These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCPlease > Niarja & Uedama = lowsec systems with ban for +supers
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Chapo Muerte
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#21 - 2016-08-21 20:57:02 UTC
TackyTachy1 wrote:
Speaking of the Map I've been watching Uedama and the kills per last hour over there seem to always be off the scale. Thinking of taking my brand new, out of the box Noctis over there and do some salvaging but I've been tied up with other stuff so no go yet.

Ganking? I've been flying Skiffs with full Hammerhead loadouts and so far it's been me three gankers naught, but CCP gonna play with the barges so that could change.


Your killboard says otherwise.
Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Something Really Pretentious
#22 - 2016-08-21 23:40:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Dom Arkaral
Chapo Muerte wrote:
TackyTachy1 wrote:
Speaking of the Map I've been watching Uedama and the kills per last hour over there seem to always be off the scale. Thinking of taking my brand new, out of the box Noctis over there and do some salvaging but I've been tied up with other stuff so no go yet.

Ganking? I've been flying Skiffs with full Hammerhead loadouts and so far it's been me three gankers naught, but CCP gonna play with the barges so that could change.


Your killboard says otherwise.

must be "on his powerful nullsec alt"
XD
How is it that pretty much everything AG says ends up being total lies?

And creating a chokepoint between hubs would be funny to see... just imagina all the supercap gatecamps on those gates XD
But yeah great idea lmao

Quick edit, just saw your "ban for +supers"
Lowsec is lowsec for a reason. your logic is flawed beyond any measure lmao

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist
Solecist Project
#23 - 2016-08-22 00:03:21 UTC
Chapo Muerte wrote:
TackyTachy1 wrote:
Speaking of the Map I've been watching Uedama and the kills per last hour over there seem to always be off the scale. Thinking of taking my brand new, out of the box Noctis over there and do some salvaging but I've been tied up with other stuff so no go yet.

Ganking? I've been flying Skiffs with full Hammerhead loadouts and so far it's been me three gankers naught, but CCP gonna play with the barges so that could change.


Your killboard says otherwise.

You could at least try to hide yourself ... Roll

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#24 - 2016-08-22 01:35:13 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:
Chapo Muerte wrote:
TackyTachy1 wrote:
Speaking of the Map I've been watching Uedama and the kills per last hour over there seem to always be off the scale. Thinking of taking my brand new, out of the box Noctis over there and do some salvaging but I've been tied up with other stuff so no go yet.

Ganking? I've been flying Skiffs with full Hammerhead loadouts and so far it's been me three gankers naught, but CCP gonna play with the barges so that could change.


Your killboard says otherwise.

You could at least try to hide yourself ... Roll

But this portrait is from the other side of the face and with a different background.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
Zanar Skwigelf
HIgh Sec Care Bears
Brothers of Tangra
#25 - 2016-08-22 02:04:32 UTC
As long as there is a continuous high sec route between trade hubs making these 2 systems low sec does nothing. AG might as well move to Tama and Rancer to save all those freighters.
Maldiro Selkurk
Radiation Sickness
#26 - 2016-08-22 04:26:14 UTC
Changing highsec into lowsec.....LOL !


oh you were serious.......

Yawn,  I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.
Lan Wang
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#27 - 2016-08-22 10:22:07 UTC
Also move Tama just a couple of jumps closer to jita and that'd be great

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*
Galaxy Duck
Galaxy Farm Carebear Repurposing
#28 - 2016-08-22 14:04:01 UTC
Great thread! Goin' places! :D
Lady Ayeipsia
BlueWaffe
#29 - 2016-08-22 15:10:25 UTC
Zanar Skwigelf wrote:
As long as there is a continuous high sec route between trade hubs making these 2 systems low sec does nothing. AG might as well move to Tama and Rancer to save all those freighters.


Agreed. It won't change anything. People will either circle the long way around or use citadel's and jump freighters to pass quickly through these systems.

Plus think of all the concord npcs who would be out of a job!
Lan Wang
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2016-08-22 15:37:20 UTC
Zanar Skwigelf wrote:
As long as there is a continuous high sec route between trade hubs making these 2 systems low sec does nothing. AG might as well move to Tama and Rancer to save all those freighters.


that would be funny, wouldnt be much saving happening though

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*
Elenahina
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2016-08-22 18:24:30 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:
If everyone was ganking there, we'd all be there.
Then everyone would be ganking and no one would be the ganked.
So no one would be ganking, because everyone would be ganking.



<3 this

Eve is like an addiction; you can't quit it until it quits you. Also, iderno
Pandora Carrollon
Provi Rapid Response
#32 - 2016-08-22 19:25:55 UTC
The OP's fundamental logic doesn't bear out, in several ways that had been stated. However, one thing to keep in mind:

If everyone is having fun ganking and counter ganking, (I flew the Ikao > Uedama route last night and there were about 100 Concord on the gate, or it was a SEA of them so something big happened) then I suggest that content was had, people played and the systems worked perfectly by design.

Now, if you want to re-do the entire game, put DMZ's of Null Sec around all the Empires and see what fun that creates...

8 Golden Rules of EVE • EVE is entirely PvP
Dornier Pfeil
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#33 - 2016-08-22 19:48:20 UTC
Callitari Mundani wrote:
Hello,

Niarja & Uedama are "Hi-sec systems", there is already too much ganking around which limits the anti-ganker pilots to reactive actions, I suggest we do these systems lowsec so we could have fun all day long.

Everybody is ganking there, using the stations freely without any issues, sec status is non-sense - let's have a brawl! Cut the hisec connections between the market hubs, that would be GREAT fun! It will open full range of new possibilities for gankers / anti-gankers alike.

Haulers could start to pay for protection, make alliances, etc ...
Using the current configuration, gankers are in a great advantage - time to reballance that!


Why don't we just get rid of all of Empire space altogether. Null Everywhere! After all we wouldn't want your SecStat to suffer being proactive and all.
Pandora Carrollon
Provi Rapid Response
#34 - 2016-08-23 15:24:47 UTC
Dornier Pfeil wrote:
Why don't we just get rid of all of Empire space altogether. Null Everywhere! After all we wouldn't want your SecStat to suffer being proactive and all.


Certainly something that has been said before, but if you think what that will do to the player base, you might be unhappy with the results of that proposition. You'd lose at least 25% of the player base overnight, probably more.

Less than half of the current HiSec population probably would be willing to make that adjustment. They are in HiSec for a reason. It doesn't exist for giggles.

LoSec also serves a purpose. It allows for relatively safe transport of goods while still allowing good ship to ship PvP off the gates and stations. The LoSec population would more easily adjust to such a change but even then, you'd be wiping out several current play styles.

Null is the wild west and it's all about player control.

So, I don't think you'll be seeing the security zones drop any time soon.

8 Golden Rules of EVE • EVE is entirely PvP
HeXxploiT
Doomheim
#35 - 2016-08-24 00:51:43 UTC
Callitari Mundani wrote:
Hello,

Niarja & Uedama are "Hi-sec systems", there is already too much ganking around which limits the anti-ganker pilots to reactive actions, I suggest we do these systems lowsec so we could have fun all day long.

Everybody is ganking there, using the stations freely without any issues, sec status is non-sense - let's have a brawl! Cut the hisec connections between the market hubs, that would be GREAT fun! It will open full range of new possibilities for gankers / anti-gankers alike.

Haulers could start to pay for protection, make alliances, etc ...
Using the current configuration, gankers are in a great advantage - time to reballance that!


Gankers don't pvp they gank. Make it lowsec and they'll all just move to other highsec systems.
TackyTachy1
Doomheim
#36 - 2016-08-24 02:12:42 UTC
Chapo Muerte wrote:
TackyTachy1 wrote:
Speaking of the Map I've been watching Uedama and the kills per last hour over there seem to always be off the scale. Thinking of taking my brand new, out of the box Noctis over there and do some salvaging but I've been tied up with other stuff so no go yet.

Ganking? I've been flying Skiffs with full Hammerhead loadouts and so far it's been me three gankers naught, but CCP gonna play with the barges so that could change.


Your killboard says otherwise.


Apparently you didn't read the part where it says "Designated rep for....,
TT1 is my forium alt and his killboard (or lack thereof) has nothing to do with the rest of the crew. Other characters, kills, location, all that is intel, classified and you don't get to see all that. Next time read the sig, or not. Thing about ganking is if you don't like them there are numerous quiet little systems with belts heavy with ore bearing asteroids, with nary a ganker in sight. But you gotta look, and be prepared to move on if/when they show up. Either that or just blow'em to hell up.

Forum Rep for a bunch of characters, couple corps and one seriously Lost In Space multiboxer.
Caleb Seremshur
Bloodhorn
Patchwork Freelancers
#37 - 2016-08-24 02:35:01 UTC
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
Yeah not going to happen.

Highsec's for everyone, including the routes between trade hubs.

IB4L


That's incredibly weak reasoning and I see no reason to believe that caldari and gallente would share a hisec border at all considering the state of blackrise and placid.

But you do what does you m8.
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#38 - 2016-08-24 03:05:04 UTC
Lulu Lunette wrote:
I like the idea of a decentralized New Eden so making each trade hub or empire region its own high sec island could be pretty cool

Nerf Jita!

This would actually buff Jita, and kill all the other hubs. And everyone would live in Caldari highsec.
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#39 - 2016-08-24 07:14:47 UTC
Caleb Seremshur wrote:
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
Yeah not going to happen.

Highsec's for everyone, including the routes between trade hubs.

IB4L


That's incredibly weak reasoning and I see no reason to believe that caldari and gallente would share a hisec border at all considering the state of blackrise and placid.

But you do what does you m8.

You're right, lore should totally dominate gameplay and AG types like the OP should totally expect that CCP change highsec systems used by others, into lowsec systems because they request it without thinking about how it wouldn't actually benefit them.

Totally.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
Solecist Project
#40 - 2016-08-24 11:53:43 UTC
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
Caleb Seremshur wrote:
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
Yeah not going to happen.

Highsec's for everyone, including the routes between trade hubs.

IB4L


That's incredibly weak reasoning and I see no reason to believe that caldari and gallente would share a hisec border at all considering the state of blackrise and placid.

But you do what does you m8.

You're right, lore should totally dominate gameplay and AG types like the OP should totally expect that CCP change highsec systems used by others, into lowsec systems because they request it without thinking about how it wouldn't actually benefit them.

Totally.

I honestly doubt it's an antiganker. The name "antiganker" is, btw, hilarious. ^_^

Even if, i doubt he actually understands what he asks for.
It would be a slaughterhouse.
Gates permacamped.

It would be glorious!
... and they'd be sitting in stations chestbeating ...
... just like they do on forums ...
... while everyone else ******* dies! Twisted

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia