Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center

Would you, by extension, want to roll back the entire Crius expansion? Seems like your example was one of the few non-punitive features to come out of that.

Market:
Iif you want to change transaction tax to 2.5% and the broker's fee to 5-6% apply this changes to the order DURATION = 3 months. but if you set order for 1 day it would be the same as now (1.5% and 1%).
in enother words add variable taxes repending on order duration

Contracts:
add the same - tax depending on contract duration

Jump Clones:
chnge it to 1m, not 5m. also add "force clone jump"
"force clone jump"-this jump can be made after 2-3 hours after normal clone jump but you will pay for this jump 10mil. Those who wants to use it - 10mil not a price.

Not when done in NPC stations where a good chunk is done

Increasing the cost to installing jump clones is no problem; but there are certain issues to be had with jumping fees.
The main issue is many players have jump clones not because they want to get from one side of New Eden to the other quickly (I am aware many people use it for that reason also) but because they need to swtich between expensive implant clones for better learning and cheaper empty clones that they can take into low and nullsec with little worry.

Charging 5 million per jump will hurt newer and casual players and will further lower the populations of low and NPC nullsec.

Personally I wouldn't have a problem with jumping fees if clone swapping at the same station is free but a jumping fee is charged for jumping to the other side of New Eden.
Example:

I am currently docked in Amarr with a clone with learning implants.
I have an inactive clone without implants in the same station.
I have an inactive clone in Jita (Doesn't matter if it has implants ort not).

If I want to swap clones in Amarr I should not have to pay a fee; or at least it should be a relatively cheap fee AT MOST it should be 100,000 isk.
But if I want to clone jump to my clone in Jita I should pay a fee; 1-5 million isk would be acceptable.

open ship fitting from corp fittings. 'buy all' inside the citadel where your glorious logistics bros have seeded the market.

Yes: This makes sense.

Let us take a simple contract and make the person put up a minimum of 9 sell orders (ship, fittings, ammo, etc.).

Then let us take those 9 sell orders and make them visible to everyone in the region (because that is how the market in Eve works).

Then let the invaders or attackers go through and buy out the market (because again that is how the market in Eve works).

Guess what? Can you see the problem yet?

Now you have no doctrine ships for your pilots to fly.

Don't think this will happen? Why do you think people started using contracts in the first place?

It's just the initial release they will be added to citadels once they can be

Please rethink the 5m isk fee for using a jumpclone. Installation of JC's, fine, but please do not create dis-incentives from getting people who are new into pvp.

With the market transaction fees - perhaps I missed it, but do the relevant market related skills & standings not reduce the fees anymore? Whilst I'm fully confident that the market will just rebalance after a short-term period of liquidity destabilization, I'm curious as to why the decision was made that will benefit powerblocs (by reaping additional taxes), but again, will effectually punish someone just getting into industry who is using NPC stations to manufacture / sell in.

If you're wanting to make citadels more attractive, why introduce barriers into the rest of Eve in order to do so?

Edit: One other thing - Plexes. This will take about 95m isk out of the value of purchasing a plex to sell for isk - are you wanting to see plex immediately hike to cover this, especially since eve inflation is often measured against the plex?

Instead of nerfing the game, why don't you lower the fuel cost of the clone service that is not even released yet? The initial contract at 5M is fine, but there should be no fee for jumping.

There will NEVER be a market to compete with NPC stations that is able to deny entry or be destroyed. Citadel owners can increase taxes, block access, and the Citadel can be destroyed. Even if the market goods are not destroyed along with a Citadel, a massive amount of goods would then need to be hauled to a new Citadel or station, and then have broker's fees applied once again. The unpredictable nature of players will mean that Citadel markets will primarily be used in WHs and Null for specific alliances. The proposed taxes are utterly insane, and will do nothing other than nerf an entire playstyle. Station traders will have to widen the margins so far apart that people will no longer even sell into buy orders. How about you just leave this alone? Station trading is not overpowered. No one forces someone to sell into buy orders.

The 100000 ISK for JCs is a flat number and is fine to increase. The markets work off of a percentage already, and should not be touched.

In general I sit by during changes and do not complain, but some of these changes have me absolutely baffled.

The irony here is that they are nerfing trade, which is one of the few ways in this game to earn ISK that already combats inflation (taxes). It purely transfers ISK. Most other ways of earning ISK have the effect of increasing total ISK. As in, instead of wasting my time trading, I may start missioning, which only increases inflation through new ISK (or ratting/sleepers).

Also, if the idea behind increasing the tax is to decentralize market hubs like Jita, Amarr, or Dodixie, the tax increase will have the opposite effect.

Specifically: Stocking a far flung market - as in the less trafficked parts of empire space like Agil - will become less tenable. A small, slow moving market where your orders might never completely fill/sell becomes completely undesirable when you bump taxes up by 6%.

All your doing is making the content enablers of eve, the people seeding markets near and far, more likely to go to a station where their stock will sell.

And again: no one will put trillions of assets on sale in a citadel where trade fees are arbitrarily set by players, that can be reinforced, un-anchored, or destroyed. It just doesn't make any financial sense to ever do this.

Putting the two points above together, you're going to end up centralizing the hisec markets more, not less.