These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Lack of new content for 0.5 to 1.0 space

First post
Author
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#21 - 2016-05-02 16:44:15 UTC
sci0gon wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
While you are here complaining about CCP not catering to the already over-indulged and over-privileged solo PVErs of high sec, real PVE players are killing NPCs in interesting ways (while NOT dying to try-hard PVPrs) and having fun doing it outside of high sec..



Thats an interesting mindset you seem to have on the solo pve'rs of high sec, would you care to elaborate why you feel that the high sec pve'rs are over-indulged and privileged?


This thread.

Quote:

The main point the op is making is the lack of content for pve.


There is no lack of content for pve. There is a lack of will on the part of some who PVE to find and enjoy the content that already exists. It's pretty dumb to ask for more content when you haven't exhausted the content that already exists, which is what many high sec mission runners do.

Basically, they are blaming their lack of ingenuity and drive (which would lead them to better content) on CCP for not spoon feeding them more and different ways to save the same Damsel.
kage1982
Forks are for Fat Girls
#22 - 2016-05-02 16:44:50 UTC  |  Edited by: kage1982
Jenn aSide wrote:


Ah, so you want more missions.

Like lvl 5 missions in low sec?

Like Pirate lvl 1-4 missions (burner missions included in the lvl 4s) in npc null? Missions like CONCORD Blockade that aren't available in high sec?

Like Faction Warfare Missions?

Like the 2 Pirate Epic Arcs (which you can start in high sec and do in small hard to kill ships)?

Like the low sec COSMOS missions and complexes and the null sec COSMOS complexes?



Have you ready the original post? Ive stated clearly i have no interest to go to low security space and be forced to take part in pvp that i find boring.
Im not bothered if a high security space version of the above would yield less profit, its the general interest that id like to do different missions.
As ive stated ive already done burner missions, there are not many of them.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#23 - 2016-05-02 16:49:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
kage1982 wrote:


Ive stated clearly i have no interest to go to low security space and be forced to take part in pvp that i find boring.


Sooo, high sec missions have gotten boring to you but going to the places that have more, different and better missions is also boring.

Which proves my point. The problem is your preferences and lack of will to try different things. your boredom is your fault.

Tell me, have you done all of the epic arcs in high sec? All the COSMOS missions?

Quote:

Im not bothered if a high security space version of the above would yield less profit, its the general interest that id like to do different missions.
As ive stated ive already done burner missions, there are not many of them.


The above reads as "Can i PLEASE have my cake and eat it too?". Sorry if this sounds harsh but posters like you are why the PVEing community gets such a bad name.
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#24 - 2016-05-02 17:04:32 UTC
there was a time when we would have executed a bunch of random carebears for this ... apparently i may have to start doing that again
embrel
BamBam Inc.
#25 - 2016-05-02 17:08:42 UTC
I'm a PVE'r too. Had I stayed in HS, I'd probably have quit long ago.
Missions become boring fast and I don't see a way to change that.
Solo in 0.0 or a WH adds a certain flavor that, for most, isn't enough, but I'm simple.
kage1982
Forks are for Fat Girls
#26 - 2016-05-02 17:11:14 UTC
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
there was a time when we would have executed a bunch of random carebears for this ... apparently i may have to start doing that again



There was also a time when folk read the original post and knew that such insults were just met with rolled eyes and ignorance.
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#27 - 2016-05-02 17:14:57 UTC
kage1982 wrote:
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
there was a time when we would have executed a bunch of random carebears for this ... apparently i may have to start doing that again



There was also a time when folk read the original post and knew that such insults were just met with rolled eyes and ignorance.

i fail to see the insult there, we were well known for it
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#28 - 2016-05-02 17:15:17 UTC
kage1982 wrote:
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
there was a time when we would have executed a bunch of random carebears for this ... apparently i may have to start doing that again



There was also a time when folk read the original post and knew that such insults were just met with rolled eyes and ignorance.


You don't know how to solo burner missions (by your own admission) and someone else is ignorant lol.

#High sec.
kage1982
Forks are for Fat Girls
#29 - 2016-05-02 17:16:52 UTC
embrel wrote:
I'm a PVE'r too. Had I stayed in HS, I'd probably have quit long ago.
Missions become boring fast and I don't see a way to change that.
Solo in 0.0 or a WH adds a certain flavor that, for most, isn't enough, but I'm simple.

If WH space wasnt all 0.0 id be in there more often
Cien Banchiere
Extrinsic Arcadia Distribution
#30 - 2016-05-02 17:21:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Cien Banchiere
The fact you choose to stay in HS and are tired of the same mission is not the fault of CCP. There are still several avenues of pve to explore but you chose not to. That's on you

No one can argue they don't need to update and add some new ones, but you haven't even tried looking into types of pve. CCP also have bigger things to fix and worry about the pve at the moment.
kage1982
Forks are for Fat Girls
#31 - 2016-05-02 17:24:03 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
kage1982 wrote:
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
there was a time when we would have executed a bunch of random carebears for this ... apparently i may have to start doing that again



There was also a time when folk read the original post and knew that such insults were just met with rolled eyes and ignorance.


You don't know how to solo burner missions (by your own admission) and someone else is ignorant lol.

#High sec.


Not quite i said you dont run them solo. As that would be rather dull . rather like your comments. I begin to tire with the input from TEST to be honest. Go and enjoy the game in your own way, if you feel the need to comment on Mission running post while you dont do them well that says a lot about you. I shall take the advice of your alliance with your flaming and will just ignore you. :)
Salah ad-Din al-Jawahiri
Dreamweb Industries
Novus Ordo.
#32 - 2016-05-02 17:39:45 UTC
Try fitting some green and blue, OP, and you'll be given a very special and exciting mission you'll enjoy for sure. It's called "Outrun the ganker". Pirate

Agent of the New Order

Live by the Code - die by the Code.

The Voice of Highsec

sci0gon
Kaira Innovations
#33 - 2016-05-02 17:41:09 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
There is no lack of content for pve. There is a lack of will on the part of some who PVE to find and enjoy the content that already exists. It's pretty dumb to ask for more content when you haven't exhausted the content that already exists, which is what many high sec mission runners do.

Basically, they are blaming their lack of ingenuity and drive (which would lead them to better content) on CCP for not spoon feeding them more and different ways to save the same Damsel.


The lack of content comes from players who have no interest in moving past high sec due to the higher risk of being caught up in pvp and are just not interested in it. Some of those players couldnt care less about what happens outside their own bubble of safety and its not really a matter of players not having the will to do things, they simply chose not to.

This mindset is shared through a lot of players who still remain in high sec and its just a shame that the amount of people who actively use the boards vs the subscriptions excluding alt accounts dont really match up, so things like this receive less backing from other players of the same nature.

Also last i checked cosmos missions are not like they used to be where you could repeat them every month, it was a one time deal.

I know ccp has tried countless times to move more and more of players out of high sec through several updates that made both low sec and null look more appealing but some players are stuck in their ways which is why i personally dont blame neither side.
Digits Kho
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#34 - 2016-05-02 17:42:47 UTC
OP wants new missions n HS ?
Digits Kho
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#35 - 2016-05-02 17:44:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Digits Kho
del
kage1982
Forks are for Fat Girls
#36 - 2016-05-02 17:46:24 UTC  |  Edited by: kage1982
Salah ad-Din al-Jawahiri wrote:
Try fitting some green and blue, OP, and you'll be given a very special and exciting mission you'll enjoy for sure. It's called "Outrun the ganker". Pirate



Are you done measuring your penis in public son? Im guessing your a ganker eh Pirate yarrr look at me a space pirate . Its been done to death.

sci0gon wrote:
The lack of content comes from players who have no interest in moving past high sec due to the higher risk of being caught up in pvp and are just not interested in it. Some of those players couldnt care less about what happens outside their own bubble of safety and its not really a matter of players not having the will to do things, they simply chose not to.


This mindset is shared through a lot of players who still remain in high sec and its just a shame that the amount of people who actively use the boards vs the subscriptions excluding alt accounts dont really match up, so things like this receive less backing from other players of the same nature.

Also last i checked cosmos missions are not like they used to be where you could repeat them every month, it was a one time deal.

I know ccp has tried countless times to move more and more of players out of high sec through several updates that made both low sec and null look more appealing but some players are stuck in their ways which is why i personally dont blame neither side.


Nail hit on head, cheers for the decent response :)
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#37 - 2016-05-02 17:50:02 UTC
kage1982 wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
kage1982 wrote:
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
there was a time when we would have executed a bunch of random carebears for this ... apparently i may have to start doing that again



There was also a time when folk read the original post and knew that such insults were just met with rolled eyes and ignorance.


You don't know how to solo burner missions (by your own admission) and someone else is ignorant lol.

#High sec.


Not quite i said you dont run them solo. As that would be rather dull . rather like your comments. I begin to tire with the input from TEST to be honest. Go and enjoy the game in your own way, if you feel the need to comment on Mission running post while you dont do them well that says a lot about you. I shall take the advice of your alliance with your flaming and will just ignore you. :)


You could run lvl 4 missions from right now till doomsday, you probably wouldn't catch up to me. While old people were walking uphill in the snow to get to school, I was saving the Damsel and Stopping the Thief for the millionth time.

And I'm speaking for me, not TEST (the fact that you mention my alliance means you know your argument is crap). I'm not telling anyone to enjoy the game my way. I'm saying that YOU are the problem here, not CCP's lack of adding more content. I don't care how you play, I'm saying it's silly to be bored in a game that has so much to offer just because you can't figure things out.

If you want better content go get it, it already exists.
Pandora Carrollon
Provi Rapid Response
#38 - 2016-05-02 17:56:14 UTC
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
there was a time when we would have executed a bunch of random carebears for this ... apparently i may have to start doing that again


Ralph, I counsel that you don't make it random... please feel free to target specific Carebears that need a refresher course in how exciting HiSec can be.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#39 - 2016-05-02 17:59:54 UTC
sci0gon wrote:

The lack of content comes from players who have no interest in moving past high sec due to the higher risk of being caught up in pvp and are just not interested in it.


What one is 'interested in' means nothing. Either you want better content (which means trading safety for it) or you don't want better content (at which point you stay put).

But some people want "option C" which is "give me new stuff, but I don't want to trade anything for it". Sorry, but no, EVE should never be one of those games.

Quote:

Also last i checked cosmos missions are not like they used to be where you could repeat them every month, it was a one time deal.


COSMOS missions never could be repeated.

Quote:

I know ccp has tried countless times to move more and more of players out of high sec through several updates that made both low sec and null look more appealing but some players are stuck in their ways which is why i personally dont blame neither side.


CCP has tried no such thing. The "they want me to leave high sec" idea has always been a delirious high sec construct, based on the self serving idea that someone "cares about the way others play". Newsflash, they don't care.

Neither do I. If none of you ever leave high sec that just more anoms and plexes and loot for me. I simply dislike selfish and greedy people who think developer resources should be devoted to their specific nonsense needs when they could simply enjoy what already exists while those developers spend their time doing better things for everyone.
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#40 - 2016-05-02 18:12:29 UTC
Pandora Carrollon wrote:
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
there was a time when we would have executed a bunch of random carebears for this ... apparently i may have to start doing that again


Ralph, I counsel that you don't make it random... please feel free to target specific Carebears that need a refresher course in how exciting HiSec can be.

Oh it wasn't actually random,
their own hubris was invariably the deciding factor in who was martyred, regardless of their actual involvement in the initial "sin".