These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Tibus Heth. Great Caldari Hero ? Or, Greatest Caldari Hero ?

Author
James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#161 - 2016-01-22 15:14:38 UTC  |  Edited by: James Syagrius
Utari Onzo wrote:
Generally, I try to stay out of Caldari business here on the IGS. But when it comes to Caldari Prime, I just can't hold my tongue. Mr Syagrius, your people have never experianced having your home occupied. It is a profound, and heavy burden on the soul that even I, as an Amarrian, can feel and sympathise with. I have Civire heritage, and my father died on that damned planet, caught up in what is a mess. A big, huge mess of a scar.


Msr. Onzo, thank you for your kind response.

You are right it is a huge mess, and I am truly sorry that your father died due to it. But many have blood and bone in that soil, so lets not forget that.

Let’s not presume shall we, that Caldari who have never even seen the rock have more claim to it that those born there, regardless of race.

Utari Onzo wrote:
Mr Syagrius, you point to the fact the Caldari occupy parts of Caldari Prime as if that's a positive. The fact you fail to mention there's still enforced Gallente areas of control deftly misses the point when the Caldari speak of reclaiming Home. They don't want some of it, they don't want to be given little scraps as rewards for 'good behaviour' in the eyes of the Federation, they want all of it back, and they successfully did just that with military force not that long ago. If I recall, they got Caldari Prime and declined to push further, so in a sense Mr Tuulinen's comment of stopping when you stop is demonstrated no?


Actually… no. I point to the fact that they occupy parts of Caldari Prime to demonstrate that they won’t ‘stop’. There was peace after a fashion, and they decided to break it.

‘Declining’ to push further not from principled intent, but because they were at the limit of their force projection capacity.

You are correct, the Caldari are very good at ambushes and sneak attacks they excel at it.

I am simply reminding my colleges within the Federation that regardless of what they say, or what the sign, they cannot be trusted. Because as you so aptly asserted ‘they want it all’, and nothing less, that is why negotiations on the matter are pointless.

Utari Onzo wrote:
Mr Syagrius, there are many issues between the Caldari and the Gallente I am not qualified to address, but to see the issue of Caldari Prime bushed off as if it's a positive situation in favour of the Caldari feels insulting to me. The question is still unanswered about its future, negotiations continue, and the residents of the planet (regardless of ethnicity and citizenship) and the people of The State continue to have to endure a kind of 'stasis' held in check only by a Private Military Company and a general lack of political progress.


I am sorry that you were insulted, you seem an agreeable sort, and I do hate giving unnecessary offence to anyone.

But if your insulted by the truth of a thing Msr. Onzo, then there isn’t much that I can do about it is there?

Utari Onzo wrote:
Forgive me Mr Tuulinen, but I just couldn't hold my silence on this one.


Oh one last thing.

While I believe your intentions, however misguided, are honorable.

There are many within our Federal Union that will find humor in an Amarrian lecturing others on… liberty.

I thank you again for your most kind response.
Utari Onzo
Escalated.
OnlyFleets.
#162 - 2016-01-22 15:26:42 UTC
Thank you for the reasoned answer sir, but I must reply.

Considering the Gallente forcibly occupied Caldari Prime during the Caldari-Gallente war, and further poured in colonists onto the planet with what I interpret as little to no regard for the wishes and best interests of the natural citizens there, what right under Gallentean ideals of self determination and liberty can the Federation then claim ownership of the planet? Unless you believe force of arms is a legitimate means of conquest?

"Face the enemy as a solid wall For faith is your armor And through it, the enemy will find no breach Wrap your arms around the enemy For faith is your fire And with it, burn away his evil"

Claudia Osyn
Non-Hostile Target
Wild Geese.
#163 - 2016-01-22 16:40:12 UTC
Utari Onzo wrote:
Unless you believe force of arms is a legitimate means of conquest?

I would like to point out that history will show that force of arms has always been a legitimate means of conquest. Example: The Amarrians Reclaiming.

A little trust goes a long way. The less you use, the further you'll go.

James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#164 - 2016-01-22 16:47:00 UTC
Utari Onzo wrote:
Thank you for the reasoned answer sir, but I must reply.

Considering the Gallente forcibly occupied Caldari Prime during the Caldari-Gallente war, and further poured in colonists onto the planet with what I interpret as little to no regard for the wishes and best interests of the natural citizens there, what right under Gallentean ideals of self determination and liberty can the Federation then claim ownership of the planet? Unless you believe force of arms is a legitimate means of conquest?

It seems my good Sir, a good enough argument for you and your State allies. so who am I to argue.
Makoto Priano
Kirkinen-Arataka Transhuman Zenith Consulting Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#165 - 2016-01-22 16:54:11 UTC
James Syagrius wrote:

Actually… no. I point to the fact that they occupy parts of Caldari Prime to demonstrate that they won’t ‘stop’. There was peace after a fashion, and they decided to break it.

‘Declining’ to push further not from principled intent, but because they were at the limit of their force projection capacity.

You are correct, the Caldari are very good at ambushes and sneak attacks they excel at it.

I am simply reminding my colleges within the Federation that regardless of what they say, or what the sign, they cannot be trusted. Because as you so aptly asserted ‘they want it all’, and nothing less, that is why negotiations on the matter are pointless.


You seem to be engaged in some creative misremembering of the circumstances.

The breaking of the peace was the point at which we reclaimed our homeworld. After that, indeed, Heth failed to secure a lasting peace. However, we at no point before had held our home.

Now, indeed, there is a perpetual border war. Noone to my knowledge is taking steps to resolve that, despite the recommendations of the Pahkshi Peace Conference. This does not make us villainous, though, because not even your vaunted Federation has made the slightest motion towards a peaceful resolution of the conflict.

Pfah. Nationalists.

Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries: exploring the edge of the known, advancing the state of the art. Would you like to know more?

Utari Onzo
Escalated.
OnlyFleets.
#166 - 2016-01-22 16:55:30 UTC
Claudia Osyn wrote:
Utari Onzo wrote:
Unless you believe force of arms is a legitimate means of conquest?

I would like to point out that history will show that force of arms has always been a legitimate means of conquest. Example: The Amarrians Reclaiming.


That was my point. It seems of the largest CONCORD signatories, the one least likely to admit to forcefull annexation are the Federation. Instead, time and again I see Federals speak of concepts such as the local population, which in the case of Caldari Prime they mostly put there, rather then dropping the hypocracy and openly admitting they want the planet for political gain. This, in my opinion, is something difficult for many Gallente to admit, as it breaks the narrative of being the beacon of so called "liberty" and "self determination."

Which brings me back to the concept it's as good an argument as any. Why, then, if force of arms is a legitimate conquest method did you bring up the concept that the Caldari have no more right to the planet then the Federation, Mr Syragius? Especially in light that they'd successfully used force of arms to reclaim their former home. If force of arms is a legitimate means of aquiring territory, why do you bring up the concepts of the local population, the fact that State citizens for the most part aren't born there, and a general attempt to paint the Caldari as untrustworthy?

It seems to me they're the most clear, direct and honest in their intentions for Caldari Prime.

"Face the enemy as a solid wall For faith is your armor And through it, the enemy will find no breach Wrap your arms around the enemy For faith is your fire And with it, burn away his evil"

Claudia Osyn
Non-Hostile Target
Wild Geese.
#167 - 2016-01-22 19:39:24 UTC
Utari Onzo wrote:
Claudia Osyn wrote:
Utari Onzo wrote:
Unless you believe force of arms is a legitimate means of conquest?

I would like to point out that history will show that force of arms has always been a legitimate means of conquest. Example: The Amarrians Reclaiming.


That was my point. It seems of the largest CONCORD signatories, the one least likely to admit to forcefull annexation are the Federation. Instead, time and again I see Federals speak of concepts such as the local population, which in the case of Caldari Prime they mostly put there, rather then dropping the hypocracy and openly admitting they want the planet for political gain. This, in my opinion, is something difficult for many Gallente to admit, as it breaks the narrative of being the beacon of so called "liberty" and "self determination."

Which brings me back to the concept it's as good an argument as any. Why, then, if force of arms is a legitimate conquest method did you bring up the concept that the Caldari have no more right to the planet then the Federation, Mr Syragius? Especially in light that they'd successfully used force of arms to reclaim their former home. If force of arms is a legitimate means of aquiring territory, why do you bring up the concepts of the local population, the fact that State citizens for the most part aren't born there, and a general attempt to paint the Caldari as untrustworthy?

It seems to me they're the most clear, direct and honest in their intentions for Caldari Prime.


Just because we are using the planet as political leverage doesn't mean that we are not also concerned with maintaining the freedom and liberties of our people on said planet, the two are not mutually exclusive. Some place more emphasis on the matter of the people, however, and tend to ignore Caldari Prime's political value as a bargaining chip. I'm sure that Mr. Syragius is one of those people.

As for the matter of the Caldari being untrustworthy, I find most Governments fit that bill. But the Caldari are a unique problem due to the way their government is structured. We could have good business with one Corporation and be attacked by another. Holding Caldari Prime is one of the few things we have that can actually get a Mega corp at the table and avoid unnecessary fighting with all the others along the way.

A little trust goes a long way. The less you use, the further you'll go.

Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#168 - 2016-01-22 19:45:33 UTC
IbanezLaney wrote:
Valerie Valate wrote:


Is Tibus Heth a great hero of the State ? Or the greatest hero of the State ?



Both

Greatest comment in this thread so far!
Well done.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#169 - 2016-01-22 19:50:27 UTC
Utari Onzo wrote:
James Syagrius wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
James Syagrius wrote:
I have avoided this discussion for obvious reasons, but I warn my fellow Federalists… there is no profit in your efforts.

They do not have ears to hear and use even peace as a weapon.

You see the Caldari have elevated victimhood to spiritual dimension.

So let them wallow in it, all the while losing their prize one acquisition at a time.


We'll keep mentioning it so long as you guys don't stop doing it. You stop, we stop.

It's all pretty simple stuff.

Oh Pieter my old… friend, but that’s the point. You don’t.

The fact you occupy parts of Caldari Prime today proves the point.

Declaring the superiority of your cause is delusion.




Generally, I try to stay out of Caldari business here on the IGS. But when it comes to Caldari Prime, I just can't hold my tongue.

Mr Syagrius, your people have never experianced having your home occupied. It is a profound, and heavy burden on the soul that even I, as an Amarrian, can feel and sympathise with. I have Civire heritage, and my father died on that damned planet, caught up in what is a mess. A big, huge mess of a scar.

I say, in order for gallente to understand us and to try to talk with them PEACEFULLY we should let them feel our position first-hand.

For this, we should first liberate Caldari Prime completely from gallente occupants, and then we should occupy Gallente Prime for about 200 years. After these 200 years the justice will be served and we can talk with gallenteans about peace.

This will be fair. Right? 200 years of occupation for 200 years of occupation. We could even count days so no side would feel wronged.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Utari Onzo
Escalated.
OnlyFleets.
#170 - 2016-01-22 19:56:51 UTC
Claudia Osyn wrote:


Just because we are using the planet as political leverage doesn't mean that we are not also concerned with maintaining the freedom and liberties of our people on said planet, the two are not mutually exclusive. Some place more emphasis on the matter of the people, however, and tend to ignore Caldari Prime's political value as a bargaining chip. I'm sure that Mr. Syragius is one of those people.


No doubt, you are right on the account of Mr Syragius.

On account of the liberty and freedom of the people, I'm guessing this relates mostly to the Federation colonists. Do you think they are more deserving of protection, self determination and rights by virtue of being ethnically of Federation origins? Are they the only ones allowed a sense of self determination? It seems rather convenient to be concerned about the rights of people the Federation Government dumped there, likely for the purpose of having more then just a case of military conquest to continue their concerns.

As a group that stands as a beacon of 'democracy', do you think the Federation would be keen on a general plebiscide of the entire popualtion of the planet, and if the result was a move back to the State, would it respect the wishes of the people?

Claudia Osyn wrote:

As for the matter of the Caldari being untrustworthy, I find most Governments fit that bill. But the Caldari are a unique problem due to the way their government is structured. We could have good business with one Corporation and be attacked by another. Holding Caldari Prime is one of the few things we have that can actually get a Mega corp at the table and avoid unnecessary fighting with all the others along the way.


So holding a planet, and its original population, to ransom and conducting blatant annexation is a perfectly acceptable way for the Federation to behave for the purpose of foreign affairs. Almost makes me wonder why Federal citizens are so keen to point fingers at others for doing such things in the past when the same is being conducted by your Government to this very day.

Forgive me for these probing questions, but I find the Federation offensive in espousing values, but willingly discarding them towards others when politically convenient. Yet, they feel the most capable of judging others for their actions, with stern faces of disapproval.

"Face the enemy as a solid wall For faith is your armor And through it, the enemy will find no breach Wrap your arms around the enemy For faith is your fire And with it, burn away his evil"

James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#171 - 2016-01-22 20:29:21 UTC
Makoto Priano wrote:
The breaking of the peace was the point at which we reclaimed our homeworld.

Yes you did, I am glad you agree with me.
Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#172 - 2016-01-22 20:36:24 UTC
James Syagrius wrote:
Makoto Priano wrote:
The breaking of the peace was the point at which we reclaimed our homeworld.

Yes you did, I am glad you agree with me.

Don't listen to Makoto, she is a liar and can't be considered Caldari anymore, thus her usage of "we" is invalid.
(Ref. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=381560 )

Gallente did broke the peace, first by a terror act, performed by Federal Navy against the peace conference station, then by their racist attacks all over Caldari Prime against Caldari. Tibus Heth has only reacted to defend our people and homeworld from gallentean agression. They started war 200 years ago, and so did they now. Again.

As a result of gallentean actions on Caldari Prime (defacing of Caldari monuments, beating of Caldari people, burning arhcheological digs), they should not be allowed to stay on Caldari Prime anymore. Any gallentean, who will put their dirty foot on the soil of Caldari Prime must be considered as an occupant and as a militant unit disregarding their age, equipment and words.

And every damn gallente occupant MUST DIE.

Killing them is my profession.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#173 - 2016-01-22 20:51:52 UTC
Utari Onzo wrote:
That was my point. It seems of the largest CONCORD signatories, the one least likely to admit to forcefull annexation are the Federation. Instead, time and again I see Federals speak of concepts such as the local population, which in the case of Caldari Prime they mostly put there, rather then dropping the hypocracy and openly admitting they want the planet for political gain. This, in my opinion, is something difficult for many Gallente to admit, as it breaks the narrative of being the beacon of so called "liberty" and "self determination."

Which brings me back to the concept it's as good an argument as any. Why, then, if force of arms is a legitimate conquest method did you bring up the concept that the Caldari have no more right to the planet then the Federation, Mr Syragius? Especially in light that they'd successfully used force of arms to reclaim their former home. If force of arms is a legitimate means of aquiring territory, why do you bring up the concepts of the local population, the fact that State citizens for the most part aren't born there, and a general attempt to paint the Caldari as untrustworthy?

It seems to me they're the most clear, direct and honest in their intentions for Caldari Prime.

Well it’s always nice to see what others thank of you, and your criticisms regarding the Federations many flaws are taken with due weight. Especially considering how many necks you have your feet on.

As to using force, I don’t recall indicating that it was legitimate, being a pragmatist, I understand that in the end below that thin veneer of civilization it always comes down to the axe.

We play these games with peace Msr. Onzo so that progress may creep forward. So that we can claw our way out of the cave, cooperate together to kill larger game to feed more mouths and so on and such as until us….

As to the intentions of your friends in the State … I think its fairly clear. They plan to kill us until were gone, forgive us then if we fight back.

So lets be very careful, should we descend into that pit.
James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#174 - 2016-01-22 21:07:36 UTC  |  Edited by: James Syagrius
Utari Onzo wrote:
Forgive me for these probing questions, but I find the Federation offensive in espousing values, but willingly discarding them towards others when politically convenient. Yet, they feel the most capable of judging others for their actions, with stern faces of disapproval.

Well I did learn moral pragmatism from the Amarr.

But here we are talking at each other, and not to each other, forgive me.

I shouldn’t have interrupted your.. discussion, but I slip from time to time and like you, let slanders guide me to dark places.

So… to answer Madam’uselle Kims question.

Yes, dear he was a hero, who else could make the Ultra – Nationalists seem rational, and a pointless conflict seem the very soul of logic.

Hero indeed.
Sahriah BloodStone
No.Mercy
Triumvirate.
#175 - 2016-01-22 22:25:16 UTC
Kador Ouryon wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:

Probably I should send you a history textbook so you could next time distinguish events that happened seven and two years ago. Not sure though they have appeared in history textbooks yet...

Meanwhile I would recommend you to cease commenting on the topics that you lack information about. I don't think your superiors will be happy to know you are disgracing your corporation in such a way.


I'll certainly apologise for the very superficial mistake of misinterpreting which of the two conflicts you were referring to however I won't tolerate your criticism my service to and the service of the Classiarii.

Even if you are a mutual friend of one of my brothers in arms, Templares Vadam, we will be having words Commander Kim to resolve this matter to a mutually agreeable solution.


Well that sounds like quite the exercise in futility Kador. Good luck

Rallying people to a cause is less admirable than being able to maintain level-headed restraint once you have done so. Heth is a lesson, nothing more.

Sahriah Bloodstone

No.Mercy // Triumvirate

"Never underestimate your enemy or disrespect its abilities. If you do, you shall become the hunted "

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#176 - 2016-01-23 08:33:21 UTC
James Syagrius wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
James Syagrius wrote:
I have avoided this discussion for obvious reasons, but I warn my fellow Federalists… there is no profit in your efforts.

They do not have ears to hear and use even peace as a weapon.

You see the Caldari have elevated victimhood to spiritual dimension.

So let them wallow in it, all the while losing their prize one acquisition at a time.


We'll keep mentioning it so long as you guys don't stop doing it. You stop, we stop.

It's all pretty simple stuff.

Oh Pieter my old… friend, but that’s the point. You don’t.

The fact you occupy parts of Caldari Prime today proves the point.

Declaring the superiority of your cause is delusion.



Meh. That'd sting more if I hadn't already given your senate props for acting like human beings for once.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#177 - 2016-01-24 23:57:52 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Meh. That'd sting more if I hadn't already given your senate props for acting like human beings for once.

It wasn't meant to 'sting' Pieter.

It was meant to emphasize to my Federal comrades who seem to be in a trusting mood, that the State cannot be trusted in any negotiation.

That any act of generosity will be seen simply as weakness and as an invitation to take advantage.

I in no way meant it as a comment on your personal integrity.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#178 - 2016-01-25 21:46:36 UTC
James, one of these days the Federation will lay aside the stolen jewel of Caldari Prime and find that it affects them very little to almost not at all. Will you all be surprised, do you think, when the Caldari State has no further business against you and a strong urge to move on?

There is, literally, nothing else that you have which the State wants. We have all the resources we could possibly need and plenty of room to expand away from the direction of our shared borders. We have no other ideological, political or religious need to strive against you and, in fact, many of us find individual Gallente perfectly charming fellows. We have a history of being able to cooperate in business and in research and about the only venture I would suggest against would be joint colonisation projects.

It's not like we lack for other enemies, after all. You have the Amarr, Serpentis and Angel Cartel. We have the Gurista. Both of us could concentrate more on the Sansha issue. The Drifters are a potential problem of vast scale.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Makoto Priano
Kirkinen-Arataka Transhuman Zenith Consulting Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#179 - 2016-01-26 00:41:05 UTC
As is unsurprising, Tuulinen-haan remains an asset to the state, in this case more for his ability to articulate our shared interests than his considerable combat capability.

Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries: exploring the edge of the known, advancing the state of the art. Would you like to know more?

James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#180 - 2016-01-26 02:45:17 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
James, one of these days the Federation will lay aside the stolen jewel of Caldari Prime and find that it affects them very little to almost not at all. Will you all be surprised, do you think, when the Caldari State has no further business against you and a strong urge to move on?
I don’t disagree Pieter, Caldari Prime is of little economic value. In fact, it’s a burden. Strategically however it’s indispensable, and I think you know it. Considering the States historical proclivities, we simply cannot have significant State assets within the heart of the Federation.

Let’s suppose that tomorrow a mutually agreeable solution was found to… as Ms. Kim so explicitly describes… the “Gallente problem” upon Caldri Prime. Being handed the planet in total how long would it be until we heard ‘perfectly reasonable voices within the State… we need space… we need more space… we need stations… we need dedicated transit routes. Then when any one of these or any other ‘perfectly reasonable’ requests were denied… well then we have a ‘perfectly reasonable’ reason to launch the next sneak-attack, using the very ‘perfectly reasonable’ concessions to your advantage.

Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
There is, literally, nothing else that you have which the State wants. We have all the resources we could possibly need and plenty of room to expand away from the direction of our shared borders. We have no other ideological, political or religious need to strive against you and, in fact, many of us find individual Gallente perfectly charming fellows. We have a history of being able to cooperate in business and in research and about the only venture I would suggest against would be joint colonisation projects.
It is a pity indeed, that we cannot do collectively what we manage individually. But then I have learned to trust some few Caldari. How we can come to trust the State, I do not know. But one day, perhaps, and just perhaps, if you and I live long enough, we can have that.... drink.

Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
It's not like we lack for other enemies, after all. You have the Amarr, Serpentis and Angel Cartel. We have the Gurista. Both of us could concentrate more on the Sansha issue. The Drifters are a potential problem of vast scale.

Perhaps, but I find the Amarr perfectly agreeable business partners, and I have many… well… Let us say, I find opportunity in many places.