These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

@ CCP, why do you have rules that you refuse to enforce?

Author
Freezehunter
#181 - 2011-12-15 10:32:34 UTC
Taiwanistan wrote:
hey angry man, fedex $30 2nd day shipping, use it so you don't get a stroke
and you shoulda got the 590 instead


I'm in Norway right now.

And no, I wanted a 590, but in all the GTX 590 vs Radeon 6990 the reviews I saw, the 6990 consistently outperformed the 590 by 10-20%.

Also, the 6990 uses way less power.

I might get GTX 580 in SLI later, or just wait for the next generation...

Inappropriate signature, CCP Phantom.

Killer Gandry
The Concilium Enterprises
#182 - 2011-12-15 14:09:22 UTC
Xolve wrote:
Reply of someone who didn't read or was just too weakminded to c mprehend the post.



I was stating where Griefplay comes from. Not where normal gameplay comes from. The line between playing within the rules and when it goes over into griefing ire just too vague in EVE. And CCP just lacks the backbone to put up simple but very clear rules about what exactly is griefing.

On one side they put in their EULA that grieging is prohibited but on the other side they allow certain gamestyles which are commonly accepted as griefing in virtually all other MMO's.

THAT is the problem.

The playerbase has no way to know when something is griefing and even a petition doesn't really bring an answer.
Because you can excelate a petition upwards for various steps before you know what isn't griefplay. But you never get a followup if CCP actually took action because of the "no naming and shaming" policy.

This keeps the rule of no griefing something in the shadowworld where I am sure not even the GM's and Dev's exactly know how to handle in each situation and if asked about it seperatly I am also sure that there would be big differences in replies.

Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#183 - 2011-12-15 14:58:41 UTC
actually everyone who isn't a moron knows exactly what the line is

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.

Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#184 - 2011-12-15 14:59:42 UTC
i can tell you with 100% accuracy what the result of each and every griefing petition will be

i, however, am not a bleeting sheep seeking vainly to find some way to make it against the rules for me to be sheered killed and devoured

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.

Freezehunter
#185 - 2011-12-15 15:10:11 UTC
Weaselior wrote:
i can tell you with 100% accuracy what the result of each and every griefing petition will be

i, however, am not a bleeting sheep seeking vainly to find some way to make it against the rules for me to be sheered killed and devoured


Who the F eats sheep anymore?

Sheep meat is stringy, salty and BLEH...

Inappropriate signature, CCP Phantom.

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#186 - 2011-12-15 19:05:52 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Cipher Jones is griefing all of us by continually creating these horrible threads and then abandoning them when he gets his ass handed to him by people using logic and common sense.


And when that happens I just might, right now its a long way off.

Also, love the accusations of griefing via a forum thread. It shows how little ammunition some people have in the wit arsenal. Thank you for the lulz.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#187 - 2011-12-15 19:23:13 UTC
can someone quote my long takedown of this idiot he has me on ignore because i have mocked his dumb opinions for months after blowing up all his ice mining ships tia

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.

Xolve
State War Academy
Caldari State
#188 - 2011-12-15 19:35:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Xolve
Killer Gandry wrote:
Xolve wrote:
Reply of someone who didn't read or was just too weakminded to c mprehend the post.



I was stating where Griefplay comes from. Not where normal gameplay comes from. The line between playing within the rules and when it goes over into griefing ire just too vague in EVE. And CCP just lacks the backbone to put up simple but very clear rules about what exactly is griefing.

On one side they put in their EULA that grieging is prohibited but on the other side they allow certain gamestyles which are commonly accepted as griefing in virtually all other MMO's.

THAT is the problem.

The playerbase has no way to know when something is griefing and even a petition doesn't really bring an answer.
Because you can excelate a petition upwards for various steps before you know what isn't griefplay. But you never get a followup if CCP actually took action because of the "no naming and shaming" policy.

This keeps the rule of no griefing something in the shadowworld where I am sure not even the GM's and Dev's exactly know how to handle in each situation and if asked about it seperatly I am also sure that there would be big differences in replies.




Firstly, I stopped reading at that chopped and screwed quote edit.

Secondly. Just skimming through- This isn't ALL other MMO's this is EvE. Its been this way for the better part of a decade. We like it here and if you are not of sufficient mental faculties to adapt and overcome, you will get crushed under the proverbial bootheel of every Deathbear/Pirate/Bully/AngryKid/Goon/BoredMerc as they pass you.

Griefer is a play style, its accepted, and it isn't going away. Not a single **** was given about removing insurance payouts from suicide ganker's ships, or anything else lost through concord intervention. Some people log in, just to target a random carebear, push f1, and laugh when they get a mail notification.

I understand what the post is about, I understand the crap the OP has been spewing forth for 10 pages, its all ****. If you undock in this game, regardless of the security rating of the system you venture forth into, there is a RISK that someone like me will blow your shiny toys up. Every PvPer in this game understands its not a matter of 'how' its a matter of 'when', pushing the undock button is just rolling the dice; eventually everyone loses ships. Everyone gets podded. Everyone's expensive faction modules end up in someone else's possession, and returned to the market.

This is the game you choose to play. This are the kinds of things that happen, sporadically, throughout New Eden.

To be point blank about it: CCP Endorses This Behavior, now stop whining.
Freezehunter
#189 - 2011-12-15 19:36:42 UTC
Weaselior wrote:
can someone quote my long takedown of this idiot he has me on ignore because i have mocked his dumb opinions for months after blowing up all his ice mining ships tia


I'll do it if you tell me what to quote, and if you don't grief me after work! :P

I am sure we can work out a mutually advantageous deal.

Inappropriate signature, CCP Phantom.

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#190 - 2011-12-15 19:37:39 UTC
Weaselior wrote:
can someone quote my long takedown of this idiot he has me on ignore because i have mocked his dumb opinions for months after blowing up all his ice mining ships tia


No you haven't. You neither killed nor illustrated that you have killed anything of mine. You simply assume that I am a "hisec carebear" and run your mouth. They cant quote it because it doesn't exist.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#191 - 2011-12-15 19:42:43 UTC
Quote:
We like it here and if you are not of sufficient mental faculties to adapt and overcome, you will get crushed under the proverbial bootheel of every Deathbear/Pirate/Bully/AngryKid/Goon/BoredMerc as they pass you.


Because if you are really smart, a 100k SP pilot in an Imicus can easily overcome a small fleet.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

Xolve
State War Academy
Caldari State
#192 - 2011-12-15 19:47:51 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:
Because if you are really smart, a 100k SP pilot in an Imicus can easily overcome a small fleet.


The Imicus is a lovely ship!
Freezehunter
#193 - 2011-12-15 19:49:05 UTC
Xolve wrote:
Cipher Jones wrote:
Because if you are really smart, a 100k SP pilot in an Imicus can easily overcome a small fleet.


The Imicus is a lovely ship!


Yeah, you can even fit civilian blasters on it!

Inappropriate signature, CCP Phantom.

Ai Shun
#194 - 2011-12-15 19:49:26 UTC
Xolve wrote:
If you undock in this game, regardless of the security rating of the system you venture forth into, there is a RISK that someone like me will blow your shiny toys up. Every PvPer in this game understands its not a matter of 'how' its a matter of 'when', pushing the undock button is just rolling the dice; eventually everyone loses ships. Everyone gets podded. Everyone's expensive faction modules end up in someone else's possession, and returned to the market.


Everybody in this game, be they a merc, a pirate, a hauler, a miner or just a tycoon lounging in Jita is a PvPer. EVE does not have PvE. I think that is where a lot of players become unstuck, because they expect to do their quests, get to level 80 and then raid after reset. And that's not what EVE is.
Freezehunter
#195 - 2011-12-15 19:55:58 UTC
Ai Shun wrote:
Xolve wrote:
If you undock in this game, regardless of the security rating of the system you venture forth into, there is a RISK that someone like me will blow your shiny toys up. Every PvPer in this game understands its not a matter of 'how' its a matter of 'when', pushing the undock button is just rolling the dice; eventually everyone loses ships. Everyone gets podded. Everyone's expensive faction modules end up in someone else's possession, and returned to the market.


Everybody in this game, be they a merc, a pirate, a hauler, a miner or just a tycoon lounging in Jita is a PvPer. EVE does not have PvE. I think that is where a lot of players become unstuck, because they expect to do their quests, get to level 80 and then raid after reset. And that's not what EVE is.


When I run missions or anomalies, I don't really feel like I am doing any PVP, it's PVE.

It's PVE unless you are going against another player, be it market PVP or other kinds of PVP.
If it's not something you do in competition or against another player, it's not PVP.

Doing missions or anomalies and selling your loot / ores to the first buy order is not PVP because you don't compete with anyone.

You guys have a funny idea of PVP, I swear.

Inappropriate signature, CCP Phantom.

Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#196 - 2011-12-15 19:57:23 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:
Weaselior wrote:
can someone quote my long takedown of this idiot he has me on ignore because i have mocked his dumb opinions for months after blowing up all his ice mining ships tia


No you haven't. You neither killed nor illustrated that you have killed anything of mine. You simply assume that I am a "hisec carebear" and run your mouth. They cant quote it because it doesn't exist.

i see you're still pretending to not have seen my explanation of why you're as bad a rules lawyer as you are an ice miner

but please, continue to embarass yourself it's a slow day at work

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#197 - 2011-12-15 19:59:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Freezehunter wrote:
If it's not something you do in competition or against another player, it's not PVP.
…and that's the problem: you're doing your missions and anomalies in competition with other players. Yes, you can spawn missions without competitions (and abandon/complete them), but that's where it non-competitive parts end.

Oh, and selling stuff most definitely is PvP, even if you're doing it to NPC orders (due to how those orders are modified by volume and activity).
Ai Shun
#198 - 2011-12-15 20:00:49 UTC
Freezehunter wrote:
When I run missions or anomalies, I don't really feel like I am doing any PVP, it's PVE.

It's PVE unless you are going against another player, be it market PVP or other kinds of PVP.
If it's not something you do in competition or against another player, it's not PVP.

Doing missions or anomalies and selling your loot / ores to the first buy order is not PVP because you don't compete with anyone.

You guys have a funny idea of PVP, I swear.


Really?

The player that put up that first buy order you accepted without competing was engaging in PvP.

He won.

You lost.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#199 - 2011-12-15 20:01:48 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:
Quote:
We like it here and if you are not of sufficient mental faculties to adapt and overcome, you will get crushed under the proverbial bootheel of every Deathbear/Pirate/Bully/AngryKid/Goon/BoredMerc as they pass you.


Because if you are really smart, a 100k SP pilot in an Imicus can easily overcome a small fleet.



Smile

However,

He can easily evade that small fleet.
He can make friends and join the small fleet.
He can make friends with other people and fight the small fleet.
He can tip off the enemies of the small fleet and get them to kill the small fleet for him.
... or pick any of a dozen other options.

The beauty of it is, he doesn't even need to be "really smart" to do any of those things.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#200 - 2011-12-15 20:06:47 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:
Quote:
We like it here and if you are not of sufficient mental faculties to adapt and overcome, you will get crushed under the proverbial bootheel of every Deathbear/Pirate/Bully/AngryKid/Goon/BoredMerc as they pass you.


Because if you are really smart, a 100k SP pilot in an Imicus can easily overcome a small fleet.

unironically, yes

however, you don't know how to do that because part of those smarts are social intelligence to be able to have friends who can cyno in on your bait inimicus

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.