These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dear CCP where does one draw the line?

First post
Author
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#21 - 2016-04-09 06:57:03 UTC
Quite a development.... Shocked





Oh the drama!

I think the more Eve players than ever, and even non-players given that Reddit is "the other site" are going to get a taste of "srs Eve is srs".

That plus "dirty tricks" and laundry being aired, I don't think things are going to be the same no matter what the outcome of this war.

Top kek as they say..

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Kyra Lee
Doomheim
#22 - 2016-04-09 08:26:15 UTC
Granted I know very little of all the drama involved and I can really only base my opinion on the "facts" presented in this thread and my personal knowledge of networking here is what I think.

CCP has no obligation to protect people from their own stupidity. Clicking a suspect link and having someone steal your personally identifiable information is not with CCPs realm to deal with. What that person does once he has your info could be though. If information obtained outside of the game is obtained through an illegal act and is then used to carry out an action inside of the game then it is within CCPs realm to adjudicate.

We have seen several times where CCP has taken ingame action for out of game actions. Defacing the EvE monument, and banning people for the singing ransoms are just a couple.

There are quite a few things CCP would need to investigate and decide on. If any of this proves true they should at least ban the person that took action ingame.
Mephiztopheleze
Laphroaig Inc.
#23 - 2016-04-09 08:31:58 UTC
Sentient Blade wrote:
On one hand, it was a classic sting that was seemingly well executed and took advantage of awful opsec on Lemba's part... he got baited plain and simple.


so much this. by simply using a VPN every time he logged into his leak account on Reddit, Lemba would never have been caught by such a simple piece of counter-intel work.

I think making that information public was pretty rude.

Amyclas Amatin wrote:
CCP has no jurisdiction over what we do with IT services outside the game.


*cough* Bonus Room? *cough*

Occasional Resident Newbie Correspondent for TMC: http://themittani.com/search/site/mephiztopheleze

This is my Forum Main. My Combat Alt is sambo Inkura

Violet Hurst
Fedaya Recon
#24 - 2016-04-09 08:36:58 UTC
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#25 - 2016-04-09 09:14:00 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Buldath
Kyra Lee wrote:
Clicking a suspect link and having someone steal your personally identifiable information is not with CCPs realm to deal with. What that person does once he has your info could be though. If information obtained outside of the game is obtained through an illegal act...

It's neither illegal, nor personally identifiable.

Even CCP track your IP address both in game and when you use the forum as outlined here:
https://community.eveonline.com/support/policies/privacy-cookies-policy-en

Nothing is illegal. It's the way the internet works.

Whenever you send a request to a server to receive information, you also send information to that server.

That's all that happened here.

The guy clicked a link, the server read his IP address, just like many, many other servers do.

As a member of GSF it was easy for them to compare the IP address that requested the document against the list of IP addresses that he probably provides in many places (because he was lazy) on for example the Goons forums (as forum software tracks IP addresses).

So all that happened here is:

Directors listed in the forums. IP addresses (all these IPs just ficticious and made for example purpose):
Mittani:
Lemba:
Sion:
...
...
...

When he requested the document from the server, the server read the IP address from the information he sent. For example:



Oh look, that matches Lemba.

Kick Lemba as he's the spy.

Nothing illegal. Lemba was lazy and could have avoided that form of detection very simply.

His fault, but he hasn't been personally identified. Just his character was identified as the Goon Director level spy.

There's nothing illegal about reading an IP address that you send to a server. Type into Google, "what's my IP" and you'll see your own IP presented back to you. You sent it in order for it to be read.

*Snipped all Supposed "Fake" IP Address, Regardless of Validity * ISD Buldath

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."

Johan Civire
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#26 - 2016-04-09 09:33:06 UTC
it`s fun to read ha the goons are losing so thats why the are doing this. haha and that for a game.....
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#27 - 2016-04-09 09:52:45 UTC
Violet Hurst wrote:

PL is among good guys now! Don't touch them!
Goons on the other hand ....
Cool

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Daxley
Doomheim
#28 - 2016-04-09 09:57:24 UTC
I never really post on the EVE forums, but this one has definitely sparked my interest and somewhat mandates a response.

First, let's examine what actually happened:

Party A decides to be a pro-level distributor of secret information. The secret information Part A decides to distribute comes from a privately held web service that has no affiliation with EVE Online or CCP Games, and is owned by a third party all together for which CCP Games has no access to, no administrative privileges for, and for which CCP Games does not guarantee or provide any level of service, support, or warranty.

Party B, the victim of the released information, attempts to determine who the distributor of their secret information is. As the secret information is being leaked from their privately held web services that, again, have no affiliation with EVE Online or CCP Games, are owned by a third party for which CCP Games has no access to and no administrative privileges for, and for which do not contain, use or have access to any CCP Games held assetts at all, Party B decides to try to determine who the culprit is using very simple IP matching with their own services. They do not attempt to hack anyone, or use brute force criminal activity, they simply put together a little ruse to see if the spy is dumb enough to take the bait.

Party A really loves reddit. That's his target of choice for posting information.
Party B sends Party A a private message, with a ruse link back to the privately held, non-game services, which CCP Games and EVE Online are in no way a part of.
Party A chooses to click said link on their super secret spai alt reddit account, having no idea what the link is for, or why this person would be sending them a link.
Party B reviews their private server data, determines the connection, and takes measures to remove said distributor of secret information from their privately held services.

At this point in time, based on the above, one can clearly determine that none of these activities ever involved CCP Games or EVE Online. The connection of the two parties did not take place because of in game actions or in game communications. To make matters worse, the data that was leaked by Party A from Party B was never even inside of EVE Online or CCP Games property. In fact, no in-game assets or services were used at all.

Party B, now knowing Party A has been divulging their secret information, decides that they no longer wish to be affiliated with Party A in EVE Online, and removes them from their alliance.

What happened here is a simple connecting the dots on completely outside of game assets and completely outside of game services that are not wholly or partially owned by or under the control of CCP Games. The reason that this connection of the dots even occurred is because Lemba chose to disclose chat logs from, again, an outside of game web service that was not part of CCP Games or EVE Online intellectual property in a dump on Reddit. In other words, both the events that occurred and the triggering event for the events that occurred are so far removed from EVE Online and from CCP Games that quite frankly CCP Games has absolutely no business getting involved in this matter at all and would risk legal peril to themselves if they attempted to.

Again, let me repeat, the triggering event for the activities that took place did not occur due to in-game mechanics (such as connecting with someone via a trade channel to harass them for personal enjoyment, a corp application scam where in game assets were used as a catalyst to denigrate an individual on a personal, out of game basis, or a Jita scam with advantage interrogation techniques i.e. "bonus room" style hazing) therefore they are not in any way under the control of CCP Games and there would be no terms of service violation as the mere facts of all of the above details specifically remove this from an in-game or terms of service issue. Keep in mind, in situations in the past where CCP Games has stepped in and taken action, they have been because individuals were selected, contacted or targeted using in-game assets and communications. Because everything that happened here, from the reason for the investigation to the triggering events, to all of the services involved, etc were all completely outside of the game and in no way used in game services, there is no grounds for CCP Games to intervene in this at all.

While some may be upset that others are quite savvy with technology and are able to perform these kinds of checks against your personal information out of game, keep in mind that as many others have mentioned, every time you connect somewhere or login to a forum you make a lot of data available. If that data is used against you because you chose to login, that is really your own fault. CCP Games cannot do anything to remedy situations like this unless they choose to ban all player organizations from using third party services to connect with other players that they meet in the game. In other words, RIP EVE Online.
Amyclas Amatin
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#29 - 2016-04-09 10:14:10 UTC
First public spy purge of the war.

You didn't think we play nice with spies did we? Good spies can really hamper game play. And director spies are dangerous.

Imagine if we did the same to you. (we probably already do.)

For more information on the New Order of High-Sec, please visit: http://www.minerbumping.com/

Remember that whenever you have a bad day in EVE, the correct reponse is "Thank you CCP, may I please have another?"

Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
#30 - 2016-04-09 10:15:52 UTC
You missed out the stage where they then publically pinged his ip address to a particular subset of the userbase of the game...

A subset that might have slightly rustled jimmies.

but what would I know, I'm just a salvager

Daxley
Doomheim
#31 - 2016-04-09 10:24:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Daxley
Eli Apol wrote:
You missed out the stage where they then publically pinged his ip address to a particular subset of the userbase of the game...

A subset that might have slightly rustled jimmies.


I didn't miss that. I am well aware of the fact that on Goonswarm's privately held, third party service, they have the ability to send pings out to their members. Once again, these pings were sent to individuals from a third party service, not affiliated with EVE Online or CCP Games. So, I don't think I missed it, my post should quite clearly lay out how this exact thing is once again, outside of CCP Games and EVE Online, and therefore outside of CCP Games control. Heck, if anyone in Goonswarm wants to ping out my IP address right now, I couldn't stop them from doing it. But, then again, I didn't try to hack together a pitiful spy attempt and get rused.
Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
#32 - 2016-04-09 10:27:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Eli Apol
But they sent them to a subset of the eve online userbase...



E: and their reason for sending it was based around events centred on eve online...

but what would I know, I'm just a salvager

Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#33 - 2016-04-09 10:31:20 UTC
Eli Apol wrote:
But they sent them to a subset of the eve online userbase...


Who cares. They only send them to people who have already given their permission for it to happen.

Poor Goon Director.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."

Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
#34 - 2016-04-09 10:33:36 UTC
Just pointing out that it looks a bit **** to have your product associated with such a ****** act really...

Thats all.

but what would I know, I'm just a salvager

Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#35 - 2016-04-09 10:38:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Shae Tadaruwa
Eli Apol wrote:
Just pointing out that it looks a bit **** to have your product associated with such a ****** act really...

Thats all.

You can't talk for CCP (they also track IP addresses as do the vast majority of company sites on the internet in one form or another) and there is nothing they can do in any case. Nor are they responsible for it.

It's just hysteria from people who don't understand the technology so think automatically there is something wrong with it.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."

Daxley
Doomheim
#36 - 2016-04-09 10:39:56 UTC
Eli Apol wrote:
Just pointing out that it looks a bit **** to have your product associated with such a ****** act really...

Thats all.


EVE Online is literally famous for these types of things in bloc wars. Right now, EVE is getting more press than Donald Trump between VR/Valkyrie and this war, let it roll baby.
Eli Apol
Definitely a nullsec alt
#37 - 2016-04-09 10:41:57 UTC
Im just arguing with Daxley trying to suggest that this has nothing to do with the game... Whether CCP agrees with this or not is upto them.

Its just like my opinion man.

but what would I know, I'm just a salvager

Amyclas Amatin
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#38 - 2016-04-09 10:44:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Amyclas Amatin
so what do you want CCP to do? Goonswarm Federation and its non-playing members will continue to do this over third party services.

For more information on the New Order of High-Sec, please visit: http://www.minerbumping.com/

Remember that whenever you have a bad day in EVE, the correct reponse is "Thank you CCP, may I please have another?"

Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#39 - 2016-04-09 10:44:52 UTC
Eli Apol wrote:
... trying to suggest that this has nothing to do with the game...

Who's suggesting it has nothing to do with the game?

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."

Mephiztopheleze
Laphroaig Inc.
#40 - 2016-04-09 10:45:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Mephiztopheleze
Amyclas Amatin wrote:
Imagine if we did the same to you. (we probably already do.)


What do you mean 'probably', Kimosabe? GIA/Black Hand are very, very good at what they do.

Daxley wrote:
Eli Apol wrote:
Just pointing out that it looks a bit **** to have your product associated with such a ****** act really...

Thats all.


EVE Online is literally famous for these types of things in bloc wars. Right now, EVE is getting more press than Donald Trump between VR/Valkyrie and this war, let it roll baby.


Yup. These sorts of shenanigans will appeal to a great many gamers. Heck, it was a combination of reading about the Guiding Hand Social Club and reports on B-R5RB that drew me in.

Occasional Resident Newbie Correspondent for TMC: http://themittani.com/search/site/mephiztopheleze

This is my Forum Main. My Combat Alt is sambo Inkura