Crime & Punishment

Point on the freighter to where the CODE agent touched you.

Cute
I do find it somewhat amusing that you'd liken your Alliance to a pedophile ring.. guilty conscience?

Oh, look, it's this thread again.

Since evidently you did not propperly read what I write I'll work through your post and see if anything I say does stick now.

"Well OP, I suggest you get a band of players together with sufficient force of arms or economic clout to do something about the CODE. CCP has made thier position clear. Many players, who have just as much right to their fame play as you do, also agree that HiSec has been made far too safe and as a result activity has become stagnant."

1. CCP has made their position clear.
2. I am not trying to engage if "fame play".
3. If CCP finds High-sec space too safe, they can change it themselves. They don't need some player-based racketeering branch to do that for them.

"Code has triggered more forum activities in the last year than any other single group. In fact look at just how many AFK miners, freighters, and others have been encouraged not just to PLAY the game, but to come here to vent their impotence at how unsafe a competitive pvp game is. "

1. CODE. has no right to dictate to others how they should play the game.
2. This post is not ment to vent any impotence of any kind. While I cannot speak for others, this one is an attempt to find likeminded people who are just as opposed to CODE. dictating how others play this game.
3. I don't mind Unsafe PVP-based games, I enjoy the compettitive nature of most. But this isn't about how Unsafe it is, it's about CODE. Dictating to others how they play said game. They are neither devellopers or moderators, after all.

"It reminds me of the overly entitled teenager who fails their tests and announce, "it is just not fair. ""
1. no, it's more like a student getting bullied incessantly and going to a teacher "Teacher, they're bullying" and when the teacher shrugs his shoulders saying "There is no rule against bullying", that the student starts to talk to other students about how to counter this sort of bullying.
Get your analogies straight.

"And so forth. None the less, demanding that others do for you is not a noble call to arms. If you want to be a space trucker with no consequences might I suggest Elite."
1. I am more than willing to get right in there with my nose to the grinding-stone, but in order to be able to combat a group like CODE. one needs allies. And where can one find people like that? Ohh, right! On the ******* forums.. like this.
2. Do not assume anything, and read very carefully what I write at all times. I use specific words for specific reasons, and trying to say "go play Elite if you don't like EVE" is more than a little insult to the time and efford I have put in EVE so far.

"Otherwise, be the revolutionary if you wish. Rise up enmasse amd rewrite the rules if you want. But for the love of all, stop stamping your little feet and demanding that CCP change the rules to just suit your "one moral game play" at the cost of others. It makes you sound like a petulant child being told NO for the first time."
1. Once again you make the mistake of assuming that I want CCP to change the rules. I might disagree and voice my disagreement, I do accept their ruling and am trying to work inside the system to change them. Which is why I am trying to find likeminded people on these forums to counter CODE.


Now that I've adressed every point you made, either join the conversation in a constructive manner without strawmen arguments, or simply **** off.

Well this thread went down hill fast.

Nice going, at least it highlights where your mind is at. Oh and if you're going to use the gutter to attack players, at least spell the word correctly.

Let me guess, it's the American spelling?

On the subject of strawmen how about you suck it up princess or learn to play the game.

I do hope your papers, i mean Mining permit is in order.

Let's see.

You play Eve.
You don't like how others play Eve.
You'd like CCP to nerf how others play Eve.
Even though the game is designed to allow a sandbox game, you want to restrict it for aspects you don't like.
You're so emotional about how others play Eve, you'll go as low as to include bad taste in your arguments.
You'll use an argument, then ignore it as it suits. (See strawman)
Instead of taking action yourself and using the tools provided, you'd like hand holding mechanics from CCP.
You are the 'Just one more nerf and it will be balanced' type player. Like all those types, one will never be enough.

So let me ask you this. As this game has always allowed none consent PvP everywhere, why should the game change for you? And moreover, why the hell are you even playing it?

My young friend, before the rest of the wolves smell the blood, read this: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=426574&find=unread

There be monsters here an the guide may navigate you safely on.

To the rest of you give him a life line out.

I wonder it is worth considering an alternative hypothesis where no-one mentioned it because it's blindingly obvious.

CODE does have the right to dictate how people play the game - just as a well-organised gatecamp has the right to dictate whether or not people play the game by flying through that gate, or highsec mercs have the right to dictate whether or not you can play the game by messing about on the Jita undock.

I liked the Buddhist CODE thread better.