These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

The Avg Battleship pilot. "Love PLZ" We would like to Be Known

First post
Author
Linna Excel
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#41 - 2015-12-22 22:34:58 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
I can get my battleships to do all of the above.

The biggest problem battleships have is the fact that t3 cruisers get the same EHP while sporting a sig a fraction of the size, Greater speed and cap stability.


Well, you get what you pay for..
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#42 - 2015-12-22 22:45:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Reaver Glitterstim
Give battleships +25% HP across the board, then introduce 3200mm armor plates and XL shield extenders for battleships. Problem solved. Next.



Linna Excel wrote:
Well, you get what you pay for..

So if I pay for two battleships, I get a battleship that moves like a cruiser?

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Faelune
Tous Pour Un
#43 - 2015-12-22 22:52:13 UTC
One way is open.
Honestly I think BS actually must be what destroyer are to Fregate; A Super Battlecruiser obviously.
With something new never see onany shipclass.
A new rack for high slot under the current high for Large. a rack of high slot only dedicated for Light or medium weaponry.
Bs could be fitted with Full Large or a mix with Med and Small or Large and Small.

Think it a little
elitatwo
Zansha Expansion
#44 - 2015-12-23 00:47:55 UTC
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Give battleships +25% HP across the board, then introduce 3200mm armor plates and XL shield extenders for battleships. Problem solved. Next.



Linna Excel wrote:
Well, you get what you pay for..

So if I pay for two battleships, I get a battleship that moves like a cruiser?


No, this will be so hilariously broken.

Eve Minions is recruiting.

This is the law of ship progression!

Aura sound-clips: Aura forever

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#45 - 2015-12-23 11:20:51 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
I can get my battleships to do all of the above.

The biggest problem battleships have is the fact that t3 cruisers get the same EHP while sporting a sig a fraction of the size, Greater speed and cap stability.


The problem with one ship is never due to another ship. This is a battleship problem and changing other ships to try and fix the problem will only result in more problems.

Battleships are too weak and it makes no sense! We need more BS only mods to get past some of the weaknesses... Or they should all be able to use the bastion module to make then unique from other classes


This is as blatantly untrue today as it was when the game fired up.

T3 cruisers either step on the toes or outright invalidate more than 50 other ships. Command ships for example are another class that many think are underpowered but in reality they are perfectly fine, they are simply outclassed by t3 boosters. T3D are another problem ship that have ruined the frigate balance because they are far too powerful.

I'd rather nerf 4 ships than buff over 50 that would inevitably cause even more balance issues.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#46 - 2015-12-23 11:22:36 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
Serendipity Lost wrote:



As much as I hate to add a ruined BS hull, only a frig pilot idiot would go after a geddon.


I love the new geddon, so much fun to fly and fit.

elitatwo wrote:
[quote=baltec1]

Sad and my Nightmare? or a Rokh?


Nightmare is a great ship, rokh I wouldn't use vs frigates as such it more of a long range anti-cruiser type ship best used in a gang(longer range blaster boat is always nice).
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
#47 - 2015-12-23 15:14:58 UTC
I like flying my barghest with RHML.

Some dudes zerg rushed me with a bunch of frigs the other day and I littered the space with their ship wrecks.

I agree battleships need a bit of a buff but I don't think we will see many big battleship fleets besides a few strat ops where you just bring the biggest thing you can.

Pls leave my machariel alone, thank you.

EvE-Mail me if you need anything.

Valacus
Streets of Fire
#48 - 2015-12-23 21:34:03 UTC
Linna Excel wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
I can get my battleships to do all of the above.

The biggest problem battleships have is the fact that t3 cruisers get the same EHP while sporting a sig a fraction of the size, Greater speed and cap stability.


Well, you get what you pay for..


You can't even pay to make a battleship do what a T3 can do, so that argument is crap.
Romana Erebus
Syndicate Enterprise
Sigma Grindset
#49 - 2015-12-24 00:32:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Romana Erebus
Add more T2 battleship class ships.
Maybe a T3 battleship
Also....it's okay to add skill intense ships to the game. everything does not have to be a frigate or destroyer.
elitatwo
Zansha Expansion
#50 - 2015-12-24 02:54:11 UTC
Faelune wrote:
One way is open.
Honestly I think BS actually must be what destroyer are to Fregate; A Super Battlecruiser obviously.
With something new never see onany shipclass.
A new rack for high slot under the current high for Large. a rack of high slot only dedicated for Light or medium weaponry.
Bs could be fitted with Full Large or a mix with Med and Small or Large and Small.

Think it a little


No silly, you think a little. There is no law in EVE that makes you fit any ship according to what you have been told.

But here we have it, yet another victim to the oversaturation of ships we have. Back in the day when then were less ships in EVE we actually had to think outside the box and have them perfom any task we wanted them to.

Now the newer folks ask for ships that help them go to sleep at night and read them a story. Sometime less is so much more.

Eve Minions is recruiting.

This is the law of ship progression!

Aura sound-clips: Aura forever

Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
#51 - 2015-12-24 03:30:36 UTC
A t2 battleship that is focused on heavy damage output would be very nice.

Doesn't need to have massive tank like everything t2.

EvE-Mail me if you need anything.

Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#52 - 2015-12-24 14:23:14 UTC
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Give battleships +25% HP across the board, then introduce 3200mm armor plates and XL shield extenders for battleships. Problem solved. Next.



Linna Excel wrote:
Well, you get what you pay for..

So if I pay for two battleships, I get a battleship that moves like a cruiser?



No you ninny - you get 2 battleships. I now understand the reasoning behind many of your conclusions and opinions on this forum. It all makes sense now!
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#53 - 2015-12-24 14:33:47 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Serendipity Lost wrote:



As much as I hate to add a ruined BS hull, only a frig pilot idiot would go after a geddon.


I love the new geddon, so much fun to fly and fit.

elitatwo wrote:
[quote=baltec1]

Sad and my Nightmare? or a Rokh?


Nightmare is a great ship, rokh I wouldn't use vs frigates as such it more of a long range anti-cruiser type ship best used in a gang(longer range blaster boat is always nice).



I love the old geddon. It was a giant space penis that spewed fire and death across the battlefield. Now it lands and puffs out a few drones - visually, that makes no sense. They replaced a raging teenager of doom w/ a sputtering old man ship. Graphically it should kind of sag down at the front end at this point - more bananna shaped never being straight and stucturally sound again.

The current geddon would have been excellent if intorduced as a blood raider faction BS. They could have called it a Bhaalgorn or something to that effect. The apoc would have been a better choice to ruin. It doesn't have the classic penis outline and the t1 sniping laser BS will never be a thing again (napoc will always be a better choice).

The Fozzinator did a bad thing and should be punished.
Previous page123