Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center

As for the counter thing it's the same for all the other guns that shoot below their class. If you come up against a cruiser and toy have a rlml the fight is not going to go in your favor same thing of you come up against a battleship abs you have RHML.

Then as for them not being as good as they were that is to be expected they were very very overpowered in large numbers.


Also dreads are no longer going to be 2.5 they ate being brought down to about carrier price

I'm more hopeful that by Monday they will have read over our suggestions and get something done b4 Wednesday we probably won't get any of the god ones like the on grid warping or drastic changes to the Ewar fighters do to the time they would take to implement.but ccp better not be hiding something they should have learned by now not to surprise us just b4 a launch

As long as you keep your "superiority fighters" nice and close to your carrier (for quick easy recall) they may be somewhat effective. Personally I would not put a carrier on a grid that has real capitals (dreads, supers, titans) there, your just gonna die pointlessly. Unless of course your in the biggest of the 2 blobs, then you'll die as fodder, just for the killmails, not because your an actual threat during the fight.

I stopped responding on Reddit once I realized such a large % of posters there don't actually play eve anymore but still love to throw their 2 cents worth in.

I did however find a fit for the Ninazu that can sustain cap with 3 remote reps running .
1 Capital T2 cap battery (to help reduce effectiveness of incoming neuts and give that bit more cap)
1 T2 and 2 Capital F-RX cap boosters (with navy charges)
5 capacitor power relays
1 T2 capital ancillary current router with 2 trimarks

Ehp (is dismal) poor resists + concord booster (which even in triage, with no resists won't help much) gives 552,813 EHP.

You can it seems combat refit the Fax's, as you don't get timers for repping (even if your rep target has a timer). I'm fairly sure this is a bug as Devs have stated you would not be able to combat refit.

If it is actually the case that Fax's can readily refit as required (having to wait one minute for a timer sees you die fast) - They all of a sudden become pretty useful (even taking into account the hulls will cost 50% than they should), as you can be fit for giving reps (all cap), then refit to defense when you get called primary (not a minute or so later).

Edit; You will need 64 navy capital navy cap charges for one triage cycle - not at all efficient or easy to do when your cargo hold only carries 28 which requires you to pretty much fill your fleet hangar with charges if your likely to be using the carrier for more than one triage cycle during a fight.

Dunno why not. You can MJD bombs and ships (and drones I think). No real real reason why not on the MJD for fighter squads.

Do your fighters follow the MJD'd target the 100 K or do you need to re-select it as a target.
If they just chase down the target, using their mwd, it is not really a problem as most can cover 100K fairly quickly but if you have to re-initiate what was the active target, it is bad. Not necessarily a bug, just poor fighter mechanics.

Yeah I did guess that which is why I asked if the fighters automatically chased down the moved target.
Not being able to MJFG squads of fighters I believe is intentional but if they chase down a target that has been jumped 100K away it is not so bad. If you have to start from scratch by re-sending fighters manually, it is just another somewhat broken mechanic for carriers to deal with.

Fighters should always pursue any target that is on grid, regardless of whether it moves 100K away or 1000. They have that target locked and engaged so should be able to follow it. No warping for fighters would mean if the target warps 1,000k away, you just recall fighters and find a new target as it would take way too long to reach them.

Well, that's not really true with RLML because HM can't apply correctly to Cruisers even before links & afterburners & boosters come into the equation. But that's a problem with HM being bad, rather than RLML being OP. And the principle of undersized guns not fighting the same class well holds true in every other example I can think of.

Fighters won't follow a target that actually blip warps on grid, because warp breaks locks, or did last time I bothered to test. However if fighters also would warp on grid to chase a target (like a fancy MJD) that would be awesome, land them at a fixed range from their target which isn't quite in weapons range and you still allow people to run away, or lock them and shoot them before they attack, but you allow carriers to actually project to their lock ranges properly, rather than having shorter ranges than dread HAW's.
It's the same issue Heavy Drones have always had, made a hundred times worse.

So after flying a Nyx for a while I have to ask: Are the long range heavy fighters supposed to track like lights and hit like a truck from 45km? With a set of Termites I was doing obscene things to small ships that made light fighters seem useless by comparison.

They still do this O.o i had not looked at them since the first few days and thought those tracking numbers were place holders