cited beggar belief and make Operation Highlander barely a statistical blip in terms of tonnage and crews lost - which makes me believe a lot of it is nonsense. I do know that everybody is, apparently, getting up to shady stuff in everybody elses territory. Between you and me, I think it's a waste of blood and treasure - no matter what the real figures are - and it should stop. Now.

Thirdly. The Tuulinen foundation I slapped my name all over has been doing quiet charity work in the State for years before it became public knowledge. Why did I start talking about it publicly all of a sudden? Well, I have this huge BUILDING that I'm trying to finance, that's why. Surely you understand why PR has suddenly become an issue. Like it or not the Tuulinen name has some notability in the State, can't blame me for leveraging that, can you?

Surely you don't think this is all about self-aggrandisement?

Fourthly. I think it's definitely a good idea to mend your fences before you go looking to poke your nose in abroad. The Corporations all have their own problems and it's not really the business of a Kaalakiota citizen what those problems are - this makes intervening in these situations delicate business. Even advertising the fact that there are dispossessed aboard a Corps orbital can be construed as an attempt to portray them as economically weak. I'm sure you know that the standard response to that situation is to simply ship them all to some Maker forsaken colony in the back-end of nowhere.

I take care to ensure that none of my former employees wind up on the scrapheap and that their famillies are well taken care. I do, of course, enjoy a pretty high margin in my line of work - if I was making steel armour plates for frigates I might not have that kind of flexibility.

I do, frankly, think it's better to under-promise than to under-perform. I'd rather not be able to help someone I owe nothing to out than to fail to help someone I'd sworn aid to.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.