Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center

You aren't considering the effect of gate guns on light tackle if you try and tackle the DST directly on the gate.
Ripping it off gate removes that issue.

They should read blogs and notes then. Eve a complicated game...it can need some additional reading. Eve is not alone here. Damn near any MMO or online RPG I played is like this.

CCP very generous here with a fair amount of notice. I have seen crap changed last minute with almost no warning. Sometimes nice presents...sometimes hey CCP where is my dinner, kiss or KY before you bend us over twink in the prison shower style.

Or were you expecting 2000000 noobs being in these day 1. You weren't getting this. Boats like this can be game changing force multipliers. It wasn't being given out like candy.

Specialized ship, specialized train. Those with an interest in leadership should have had these already. Fun fact....many leadership skills give passive boosts no link fit whatsoever. 2% per level. Small roam. put a player on booster spot and lets have them 5'd already for say shields. That is 10% more shield ehp right there alone. No links...in any ship they fly. These aren't useless skills. Its10% boosts max level to many areas given just by being there.


Crew/players opted to not hook themselves up doing this, thats on them. I did this long ago of own free will and no desire to fly CS'. Many did. Out with 5-10 friends often....at some point one if not more should be going you know, someone should be in the booster spot who can actually do something there, if only for 10% passive boosts no links.

I'm sort of curious as to who it is at CCP that hates Caldari ships so much as to call the new Destroyer - A common wading bird.
While the Amarr get - A rip off of the pope and Catholic church
Gallente and minmatar - Old Norse name and Greek mythological names respectively.

I guess the Caldari one had its name chosen last and you'd run out of beer and couldn't be bothered thinking about it. Or the beer really took over and you thought Stork would be a good name, in comparison to the other 3.

Not quite, most decent gate campers will have something that can tank the gate guns, once you are caught my a semi competent gate camp then killing the DST should only be a matter of time.

The DSTs best defence is to avoid being tackled, it can do this my using MWD + Cloak, and also WCS in LS. The CD won't make any difference to whether you get tackled.

Also you'd need two CDs to pull the DST out of gate gun range. After having thought about this for a few days although I believe CDs are fine by themselves, being able to daisy chain jumps will be completely OP and game breaking as you can effectively move ships an unlimited distance by daisy chaining.

Want to bring snipers to your fleet? No problem, jump 100km to pick them up and pre activate another CD for the return journey. Want to avoid gate guns? Use two CDs to move 200km out of gate gun range. I think this is too powerful as you have unlimited movement possibilities by daisy chaining.

Three changes I'd urge CCP to reconsider before these start to become balanced.

1. Disallow daisy chaining (perhaps after a CD is jumped the MJFG's needs a period of time to recalibrate).

2. An active bastion module should stop a marauder being jumped and the cyno should be jumped with the cyno ship if the ship is able to be jumped in the first place.

3. Activation of the MJFG should cause instant aggression upon activation rather than upon jumping.

Its quite obvious forum design isn't suited for feedback threads. I guess its even easier for CCP dev's themselves, to track down feedback in the "branching structured " reddit forums then in their companies very own forum.

Concerning the new ships and the MJFG module. It looks quite stimulated by merchandising logic. We have 5 new ships,with a brand new module exclusively for the new ship type. It is fair to state CCP game design department has been quite successful in the last years introducing new ship types, balancing them and listening to player feedback in the same context

On the hand this can't be said about new modules and the re-balancing of meta4 items ( ...not to speak about faction modules respective faction store items). Ancillary armor booster, ancillary shield booster, reactive armor harders, MicroJumpDrives are for example , stil sitting on blue print copy seed. Now they have settled on a function as to to save exploration pilot income ....making the already complex production mechanics of eve spreading out into the contract department .

I see the MJFG module, if balance is passed, sitting rite among this selection of "blue print copy only items"......no faction variants, no t2 variants and being fittable only on a small selection of ships.

Introducing new ship types stimulates short turn merchandising effects while module rebalancing creates long-term customer satisfaction, yeah ....its quite a typical economic dilemma.
Personally, i think, its about time to put a bit of work in the ground-laying module rebalancing. I feel that the niches for new supcap ships are becoming too small and too complicated.

The new grids on Sisi are absolutely enormous, and while what we see there is not conclusive proof of what will be there on release, we can pretty much leave old assumptions in the dust.

Sgt, at least it is a bird. Caldari ships have a long tradition in giving their birds a bird's name.

Explain the Cerberus, Ferox, Scorpion, Onyx, Naga, Badger, Tayra, Basilisk, Golem, Widow, and Rokh. Rokh should prolly have been spelled "Rukh", but I guess CCP failed to catch it.

Did I miss any non-bird name Caldari ships?

Storks are oftentimes paired with delivering babies. kinda fits.

Are you kidding? It's a great name! I'm going to be doing this every time I use one!