These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Who Killed High-Sec/Casual PvP?

Author
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#141 - 2016-06-08 17:38:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Black Pedro wrote:
Suggesting that some ship class or tactic is unbalanced does not make you a carebear. Saying that because a certain ship can be attacked at all that it is unbalanced does make you a carebear. Mining and hauling ships are suppose to die in this game. It is not "unbalanced" that that can happen.

You I am on the fence about although I am leaning towards carebear. Forgive the characterization, but you appear to abhor losing ships and it fuels your strange obsession with opposing content. You seem to view losing a ship to another player as unacceptable and it fuels your campaign to "balance" away those you view as hurting innocents in-game by exploding their ships without consent. You shape your game play with the primary goal of not losing a ship - it's why you left nullsec and it is why your killboard only has criminals on it.

More evidence for carebear: on one hand you claim to support such emergent game play and be in active opposition to highsec aggressors, but your advice to other players is always to turtle up and avoid fighting the aggressors to avoid loss. You claim to support ganking, but come up with some convoluted proposals that would nerf ganking significantly. You claim to support freighter ganking, but only if there is no way to tackle the ships.

I also think that is why you detest the vulnerability of citadels. It so disquiets you that another group of players might be able to explode such an asset, that you refuse to attach your horse to them and defend a Citadel and declare them broken.

On the other hand you seem to at least do something to oppose other players in-game.

But this is off-topic. I did not want to make this post about you and your in-game activities even if you seem to want to.

Carebears desire absolute safety while playing so that they can avoid any losses or interruption of their grinding activities. A player's position on AFK cloaking is a good litmus test for that. If they think it is "unfair" or "unbalanced" that a player can sit in local and present a theoretical risk, they are a carebear. In fact in general, if the balance proposal is based on the idea that ship loss is "unfair", that is a carebear speaking. If the balance proposal is based on making more ships explode, or explode in more interesting and exciting ways as are most of the ones you cited, they are not the carebear "balance" proposals I am referring to.


Actually there are a number of CODE players who seem to want to make it about me, some getting quite obsessive too and in this thread too.

I have lost a lot of ships, does not matter to me, of course I take more care with the expensive ones, my object is not to be an easy kill, or give away easy kills. You talk about me wanting the game to be changed to stop you ganking people, no I don't want the game made so hisec is totrally safe, I think the balance is not far of what I would think is good for the game.

You are talking about my advice on the MTU, my advice is not to give them what they want which is to engage with the Golem, and I told him why, and he went after it without risking the Golem, I hope he locked the SB up so it cold not cloak, I tried to suggest that the SB would cloak hoping he would pick up on it.

In terms of tackling freighters I am all about consequences, you have already admitted that the current bumping is OTT, I am prepared to have the timer re-set by the points, but that's no real consequence to you guys, just a noob ship with a point every 3 minutes. The objective was on my part to make it so the AG would have a better idea who your target was to be able to contest the gank, because it would be easier to work out who your real target was.

So if I oppose you in game makes me a carebear, also my kill board has a lot more than criminals on it, I also ganked someone two days ago on another toon. I like the choice of getting into a mining ship that has a tank at the cost of yield and I tank it close to the max, and should I point out that its perfectly possible for you chaps to gank me, it just takes special targetting. I have half expected you to do it and good luck to you. In reality like many who do AG, I have found out how difficult it is and how well you play the mechanics, that being said I think the balance is almost there.

Citadels, in that thread I thought they were fine then people said they were too easy and I reacted then NatrualClonekiller and Vimsy gave their views and then I was fine with the level, they are force multipliers and that is how people should approach them. In terms of the indy structures that does worry me, mainly because most indy players are just not setup to defend them with ships, as you can see here I have stated that I think that this needs to lead to a change in hisec in terms of how people operate so on balance I lean towards what CCP have said.

I am totally against total safety.

You mention AFK cloaking, you know full well that I find the AFK part of it unacceptable, as I pointed out so many times how can I bait the bugger if he is in bed snoring or at work, I can't. Which is why I suggested an AFK flag. Because I want to know when I can hunt the blighter, I have on my killboard a number of campers that I killed so I can talk about it from the act of doing it.

But if you want to say anyone who has an opinion against yours in some areas is a carebear then that is a bit meh. But I have a certain respect for your posts.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#142 - 2016-06-08 17:39:17 UTC
Skanki wrote:
This should be a sticky.

There be monsters. It's really that simple. This is why you were given procurers and skiffs. You've practically been enabled to carebear and yet it's still not enough.



A skiff can be ganked and CODE have been doing so.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Skanki
Big Strong
Hisec Miners
#143 - 2016-06-08 18:10:15 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Skanki wrote:
This should be a sticky.

There be monsters. It's really that simple. This is why you were given procurers and skiffs. You've practically been enabled to carebear and yet it's still not enough.



A skiff can be ganked and CODE have been doing so.


You truly are lost.




Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#144 - 2016-06-08 18:58:20 UTC
Skanki wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Skanki wrote:
This should be a sticky.

There be monsters. It's really that simple. This is why you were given procurers and skiffs. You've practically been enabled to carebear and yet it's still not enough.



A skiff can be ganked and CODE have been doing so.


You truly are lost.



I shall help you they were ganked in Otela, some Procurers too, so there is risk in going mining in Skiffs and Procurers which blows your throw away line out of the water...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#145 - 2016-06-08 19:11:50 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Skanki wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Skanki wrote:
This should be a sticky.

There be monsters. It's really that simple. This is why you were given procurers and skiffs. You've practically been enabled to carebear and yet it's still not enough.



A skiff can be ganked and CODE have been doing so.


You truly are lost.



I shall help you they were ganked in Otela, some Procurers too, so there is risk in going mining in Skiffs and Procurers which blows your throw away line out of the water...

the local burgelers here have been known to remove entire doors to gain access to houses , to gain access to car keys.

i still feel (and am) safer locking my doors.

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#146 - 2016-06-08 19:18:09 UTC
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Skanki wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Skanki wrote:
This should be a sticky.

There be monsters. It's really that simple. This is why you were given procurers and skiffs. You've practically been enabled to carebear and yet it's still not enough.



A skiff can be ganked and CODE have been doing so.


You truly are lost.



I shall help you they were ganked in Otela, some Procurers too, so there is risk in going mining in Skiffs and Procurers which blows your throw away line out of the water...

the local burgelers here have been known to remove entire doors to gain access to houses , to gain access to car keys.

i still feel (and am) safer locking my doors.



Quite, you are also safer in getting an armoured door and you have the choice to do so. If one looks closely at those Skiffs their tank was not optimal.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#147 - 2016-06-08 19:19:28 UTC
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Skanki wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Skanki wrote:
This should be a sticky.

There be monsters. It's really that simple. This is why you were given procurers and skiffs. You've practically been enabled to carebear and yet it's still not enough.



A skiff can be ganked and CODE have been doing so.


You truly are lost.



I shall help you they were ganked in Otela, some Procurers too, so there is risk in going mining in Skiffs and Procurers which blows your throw away line out of the water...

the local burgelers here have been known to remove entire doors to gain access to houses , to gain access to car keys.

i still feel (and am) safer locking my doors.


How does one remove a door... from the outside... without being noticed?
That sounds like quite a feat actually

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist

Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#148 - 2016-06-08 19:20:56 UTC
cant we just settle all this over a great honor brawl in pvp vargurs in rancer drunk and on comms?

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#149 - 2016-06-08 19:54:16 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
cant we just settle all this over a great honor brawl in pvp vargurs in rancer drunk and on comms?

I'm in

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#150 - 2016-06-08 20:12:24 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
cant we just settle all this over a great honor brawl in pvp vargurs in rancer drunk and on comms?

I'm in


i think it would be great for networking and stuff

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#151 - 2016-06-08 20:14:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
cant we just settle all this over a great honor brawl in pvp vargurs in rancer drunk and on comms?

I'm in


Well I am obviously not as rich as you lot, that gets to my level of too expensive. Running around in a Vargur to PvP was something I was planning on doing at some point and I have one in Stain, but it is also a question of implants and the like to do it justice. I know who will be primary for everyone else too, me, but that's part of the fun. Couldn't you say something like a Tempest Fleet issue which is more my level StraightSad

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#152 - 2016-06-08 20:14:29 UTC
Can I bring a drake?

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#153 - 2016-06-08 20:22:08 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Can I bring a drake?


ofcourse! you'll do great

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#154 - 2016-06-08 21:05:37 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
cant we just settle all this over a great honor brawl in pvp vargurs in rancer drunk and on comms?

I'm in


Well I am obviously not as rich as you lot, that gets to my level of too expensive. Running around in a Vargur to PvP was something I was planning on doing at some point and I have one in Stain, but it is also a question of implants and the like to do it justice. I know who will be primary for everyone else too, me, but that's part of the fun. Couldn't you say something like a Tempest Fleet issue which is more my level StraightSad

Can you at least name it "Dracvlad's Vargur"?

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#155 - 2016-06-08 21:08:56 UTC
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
Dirty Forum Alt wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
cant we just settle all this over a great honor brawl in pvp vargurs in rancer drunk and on comms?

I'm in


Well I am obviously not as rich as you lot, that gets to my level of too expensive. Running around in a Vargur to PvP was something I was planning on doing at some point and I have one in Stain, but it is also a question of implants and the like to do it justice. I know who will be primary for everyone else too, me, but that's part of the fun. Couldn't you say something like a Tempest Fleet issue which is more my level StraightSad

Can you at least name it "Dracvlad's Vargur"?


How about "Not Dracvlad's Vargur", do you think that would help?

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Ankor Grammaten
Dragonhold Enterprises
#156 - 2016-06-08 22:40:28 UTC
OK, I thought you might be interested in hearing from an actual "newb", which I guess I still am after 3 months' play. This is how I feel about hi-sec, PVP, and all that, at my stage of the the game. Take it or leave it, it reflects my own experience and feelings only.

1. I absolutely assert my right to play the game any way I ****ing want, limited only by the actual mechanics of the game. If that doesn't jibe with your mental picture of the "right" way to play, tough.

2. I'm currently exploring the game in my own way, which is basically to research something, try it out, get advice if needed, try some more, then move on.

3. I tried mining and manufacturing. The idea was to mine, refine, and build, with the idea of experiencing the whole industry "path". My retriever got ganked. It was completely avoidable, it died with drones still in the bay and no GTFO destination set. Basically I froze up, despite the fact that someone had already warned me that CORE people were around. I learned a few useful things, like setting people to "red" and keeping an eye on the local chat. I was advised that a Procurer was a better choice of ship. I quit mining instead, as I had already pretty much decided that it was too boring, and didn't feel like grinding through the training for yet another ship.

3. I'm now running missions. This is more fun, but I already sense a certain boredom creeping in. Frankly, with a Vexor at level 2, it's too easy. And repetitive. I'll continue up to L4 though to get the full experience.

4. In answer to the OP, I feel your pain but I have no interest in being your target. There's a lot more to PVP than there is to PVE it seems and I don't feel confident enough to give you a good fight. Maybe if there was some expectation of equality in the combat (not safety, I get that, but even matching) I might feel differently.

5. I have (implicitly) been accused of cowardice because I don't (yet) do PVP. It's not cowardice to say that I don't want to jump into a shark infested pool equipped with only a knife. I would call it common sense. This thread has, though, given me the idea that it might be entertaining to take a cheap frigate into low-sec and see how long I can survive. I may try it. Or not :-)

6. It doesn't surprise me that people want to stay safe in EVE. The problem, as it applies to me anyway, is that the "jump" between PVE and PVP is too great. Spend a lot of time and ISK on a ship, sally forth, get pwned, rinse and repeat is not my idea of fun. Nor, as I mentioned before do I feel any responsibility to other players to provide cannon fodder for their amusement.

7. I will get to PVP, but in my own time and in my own way. I don't know what that is yet.

I have deliberately avoided offering any solutions. I wonder if my situation is common among so-called "carebears". I don't know.

Just for fun though, not too seriously, how's this for an idea? I will form a corporation of people who will hire themselves out to be killed. It'll cost you (based on overhead and a reasonable profit), but think what you get. You will be able to specify the exact ship, tank and dps within a limited menu. The pilot will fight just hard enough to give you a sense that you achieved something but will ultimately lose. You will get a message praising your skills and a hearty "GF". Alternatively, using a very low tank and dps ship, the pilot will offer no resistance at all to your attack, and if you wish simulate AFK. In this case you also get an angry message telling you that you have no right to gank and that you should be banned from the game. This may be published in any way you wish.
Dirty Forum Alt
Forum Alts Anonymous
#157 - 2016-06-08 23:15:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Dirty Forum Alt
Ankor Grammaten wrote:
OK, I thought you might be interested in hearing from an actual "newb", which I guess I still am after 3 months' play. This is how I feel about hi-sec, PVP, and all that, at my stage of the the game. Take it or leave it, it reflects my own experience and feelings only.

1. I absolutely assert my right to play the game any way I ****ing want, limited only by the actual mechanics of the game. If that doesn't jibe with your mental picture of the "right" way to play, tough.

2. I'm currently exploring the game in my own way, which is basically to research something, try it out, get advice if needed, try some more, then move on.

3. I tried mining and manufacturing. The idea was to mine, refine, and build, with the idea of experiencing the whole industry "path". My retriever got ganked. It was completely avoidable, it died with drones still in the bay and no GTFO destination set. Basically I froze up, despite the fact that someone had already warned me that CORE people were around. I learned a few useful things, like setting people to "red" and keeping an eye on the local chat. I was advised that a Procurer was a better choice of ship. I quit mining instead, as I had already pretty much decided that it was too boring, and didn't feel like grinding through the training for yet another ship.

3. I'm now running missions. This is more fun, but I already sense a certain boredom creeping in. Frankly, with a Vexor at level 2, it's too easy. And repetitive. I'll continue up to L4 though to get the full experience.

4. In answer to the OP, I feel your pain but I have no interest in being your target. There's a lot more to PVP than there is to PVE it seems and I don't feel confident enough to give you a good fight. Maybe if there was some expectation of equality in the combat (not safety, I get that, but even matching) I might feel differently.

5. I have (implicitly) been accused of cowardice because I don't (yet) do PVP. It's not cowardice to say that I don't want to jump into a shark infested pool equipped with only a knife. I would call it common sense. This thread has, though, given me the idea that it might be entertaining to take a cheap frigate into low-sec and see how long I can survive. I may try it. Or not :-)

6. It doesn't surprise me that people want to stay safe in EVE. The problem, as it applies to me anyway, is that the "jump" between PVE and PVP is too great. Spend a lot of time and ISK on a ship, sally forth, get pwned, rinse and repeat is not my idea of fun. Nor, as I mentioned before do I feel any responsibility to other players to provide cannon fodder for their amusement.

7. I will get to PVP, but in my own time and in my own way. I don't know what that is yet.

I have deliberately avoided offering any solutions. I wonder if my situation is common among so-called "carebears". I don't know.

Just for fun though, not too seriously, how's this for an idea? I will form a corporation of people who will hire themselves out to be killed. It'll cost you (based on overhead and a reasonable profit), but think what you get. You will be able to specify the exact ship, tank and dps within a limited menu. The pilot will fight just hard enough to give you a sense that you achieved something but will ultimately lose. You will get a message praising your skills and a hearty "GF". Alternatively, using a very low tank and dps ship, the pilot will offer no resistance at all to your attack, and if you wish simulate AFK. In this case you also get an angry message telling you that you have no right to gank and that you should be banned from the game. This may be published in any way you wish.

Lol you are much more open minded than most new players these days tbh o7

I wouldn't expect you to solo me, and if your corp doesn't have enough members to make up for the combat experience disadvantage I can certainly understand that.

I fully support your goal to try a bit of everything - it is the only way to find out what you really like. All too many people just pick 1 thing like "mining" or "missions" and try to dedicate 100% of their EVE life to that 1 thing without ever trying anything else.

As for people calling you a "coward" - I would recommend ignoring everything said in local chat, always. It is the realm of trolls - and name-calling in order to make people angry to try to get them to fight is a time honoured but often annoying EVE tradition.



If you ever do decide to try out low-sec in a cheap frigate, I would recommend roaming in FW space. The novice plexes are limited to t1 and faction frigates - so while you'll still probably be overmatched more often than not, you'll at least have something of a fighting chance. Also the FW carebears can be fun targets that a new player can actually beat - *IF* you can catch them.

There are also a lot of new-player-friendly low-sec corps, both in and out of PvP. Even if you don't join one, you might consider asking whoever murders you for advice - there will of course be some trolls, but the vast majority of PvP players are actually quite friendly and helpful if you approach them in a friendly manner. They'll still kill you without remorse - but they'll also offer good advice in most cases.



As for your solution - it might satisfy some people, but personally I like real fights with the outcome unknown P

As I say, I don't mind losing a ship, as long as I got a decent fight out of it first. But I am probably a minority in EVE I suppose, many of them do just want kills...

I suspect people would try to troll/scam you though if you actually did it, more than paying you P

The dead swans lay in the stagnant pool. They lay. They rotted. They turned Around occasionally. Bits of flesh dropped off them from Time to time. And sank into the pool's mire. They also smelt a great deal.

Paula Nancy Millstone Jennings (Sussex)

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#158 - 2016-06-09 00:55:02 UTC
Ankor Grammaten wrote:
OK, I thought you might be interested in hearing from an actual "newb", which I guess I still am after 3 months' play. This is how I feel about hi-sec, PVP, and all that, at my stage of the the game. Take it or leave it, it reflects my own experience and feelings only.

1. I absolutely assert my right to play the game any way I ****ing want, limited only by the actual mechanics of the game. If that doesn't jibe with your mental picture of the "right" way to play, tough.

2. I'm currently exploring the game in my own way, which is basically to research something, try it out, get advice if needed, try some more, then move on.

3. I tried mining and manufacturing. The idea was to mine, refine, and build, with the idea of experiencing the whole industry "path". My retriever got ganked. It was completely avoidable, it died with drones still in the bay and no GTFO destination set. Basically I froze up, despite the fact that someone had already warned me that CORE people were around. I learned a few useful things, like setting people to "red" and keeping an eye on the local chat. I was advised that a Procurer was a better choice of ship. I quit mining instead, as I had already pretty much decided that it was too boring, and didn't feel like grinding through the training for yet another ship.

3. I'm now running missions. This is more fun, but I already sense a certain boredom creeping in. Frankly, with a Vexor at level 2, it's too easy. And repetitive. I'll continue up to L4 though to get the full experience.

4. In answer to the OP, I feel your pain but I have no interest in being your target. There's a lot more to PVP than there is to PVE it seems and I don't feel confident enough to give you a good fight. Maybe if there was some expectation of equality in the combat (not safety, I get that, but even matching) I might feel differently.

5. I have (implicitly) been accused of cowardice because I don't (yet) do PVP. It's not cowardice to say that I don't want to jump into a shark infested pool equipped with only a knife. I would call it common sense. This thread has, though, given me the idea that it might be entertaining to take a cheap frigate into low-sec and see how long I can survive. I may try it. Or not :-)

6. It doesn't surprise me that people want to stay safe in EVE. The problem, as it applies to me anyway, is that the "jump" between PVE and PVP is too great. Spend a lot of time and ISK on a ship, sally forth, get pwned, rinse and repeat is not my idea of fun. Nor, as I mentioned before do I feel any responsibility to other players to provide cannon fodder for their amusement.

7. I will get to PVP, but in my own time and in my own way. I don't know what that is yet.

I have deliberately avoided offering any solutions. I wonder if my situation is common among so-called "carebears". I don't know.

Just for fun though, not too seriously, how's this for an idea? I will form a corporation of people who will hire themselves out to be killed. It'll cost you (based on overhead and a reasonable profit), but think what you get. You will be able to specify the exact ship, tank and dps within a limited menu. The pilot will fight just hard enough to give you a sense that you achieved something but will ultimately lose. You will get a message praising your skills and a hearty "GF". Alternatively, using a very low tank and dps ship, the pilot will offer no resistance at all to your attack, and if you wish simulate AFK. In this case you also get an angry message telling you that you have no right to gank and that you should be banned from the game. This may be published in any way you wish.



Admittedly the only way not to be anybody's target in Eve Online is not to log in at all.

Part of the game is to do whatever you want.

While being somebody else's target. And you need not be locked up all of the time.

What's also important to keep in mind is that how you feel about the topic does not make any difference in how you will be treated, especially on the subject of being a target (or not). But you can also keep in mind that when or if you do get targeted, it's not personal.

As for being called a coward, that was an attempt to get you to do a thing called "Honor Tanking". Chances are you don't have this trained up to at least level 4. Yes there are players who have no honor and part of their game is to make you have honor so they can point and laugh even harder.

What some people do is take Local chat and expand the character list to the point that you can hardly see what anybody is saying. Because it does not matter what anybody is saying in local, but you will want to be aware of who is in it.


As for PVP, that is, wanting it, I would suggest that you get into ASAP in any way that suits you. If you don't want to get raep-caged in nullsec (often) you can join a large nullsec alliance like Pandemic Horde or TEST. Lowsec instalock camps are common and if you are not the camper you will be the target. Look up Spectre-Fleet for that so you don't go alone and they have T1 fleet doctrines you can use as well. I highly recommend it and you'll learn the most social core aspect of this game: operating in a fleet.

Highsec PVP, on which this entire thread is about, might be a good start for a newbro and you might want to hit up some of the highsec merc groups to see if they have newbro hiring going on. Some of them do low and nullsec roams or take contracts across all kinds of space. Try to stay away from those that strictly hub-hump.

Whatever the case, keep up doing with you feel like, don't let anybody try to shame you into ending up on their killboards. Taking any and all measures not to get popped is just as acceptable as taking any and all measures to get a kill. I remember back when I used to try new things, before all you damned kids started playing on my lawn.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Ankor Grammaten
Dragonhold Enterprises
#159 - 2016-06-09 03:20:32 UTC
Hmmm, bit of misunderstanding here and there.

Nobody called me a coward in any chat room, and it wouldn't bother me if they did. "Sticks and stones" and all that. The reference was (remember "implicitly"), in this thread, to "carebears" who wouldn't fight back as cowardly. As I qualify for "carebear" by not currently doing PVP, that was an "implicit" reference to me. I was trying to refute that. No offense intended.

About "targets", I didn't mean the ever present risk of attack that we all face when we undock, rather the idea that newbs aren't somehow fulfilling their proper function by refusing to retaliate when attacked. The image in my mind was a target at a shooting range that has the sole function of being shot at. It's fair to say that I understand that EVE is not a game like some that try to even things out, for example by nerfing higher level players when they are in low level areas. I get it, I really do. That's EVE and part of why I'm still playing. I was just saying that I didn't want to play that role. I'm thinking though that, as I learn PVP, if I think I have half a chance against you, watch your back! :-)

"It's not personal". I'm sure that's true of most players. On the other hand, I find it difficult to relate to players who will kill the utterly defenseless just for fun. I'm afraid I can't leave my morality behind totally when I log on. NPCs are OK, they don't have feelings, but people do. I just hope that those who get upset either toughen up or leave the game.

I'll give FW a look. Thanks for the suggestion.

Joining a corp is very much in my future. I don't have a very good record with guilds and the like in other games, why is definitely off topic. My current corp is me and two alts, for convenience mostly. You guys have made me think about what I'd do if it gets decced. Will I fight, or shut down the corp? Part of me wants to fight those a-holes and go down in a blaze of glory!

Otherwise, thanks for the friendly responses. Fly safe! Or not, as you prefer.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#160 - 2016-06-09 05:43:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Ankor Grammaten wrote:
A point of view.


1. It is a sandbox with the limits of the sandbox set by CCP, there are a lot of people who insist that you have to play it their way, I play it as I want to play it and its perfectly fine that you do too.

2. Best way, there are a lot of people who will give you advice on things.

3. The Retreiver is an easy ship to gank, a Procurer is more difficult and hardly worth it to them in terms of value if you tank it right. Mining is boring to many myself included, while there are others who love the sight of their mining lasars hitting on rocks, I only mine to get stuff that I want, currently mining for a Citadel, but I am uinlikely to put one up, though the instant change clone bay interests me. Indy is painful unless you have top skills. Level 4's will get boring after a while trust me.

4. You touch on part of the issue here, I am not so sure equality is the way to put it, but a chance to get a kill, the OP appears to have a 200m SP character, though this does not mean that you will be totally outclassed if you get small ships along with all the core skills around the fitting and weapons to level 4 including the specific T2 weapons specialisations. But you will only beat him if he is not a good pilot and I would bet that he is pretty good. Early on in my Eve career I took on a Vet who did a war dec with a frigate and he did not kill me, he did kill a corp mate in a drake however. I did howeever make more than a dent in him. One aspect is that Eve combat is more about getting the drop on people then anything else, though using certain mechanics like transversal can make a major difference.

5. No you are not a coward, your attitude is correct, you want to have a chance, in truth jumping into a frigate can be fun, but you will lose a lot, but when you get that first solo kill you will like it, especially those good fights were you get the tactics right and everything works as intended. But you will see the real bad side of Eve with people blobbing you with combat recons, etc. An ex-corpmate did FW and he was pretty good at solo frigate fighting and he said he got about one good fight in ten, but sometimes it was worth it, but after a while he just kept getting blobbed and moved on and then stopped playing.

6. Safe is a relative word, for example the Goons are now ganking mission runners in and around Osmon, which is one reason I decided not to do it at this point (ignoring the current war dec), what is that prudence, common sense, some would call that cowardice, but why risk something when I have no real need to do so. But some people act as if they are safe, people auto piloting freighters or DST's or Industrial ships, it is mind boggling at times. The other day an auto piloting Occator barely survived a gank, it was noticed by AG who repped up its shields and armour then I came along and repped up its structure and then I followed it to Amarr and made sure it docked. Thats the level of stupid you can see. Play expecting aaht people are out to kill you and mitigate the risk by your actions and you will enjoy the game.

I mentioned that cannon fodder aspect myself as one of the reasons people don't fight war decs.

7. What I did was train up to a level where I thought I could be OK then moved to 0.0, I was 9 months into the game when I did that, I joined something called Hub Zero, two weeks into it it blew up in a pretty spectacular way and I found myself in a full on Eve emo war between the leader of that group and an ex-pet alliance of CVA and the people who this leader had annoyed. I operated there for 5 months doing some at times fun PvP, then joined a renter alliance where I perfected camper hunting. I really enjoyed it.

About your idea, why not set up a corp with like minded people that join in as an ally with other new bro corps that are war decced and have fun with the war dec. One bit of advice, avoid war decs with the blanket war dec groups, pick war decs by people like the OP. They can be fun if you are happy to lose ships and learn and maximise your strengths, don't forget the key part of this is to get the drop on people by setting something up, or using ships that negate the War deccers ship choice and skills. I hope more people get into this type of approach in hisec, because it can be fun. You sound like you have the right attitude to play verbally with CODE, they have such tender ego's its quite laughable at times.

I would suggest you are ready to PvP when you have the mindset to do it, so develop your training to fly a ship and its weapon system, then learn how to fly it, in terms of using its attributes, such as kiting ships or brawling ships, understand how to get more shots on them at higher damage by understanding your optimals and transversal, work out tactics to get them into your weapons optimal, that is a cruical part of the fight, in frigate fighting speed and agility are vital. In terms of 1v1 which is rare to really get at times, you need to have a repping ability, in general buffers don't work for 1v1, but buffers do work for small gang, though a well piloted repping ship can defeat a gang of buffer fit ships unless they have logi. Also look at the enemy ships to see what they are using, because fight selection is key to this but doing is fun.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp