These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

News on free to play

First post
Author
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2016-01-01 13:50:07 UTC
And that is true to, and an excellent point to consider and factor in. But it doesn't address why we're not seeing any new IPs, and why so many PC games that the demographic you specified won't touch are taking the F2P route as well.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Salah ad-Din al-Jawahiri
Dreamweb Industries
Novus Ordo.
#22 - 2016-01-01 13:52:38 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I remember SMITE. It was one of the games that did F2P right, and made developers take notice of its success if I remember correctly. Paradoxically, while doing it right, SMITE may have inadvertently smote quality gaming by 'inspiring' some shady business practice amongst others that saw F2P as an opportunity to take advantage of gamers.


I'll have to disagree with that one. The pioneers of *****y F2P online games were the browser games, the first of which were developed circa 2000, long before MOBAs came to life.

Agent of the New Order

Live by the Code - die by the Code.

The Voice of Highsec

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2016-01-01 13:59:43 UTC
Salah ad-Din al-Jawahiri wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I remember SMITE. It was one of the games that did F2P right, and made developers take notice of its success if I remember correctly. Paradoxically, while doing it right, SMITE may have inadvertently smote quality gaming by 'inspiring' some shady business practice amongst others that saw F2P as an opportunity to take advantage of gamers.


I'll have to disagree with that one. The pioneers of *****y F2P online games were the browser games, the first of which were developed circa 2000, long before MOBAs came to life.


Then I'm thinking of something else and I'd have to go and look it up which I'm not doing right now cuz I feel like I'm gonna pass out in a minute. Tired as all hell, had a long day. I'll probably just come back tomorrow and see where this thread's gone. Based on my experience though, F2P may have had it's diamonds in the rough, but all in all, it's been little more that a scourge on gaming that I'd sooner see eradicated than indulge.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Solecist Project
#24 - 2016-01-01 14:17:37 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
What decisions do marketers make for me, that I believe I make on my own?

When people say they're hooked, do you believe that's a conscious, rational decision?
No. You're being emotionally steered into playing.

Just look at Indah. She doesn't even like the game as it is ...
... yet she is running three a counts again!

You think there's any rationality behind that?

Nope!


What makes people buy Coke? What makes people buy crap from IKEA?
Mercedes? Intel or AMD?

Marketing is out there to work around your rationality.

If you look at how it worked for decades now, you'll ses that ads constantly want to sell you a value you are lacking.

Be the hero!
Drink Coke and be part of the lifestyle!
Drive this big car, it makes you big as well!

Did you know that the reason diamonds are on engagement rings ...
... is because of a huge, successfull marketing campaign?


Do you understand now?

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Solecist Project
#25 - 2016-01-01 14:18:50 UTC
Salah ad-Din al-Jawahiri wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I remember SMITE. It was one of the games that did F2P right, and made developers take notice of its success if I remember correctly. Paradoxically, while doing it right, SMITE may have inadvertently smote quality gaming by 'inspiring' some shady business practice amongst others that saw F2P as an opportunity to take advantage of gamers.


I'll have to disagree with that one. The pioneers of *****y F2P online games were the browser games, the first of which were developed circa 2000, long before MOBAs came to life.

Zynga.
Farmville.

Iirc they were the first big one.

That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#26 - 2016-01-01 14:21:06 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
And that is true to, and an excellent point to consider and factor in. But it doesn't address why we're not seeing any new IPs, and why so many PC games that the demographic you specified won't touch are taking the F2P route as well.


I can't say I've noticed a lack of new IPs. I think game development is now more accessible to indie devs than it's ever been. Maybe this is why larger developers are going F2P. To be honest, I don't know which kind of PC games are going F2P, other than MMOs and Hearthstone which I mentioned earlier, which is actually an Android game.


Nana Skalski
Taisaanat Kotei
EDENCOM DEFENSIVE INITIATIVE
#27 - 2016-01-01 14:56:07 UTC
Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#28 - 2016-01-01 15:14:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Riot Girl
Solecist Project wrote:
When people say they're hooked, do you believe that's a conscious, rational decision?
No. You're being emotionally steered into playing.
Yes, of course it is. People play games because they are looking for entertainment. That is a conscious, rational decision to look for entertainment.

When they decide on a game, they choose a game that appeals to their interests, something they hope they'll enjoy. That is a conscious, rational decision to allow themselves to become hooked on something they like. People want to be hooked on their chosen form of entertainment. They don't want to be bored.

How often do you hear people complain, "I can't get into any games lately". I say it a lot and that is because I yearn to find something that can grab me and get me hooked. I consciously and rationally want that to happen.

Quote:
What makes people buy Coke? What makes people buy crap from IKEA?
Mercedes? Intel or AMD?

Most people are rational buyers (i.e adults with limited budgets). They spend what they can afford and budget appropriately based on their requirements.

People buy coke because they prefer the taste over other products. If they prefer the taste of Pepsi, no amount of advertising is going to make them switch brand and if they can only afford a cheap brand, advertising isn't going to convince them otherwise. Advertising allows new customers to learn about a product and reminds old customers a product is still available. It doesn't convince people to spend money if they have no interest in the product (unless they're hiding something in the small print).

With Mercedes, they are paying for luxury, reputation, quality and also a status symbol. They are paying for a brand, but that brand has the benefit of bringing status with it. It impresses women and makes your neighbours jealous. If you can't afford a Mercedes, you get a Ford instead. People don't buy a Mercedes if they can't afford one, if they did we'd all be driving expensive cars and there would be no market for cheap cars. The reason there is a market for cheap cars is because most people spend rationally and would prefer not to get into debt for the sake of making their neighbour jealous. Those that can afford to, do.

AMD vs intel is kinda... well there isn't much choice there as there isn't much competition. You either buy intel or AMD based on reviews, requirements and your budget.
Ibutho Inkosi
Doomheim
#29 - 2016-01-01 15:36:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Ibutho Inkosi
Riot Girl wrote:
What decisions do marketers make for me, that I believe I make on my own?
One such decision, for example, is the introduction of sugar into foods one wouldn't normally expect to find, or even look for sugar, in order to create a sugar addiction and thus cause you to keep coming back for more. Almost the entire processed food industry does this. McDonalds even does it with its french fries using a starch/sugar chemical function.

As long as the tale of the hunt is told by the hunter, and not the lion, it will favor the hunter.

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#30 - 2016-01-01 16:08:42 UTC
Ibutho Inkosi wrote:
Riot Girl wrote:
What decisions do marketers make for me, that I believe I make on my own?
One such decision, for example, is the introduction of sugar into foods one wouldn't normally expect to find, or even look for sugar, in order to create a sugar addiction and thus cause you to keep coming back for more. Almost the entire processed food industry does this. McDonalds even does it with its french fries using a starch/sugar chemical function.

But I don't eat food, it makes me sick.
Nafensoriel
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#31 - 2016-01-01 18:02:48 UTC
Solecist Project wrote:
Salah ad-Din al-Jawahiri wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I remember SMITE. It was one of the games that did F2P right, and made developers take notice of its success if I remember correctly. Paradoxically, while doing it right, SMITE may have inadvertently smote quality gaming by 'inspiring' some shady business practice amongst others that saw F2P as an opportunity to take advantage of gamers.


I'll have to disagree with that one. The pioneers of *****y F2P online games were the browser games, the first of which were developed circa 2000, long before MOBAs came to life.

Zynga.
Farmville.

Iirc they were the first big one.

Travian would arguably be earlier. It was also one of the first to really pull in serious cash from a browser game perspective.



Also yes you choose to buy products.. And companies choose to design those products to play on biology, psychology, and culture to make you buy the product more often. You dont think toothpaste comes in a shiny white box out of personal preference do you? No.. it simulates healthy teeth and thanks to the subconscious effects its been proven to to make you want to buy the product.
malcovas Henderson
THoF
#32 - 2016-01-01 18:26:04 UTC
CCP have already jumped on the "money cow" band wagon. It is no different to the F2P model. It all takes extra dollars from the consumer. If you want F2P to be banned, then you have to also want micro transaction like plex to go as well. They too play on the addiction of consumers to part with cash.

Blizzard, EA, Trion, Bethemusa, and most other large gaming companies have adopted MT's as standard practice.

There are some good and bad points to milking the consumer, but Good or bad for the industry, it is here to stay.
Pix Severus
Empty You
#33 - 2016-01-01 21:00:23 UTC
I'm now going to throw in the obligatory "EVE is already free to play" comment, before someone else does.

Also, I'll just leave this here.

MTU Hunter: Latest Entry - June 12 2017 - Vocal Local 5

MTU Hunting 101: Comprehensive Guide

Hal Morsh
Doomheim
#34 - 2016-01-01 21:17:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Hal Morsh
Nafensoriel wrote:
he trouble(back to the regulation comment) is that its very hard for "Joe the Phone Maker Guy" to get a loan and buy into that sector to create competition considering apple has nearly 1T bucks in the bank for just that purpose.



Thing is I'm happy with my cheaper Ipod touch 6g. It's not artificial happyness, it's a literal library at my fingertips. I keep info and such there. Apple simply provides the tool.

Yes I know companies learn from info the apple products collect. It's hard to say no to it's instant usefulness though, and it is DEFINATELY smaller than a tricoder (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tricorder) and is getting to the point where it can process live environmental information.


Primative example of it, but here.

http://lifehacker.com/word-lens-the-real-time-translation-app-is-now-free-1579220195

Translating images of language in real time with an app.


I can load a route on google maps with wi-fi, and even though it can't load anything after we have left in our car it still tells us where we are along the set route. Even if you can't access the internet yourself, the app is somehow figuring out where you are through something so long as you are near any connection.

It will tell me where I am on the map even if I only have major roads loaded and can't load the zoomed in view because I don't actually have internet, but it only updates location when i'm near a building, so I assumed it's wi-fi (locked or not).

Oh, I perfectly understand, Hal Morsh — a mission like this requires courage, skill, and heroism… qualities you are clearly lacking. Have you forgotten you're one of the bloody immortals!?

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#35 - 2016-01-01 21:24:07 UTC
Pix Severus wrote:
I'm now going to throw in the obligatory "EVE is already free to play" comment, before someone else does.

Also, I'll just leave this here.
And I'll just point out that while this has come up hundreds of times. Remiel gets the dubious distinction of being the first to rehash a stupid and overdone troll for the first time in 2016.

Gratz....first locked thread of the year.

Mr Epeen Cool
Hal Morsh
Doomheim
#36 - 2016-01-01 21:30:24 UTC
Mr Epeen wrote:
Pix Severus wrote:
I'm now going to throw in the obligatory "EVE is already free to play" comment, before someone else does.

Also, I'll just leave this here.
And I'll just point out that while this has come up hundreds of times. Remiel gets the dubious distinction of being the first to rehash a stupid and overdone troll for the first time in 2016.

Gratz....first locked thread of the year.

Mr Epeen Cool



Don't make it a challenge.

Oh, I perfectly understand, Hal Morsh — a mission like this requires courage, skill, and heroism… qualities you are clearly lacking. Have you forgotten you're one of the bloody immortals!?

Nafensoriel
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#37 - 2016-01-01 22:04:00 UTC
Hal Morsh wrote:
Nafensoriel wrote:
he trouble(back to the regulation comment) is that its very hard for "Joe the Phone Maker Guy" to get a loan and buy into that sector to create competition considering apple has nearly 1T bucks in the bank for just that purpose.



Thing is I'm happy with my cheaper Ipod touch 6g. It's not artificial happyness, it's a literal library at my fingertips. I keep info and such there. Apple simply provides the tool.

Yes I know companies learn from info the apple products collect. It's hard to say no to it's instant usefulness though, and it is DEFINATELY smaller than a tricoder (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tricorder) and is getting to the point where it can process live environmental information.


Primative example of it, but here.

http://lifehacker.com/word-lens-the-real-time-translation-app-is-now-free-1579220195

Translating images of language in real time with an app.


I can load a route on google maps with wi-fi, and even though it can't load anything after we have left in our car it still tells us where we are along the set route. Even if you can't access the internet yourself, the app is somehow figuring out where you are through something so long as you are near any connection.

It will tell me where I am on the map even if I only have major roads loaded and can't load the zoomed in view because I don't actually have internet, but it only updates location when i'm near a building, so I assumed it's wi-fi (locked or not).



I was more referring to the quality aspect. Companies use addictive methods and integration locks to heavily encourage(notice i didn't say force) the consumer to buy the newest product. The problem with this is over time once you've been "locked" into that culture or product series its very difficult for the average consumer to simply walk away due to feelings of "investment" in those products or services.

You can see the results of product investment in just about every industry. Take Old Navy. Their original products had nearly twice the thread count and were arguably of significantly higher quality. Now however they tailor to the quick in quick out fashion culture and, especially in womens case, the product line is only manufactured to last until the next fad fashion movement. This again isn't evil.. its smart marketing. It's just bad logic and bad for generally anything not related to making money.

Another example that might be more relatable to you is apple products in general. Their quality, and that of the industry in general, has declined over the decades. Ever use an Apple 2e? Stop to consider that they still function as designed to this day. Technical complexity aside this is the norm. It's not cost effective to make a product that is actually designed with the consumers best interest in mind. A companies goal is to sell a product, ensure a continual market, and delay innovation to maximize profit. Making a phone that can be useful for 10 years is a fast way to get murdered when the next guy releases a minor innovation that makes your product look inferior.. so we don't design around longevity. We design around product cycles and consumer buying habits.

Again none of this is "evil". It's the raw nature of free market capitalism. Normally a government ensures new startups can eventually challenge the monoliths of an industry. In most countries around the world however these startups can't directly compete thanks to general consumer lack of understanding in what denotes a good product. This means we slowly erode our basic right to "vote with our pocketbooks" entirely within our own minds and become "addicted" to a product line or service.

Disturbing thing is even though the system is broken right now it still provides a better quality of life to the people under it than any other system. It's one of the main reason capitalist countries typically have a higher quality of life. We know its broken.. but it still runs.. and much like your first college car its good enough for the average joe.
Hal Morsh
Doomheim
#38 - 2016-01-01 22:49:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Hal Morsh
I was unhappy with design decisions on the Ipod touch 5g, but my only real complaint about the 6g is ram, it's a small part of why the 5g went out so fast when it came to games, but the 6g processor on release was ahead of where the 5g was when it was released compared to the phones.

In other news i've been using the same "survivor" case for 2 years. it fit the new Ipod too wadya know.

I'm also not rich like everyone else splurging on iphones + contracts. Which is why the Ipod exists i'm pretty sure. A cheap alternative.

Oh, I perfectly understand, Hal Morsh — a mission like this requires courage, skill, and heroism… qualities you are clearly lacking. Have you forgotten you're one of the bloody immortals!?

Vertinox
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#39 - 2016-01-01 22:53:58 UTC
There are some F2P companies that don't scam their customers.

Dungeon Defender 2 and Path of Exile only offer cosmetic DLCs and there is no way you can buy advantages in game.

Both games are pretty fun and spent 50 hours on each.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#40 - 2016-01-01 23:04:48 UTC
Ibutho Inkosi wrote:
Riot Girl wrote:
What decisions do marketers make for me, that I believe I make on my own?
One such decision, for example, is the introduction of sugar into foods one wouldn't normally expect to find, or even look for sugar, in order to create a sugar addiction and thus cause you to keep coming back for more. Almost the entire processed food industry does this. McDonalds even does it with its french fries using a starch/sugar chemical function.


Okay.... so explain to me why people don't eat more fruit. Fruit's full of sugar too.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104