These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Misalignment between AUR packages and skill extractor prices - CCP?

Author
Kalgeroth
Doomheim
#1 - 2016-02-06 09:23:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Kalgeroth
I don't have a problem with the item or the extractor prices as such.

But I do have a problem with the alignment between AUR packages and the prices

Arrow Want to buy 1 extractor? Then you need to buy 1950 AUR package because the 900 one is just short
Arrow Want to buy 5 extractors? Then you need to buy the 9000 AUR package because the 3600 one is just short
Arrow Want to buy 10 extractors? Then you need to buy the 9000 AUR package have have 1000 AUR left over

No matter how you configure it, going to have AUR left over or buy some ridiculous configuration of extractors you didn't want.

It seems to have been created deliberately this way to irritate the playerbase while scraping a little more revenue out of people. It's counterproductive. People want a simple two-clicks transaction which is easy to calculate, not to have to build spreadsheets to work out the most cost effective option.

Players who stick with EVE tend to be pretty smart - it's a complex and intelligent game.

And the playerbase does not react well to nonsense like this, it's dumb move on the part of CCP and they will lose players and revenue as a result. What works for silly f2p games on facebook isn't going to cut it for EVE.

CCP - kindly adjust the AUR packages or adjust the extractor prices, or you will lose out on revenue while irritating your dwindling playerbase.
Marcus Sablemane
Lari Garbage Disposal
#2 - 2016-02-06 09:29:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Marcus Sablemane
I see people buying packages of different amounts to compensate for the difference.

Five extractors, 4499 right?

- One $20USD package for 3600 AUR + one $5 USD package for 900 AUR. I don't agree with it, but it's what I see happening.

I too would prefer them to align the prices with the packages.


-corrected values.
Primary This Rifter
Mutual Fund of the Something
#3 - 2016-02-06 09:30:55 UTC
ib4td
Kalgeroth
Doomheim
#4 - 2016-02-06 09:35:47 UTC
Marcus Sablemane wrote:
I see people buying packages of different amounts to compensate for the difference.

Five extractors, 4499 right?

- One $20USD package for 3600 AUR + one $5 USD package for 900 AUR. I don't agree with it, but it's what I see happening.

I too would prefer them to align the prices with the packages.


-corrected values.


yup, this is my point - we shouldn't have to put up with this BS like we're dumb players on some f2p facebook game
Primary This Rifter
Mutual Fund of the Something
#5 - 2016-02-06 09:39:14 UTC
Well, we do have to put up with it. That's never going to change.
Cristl
#6 - 2016-02-06 09:44:00 UTC
I agree. A $9.99 meal works psychologically, but for a secondary 'currency' you pay for, it backfires and has a negative effect.

If a club charged $10 for 9 tokens, and charged 10 tokens for a drink, it just wouldn't sit right with most people.
Marcus Sablemane
Lari Garbage Disposal
#7 - 2016-02-06 09:44:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Marcus Sablemane
Kalgeroth wrote:


yup, this is my point - we shouldn't have to put up with this BS like we're dumb players on some f2p facebook game


All theory crafting about marketing strategies and price-baiting aside, the bottom line is that some will use this optional service (because let's be realistic, it's entirely optional) and some will not.

As far as being "new player friendly," there is an argument to be made on that point.

New player friendly, yes, if you consider it a one time "get into the game" boost to get your core skills so you're proficient at something low-tier (say mastery level 3 on a cruiser). This gives a new player a means to explore the game without having to "wait" for core skills, just as learning skills once were.

And new player friendly, no, when you look at it is something to be done again and again so that you can rush to 50+ million SP and jump into a capital ship. Some that some will without a doubt go for, however new players shouldn't.




Myself, it'll be a one time deal to scavenge ~15 or so million SP off an old industry character from when I used to seriously play years ago. Those points will be dumped into this character so I can explore other areas of the game without having to repeat alot of what I already know.

Beyond that, it'll be a service for those that want it.
Kiandoshia
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#8 - 2016-02-06 09:50:17 UTC
I hope you all saw this coming because it is a little naive to think (or have thought?) that anything else was going to happen.
Nana Skalski
Taisaanat Kotei
EDENCOM DEFENSIVE INITIATIVE
#9 - 2016-02-06 10:11:24 UTC
Kiandoshia
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#10 - 2016-02-06 10:31:01 UTC
Nana Skalski wrote:
Dont buy them then. They are not essential to play the game.


I'm probably not gonna buy any. My characters are all at the point where I don't need to buy SP and still be able to fly everything and have no idea how half of it works =p

Might be useful for getting utility alts up and running quickly though.
Faenir Antollare
For Ever And Ever
#11 - 2016-02-06 11:01:24 UTC
Cristl wrote:
I agree. A $9.99 meal works psychologically, but for a secondary 'currency' you pay for, it backfires and has a negative effect.

If a club charged $10 for 9 tokens, and charged 10 tokens for a drink, it just wouldn't sit right with most people.



Superb analogy in that it nails the issue (of most concern) perfectly.

RiP BooBoo 26/7/1971 - 23/7/2014 My Lady My Love My Life My Wife

TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#12 - 2016-02-06 11:06:32 UTC
Cristl wrote:
I agree. A $9.99 meal works psychologically, but for a secondary 'currency' you pay for, it backfires and has a negative effect.

If a club charged $10 for 9 tokens, and charged 10 tokens for a drink, it just wouldn't sit right with most people.


Good example.

CCP, stop your greedy tactics. No doubt someone in your finance department thought this was an amazing idea, but you're pissing everyone off. Stop it.

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

Lasse R Farnsworth
Blue Republic
RvB - BLUE Republic
#13 - 2016-02-06 11:30:46 UTC
Copy & Paste from another thread:

Ironically I just ragelogged from Planetside 2 because of their stupid "join now" buy this gun but it dosn't align with our cash pakets after finding out that after spending 50 € that I will have left around 90 Cents I NEVER EVER will be able to spend. Now I startet to look at the AUR Shop in EVE and I will never ever be able to spend any amount of money without having AUR left. I mean even with doing spreadsheets I will not be able to buy say 2 injectors and 2 skinns and then be done.

There are reasons why STEAM, AMAZON and IKEA are so sucessfull. They MAKE IT EASY for their customers to do SMALL buys with them. I have 5 € here ... give me something for it without feeling bad. I'm in RvB .. would love to just buy a blue skin for the ship I'm flying. I would LOVE to pay a small fee for the skill I NEED RIGHT NOW. I DON't want to jump through burning rings just to give you some money.

End of Copy Paste.

And on reddit there was this link: http://i.imgur.com/0Q4S0ef.jpg

I get it that your accounting department wants money. But actualy there is a reason why Valve makes so much money. SMALL buys .. give me a 1 € Skin I can gift to a person in my fleet without feeling bad. etc etc etc
Thorian Baalnorn
State War Academy
Caldari State
#14 - 2016-02-06 13:57:39 UTC
IF CCP charged say $5 per injector, it would cost them more money in fees. Payment processors charge both on the per transaction and a percentage of gross. So 10 -$5 transactions cost CCP more money than one $50 transaction. This is why with premium currency you get better rates with the more you buy. They rather you spend $20 once this month than $5 every week.

Though the 999 AUR sales gimmick is cheesy and kind of an insult to the players intelligence and i feel like CCP would be above treating there customers like that. Dont insult our intelligence, just make it 1000 AUR.

Sometimes you are the squirrel and sometimes you are the nut. Today, you are the nut and the squirrel is hungry.

Mister Ripley
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#15 - 2016-02-06 14:22:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Mister Ripley
Microtransactions 101:

  • Trick the customer with a second currency that is hard to manage
  • Make transactions elusive
  • Make microtransaction currency non-transferable
  • Make microtransaction currency non-refundable
  • Create a pricing model that makes it impossible to spend everything down to zero
  • An everlasting amount of "currency" that is directly associated with real money stays in the game, bound to one character/account.

Psychology that sure works on twelve year olds, but makes adults just angry...

Every browser game has this. Buy a pack of 100 "currency". Everything costs 48 "currency". There is basically no way to spend all "currency". Except spending thousands of dollars of course.

They did the same with skins, so I'm surprised why everyone is so mad.



At least we now know what the EA people are doing at CCP Sad
Mithandra
B.O.P Supplication For Glorious
Dracarys.
#16 - 2016-02-06 15:54:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Mithandra
Its being done that way for one of the oldest reasons in retail

Why do you think hotdogs are sold in 5's and hot dog buns are sold in 4's hmmmmm?

Its to make you buy more than you need.

Eve is the dark haired, totally hot emo gothchild of the gaming community

Jherik
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2016-02-06 16:05:49 UTC
Mithandra wrote:
Its being done that way for one of the oldest reasons in retail

Why do you thing hotdogs are sold in 5's and hot dog buns are sold in 4's hmmmmm?

Its to make you buy more than you need.


I offically dub this controversy Hotdog-gate
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#18 - 2016-02-06 18:22:40 UTC
Something something grr that EA dude is probably the mastermind.
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#19 - 2016-02-06 18:41:32 UTC
-who cares-

its entirely optional.
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#20 - 2016-02-06 18:54:51 UTC
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
-who cares-

its entirely optional.
I would have worded it with a little more disdain to the morons posting here, but you nailed it, Ralph.

Mr Epeen Cool
123Next pageLast page