These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

"WHAT A DEBACLE!" - Vince McMahon - Michael Scott

Author
Maekchu
Doomheim
#21 - 2016-05-29 21:21:10 UTC
So post and topic removed, as well as Charity Citadel corp closed. Nothing has yet been announced from Chribba...

Project closed? Not sure if fishy or not. I thought the initial idea was quite cool, even if it would inflate the PLEX price.

Anyway, if you used the setup to get investors and now run with the money, you should just be banned for scamming using the PLEX 4 GOOD.

Looking forward to see where this is going.
Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#22 - 2016-05-29 21:33:45 UTC
Sasha Nemtsov
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2016-05-29 22:01:16 UTC
Tipa Riot wrote:
Sasha Nemtsov wrote:
Areen Sassel wrote:


That said, and I'm not saying he _isn't_ involved, but I ain't seen anything from Chribba to say he is...


It's on Reddit, item 9 at the moment.

No post from Chribba in the thread. Usually Chribba immediately confirms claims of his involvement in the forum. I'm surprised too, that this did not happen yet ... until then, we have only the words of OP's freshly created forum posting alt.


Thanks, Tipa; I didn't read the Reddit post correctly. My apologies for unwittingly misleading folks.
Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#24 - 2016-05-30 11:07:17 UTC
Maekchu wrote:
So post and topic removed, as well as Charity Citadel corp closed. Nothing has yet been announced from Chribba...

Project closed? Not sure if fishy or not. I thought the initial idea was quite cool, even if it would inflate the PLEX price.

Anyway, if you used the setup to get investors and now run with the money, you should just be banned for scamming using the PLEX 4 GOOD.

Looking forward to see where this is going.



TBH it may well not have been 'suspicious' but either Chribba or the OP may have reconsidered the plan after seeing objections. It was even polarizing on Reddit.

FWIW I'd be 100% behind an entity (alliance, trader, corp, whatever) setting up a Citadel as a competitive market for themselves then announcing "July 14th-22nd all proceeds from this Citadel will be used to fund a charity roam (with the Citadel owners buying ridiculous ships for the participants, then sending them off to lose them in hilarious fashions while streaming it and soliciting donations to IRL charities). I was part of "Suicide Gank 4 GOOD" which was somewhat similar to this although linked to a PLEX 4 GOOD appeal.

It's the permanence that I have issues with. Both the permanent CCP enforced "this corporation cannot scam" and the permanent "if you attack this structure you are bad IRL" guilttripping.

OP - If you do set up a Fortizar for yourself and want to set up a temporary charity event, let me know and I'll be in.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Rhivre
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#25 - 2016-05-30 12:45:41 UTC
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:
Maekchu wrote:
So post and topic removed, as well as Charity Citadel corp closed. Nothing has yet been announced from Chribba...

Project closed? Not sure if fishy or not. I thought the initial idea was quite cool, even if it would inflate the PLEX price.

Anyway, if you used the setup to get investors and now run with the money, you should just be banned for scamming using the PLEX 4 GOOD.

Looking forward to see where this is going.



TBH it may well not have been 'suspicious' but either Chribba or the OP may have reconsidered the plan after seeing objections. It was even polarizing on Reddit.

FWIW I'd be 100% behind an entity (alliance, trader, corp, whatever) setting up a Citadel as a competitive market for themselves then announcing "July 14th-22nd all proceeds from this Citadel will be used to fund a charity roam (with the Citadel owners buying ridiculous ships for the participants, then sending them off to lose them in hilarious fashions while streaming it and soliciting donations to IRL charities). I was part of "Suicide Gank 4 GOOD" which was somewhat similar to this although linked to a PLEX 4 GOOD appeal.

It's the permanence that I have issues with. Both the permanent CCP enforced "this corporation cannot scam" and the permanent "if you attack this structure you are bad IRL" guilttripping.

OP - If you do set up a Fortizar for yourself and want to set up a temporary charity event, let me know and I'll be in.



I agree, it is not the "Profits that go to PLEX4GOOD" per sé that is the problem, it is the effective CCP endorsement of a player structure, and the permanence, along with the guilt tripping that is the problem.

Most of the critics have, in one form or another taken part in charitable stuff throughout Eve, so we are not objecting to that.
Termerity Faceturn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#26 - 2016-05-30 14:58:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Termerity Faceturn
Being dealt with in other thread.

Always strive to be the best version of yourself.

The universe deserves no less.

Maekchu
Doomheim
#27 - 2016-05-30 15:16:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Maekchu
Termerity Faceturn wrote:
Anyone who has genuine, intelligent questions or interest in the project can follow the project's Twitter @CharityCitadel.

Interesting how the official forums for every MMO exhibit the same... traits. Lol

Yeah, I was indeed checking your twitter, but no announcements have been made on the topic on why the corp was closed and why this post was deleted.

While my initial post may have come across a bit provocative, it still had a genuine question on what the hell happened to the project. I think that is a valid question, given the closure of both the corp and this thread, with no response on your part what-so-ever. Given this projects scope and influence on both EvE and the real world, I hope you can see the interest and concern from people following the progress of the Charity Citadel.

I'm not sure it's a great thing to insult people, just because you didn't do a great PR work yourself. All this could have been avoided if you would have communicated properly on what is happening.
Sasha Nemtsov
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2016-05-30 15:21:24 UTC
Termerity Faceturn wrote:
The project is still very much on, and in fact is on the cusp of even greater growth. If anyone actually doubts Chribba's involvement, feel free to contact him yourselves. I removed the posts here because there are more... effective ways of reaching the EVE playerbase.

Anyone who has genuine, intelligent questions or interest in the project can follow the project's Twitter @CharityCitadel.

Interesting how the official forums for every MMO exhibit the same... traits. Lol


Termerity, I am opposed to the proposal, as it currently stands. Does that mean that my interest is false or that I lack intelligence?

The opinions of those who don't rush to support you may in fact be helpful in pointing up potential and potentially damaging conflicts of purpose.

Even if you, in your majesty, do not consider the EVE Forums worthy of your engagement, CCP certainly does. You will probably require some assistance from them in ensuring the success of your venture. Best be diplomatic, no? Better surely to answer your critics where you find them, and with wise words and cogent explanations, than to dictate whence they should follow you in order to gain a hearing.

If your kind of charity is the sort which craves public adulation , perhaps it would be better to place it where all good charity should begin - at home, among these Forums.

I do not doubt for one moment that you believe fervently in what you're trying to achieve. I'm only surprised at the arrogance of someone who preaches 'charity' but shows so little of it to his fellow players.
Rhivre
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#29 - 2016-05-30 15:51:02 UTC
I have no doubt that you fervently, truly, zealously believe that you are saving Eve from the greater evil of a New Jita, as outlined in the nightmare scenario which inspired you to do the charity citadel. (So, please do not pretend it is charity which is driving you, it is the fear on a blog of some big alliance running a New Jita)

Dismissing anyone who has concerns about the project as false or unintelligent is, well, not very charitable.

You have not answered key questions, either here or on Reddit, your standard reply is "I am a good person, CCP will protect you all from scams, and anyone who doubts me is bad".

So, do you actually have answers to questions and concerns, or are you planning on just batting them around and hoping no one reads them?


Plleasure Hub
Municorn
#30 - 2016-05-30 16:51:31 UTC
+1 to the sentiment that we are not completely against an idea like this, but the permanence and totality of a charity citadel. It is one thing if you were using Chribba to supervise the funding of a new neutral Citadel, which will donate 1-10% of its earnings to charity, or something along those lines. But the way you have laid it out, this venture is the most extreme version, being 100% charity-focused. You leave no room for doubt that attacking such a venture in any way would cause direct harm to its charitable giving. Add to that the fact that you are doing all of this inside a fantasy space MMO, blurring the lines between a thriving fiction and the real world. That is not inherently a bad thing, but it can be, even if your intentions are good.

These are legitimate concerns from good people, and your dismissive attitude is unwarranted. You should take the time to openly consider intelligent criticism, as doing so could ensure the success of the project and perhaps mold it into an even better model. I am sure that many critics in this thread are good people. Personally, I love giving back to the community and aiding charitable organizations. IRL, I am volunteering countless hours building information systems for my local library.

Frankly, I think it is the fact that we do care about charities that has us so concerned. I would feel terrible organizing a fleet assault on a purely charitable citadel. You need to find a happy medium where you can effectively raise funds for PLEX4GOOD without making the droves of us with hearts feel guilty for out-of-game reasons about targeting the wrong citadel.

"There's no meaningful difference between a real and a virtual world. It's pointless to ask anyone who they really are. All you can do is accept and believe in them, because whoever they are in your mind, is their true identity." — Kazuto Kirigaya

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#31 - 2016-05-30 17:01:41 UTC
Just to confirm that I've been asked to hold the CEO position of the Citadel owning corporation to ensure that the ISK goes to the right places and that suddenly docking rights etc change without prior notice.

Sorry for the delay, I'm on vacation atm

/c

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

Areen Sassel
Dirac Angestun Gesept
#32 - 2016-05-30 17:12:05 UTC
Chribba wrote:
Just to confirm that I've been asked to hold the CEO position of the Citadel owning corporation to ensure that the ISK goes to the right places and that suddenly docking rights etc change without prior notice.


Not your fault, but it is rather unfortunate that your partner threw a tantrum in the few days before you made this post.

When you have time I would be grateful if you would sum up your understanding of the project.
Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#33 - 2016-05-30 17:34:57 UTC
Termerity Faceturn wrote:
The project is still very much on, and in fact is on the cusp of even greater growth. If anyone actually doubts Chribba's involvement, feel free to contact him yourselves. I removed the posts here because there are more... effective ways of reaching the EVE playerbase.

Anyone who has genuine, intelligent questions or interest in the project can follow the project's Twitter @CharityCitadel.

Interesting how the official forums for every MMO exhibit the same... traits. Lol


I am sure that kind of arrogance will get the MD very friendly..

Good luck with your borderline scammy project. The fact that you got Chribba on as a standard 3rd party service means very little to people in here..

Your not just handing over a Capital ship, or securing collateral.. Your using the Chribba name, and charity to paint a BIG "Red Cross" on an admitted future War Funding Machine!

and CCP will never guarantee anti-scamming, especially not from a potentially not really neutral body.

Your attempt to monopolize the Citadel Market Hub Wars, via goodwill, charity and the Chribba brand is not working on me, I find it offensive against anything that is financial PVP.

Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#34 - 2016-05-30 17:38:47 UTC
Chribba wrote:
Just to confirm that I've been asked to hold the CEO position of the Citadel owning corporation to ensure that the ISK goes to the right places and that suddenly docking rights etc change without prior notice.

Sorry for the delay, I'm on vacation atm

/c


This project is NOT your average 3rd party service.. I hope you consider how your Brand is being used to basically promote a service, that was admitted is potentially NOT neutral at all.

So Unless you Chribba with the CEO post, and ofc Shares Majority on hand, promise oversight in the form of proper audits, then you should really reconsider lending your name to this thing..

No audits, no oversight, no trust..
Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2016-05-30 17:44:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Tipa Riot
The OP's replies show an unhealthy amount of arrogance for the to-be market and charity leader of New Eden.

I'm my own NPC alt.

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#36 - 2016-05-30 17:46:07 UTC
I can just see it in the overview now





"Ricdic Citadel"

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log

Termerity Faceturn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#37 - 2016-05-30 17:49:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Termerity Faceturn
Being dealt with in other thread.

Always strive to be the best version of yourself.

The universe deserves no less.

Caleb Ayrania
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#38 - 2016-05-30 18:17:00 UTC
Termerity Faceturn wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/4lhci2/chribba_joins_charity_citadel_as_ceo_project_will/

For an intelligent discussion of the topic with actual interest in things like facts, click that link.


This is priceless...

I cant defend my idea to people that do markets as primary thing in EVE, so come to retardit and post where they can be trolled and downvoted to the max..

How about you answer peoples legit questions instead of this pathetic obfuscation..

Or maybe you can give the same reply as the "Gamblers"; "What is an audit"..

I would guess your financial expert source for the doomsday scenario is Gevlon Goblin..

So the solution to other peoples potential monopoly is to give it to you and chribba? I think I would like to say no thanks, and keep a competition based market..

As pretty much always Gevlon is WRONG, and this idea is a horrible attempt to get ahead on scaremongering, and other peoples long developed brands..

Rhivre
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#39 - 2016-05-30 18:18:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Rhivre
Termerity Faceturn wrote:
Areen Sassel wrote:
Not your fault, but it is rather unfortunate that your partner threw a tantrum in the few days before you made this post.


A long time ago someone realized and shared the simple fact that 1+1=2. Was he throwing a tantrum for recognizing and stating a plain and obvious fact? It appears some here would make such a disingenuous assertion. Thank them for the reaction you'll get from most EVE players when you even bring up the topic of the official forums: laughter and derisive mockery and laughter and horror stories and laughter.

All mature people who wish to engage in meaningful conversation, see my signature, join us there and I'll be more than happy to engage in discussion with those who are actually interested in things like facts and reason. I answer all questions and welcome all criticisms there, where it's actually worth it.

Lol




Will you actually answer my questions on reddit then, as you are avoiding them here.

Also, while you have obviously surveyed eve players, did you ask them for their views on Reddit as a platform for intelligent discourse about Eve.


In case it is difficult to find my questions on reddit, which I assume it must be, as the fact is that you have answered 0 of them, here they are again in short bullet form:

1: When you talk about funding charitable wars, who is the "You" who you will listen to? Will it be whoever has funded you the most that month? If someone pays you 100b in broker fees per month, and asks that you do a charity invasion of an area, would you do it?

2: If the owner of the perimeter citadel changed the name to "All profits to PLEX4GOOD" would you throw your support behind them? If not, why not? If GSF opened a charity citadel, would you also throw your support behind that?

3: Have you had anything close to confirmation from CCP about their endorsement?

4: Will your hub be close enough to 4-4 to allow for offshoring

5: Assume you take over the New Eden economy (as stated in the opening section of your post), how will players who do not wish to pay their broker fees to charity be able to get a refund, will they be able to pay 0% fees, as, if you become the "New Jita" (copyright Gevlon 2016), players will have no choice but to use your citadel.

6: Have you dropped your original idea to fund "neutral service corps", and if not, how are you defining these?

7: You namedrop a lot of charities (although, B4R is not an ingame charity), do you have statements from the people who run these charities.

8: Can I as a trader choose which charities my ISK goes to?


EDIT: One final question, you have followed the rules for P4G by doing this? "In order to register your intent to host a fund raising drive, you must create a thread on the In game events and gatherings forum, prefixed with the tag "PLEX for GOOD" in the subject, detailing the charity drive, and file a Support Ticket under the Community category for approval. The event may only go ahead once approval has been given by the Community Team."

https://web.archive.org/web/20160222095836/https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/PLEX_for_GOOD
Alexi Stokov
State War Academy
Caldari State
#40 - 2016-05-30 18:18:50 UTC
Termerity Faceturn wrote:
Areen Sassel wrote:
Not your fault, but it is rather unfortunate that your partner threw a tantrum in the few days before you made this post.


A long time ago someone realized and shared the simple fact that 1+1=2. Was he throwing a tantrum for recognizing and stating a plain and obvious fact? It appears some here would make such a disingenuous assertion. Thank them for the reaction you'll get from most EVE players when you even bring up the topic of the official forums: laughter and derisive mockery and laughter and horror stories and laughter.

All mature people who wish to engage in meaningful conversation, see my signature, join us there and I'll be more than happy to engage in discussion with those who are actually interested in things like facts and reason. I answer all questions and welcome all criticisms there, where it's actually worth it.

Lol



Why is criticism and question worth more there than here....especially since they would be the same questions and criticisms? Of course the obvious question becomes why did you post here at all if the official forums are trash?