These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Do u think that Gila is still OP?

Author
Zirashi
Cyclical Destruction
#21 - 2016-07-14 16:30:28 UTC
Roenok Baalnorn wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
Roenok Baalnorn wrote:
I like how every time alliances use a ship as a doctrine ship people start screaming its to powerful! NERF IT! They even did it back with the drake swarm a few years ago. drake is to strong NERF IT!. Dramiel is to fast NERF IT! Svipul is to OPed NERF IT! Catalyst is to ganky NERF IT!

I think people should stop trying to get ccp to swing the nerf bat every time they cant instantly counter a ship/fit instead of having a ship fit bout it.


Also by the way... DREADBOMB- to powerful NERF IT!


Svipuls are pretty silly though
They are good ships, but that doesnt mean they are OPed. Svipuls are fun to fly because of the utility and flexibility of them. They are still a bit squishy even in defense mode without logi support.


Yeah, a destroyer with 20k EHP is like suuuper squishy guys. Roll
ll Kuray ll
Space Wolves ind.
Solyaris Chtonium
#22 - 2016-07-14 17:37:29 UTC
Corvald Tyrska wrote:
Roenok Baalnorn wrote:
I like how every time alliances use a ship as a doctrine ship people start screaming its to powerful! NERF IT! They even did it back with the drake swarm a few years ago. drake is to strong NERF IT!. Dramiel is to fast NERF IT! Svipul is to OPed NERF IT! Catalyst is to ganky NERF IT!

I think people should stop trying to get ccp to swing the nerf bat every time they cant instantly counter a ship/fit instead of having a ship fit bout it.


Also by the way... DREADBOMB- to powerful NERF IT!


When a large number of the major groups change their doctrine to a particular ship it usually isn't because they believe that ship is particularly balanced and fair or because it will be challenging to fly and hence improve their pilots' skills.

If a lot of groups change their doctrine to the same ship at the same time, in different regions, for different styles of combat, it usually means that ship is stupidly OP.

People do have a tendency to come on here and scream for nerfs whenever they lose to a ship but in some cases it is justified.


Well let's just give all ships a standard stat and be gone with everything else.
Noah Reese
#23 - 2016-07-14 19:16:47 UTC
Roenok Baalnorn wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
Roenok Baalnorn wrote:
I like how every time alliances use a ship as a doctrine ship people start screaming its to powerful! NERF IT! They even did it back with the drake swarm a few years ago. drake is to strong NERF IT!. Dramiel is to fast NERF IT! Svipul is to OPed NERF IT! Catalyst is to ganky NERF IT!

I think people should stop trying to get ccp to swing the nerf bat every time they cant instantly counter a ship/fit instead of having a ship fit bout it.


Also by the way... DREADBOMB- to powerful NERF IT!


Svipuls are pretty silly though
They are good ships, but that doesnt mean they are OPed. Svipuls are fun to fly because of the utility and flexibility of them. They are still a bit squishy even in defense mode without logi support.



You just disqualified yourself from any balancing thread.
Shiloh Templeton
Cheyenne HET Co
#24 - 2016-07-16 01:13:23 UTC
No, since they aren't great C3 solo boats anymore.

Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2016-07-19 06:21:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Brokk Witgenstein
Zirashi wrote:

Yeah, a destroyer with 20k EHP is like suuuper squishy guys. Roll


It's a 70 mil destroyer tho. A 70 mil cruiser ownzones it no prob.

Edit: as for the Gila, it's fina as-is.
FT Cold
FT Cold Corporation
#26 - 2016-07-19 06:34:38 UTC
ll Kuray ll wrote:

Balance just creates a stagnant playing field.



You're joking right?
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#27 - 2016-07-19 06:41:33 UTC
FT Cold wrote:
ll Kuray ll wrote:

Balance just creates a stagnant playing field.



You're joking right?


Probably not, but, there's no lack of balance here, you just need to learn to create your own. Here, let me show you.

If you bring a Gila to a fight, I'll counter it with a Phantasm. You bring a Phantasm, I'll bring an Ashimmu. You bring an Ashimmu, I'll bring a Cynnabal. And those aren't even the only possible counters, just examples of counters in the same class of ship, pirate faction cruisers. I tend to find that "x is OP, nerf it posts" often follow events where the OP has been defeated by whatever OP is claiming is OP, while in the same vein, complaining that what they got kill in is too underpowered. These are players that have no concept of how to balance their own playing field.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Noah Reese
#28 - 2016-07-19 06:49:36 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
FT Cold wrote:
ll Kuray ll wrote:

Balance just creates a stagnant playing field.



You're joking right?


Probably not, but, there's no lack of balance here, you just need to learn to create your own. Here, let me show you.

If you bring a Gila to a fight, I'll counter it with a Phantasm. You bring a Phantasm, I'll bring an Ashimmu. You bring an Ashimmu, I'll bring a Cynnabal. And those aren't even the only possible counters, just examples of counters in the same class of ship, pirate faction cruisers. I tend to find that "x is OP, nerf it posts" often follow events where the OP has been defeated by whatever OP is claiming is OP, while in the same vein, complaining that what they got kill in is too underpowered. These are players that have no concept of how to balance their own playing field.


But the Gila IS too good so that kinda makes your statement moot.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2016-07-19 07:20:33 UTC
Noah Reese wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
FT Cold wrote:
ll Kuray ll wrote:

Balance just creates a stagnant playing field.



You're joking right?


Probably not, but, there's no lack of balance here, you just need to learn to create your own. Here, let me show you.

If you bring a Gila to a fight, I'll counter it with a Phantasm. You bring a Phantasm, I'll bring an Ashimmu. You bring an Ashimmu, I'll bring a Cynnabal. And those aren't even the only possible counters, just examples of counters in the same class of ship, pirate faction cruisers. I tend to find that "x is OP, nerf it posts" often follow events where the OP has been defeated by whatever OP is claiming is OP, while in the same vein, complaining that what they got kill in is too underpowered. These are players that have no concept of how to balance their own playing field.


But the Gila IS too good so that kinda makes your statement moot.


But the Gila isn't too good, so that kinda makes your statement moot.

The difference between my claim and yours is, I have the experience to back it up, and I know what I'm talking about, and can prove it. Additionally, the statement that you called moot was a direct refutation of the claim you just made to support the 'mooting' you declared, so... I don't even know what to call that one. Full potato? Never go full potato.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#30 - 2016-07-19 07:42:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Brokk Witgenstein
Let's just say the amount of "OP" ships and strategies is staggering.

Therefore I submit none of these are actually overpowered; it's about knowing how to use it and under which circumstances.

Within a same class of ships (eg 'pirate faction cruisers'), there is some room for comparison... would you like to see what an Orthrus can do? Did you know our Cynabals eat Gilas like popcorn? Vigilant? Lemme guess: those are also OP- must be that, right?



edit: typoes.
Wanda Fayne
#31 - 2016-07-19 13:52:40 UTC
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:

Therefore I submit none of these are actually overpowered; it's about knowing how to use it and under which circumstances.



Svipul

"your comments just confirms this whole idea is totally pathetic" -Lan Wang-

  • - "hub humping station gamey neutral logi warspam wankery" -Ralph King-Griffin-
Roenok Baalnorn
Baalnorn Heavy Industries
#32 - 2016-07-19 14:19:36 UTC
Quote:
Yeah, a destroyer with 20k EHP is like suuuper squishy guys.
If im applying 400 dps a second to your svipul and you dont have support, you are dead in 50 seconds. If im using a ship with a 25k tank and your doing 200 dps applied, i win. Even if your shooting 400 dps i still win. And thats just straight out brawling. There are so many more options i have since we didnt specify the svipul is OPed compared to what.

My confessor gets about another 4k EHP and another 75 dps over the svipul. Does that make it more OPed than the svipul?No. Each has its benefits and drawbacks. Each have situation use. Now when you use either in a group say with logi then the drawbacks become less. But then if you are fighting a gang of t3s with another gang , they are not hard ships to alpha to death.

The same applies for all ships in this game. I can counter any ship in the game with another ship and/or fit(read: multiple ships and fits) and win provided our skill points are equal and numbers are equal. However, this is never the case in eve. In eve someone always has the advantage and someone the disadvantage.


Quote:
You just disqualified yourself from any balancing thread.
I know because balancing threads arent about balance, they are about whining about a ship being OPed because someone got owned in one and they have no clue how to counter it. So instead of enhancing their game knowledge they CCPLEASE!!!! This is eve not rock, paper, scissors.

Quote:

When a large number of the major groups change their doctrine to a particular ship it usually isn't because they believe that ship is particularly balanced and fair or because it will be challenging to fly and hence improve their pilots' skills.

If a lot of groups change their doctrine to the same ship at the same time, in different regions, for different styles of combat, it usually means that ship is stupidly OP.


We will use the cerb as an example because i know several alliances that have a cerb doctrine( ironically no one is complaining this ship is OPed). the cerb has three general fits. The reason why alliances use cerbs is because you can use rapid lights to take out small targets. This is good against alliances that fly smaller light tanked stuff. It does good dps at a decent range. But the reload time could really hurt you when using against heavier tanked targets with logi support. The HML fit is very long range. Allowing your fleet to sit at over 100 km away. This basically allows you to snipe at targets and apply alpha without getting in bubble/tackle/ewar range. It applies lower but more constant dps at a longer range. The third fit is HAMs. Hams provide the most DPS of the 3. But they are short range. Your fleet needs to be in the range of bubbles/tackle and will be in optimal of pretty much all ewar.

I can do all 3 fits on the same cerb changing out the highs and one/two lows/mids if any. This makes it versatile and hence why it is popular with alliances.

Now if you compare the gila to the cerb, the gila does more dps. Well it is a pirate cruiser. It also uses a mixed weapon system. So you have duel train on both ships and weapon systems. The cerb as the advantage of applying damage at range. A cerb can apply 500 dps at 100 km. The gila is a short range brawler and because of its heavy use of drones it needs to stay under 50km and ideally in brawler range. The gila is also more expensive than the cerb.

The svipul, which is this months featured whine, Is a bltiz ship. It made to get in, kill stuff, and gtfo. Its good for roaming, entosis defense/attack, picking off stragglers, and dealing with smaller threats and people who try to do sov warfare in mixed trash ship fleet. Against an organized fleet it will melt like butter.
Wanda Fayne
#33 - 2016-07-19 23:14:47 UTC
Roenok Baalnorn wrote:
Against an organized fleet it will melt like butter.


So your counter to the Svipul is "an organized fleet"?
Roll

"your comments just confirms this whole idea is totally pathetic" -Lan Wang-

  • - "hub humping station gamey neutral logi warspam wankery" -Ralph King-Griffin-
Roenok Baalnorn
Baalnorn Heavy Industries
#34 - 2016-07-20 03:05:25 UTC
Wanda Fayne wrote:
Roenok Baalnorn wrote:
Against an organized fleet it will melt like butter.


So your counter to the Svipul is "an organized fleet"?
Roll

Yes that is exactly what i said *facepalm*...

...Its like trying to teach my dog to speak Chinese.

Im not talking one svipul against a fleet. Im talking fleet against fleet. No one cares about solo play. You cant balance Eve on solo play. You have to balance it on fleet play. But its not that hard to defeat 1v1 either.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2016-07-20 03:13:19 UTC
Wanda Fayne wrote:
Roenok Baalnorn wrote:
Against an organized fleet it will melt like butter.


So your counter to the Svipul is "an organized fleet"?
Roll


I don't know what game you're playing, but I've killed many a svip with a properly tanked confessor in 1v1. Seriously, how does no one know how to properly tank a confessor? Everyone keeps trying to speed tank it but you waste its greatest strengths when you do that. Dual-rep pulse fit with dual neuts and cap booster or go home.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Brokk Witgenstein
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#36 - 2016-07-20 03:45:33 UTC
Wanda Fayne wrote:
Roenok Baalnorn wrote:
Against an organized fleet it will melt like butter.


So your counter to the Svipul is "an organized fleet"?
Roll


My god. You're hijaaking the Gila thread to complain about svipuls? Is easy: Osprey Navy, Augoror Navy, Rupture, even a Sabre can give it a run for the money, ..... lots of counters really.

Usually, people complain about different kinds of Svipuls but guess what: you can't do all those things at the same time or with the same fit. The "cancer instalock uhuhuhuuuu u shveepulll OP must nerf" dies to a properly flown Firetail.

Then there's the tanky AC Svip, which dies to a navy faction cruiser, a Caracal, a Rupture, something along those lines.

Then there's the Artillery-haha-gotcha Alpha / kiting Svipul, which is equally vulnerable just to different kinds of cruiser.

And then there's the fleet Svipul with resists and low sig radius; mostly a pest because of the Kirins and Scalpels supporting it. Apply neuts where appropriate.

Of course, if all this sounds like Svipul + Svipul + Svipul + Svipul, THEN it's OP. But you can't do all that in one package-- fitting choices are important here. It doesn't do 300 DPS AND 26k tank AND 1130mm scanres AND 2600 m/sec. It can do either/or, but not all at the same time, and that 26k tank does require T2 rigs and faction mods. Apples and oranges.

Le omg Svipul dies quite well to throwaway Thrashers too, fyi.

Can we now please get back on topic of the Gila?
Wanda Fayne
#37 - 2016-07-20 03:50:16 UTC
LOL at you boys. I'm surprised that not ONE of you mentioned the GILA as a counter to the SvipulBlink

"your comments just confirms this whole idea is totally pathetic" -Lan Wang-

  • - "hub humping station gamey neutral logi warspam wankery" -Ralph King-Griffin-
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2016-07-20 04:05:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Wanda Fayne wrote:
LOL at you boys. I'm surprised that not ONE of you mentioned the GILA as a counter to the SvipulBlink


Why would we need to? It's not just a counter, it's overkill. If we're talking about counters in the context of matching ships, for the sake of balance, then other T3 destroyers are fine for killing svips, especially the confessor, if you know how to confessor right. The same could be said for the svip though - it's just not that good unless you know what you're doing with it, same as anything.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

MidnightWyvern
Fukamichi Corporation
SAYR Galactic
#39 - 2016-07-20 04:49:14 UTC
Nothing out-OPs the Svipul.

Rattati Senpai noticed us! See you in the next FPS!

Alts: Saray Wyvern, Mobius Wyvern (Dust 514)

Roenok Baalnorn
Baalnorn Heavy Industries
#40 - 2016-07-20 05:01:01 UTC
Wanda Fayne wrote:
LOL at you boys. I'm surprised that not ONE of you mentioned the GILA as a counter to the SvipulBlink

Thats an obvious given. Or at least i thought it was obvious.Tackle, launch drones, go get a drink, loot wreck, profit?

Quote:
The same could be said for the svip though - it's just not that good unless you know what you're doing with it, same as anything.
That is the problem. Some people know what they are doing, therefore, CCP should nerf people and not ships. Remember folks, guns dont kill people, people kill people. And people who know what they are doing can kill you with a tin tea cup.

Quote:
Can we now please get back on topic of the Gila?
Yes the gila is OPed because someone knows how to fly it. Therefore, for balance purposes, it should only be allowed 1 drone, no low slots, and have to fly in reverse while only able to make left hand turns.
Previous page123Next page