These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Vote For Real Change in the YC118 CSM Elections

Author
Quattras Peione
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#1 - 2015-11-21 08:31:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Quattras Peione
In the centuries since mankind ascended to the stars, countless souls have ventured forth into the infinite black in search of freedom. Freedom from oppression, freedom from poverty, freedom to create one’s own destiny. In the years since the Jovian gift of the hydrostatic capsule, that pursuit of freedom has taken us ever further across the galaxy, spanning the width and breadth of New Eden and Anoikis alike.

The oldest institutions in existence – the governments, corporations, and sociopolitical entities under which New Eden became what it now is – are ill-equipped to handle the relentless pursuit of further horizons that is the nature of capsuleers. Quite often the goals of our organizations conflict with their own, and they react to this in the same manner in which governments have reacted to new powerful entities for tens of thousands of years: they enact laws telling us that we have to do as they say, or else. To this we in return reply in the manner in which capsuleers invariably reply to such talk:

Or else what, exactly?

It is the capsuleers who power the financial engines of New Eden. Our bottomless coffers, our insatiable wanderlust, and our effective immortality fund their petty squabbles over patches of dirt, their “grand” grasps at power over corporate entities that the least of us could buy and sell a dozen times over without giving it a second thought. Even the largest and most powerful megacorporations pale in comparison to the absolute might wielded by most large capsuleer alliances.

The empires use the threats of force to keep us in check, but what do they actually have at their disposal? We hear mention of vast fleets of ships, but it is we who do their dirty work, with these supposed fleets never to be seen. We hear mention of the Iapetan titans, but those ancient unwieldy machines are few and far between, in comparison to the thousands that could be wielded by a united capsuleer force. They boast numbers, but these numbers are mostly civilians – the elderly, the infirm, children, and the meek. Even should they manage to militarize all of their citizenry, these entities are fractious – divided amongst themselves, each coveting their neighbor’s share of power and money.

And what of CONCORD? What indeed. The only real power that CONCORD wields is the Jovian technology that powers their ships, the “remote control” that can turn off our warp drives and weapons systems. If they are beholden to any master at all, it is the Jovian empire, a master of whom they should be wary indeed. As we have seen in recent events, it is CONCORD and specifically the Directive Enforcement Department that is the least trustworthy baseliner organization of all. Their suppression of vital information of public interest, their harassment and at times outright assault on the media, their strong-arm tactics in dealing with capsuleers, suggest that they are not to be bargained with, but dissolved entirely.

The empires are completely aware that actual, gloves-off competition with one another would devastate them all. Their citizens would not stand for it, their infrastructure could not support it, and their respective pride could not tolerate the potential for failure. This is why the Emergency Militia War Powers Act was enacted, and why it must be repealed for us to realize our full potential. We are told that the EMWPA was necessary to prevent another incident like the Battle of Caldari Prime. But according to how it is enacted, it does nothing of the sort. Instead capsuleers are encouraged to focus their efforts on skirmishes to protect the “borders” of their respective empires, while there are high-security paths between all four of the major empires that bypass the militia zones entirely. Pilots are encouraged to take and re-take systems with little to no strategic or economic value, into which no governmental resources will be put. Civilians unfortunate enough to live in a Factional Warfare system receive little to no support from their governments, only a different occupying force every once in a while. The most fortunate are those who live in a system primarily occupied by a pirate corporation, whose residence provides both economic and social stability for resident civilian populations.

Yet there are those who stand against these trends. We stand for an open culture of free exchange and expression of ideas, tools, and works. We stand for transparency and openness, a culture where the activities and agendas of governments are not hidden from the public. We stand for individual privacy, and the freedom to make personal decisions that do not harm others. We stand against monopolistic policies. We stand for the power of the individual against institutions, and the universal rights of all humanity, regardless of ethnicity or socioeconomic status.

For these values they call us “pirates.” For our belief in self-determination, they call us “pirates.” For our belief in every human’s right to participate in their own governance, they call us “pirates.” For our insistence that surveillance and the assumption of guilt are intrinsically unjust, they call us “pirates.” For our rejection of traditional authority and exclusionary policies, they call us “pirates.”

We wear this label of “pirate” as a badge of honor, a name to be worn proudly, no longer to be looked at as an inflammatory slur, implicative of criminality. We are Pirates. We stand for the liberty, equality, and solidarity of all human beings, and against any and all threats that they may face.

It is on these principles that Joffy Aulx-Gao of A Band Apart is running for the Council of Stellar Management in the coming year. Embrace freedom. Embrace self-determination. Embrace the future. Vote Joffy.

Dr. Quattras Alvar Peione

No, I'm not that kind of doctor.

Quattras Peione
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2 - 2015-11-21 08:32:57 UTC
((In all seriousness, in addition to being one of the nicest guys I've met in Eve and arguably the most honorable pirate in lowsec, Joffy is running to make important changes to the game, including making it more accessible to potential players with disabilities. The Man - The Campaign))

Dr. Quattras Alvar Peione

No, I'm not that kind of doctor.

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#3 - 2015-11-21 10:31:57 UTC
The only decent point you make is that the EMWPA war should end.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#4 - 2015-11-21 15:39:19 UTC
Uh... that is all nice and well, but...

What is the CSM?
Quattras Peione
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#5 - 2015-11-21 17:04:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Quattras Peione
Politics aren't my area of expertise, but My understanding of it is that they are a board of capsuleer delegates elected to represent us before CONCORD and the DED. If this agenda is to move forward, that's the place to start. None have yet had the audacity to challenge the status quo in the manner that my alliance mate proposes to.

Dr. Quattras Alvar Peione

No, I'm not that kind of doctor.

Nick Bete
Highsec Haulers Inc.
#6 - 2015-11-21 17:29:19 UTC
Sorry but he lost me at the low-sec piracy part. There are already enough low/null sec agenda types on that advisory body now.
Quattras Peione
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#7 - 2015-11-21 17:44:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Quattras Peione
Oh really? Perhaps you could enlighten us as to precisely what lowsec agenda is being pushed currently? I don't deny that the nullsec crowd gets disproportionate representation, but to lump the two groups together is to do both a grave disservice.

I should also point out that I and the members of my corporation are in good standing with the baseline empires and reside in highsec.

Dr. Quattras Alvar Peione

No, I'm not that kind of doctor.

Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#8 - 2015-11-21 17:44:55 UTC
Quattras Peione wrote:
The only real power that CONCORD wields is the Jovian technology that powers their ships, the “remote control” that can turn off our warp drives and weapons systems.


They don't need any other power. In the end raw brute force is all that matters in case of all empires.

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude

Quattras Peione
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#9 - 2015-11-21 17:55:24 UTC
I respectfully disagree with your opinion on brute force, pilot Lanate. There is much to be said for training the hound without beating it.

As regards your stance on CONCORD, I concur that they do not need any more power than what they already wield. Point of fact, I don't believe they need the power they already wield. I appreciate the intentions behind it, but the fact of the matter is that the only parties served by this are CONCORD themselves and a certain segment of capsuleers. Baseliners - the population whose interests I am the most concerned with - benefit nothing from the status quo. Perhaps if there were actual police work and preventative action in place as opposed to the convoluted ruleset that we have, which is laughably easy to bypass and does nothing to deter the worst of us - I would have a higher regard for the law enforcement that we have in place. As it stands, it's quite frankly a joke and needs the scrutiny that can only come with being unafraid to tear it all down and start from scratch.

Dr. Quattras Alvar Peione

No, I'm not that kind of doctor.

Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#10 - 2015-11-22 12:53:17 UTC
Before the ending of the War, the Federation must be destroyed and our Caldari Prime must be cleansed from gallentean swines.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Ria Nieyli
Nieyli Enterprises
When Fleets Collide
#11 - 2015-11-22 13:06:19 UTC
Honestly, the CSM has a lot to answer for. I believe three electees stepped down from it before their term ended? That's simply unacceptable, how are people supposed to have faith in the process when stuff like that happens?
Arrendis
TK Corp
#12 - 2015-11-22 14:19:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Arrendis
Alternatively:


  • One Councillor voluntarily stepped down when he realized he couldn't fulfill his duties, allowing one of the elected alternates to take his place. Oh no, the system is working and the Councillors are acting honorably and honestly to ensure the people have diligent representation.

  • How ever could someone have faith in the system?

  • A second Councillor was judged by the rest of the peoples' elected representatives to be not doing his job at all, and was removed, allowing one of the elected alternates to take his place. Oh no, the system is working and the Councillors are acting honorably and honestly to ensure the people have diligent representation.

  • How ever could someone have faith in the system?

  • In the third case, an actual violation of the Council's rules was found, and the violator was punished. Oh no! The system works, and when Councillors don't act honorably and honestly, they get removed from their position.

  • How EVER could someone have faith in the system?


When you have a demonstrable case of actual malfeasance not being punished, then you can decry the system and question how people are supposed to have faith in the process. But personally? If someone says 'hey, I thought I could do this, but I can't, let me get out of the way"? That's not a failure of the system. When someone isn't doing the work, or is otherwise violating the trust of the rest of the Council or of the people he's supposed to represent, and he gets removed? That's not a failure of the system.

This is what's supposed to happen in these situations - unless you're actually claiming you'd prefer that CSMs who either can't or won't do the job are indefinitely retained in the position, not serving the peoples' needs?
Ria Nieyli
Nieyli Enterprises
When Fleets Collide
#13 - 2015-11-22 15:10:23 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Alternatively:


  • One Councillor voluntarily stepped down when he realized he couldn't fulfill his duties, allowing one of the elected alternates to take his place. Oh no, the system is working and the Councillors are acting honorably and honestly to ensure the people have diligent representation.

  • How ever could someone have faith in the system?

  • A second Councillor was judged by the rest of the peoples' elected representatives to be not doing his job at all, and was removed, allowing one of the elected alternates to take his place. Oh no, the system is working and the Councillors are acting honorably and honestly to ensure the people have diligent representation.

  • How ever could someone have faith in the system?

  • In the third case, an actual violation of the Council's rules was found, and the violator was punished. Oh no! The system works, and when Councillors don't act honorably and honestly, they get removed from their position.

  • How EVER could someone have faith in the system?


When you have a demonstrable case of actual malfeasance not being punished, then you can decry the system and question how people are supposed to have faith in the process. But personally? If someone says 'hey, I thought I could do this, but I can't, let me get out of the way"? That's not a failure of the system. When someone isn't doing the work, or is otherwise violating the trust of the rest of the Council or of the people he's supposed to represent, and he gets removed? That's not a failure of the system.

This is what's supposed to happen in these situations - unless you're actually claiming you'd prefer that CSMs who either can't or won't do the job are indefinitely retained in the position, not serving the peoples' needs?


Why were they allowed to run in the first place? What about the people who voted for them, believing that they'd be represented by those people?

Not to mention that setting in people as replacements that couldn't garner enough votes in the first round is a bad precedent. What if the #1 votee drops out next season? You could potentially end up in a situation where the majority of the people voted against the current CSM.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#14 - 2015-11-22 15:29:03 UTC
Ria Nieyli wrote:
Why were they allowed to run in the first place? What about the people who voted for them, believing that they'd be represented by those people?

Not to mention that setting in people as replacements that couldn't garner enough votes in the first round is a bad precedent. What if the #1 votee drops out next season? You could potentially end up in a situation where the majority of the people voted against the current CSM.



They were allowed to run because they had solid credentials and there was no evidence that there would be any problem. Conditions in peoples' lives change. Feces occurs, as it were. The democratic process gets messy.

Considering the number of people available, if the person who is 15th has that poor a showing, then isn't the problem that not enough people are voting?
Ria Nieyli
Nieyli Enterprises
When Fleets Collide
#15 - 2015-11-22 15:46:29 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Ria Nieyli wrote:
Why were they allowed to run in the first place? What about the people who voted for them, believing that they'd be represented by those people?

Not to mention that setting in people as replacements that couldn't garner enough votes in the first round is a bad precedent. What if the #1 votee drops out next season? You could potentially end up in a situation where the majority of the people voted against the current CSM.



They were allowed to run because they had solid credentials and there was no evidence that there would be any problem. Conditions in peoples' lives change. Feces occurs, as it were. The democratic process gets messy.

Considering the number of people available, if the person who is 15th has that poor a showing, then isn't the problem that not enough people are voting?


People won't vote if they feel they're improperly represented. And I think this CSM is going to be the worst one yet in terms of voter confidence.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#16 - 2015-11-22 16:11:55 UTC
Ria Nieyli wrote:
People won't vote if they feel they're improperly represented. And I think this CSM is going to be the worst one yet in terms of voter confidence.


And you're doing a very good job of undermining them by fomenting mistrust in a system for working properly.
Ria Nieyli
Nieyli Enterprises
When Fleets Collide
#17 - 2015-11-22 16:16:13 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Ria Nieyli wrote:
People won't vote if they feel they're improperly represented. And I think this CSM is going to be the worst one yet in terms of voter confidence.


And you're doing a very good job of undermining them by fomenting mistrust in a system for working properly.


Yeah, the system is working properly... or is it? See, I'm just asking questions.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#18 - 2015-11-22 16:34:28 UTC
Ria Nieyli wrote:
Yeah, the system is working properly... or is it? See, I'm just asking questions.


No, you're not. You're blatantly and transparently working to undermine voter confidence and voter turnout. As I said already: yes, these are examples of the system working.

Or, again, would you prefer these people remain on the CSM and not work for the people? You still haven't answered that.
Ria Nieyli
Nieyli Enterprises
When Fleets Collide
#19 - 2015-11-22 16:58:39 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Ria Nieyli wrote:
Yeah, the system is working properly... or is it? See, I'm just asking questions.


No, you're not. You're blatantly and transparently working to undermine voter confidence and voter turnout. As I said already: yes, these are examples of the system working.

Or, again, would you prefer these people remain on the CSM and not work for the people? You still haven't answered that.


Yes, and if they don't work cancel their clone contract. They knew what they were getting into when they ran their campaigns, there are no innocent bystanders here.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#20 - 2015-11-22 17:14:32 UTC
Quattras Peione wrote:
Politics aren't my area of expertise, but My understanding of it is that they are a board of capsuleer delegates elected to represent us before CONCORD and the DED. If this agenda is to move forward, that's the place to start. None have yet had the audacity to challenge the status quo in the manner that my alliance mate proposes to.


Never heard of it...
12Next page