These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A list from a bitter veteran. [Upppdated]

Author
Hungry Eyes
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#41 - 2011-12-19 18:10:21 UTC
fully agree with OP. overall, EVE sucks, which is why i stopped paying for it with my money. i like space, exploration, and a few other things in this game, which is why im still here. im waiting to see if anything will come of all the things they promised to fix in this "new direction".
Hungry Eyes
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#42 - 2011-12-19 18:15:59 UTC
Thorn Galen wrote:


As far as CCP goes, you must have considered at least that a company such as CCP must, by the very nature of the volatile market they are in, cater to the tastes of the gaming public they have not yet gathered ? .

As a vet, you must appreciate the complexity of running such an MMO.




overall, CCP doesnt listen. most of EVE's problems can be resolved by tweaking a few numbers. i have no sympathy for CCP. not until they deliver on some of the new promises they've made. everything that was done in Crucible will have little effect on the overall state of the game. ship balance, FW, nullsec are all in a PATHETIC state, probably the worst theyve ever been. this game is about pvp, but the pvp sucks; nothing new has been offered in years.
mirel yirrin
Ore Mongers
#43 - 2011-12-19 18:16:31 UTC
mirel yirrin, S.D (Space Doctor) here,

I must ask that you all stop posting at once - Mr Krint is in a precarious mental state, despite our best efforts. He has barricaded himself inside the computer room and taken Nurse Chambers hostage. I believe we will be able to talk him down, but currently he is unresponsive, and has taken to screaming incoherently whilst smearing his own waste over the windows in an attempt to prevent us from observing him.

Darius III for CSM! Or your money back!

Mina Sebiestar
Minmatar Inner Space Conglomerate
#44 - 2011-12-19 18:25:18 UTC
Agreed on plex but it is here to stay it is shitting on game but profit is above all else.

Also what sandbox.

You choke behind a smile a fake behind the fear

Because >>I is too hard

fuer0n
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#45 - 2011-12-19 18:28:24 UTC  |  Edited by: fuer0n
mirel yirrin wrote:
mirel yirrin, S.D (Space Doctor) here,

I must ask that you all stop posting at once - Mr Krint is in a precarious mental state, despite our best efforts. He has barricaded himself inside the computer room and taken Nurse Chambers hostage. I believe we will be able to talk him down, but currently he is unresponsive, and has taken to screaming incoherently whilst smearing his own waste over the windows in an attempt to prevent us from observing him.



funny, i remember you from somewhere:P anyway plod on. NEXT.

edit 2 :when i remember i think your ******. know the face cant place the name.
Dominic Braga
Doomheim
#46 - 2011-12-19 18:29:02 UTC
Xoria Krint wrote:
I share my girlfriend if you are interested? Best. Stuff. Ever.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pi7gwX7rjOw

Carribean Queen
Vadimus Quarrier Works
#47 - 2011-12-19 18:31:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Carribean Queen
I am so terribly sorry not enough newbs are coming into your lowsec area for you to gank on.

Removing L4's from highsec is a tarded idea.

Level 5's were removed from high security space and into lowsec. Because people like you Q.Q 'd

But no, that's not f*cking good enough for you.

Now you want L4's because it is an ISK sink. And next you'll want L3's and L2's. So that eventually newbs can only make ISK in highsec by mining or running Level 1's. And then you'll cry when they won't come to lowsec ANYWAY.

Q.Q

CCP isn't tailoring EVE to your specific liking.

Q.Q

Hate to say this, but CCP wants the player base to grow. And none of your reasons or Q.Q will do either of those things, much less increase their revenue.

You're not a bitter vet. You're a ****** or a Troll.
Swordfingers
The Swollen Horse Society
#48 - 2011-12-19 18:38:02 UTC
Xoria Krint wrote:
...Making a popular game is never a good thing. Popular games tend to try to fit everyone. There is tons of games like that out there. Why not make something different?...

Because devs have ******* families and themselves to feed. Damn, I wish that proclaiming yourself a bitter vet would be a bannable offense, the game would be much better that way.
Trainwreck McGee
Doomheim
#49 - 2011-12-19 18:43:23 UTC
o great more rantings of an ignorant senile old man (in eve terms) we dont get enough of these......

CCP Trainwreck - Weekend Custodial Engineer / CCP Necrogoats foot stool

fuer0n
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#50 - 2011-12-19 18:44:09 UTC
Swordfingers wrote:
Xoria Krint wrote:
...Making a popular game is never a good thing. Popular games tend to try to fit everyone. There is tons of games like that out there. Why not make something different?...

Because devs have ******* families and themselves to feed. Damn, I wish that proclaiming yourself a bitter vet would be a bannable offense, the game would be much better that way.



do your ******* job you fuckign lightweight tea drinking ****.
edit :work
Xoria Krint
The Angelic
#51 - 2011-12-19 19:07:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Xoria Krint
Thorn Galen wrote:

Dear Xoria,

Please bear with my wall of text as I did yours.

I will truly do my best. I will take in parts, since i'm not sober..
Thorn Galen wrote:

I will do my best not to come across as insulting or demeaning in any way. I am a vet of other MMO's (no, not WoW) for over 12 years and I see the same patterns in many players emerge after a minimum of 4 years playing one game.

You say you have played this game for eight years and have adapted along the way - I believe you have done so when you say this. However, there is a difference between adapting to a situation and accepting it 100%, or adapting to a situation and only accepting some of it, let's say 50% for discussions sake. You may have adapted, but have you ever accepted to a large degree, say 90% of changes and updates made ? Perhaps, perhaps not. That's something you need to ask yourself honestly.

I agree. I have NOT accepted some of the changes. Most of it I accept. I even think that i'm somewhat tolerant. BUT mixing with the core concept, as the sandbox thing is. I do not tolerate. Boot.ini, T20, wrong priority's, releasing new features while the old one is broken, NeX Store (who cares as long as it's only looks and not one of the most powerful things in Eve, ISK), Making lag WORSE in fleet battle (days with lags in fleetbattles, probably months), releasing new ships while the old ones are broken, waiting years for promised features etc etc... All this i can take. I don't really care. I understand that it's a complex thing and that people can't work 24/7.

But as I said, in my opinion you should not be able to buy the most powerful "item" for real cash, in a sandbox world as Eve (once was).
Thorn Galen wrote:

As far as CCP goes, you must have considered at least that a company such as CCP must, by the very nature of the volatile market they are in, cater to the tastes of the gaming public they have not yet gathered ? CCP must make money in whatever way they can. A company must grow or die. They, just like you, have to adapt. They cannot keep everyone happy all of the time, that is just impossible. They have to make decisions based on their wallet, quite literally. Make most of the people happy most of the time, that's a rule they have to apply and probably do, knowingly or not.

Infinite grow? I think they would make more people happy and make more money with changing some of the game mechanics. Some people might stop playing the game but some people will start playing as well. Many people have quit Eve over the years and when I talk to these people they often say that the reason is "They got bored" "Got tired of PvP" etc. But when you ask them more questions and dig deeper into it it seems that the devaluation of ISK was the true reason. The people that first started to play Eve in its first years, the players that are the reason that Eve and CCP even exists in its form today. Many of them liked the sandbox world (where you valued your ISK and worked for them).

Thorn Galen wrote:

Incarna was stark proof of this. I'm not going into all the details, as a vet you must be aware of the whole fiasco around that. It also came at a time when the economy, especially in Iceland, was pretty bad (it still is, worldwide). In brief, CCP were forced to comply with the needs and wants of the majority of the players and worked hard on releasing Crucible. Sure, there was some pretty bad fallout (no pun intended) from all of that, people were laid-off as other projects were shelved.

Funny "how the-world-economy-is-bad" comes up when we discuss a game. It's all about priority's. Sure, if CCP wants to become the new EA Games they need that greedy kind of mindset. But I don't wan't CCP to become the biggest game developers in the world, don't become EA Games. Stay genuine and true to your concepts and close to your player-base. As you did for so long. (Pre-Plex <3)
Thorn Galen wrote:

Like it or not, CCP listen to the majority of people. Fortunately, or unfortunately, the group you "fit" into is not the majority. There are many Eve veterans still playing this game for as long as you have and they have adapted and accepted and thus have no major gripes.
Xoria Krint
The Angelic
#52 - 2011-12-19 19:08:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Xoria Krint
The game developers should not listen to the majority of the people. Do you understand how stupid that is to do? They should have a concept, a pattern. Some kind of idea behind the work. Not just releasing stuff that they know the players wants. But they should listen to feedback, of curse. There is a difference.
Thorn Galen wrote:

There are bugs to fix, there are systems to redesign and deploy (FW, Bounty to name two). These are not easy to design and will take a large amount of development time to get them to be acceptable to the majority of players. Note I wrote acceptable, not perfect. Such systems in an MMO can never be perfect, you can never keep the entire playerbase appeased, but you can keep the majority appeased. In the interim, there will always be bugs, old and new. These too have to be addressed and by and large, a decent amount have been addressed in the release of Crucible. In no way are all of the bugs and issues resolved, it's an ongoing process.

Let it take its time. I'm patient. I hope they take goood time. I don't even care if they stop an expansion or two and just brainstormed and talked to each other about the plans of Eve. I think that would be good for the game.

Thorn Galen wrote:

With regards PLEX in this MMO. With respect, but it is an essential, no, critical part of Eve for one very simple reason - CCP needs the cash, fullstop. Players want PLEX, players want ISK and more ISK to buy more things. If (the majority) of players where indeed earning the copious amounts of ISK you say they are from Level 4 missions, there would be very little need for PLEX as players would be forced to pay real money for subs, instead of earning the Plex. This PLEX issue is circular and has its' pro's and con's. You Like, I don't. I like, you don't - and so things go. It's a matter of acceptance, not just adapting. CCP must grow and to grow they need cash. Cash comes from a constant subscriber base as well as new subscriptions and PLEX.

With respect, Eve would survive without PLEX. CCP would. Some players would left, some would join. CCP could grow without PLEX. They could grow with only subscription. But if they wan't to develop 10games at the same time, they would not.

Thorn Galen wrote:

I'm not even going to go into what the Nex store could potentially do to this game, suffice it to say that the majority of players who want WiS, want NeX. However, the majority of players who do not want WiS do not want NeX either. What to do ? For now, the best and only thing to do is to leave matters stand as they are and focus on FiS and fiction long-standing problems.

As a vet, you must appreciate the complexity of running such an MMO. It's not good for you feeling bad about what's going on - it doesn't "fit" completely with your expectations of what Eve should be, what is was to you in the past, in 2004.

In signing off, let me just say that it is far easier to insult and perjure in these forums than it is to enter into a reasonably intelligent conversation. That again is endemic to the Internet as a whole, not just Eve. Never take it seriously. It's a game, enjoy it or you don't. In feeling bad about it, you want it to be like it was when you enjoyed it, but in truth, it can never be the same again.

Peace, out
o/


Give me WiS and NeX, i don't care. But fix the game first. And thank you for a more intelligent post then the most in this forum could be capable of writing. Much appreciated.

Peace
o7
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
Ferguson Alliance
#53 - 2011-12-19 19:17:33 UTC
Agree almost entirely. (I don't have a problem with PLEX-for-gametime, and I'd replace it on your list with 'mandatory T3 boost alts')

CCP seems hellbent on killing everything that makes EVE special (the sandbox, the harshness, the struggle, the 'virtual world' immersion) while devoting almost no resources to EVE's biggest problems (botting, big RMTing alliances, risk-free ISK fire hoses, client hacks.)

Many if not most, of the voices of reason are gone (Mynxee and Teadaze to name 2) so the jabbering WoWtards significantly outnumber the few of us who remain.

As you say, the few of us who remain are also banned for frivolous/nonexistent reasons because we have the audacity to tell it like it is.
Xoria Krint
The Angelic
#54 - 2011-12-19 19:27:48 UTC
Carribean Queen wrote:
I am so terribly sorry not enough newbs are coming into your lowsec area for you to gank on.

Removing L4's from highsec is a tarded idea.

Level 5's were removed from high security space and into lowsec. Because people like you Q.Q 'd

But no, that's not f*cking good enough for you.

Now you want L4's because it is an ISK sink. And next you'll want L3's and L2's. So that eventually newbs can only make ISK in highsec by mining or running Level 1's. And then you'll cry when they won't come to lowsec ANYWAY.

........ Do you even know how much money you can make in high security space without both mining and agents? It's not like that's where the big money comes from.
Carribean Queen wrote:

CCP isn't tailoring EVE to your specific liking.

It was, for long. Probably longer then you have played Eve. It was for many more then me. Hence the "bitter vets".
Carribean Queen wrote:

Hate to say this, but CCP wants the player base to grow. And none of your reasons or Q.Q will do either of those things, much less increase their revenue.

You're not a bitter vet. You're a ****** or a Troll.

I would love to see the players base grow. But I truly believe that it can be done without PLEX. It has been done without PLEX, for long. And I also believe that it can be done without dumbing the game down.

I love you so much. I want you in a cage as well. So cutie. A/S/L? Blink
Knug LiDi
The Dark Space Initiative
Scary Wormhole People
#55 - 2011-12-19 19:40:44 UTC
PLEX was brought in as a fix to RMT.

RMT, which may have existing in 2004, but nowhere near as big as it became.

As EVE grew in age and player base, RMT grew because the market for RMT grew.

The players in 2004 and later grew the market for RMT.

That's right. You guys.

Because ISK was 'so hard' to earn, you wanted a short cut. So RMT was born.

That's right. You guys.

This is only my 3rd year in EVE, but in that entire time RMT was being fought. Its a loosing battle, much like the 'war on drugs'. PLEX was brought in as a way for folks to get ISK for cash and take away the market from the RMT guys. Here in Ontario, we have the LCBO to sell booze. The Government sells booze to cut out the bootleggers and the moonshiners. Oh, its not perfect, but that way the government gets its cut, we get our booze. Here, with PLEX, those that need ISK can buy it with cash and CCP gets its cut. Those that have ISK can buy game time (that play for free feeling) and increase the player base.

You're upset that folks with cash can buy ISK to buy superior ships and equipment. I agree.

I understand your anger.

But I am not upset at PLEX. Its an evil necessitated by the actions of those that feel the need to buy ISK for cash.

I am far, far more upset that there is a legitimate market for old characters. People can buy and sell in-game characters for ISK. THAT I consider far, far worse than PLEX, worse than RMT. PLEX lets someone buy in game stuff for cash. Buying characters buys TIME. The time that many of us invest in this game.

So forgive me if I am not upset at PLEX. Forgive me for managing one of my accounts by buying PLEX.

But don't be surprised if I lay the blame for the need for PLEX in the first place at your bitter vet feet and curse you for the idiocy of transfer of in-game characters for ISK.

You were around when the seeds were sown. You were there when the market first grew. You were there to legitimize character transfer. You were there when making game changes to kill RMT before it could establish itself was a possibility.

Not me.

The irony is that the future of EVE lies NOT with you, but with me and those that follow after. And we are the ones that have the most to loose due to your actions those years ago.

Bitter vet? Bite me.


If only we could fall into a woman's arms

without falling into her hands

Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
#56 - 2011-12-19 19:43:55 UTC
@Xoria Krint

*Salutes*

Respect Sir, for comprehending what I wrote and responding in kind. Thank you for your insights.

(I subsequently found more spelling errors in my text and I blame my keyboard Gremlin, but will rather let it stand as-is)

o/

Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#57 - 2011-12-19 19:56:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Vertisce Soritenshi
I had a longer post but...here is a shorter version.

The OP sucks.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821

Xoria Krint
The Angelic
#58 - 2011-12-19 19:58:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Xoria Krint
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
I had a longer post but...here is a shorter version.

The OP sucks.

Oh noe.. I liked the longer version better. Please switch back <3
(was a lot of aggression in it. Pretty interesting. I have seen it before.. The aggression of the defenders of the PLEX)

Tinfoil time.
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
Ferguson Alliance
#59 - 2011-12-19 20:00:31 UTC
Knug LiDi wrote:
------Well reasoned WoT--------

Bitter vet? Bite me.



I agree with your wall of text. That's why I have no problem with PLEX-for-gametime.

I also agree that EVE would be a vastly better game if they had never allowed character sales in the first place.

I don't get the hostility in your closing remark, but whatever. Bitter vets are generally more principled and care more about the game than CCP or the fanbois/sycophants do. I doubt this guy supported character sales at the time. Do you have some evidence that he did?

Xoria Krint
The Angelic
#60 - 2011-12-19 20:04:39 UTC
Jonathan Ferguson wrote:
Knug LiDi wrote:
------Well reasoned WoT--------

Bitter vet? Bite me.



I agree with your wall of text. That's why I have no problem with PLEX-for-gametime.

I also agree that EVE would be a vastly better game if they had never allowed character sales in the first place.

I don't get the hostility in your closing remark, but whatever. Bitter vets are generally more principled and care more about the game than CCP or the fanbois/sycophants do. I doubt this guy supported character sales at the time. Do you have some evidence that he did?


Character selling is just as bad as PLEX. PLEX-for-gametime is a pretty good compromise, i would both adapt to it - and accept it. But as it is now. No Eve of mine.