These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

State of Eve: War Dec

Author
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#181 - 2016-07-05 21:07:12 UTC
Aaron wrote:
Dracvlad,

My post was not an attack post. As usual you misunderstand me.

My post was a stop moaning and get on with it post, at no point did I say any of your points were 100% wrong. What I am saying is that your general attitude is about blaming CCP for issues like freighter bumping rather than suggesting/doing anything else you endorse the idea of changing the mechanics so its difficult/stops freighter bumping.

Of course you would view my post as an attack post, but if you read carefully you will have seen where I said "Dracvlad, you have the skills to change this" and I also said you should start something similar to Hub Zero, or create a corp/alliance specifically to fight these war deccers and gankers in hisec. I'm not sure how you saw it as an insult. What is stopping you from doing this by the way? Can't be bothered?

I realise it's not you coming up with these mechanic change ideas, but you sure do endorse them.

I remember the camper you speak of back in Stain, the one who was forced to use his friends accounts so that he could camp us? The shot caller could not stop me, I was still doing my work as usual I think I moved further up the pipe and found a clear system to rat and do combat sites. The shot caller was using 2 of his friends accounts plus his own all flying Sabre's, he still couldn't kill my cloaky hauler.

You say you were staying in 6Y so he would focus on you, This only stressed you out Drac, you chose this play style and you refused to try any other style. This is the problem, some of you Eve players flat out refuse to adapt to anything.

I'm not sure if you read this in my last post Drac, ill type it again, its up to you if you want to read and understand it. you are an extremely skillful person and you have the skills to influence people into changing this. Build your alliance up till you have some large fleets, wardec the the wardeccers, so that you and your fleets can kill them anytime. Expand your blue list and let them help you fund the war decs against the war deccers. Market and promote your ideas for change, let everyone know there is another way and get them to join you on your crusade.

Lots of folk on this thread are of the opinion you want the game to adapt to you rather than you adapting to the game. I see that you're calling me ignorant, I don't think so.. ignorance is not even bothering to try and adapt to the rigors of Eve.


Aaron, if you wanted to say something to me then you should have done it by mail. I explained the bumper issue to you, its poor gameplay. Lots of these folks, lol I could not give a rats ass what they think about me, in fact the only person that matters to me is myself, you should have realised that by now Aaron. That s why pulling the leg of some of them to do their attack posts was so amusing, because I realish them knowing I am a complete loser. Big smile I hope you work out what I mean by that...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#182 - 2016-07-05 21:21:45 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:


I knew at some point you would do an attack post, if you take the time to read back through the thread you will see it is not I who is moaning about nerf's. You make the same error as so many. Do you think that bumping someone for hours on end without consequences is a good mechanic, if you do then I have to wonder about you. CCP have adjusted it, which is good and needed, if you had come across people like I had who were raging at CCP because they had been bumped for hours you would understand just how bad it was. They can still bump, but they have to suicide point the freighter and re-set the timer, when CCP finally implement it that is. The only thing it will affect is bumpers who were after ransoms, do you get it and they are complaining about it not me.



Bumpng has always been part of pvp for 6 years before you even joined the game, Battleships were able to travel at speeds of 3km per second, bumping was a method of stopping people warping because their target had stabs on. So freighters were bumped for hours on end? Whose fault is that really? Did the pilots you spoke to have to use a freighter? Could they have split their loads and made 5 or 6 runs in a hauler? Or were they greedy or pressed for time and wanted to move their stuff in 1 hit? Honestly I don't have a real opinion on this, I am talking about it to illustrate that these people always seem to want the game to adapt to them.

Dracvlad wrote:


I should thank you for completely mis-reading what I have said based on your own prejudices and lack of knowledge of hisec, I am perfectly able to adapt, for example when I was sitting in 6Y being cloaky camped I was doing it so they would focus on me leaving the others (like you for example) free to operate in other systems, but then you went and told the campers that you and others were in other systems so they upped their campaign. Then you told me I was not able to adapt by moving systems, because somehow you forgot that I was doing that deliberately. Thanks for reminding me of that, I still laugh every time I think of it, you telling me that I should change system when I had already told you I was in that system to keep their focus on me.



I was the only one operating in a system with no station out of our whole group and I did not need you to divert the attention of a cloaky camper, this is where you go wrong, you assumed I needed your help when I did not. I carefully moved my rattiing ship to another system and got on with it. That is an example of adapting Drac. The cloaky camper moved on and I came back. Face it Drac you're not right about everything, fair enough the ideas are not yours but you sure do endorse them as if they were your ideas.

Dracvlad wrote:


Aaron there is already a group doing this, It is the AG movement, you don't know anything about this and talk from ignorance for example you don't need to war dec gankers, they are already criminal and can be shot in hisec no issues, you need to learn and understand the mechanics in hisec. To save you getting confused the Macherial bumpers do not have criminal standings and do not go suspect, just in case you don't know that and they are often in random corps and drop for war decs, well some forget to but that is because they can be stupid at times...



FYI, I do not talk from ignorance, I talk from experience, Why do you think I never fly freighters in Hi sec? I know that there are some flaws in the game and I know that people will use every advantage possible to either kill a ship or annoy someone. Do try to remember that I have been playing since 2003, and I was the one who taught you lots when you were a noob, you didn't have a clue what was going on in a fleet fight until I showed/explained it to you. Now here you are trying to school me? I can see why Jenn blocked you.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#183 - 2016-07-05 21:28:12 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Aaron wrote:
Dracvlad,

My post was not an attack post. As usual you misunderstand me.

My post was a stop moaning and get on with it post, at no point did I say any of your points were 100% wrong. What I am saying is that your general attitude is about blaming CCP for issues like freighter bumping rather than suggesting/doing anything else you endorse the idea of changing the mechanics so its difficult/stops freighter bumping.

Of course you would view my post as an attack post, but if you read carefully you will have seen where I said "Dracvlad, you have the skills to change this" and I also said you should start something similar to Hub Zero, or create a corp/alliance specifically to fight these war deccers and gankers in hisec. I'm not sure how you saw it as an insult. What is stopping you from doing this by the way? Can't be bothered?

I realise it's not you coming up with these mechanic change ideas, but you sure do endorse them.

I remember the camper you speak of back in Stain, the one who was forced to use his friends accounts so that he could camp us? The shot caller could not stop me, I was still doing my work as usual I think I moved further up the pipe and found a clear system to rat and do combat sites. The shot caller was using 2 of his friends accounts plus his own all flying Sabre's, he still couldn't kill my cloaky hauler.

You say you were staying in 6Y so he would focus on you, This only stressed you out Drac, you chose this play style and you refused to try any other style. This is the problem, some of you Eve players flat out refuse to adapt to anything.

I'm not sure if you read this in my last post Drac, ill type it again, its up to you if you want to read and understand it. you are an extremely skillful person and you have the skills to influence people into changing this. Build your alliance up till you have some large fleets, wardec the the wardeccers, so that you and your fleets can kill them anytime. Expand your blue list and let them help you fund the war decs against the war deccers. Market and promote your ideas for change, let everyone know there is another way and get them to join you on your crusade.

Lots of folk on this thread are of the opinion you want the game to adapt to you rather than you adapting to the game. I see that you're calling me ignorant, I don't think so.. ignorance is not even bothering to try and adapt to the rigors of Eve.


Aaron, if you wanted to say something to me then you should have done it by mail. I explained the bumper issue to you, its poor gameplay. Lots of these folks, lol I could not give a rats ass what they think about me, in fact the only person that matters to me is myself, you should have realised that by now Aaron. That s why pulling the leg of some of them to do their attack posts was so amusing, because I realish them knowing I am a complete loser. Big smile I hope you work out what I mean by that...


I'm too tired to work out what you mean, why don't you just tell me. Why would I want to mail you anyway, you never agree or understand anything I say. Drac, why not just have a normal convo without pulling their legs? Why not try harder to think through their responses and see the logic in what they say?

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#184 - 2016-07-05 22:37:08 UTC
It's ok Aaron. He doesn't pull anyone's leg.

That's just a way for his ego to compensate and rationalise how it's everyone else that is wrong "because he's just pulling our leg", you know because he wants everyone to think he's wrong about things so he can hunt us better.

most of us, he'll never be hunting anyway. Ever. So it's just a smoke and mirrors excuse.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."

Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#185 - 2016-07-05 22:48:58 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Anyway, but my point that the watch list removal was not the cause of blanket war decs, ...

No one has claimed it was, so no real issue then.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#186 - 2016-07-05 23:09:02 UTC
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Anyway, but my point that the watch list removal was not the cause of blanket war decs, ...

No one has claimed it was, so no real issue then.


So it ends with a fizzle.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#187 - 2016-07-05 23:41:10 UTC
nah, just wait till remie wakes up.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#188 - 2016-07-06 04:11:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
You rang?

EDIT: I see that attempting to show reason to Vladdy boy remains about as productive as assaulting a CONCORD battleship.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#189 - 2016-07-06 06:48:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Aaron,

You are desperate to get in an argument or conflict with me aren't you, well you managed to get this reply, yes I learnt some things from you, like hit and run stuff and the like small gang combat and it was fun, and you learnt from me I also learnt that you had limits as an FC, it was pretty evident right from the start. But you will not see a single loss of any industrial or freighter or mining ship in hisec on any of my characters and yet you flew an untanked T1 indy in hisec with a cynabal and its fittings in it and got ganked and you are pretending that you taught me. As I keep pointing out to the trolls here, actions speak louder than words, you should think about it.

Shae,

Except that you did, it is there above in black and white.


I set out to get a missing piece of what went on and did so thanks to Ralph, it coincided with when I was not playing Eve. Now it is time for me to concentrate on playing rather then playing the forums, apart from schooling Teckos on a certain thread, which he trolls like a large hairy troll with acne.

Because Aaron got me irritated enough to respond I might as well give my thoughts, the key thing I got from this is confirmation on why they did blanket war decs, and it was telling that it came from Ralph and the CEO of DWA's who I have a great deal of respect for. From the time I joined the game I have kept a close eye on the hisec war dec entities, it helped having a friend who has since left the game who was very high up in the Orphanage and was also in Project Nemesis who explained to me in great detail how they operated , and by the way this player had utter contempt for Aaron.

And let me make it clear, there is nothing wrong with ganking, war decs are also fine, what is the issue is what hisec has become and who operates in hisec, this is not due to carebears as they were always there and always doing this in Eve. The blanket war decs are primarily because they wanted to get bigger for obvious reasons. So its really a race to keep their player occupied and active, but ultimately its destructive on ability because it is lazy, the second reason is environment, because hisec entities just are not interested and can hide or avoid made easier with the watch list removal. But the most important thing is that war dec entities just make a huge amount of ISK out of the 0.0 alliances less careful players and their logistics. And in spite of the noise made by certain 0.0 players (not all) offering contempt filled advice to hisec players on how to deal with hisec war decs, they fail to do it themselves due to the same reasons as hisec players.

Initially I was looking to see if there was any fight in hisec players, but for them there is no real reason to do so, the only people who did fight are the ones who were new and as most of them now bypass hisec your prey has become rather thin on the ground in terms of hisec players and what there is refuse to play your game which is the best way for them. Sad

I still believe that the OS for watch list intel per constellation and giving better yield or bonuses for indy structures that cannot be pulled down within the 24 hour war dec period could create a slightly different environment, but the majority of people will not bother, they will accept the base amount and go to ground like they do now, but could a nucleas form from people who have a bit more about them. I really don't know, but one thing is certain I won't be doing it, please step forward Aaron you have found your niche in this game. Big smileTwisted

So every time one of you loudly proclaim its the carebears fault and go off on religious like mantras about this is a PvP game I snigger because real carebears are now very thin on the ground in hisec and most of you don't even realise it... ShockedRoll

Time to go try WH living... o7


PS and off topic. Aaron, will you ever realise that forums are not going to work in developing things, you have to do the footwork by getting people the hard way by building up a corp. Stain is an issue because the logistics are too difficult for new players and even old players, I find it a bit of a pain once I could no longer use a carrier and had one kick out station for a JF, the WH's were not good enough for my needs. The logistics issue of Stain is the problem for you which is why you have attracted no one, you might get a few people who have tried PH for example and want a more individualistic 0.0 experience, I hope you do, but only a few. By the way I avoided your Hub Zero thread as a certain amount of respect for your own attempt, and it was telling that you decided to follow me around when your thread died, and a bit sad. o7

EDIT: Good god you are stupid Aaron, I did not sit in 6Y for you, I did it so the other players did not get fed up and as soon as you opened your mouth they upped their game and those players got fed up and melted away or moved to another area in Stain. You will keep failing because it is always just about you and your ego. A 2003 player who makes noob errors Aaron which is why you had an un-tanked T1 hauler ganked while carrying a Cynabel and its fit. I learnt what I could from you and then tried to help you, but you are incapable of learning anything.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#190 - 2016-07-06 06:53:01 UTC
tl;dr

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#191 - 2016-07-06 06:53:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Shae Tadaruwa
Dracvlad wrote:
Shae,
Except that you did...

Nah, maybe you should just try to reread it a bit slower.

I stand by what I wrote before. The increase in blanket wardecs was a direct response to the watchlist changes.

That is not a claim that you think it is.

Maybe this wording of the same thing will make it easier for you to comprehend:

The increase in blanket wardecs following the watchlist changes was a direct response to those changes.

Hopefully that helps.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#192 - 2016-07-06 06:58:55 UTC
Aaron wrote:
I'm too tired to work out what you mean, why don't you just tell me. Why would I want to mail you anyway, you never agree or understand anything I say. Drac, why not just have a normal convo without pulling their legs? Why not try harder to think through their responses and see the logic in what they say?


No, it is not a case about tiredness Aaron, they have the same issue as you actually, yes there is logic in their responses, but the important part is from their perspective and situation. Roll

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#193 - 2016-07-06 07:09:42 UTC
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Shae,
Except that you did...

Nah, maybe you should just try to reread it a bit slower.

I stand by what I wrote before. The increase in blanket wardecs was a direct response to the watchlist changes.

That is not a claim that you think it is.

Maybe this wording of the same thing will make it easier for you to comprehend:

The increase in blanket wardecs following the watchlist changes was a direct response to those changes.

Hopefully that helps.


Actually it helped you.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#194 - 2016-07-06 07:13:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Shae Tadaruwa
How so?

The only person confused was you. Everyone else understood it just fine.

However your dumb crap isn't worth the time. It's a pointless conversation and futile trying to help you.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#195 - 2016-07-06 07:19:48 UTC
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
How so?

The only person confused was you. Everyone else understood it just fine.

However your dumb crap isn't worth the time. It's a pointless conversation and futile trying to help you.


Because you adjusted your sentence to the reality, it is there in black and white.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#196 - 2016-07-06 07:21:51 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
How so?

The only person confused was you. Everyone else understood it just fine.

However your dumb crap isn't worth the time. It's a pointless conversation and futile trying to help you.


Because you adjusted your sentence to the reality, it is there in black and white.

I didn't adjust my sentence. It's exactly the same back in the earlier quote and above.

I just reworded it for you because your iq seems too low to understand such a simple sentence.

But, glad it's been cleared up for you now.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#197 - 2016-07-06 08:07:35 UTC
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
How so?

The only person confused was you. Everyone else understood it just fine.

However your dumb crap isn't worth the time. It's a pointless conversation and futile trying to help you.


Because you adjusted your sentence to the reality, it is there in black and white.

I didn't adjust my sentence. It's exactly the same back in the earlier quote and above.

I just reworded it for you because your iq seems too low to understand such a simple sentence.

But, glad it's been cleared up for you now.


Well what you said at the end is different to what you said before, you became specific in terms of timing which meant that the sentence is now correct. Simple good use of English, the less precise you are the more that people could misinterpret, and often people leave things vague to play with interpretation. Same for laws and contracts etc. I find it rather amusing being told I have a low IQ when the fault is in your wording which was too wide in scope and shows at best laziness or at worst deliberate intent to misrepresent.

It was always clear for me, the only thing I missed was that some war dec entities made an effort to move away from blanket war decs which means that for some of them the watch list removal forced them to do blanket war decs, I was trying to work out why the felt as upset and that nailed it. It is also because it is a point of contention with CCP on mechanic changes which directly equates to their ability to get content and a green killboard. The watch list removal is to hisec gangs what the NPC kills and people in systems are to roaming gangs in null, easy vectoring in on targets...

In any case talking to people like you is an exercise in futility, because you do understand, you just have reasons to postulate as you do.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#198 - 2016-07-06 08:08:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Dracvlad wrote:
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
How so?

The only person confused was you. Everyone else understood it just fine.

However your dumb crap isn't worth the time. It's a pointless conversation and futile trying to help you.


Because you adjusted your sentence to the reality, it is there in black and white.


People have been telling you exactly this for days now, and in no uncertain terms, or terms that were broadly different from the ones Shae used here. You need to stop pretending like you can never be wrong, like everyone else is at fault, like you take no responsibility for your own confusion. The only person who believes you're not at any fault here is, surprise surprise, you.

Literally NO ONE has claimed that blanket wardeccing was caused by the removal of watchlists. The only thing we've been saying, the only thing ANYONE has been saying, is that it has caused an increase due to the blanket wardec being the only viable option now for mercs. This is why I accuse you of ignorance, vladdy boy. Because you consistently and blatantly demonstrate it all the time.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#199 - 2016-07-06 08:11:29 UTC
Here is what Shae wrote:

Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
The increase in blanket wardecs is a direct response to the loss of watchlist notifications...


Dracvlad quoted it here.

Shae did not write or imply that blanket war decs were caused by the removal of the watchlist. Such claims are simply untrue. Saying that Shae made this claim is nothing short of a lie.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#200 - 2016-07-06 08:13:49 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:
How so?

The only person confused was you. Everyone else understood it just fine.

However your dumb crap isn't worth the time. It's a pointless conversation and futile trying to help you.


Because you adjusted your sentence to the reality, it is there in black and white.

I didn't adjust my sentence. It's exactly the same back in the earlier quote and above.

I just reworded it for you because your iq seems too low to understand such a simple sentence.

But, glad it's been cleared up for you now.


Well what you said at the end is different to what you said before, you became specific in terms of timing which meant that the sentence is now correct. Simple good use of English, the less precise you are the more that people could misinterpret, and often people leave things vague to play with interpretation. Same for laws and contracts etc. I find it rather amusing being told I have a low IQ when the fault is in your wording which was too wide in scope and shows at best laziness or at worst deliberate intent to misrepresent.

It was always clear for me, the only thing I missed was that some war dec entities made an effort to move away from blanket war decs which means that for some of them the watch list removal forced them to do blanket war decs, I was trying to work out why the felt as upset and that nailed it. It is also because it is a point of contention with CCP on mechanic changes which directly equates to their ability to get content and a green killboard. The watch list removal is to hisec gangs what the NPC kills and people in systems are to roaming gangs in null, easy vectoring in on targets...

In any case talking to people like you is an exercise in futility, because you do understand, you just have reasons to postulate as you do.


What a gawdawful word salad.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online