These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Tiger Tesla for CSM XI

First post
Author
Tiger Tesla
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1 - 2015-12-23 14:18:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Tiger Tesla

Edit: I have decided to withdraw my bid for the CSM. I plan to focus my efforts on my corporation and alliance and wish all of the other wormhole candidates the best of luck!

Hello Friends,

I am Tiger Tesla and I would like to announce my candidacy for CSM XI.


About Myself

I started playing in the Spring of 2009 as a Astrophysics student in college. The games scope and complexity was very awe-inspiring, and I couldn't wait to get involved. I started off as most players do, and started mining. I loved the social aspects of the game, but found it hard to get engaged with my corp-mates as most of them were, well, afk mining.

After trying out nullsec, and dabling in lowsec, I found myself in wormholes in 2012. I still felt that I hardly knew the game, and here I was learning something else! That was where I first made bonds with the pilots I have been flying with even to this day. It wasn't truely until 2013 that I really fell in love with PvP and also started flying with Spectre Fleet. Spectre allowed me to learn how to FC, and the community there has been great in generating content and fun PVP events over the past 2 years. Today I spend most of my time as the CEO of my wormhole corporation, as well as PvPing with Spectre Fleet.


I understand that the CSM is a filtering tool, allowing CCP to vet ideas and initiate discussion on topics based on our knowledge and experiences. That being said the following are issues/ideas I would like to see discussed within the course of CSM XI (in no particular order):


  • Assault Frigates: I love the asthetic of these ships, but it is hard to warrant bringing one over a T3 Destroyer

  • Battleships: Although Machariels have seen a resurgance, I feel that all battleships should be forces to recon with on the battlefield, balanced by their slow deployment.

  • Alliance Bookmarks: This is a quality of life improvement that everyone can benefit from

  • Cross-Fleet broadcasts: As our hardware and technology increases on Tranquility, we should make the ability to have the giant fights on giant grids easier.

  • Wormhole Life: Wormholes are about to see a big change all at once. The Citadel Expansion will fundamentally change how we live and make our living in wormhole space, and I want to make sure that this change promotes more people living in wormhole space.

  • NPSI Community QOL Changes: There are many changes that would help the NPSI community, and one of them is the ability for the FC to be able to set Temporary Standings for the fleet. This would also allow alliance FCs on the battlefield to change allegiances with other fleets on grid. Being able to set the visible color of other fleets could also be incredibly beneficial.





I am excited to discuss my ideas and thoughts on any topic, so please ask if you have any questions. You can also reach me on twitter @tiger_tesla and on Reddit /u/Tiger_Tesla

o7
Tiger Tesla
Jayne Fillon
#2 - 2015-12-23 16:32:03 UTC
oh neat, you didn't tell me you were running! good luck!

Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.

Apex Aubaris
Birdsquad
#3 - 2016-01-13 16:55:25 UTC


Tiger Tesla wrote:

  • Battleships: Although Machariels have seen a resurgance, I feel that all battleships should be forces to recon with on the battlefield, balanced by their slow deployment.


  • There are quite a few viable battleship doctrines out there. As everything in Eve it highly depends on the situation and the users intention. Machariels are only one of many frequently used battleship doctrines atm.

    Buffing/Adjusting a single ship class because you "want to see more of them or they should be forces to be reconed with" isnt really a thing in eve and leads to imbalances in power in a very hard to balance environment.

    What would you want to change? And why?

    Tiger Tesla wrote:

  • Alliance Bookmarks: This is a quality of life improvement that everyone can benefit from


  • Pretty sure CCP is aware of that since forever but since alliances are corporations of corporations this is really hard to implement. This is not really anything you as CSM could change or affect.


    Tiger Tesla wrote:

  • Cross-Fleet broadcasts: As our hardware and technology increases on Tranquility, we should make the ability to have the giant fights on giant grids easier.


  • When multiple fleets work together they usually have some sort of communcation link setup already. This change would only amplify N+1 gameplay which nobody really wants to see.


    Tiger Tesla wrote:

  • NPSI Community QOL Changes: There are many changes that would help the NPSI community, and one of them is the ability for the FC to be able to set Temporary Standings for the fleet. This would also allow alliance FCs on the battlefield to change allegiances with other fleets on grid. Being able to set the visible color of other fleets could also be incredibly beneficial.


  • This was part of Jayne Fillons platform last year, and even tho CCP mentioned that they have plans in regards to this topic they clearly couldnt devote any resources to it.

    The point about temporary standings is not a big issue for most fleets since:
    1. People usually shoot what a targetcaller/FC broadcasts.
    2. FCs/targetcallers can already set standings towards other entities.
    3. Distinguishing different fleets is not an impossible task (and shouldnt be for an aspiring FC)
    4. FCs usually coordinate with each other already.

    How would this change (which is probably a lot of effort to implement) affect the day to day buisness in NPSI fleets and why should CCP devote resources to this? (considering that multifleet engagements are fairly rare, and it would be only a improvement for a very small part of the EvE population)






    Tiger Tesla
    State War Academy
    Caldari State
    #4 - 2016-01-27 14:03:01 UTC
    Apex Aubaris wrote:


    Tiger Tesla wrote:

  • Battleships: Although Machariels have seen a resurgance, I feel that all battleships should be forces to recon with on the battlefield, balanced by their slow deployment.


  • There are quite a few viable battleship doctrines out there. As everything in Eve it highly depends on the situation and the users intention. Machariels are only one of many frequently used battleship doctrines atm.

    Buffing/Adjusting a single ship class because you "want to see more of them or they should be forces to be reconed with" isnt really a thing in eve and leads to imbalances in power in a very hard to balance environment.

    What would you want to change? And why?


    Tiger Tesla wrote:

  • NPSI Community QOL Changes: There are many changes that would help the NPSI community, and one of them is the ability for the FC to be able to set Temporary Standings for the fleet. This would also allow alliance FCs on the battlefield to change allegiances with other fleets on grid. Being able to set the visible color of other fleets could also be incredibly beneficial.


  • This was part of Jayne Fillons platform last year, and even tho CCP mentioned that they have plans in regards to this topic they clearly couldnt devote any resources to it.

    The point about temporary standings is not a big issue for most fleets since:
    1. People usually shoot what a targetcaller/FC broadcasts.
    2. FCs/targetcallers can already set standings towards other entities.
    3. Distinguishing different fleets is not an impossible task (and shouldnt be for an aspiring FC)
    4. FCs usually coordinate with each other already.

    How would this change (which is probably a lot of effort to implement) affect the day to day buisness in NPSI fleets and why should CCP devote resources to this? (considering that multifleet engagements are fairly rare, and it would be only a improvement for a very small part of the EvE population)









    In regards to battleships, I simply feel that there should be a tradeoff in deployment versus power, and currently it feels that as a class they are overshadowed. I did not suggest buffing them, because I agree 100% that Nerfing the strongest and buffing the weakest just makes us see-saw into different metas. One thing I do wish is that battleships had a little bit more of their ehp in resists as opposed to raw hp.

    And as for what temporary standings accomplish, it makes the job of an FC easier, and honestly I feel that FCs need more tools to make their job easier, while also encouraging each fleet member to also fly their own ship. It is a hard balance to reach for sure.

    Ultimately though, I understand that as a CSM you can't walk in with a list of things you want, because your main job is to discuss what is presented to you. I wish their was a better way to run for CSM based on your ability to think and reason, as well as work well with others .