These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Statements and Responses to the Imperial Succession Trials

Author
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#81 - 2015-11-20 23:40:22 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
Arrendis wrote:
To call us gladiators, Ms. Farel, implies that there is a greater power at whose behest we fight.


Yes.

CONCORD and the Empire signatories.


Nonsense. The Empires certainly don't direct our conflicts, and CONCORD abhors the sheer level of organization and capability we already possess.


Every single one of your conflicts plays directly into their hand. Like for every capsuleer business, nullsec is no exception, and is even magnified tenfold.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#82 - 2015-11-21 00:49:28 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
Every single one of your conflicts plays directly into their hand. Like for every capsuleer business, nullsec is no exception, and is even magnified tenfold.


And your supporting evidence for this assertion is...?
Deitra Vess
Non-Hostile Target
Wild Geese.
#83 - 2015-11-21 01:01:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Deitra Vess
It keeps a large number of us from slaughtering them...

my proof being to look at the vast majority of capsuleers, if they weren't shooting each other, who's left to shoot at?
Arrendis
TK Corp
#84 - 2015-11-21 02:49:52 UTC
Quite likely, we'd be shooting one another in Empire space.

Even so, that's hardly playing directly into their hands. It is, at best, an indirect benefit... that could be made completely unnecessary by simply restricting access to clone and pod technology.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#85 - 2015-11-21 15:37:28 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
Every single one of your conflicts plays directly into their hand. Like for every capsuleer business, nullsec is no exception, and is even magnified tenfold.


And your supporting evidence for this assertion is...?



Every tax, every control you relinquish to them (every capsuleer), the cleaning of pirate elements in lawless regions, the sovereignty costs, the economic prospects and war casualties and ensuing material requirements that will eventually get back to the empire fold, stargate control and invulnerability, the fact that you still obey to what they let you interact with and nothing else, that you still have to pay for your license like everyone else, that they can shut you down any time they want, rules regulating infrastructure deployment...

I can continue... I thought all of this was more or less obvious...
Arrendis
TK Corp
#86 - 2015-11-21 19:44:43 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
Arrendis wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
Every single one of your conflicts plays directly into their hand. Like for every capsuleer business, nullsec is no exception, and is even magnified tenfold.


And your supporting evidence for this assertion is...?



Every tax, every control you relinquish to them (every capsuleer), the cleaning of pirate elements in lawless regions, the sovereignty costs, the economic prospects and war casualties and ensuing material requirements that will eventually get back to the empire fold, stargate control and invulnerability, the fact that you still obey to what they let you interact with and nothing else, that you still have to pay for your license like everyone else, that they can shut you down any time they want, rules regulating infrastructure deployment...

I can continue... I thought all of this was more or less obvious...


As I said: those are indirect. I'm still waiting to hear how we directly play into their hands.
Valerie Valate
Church of The Crimson Saviour
#87 - 2015-11-22 09:08:39 UTC
As a Righteous believer in one of the True Faiths, I have this to say about the Trials:

God Wills It.

That is All.

Well, also some Polite Applause.

Doctor V. Valate, Professor of Archaeology at Kaztropolis Imperial University.

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#88 - 2015-11-22 09:59:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Arrendis wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
Arrendis wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
Every single one of your conflicts plays directly into their hand. Like for every capsuleer business, nullsec is no exception, and is even magnified tenfold.


And your supporting evidence for this assertion is...?



Every tax, every control you relinquish to them (every capsuleer), the cleaning of pirate elements in lawless regions, the sovereignty costs, the economic prospects and war casualties and ensuing material requirements that will eventually get back to the empire fold, stargate control and invulnerability, the fact that you still obey to what they let you interact with and nothing else, that you still have to pay for your license like everyone else, that they can shut you down any time they want, rules regulating infrastructure deployment...

I can continue... I thought all of this was more or less obvious...


As I said: those are indirect. I'm still waiting to hear how we directly play into their hands.


I find them pretty direct myself...

You really seem to show a willingness to play on words for a lack of better arguments, if I may say so.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#89 - 2015-11-22 13:56:23 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
I find them pretty direct myself...

You really seem to show a willingness to play on words for a lack of better arguments, if I may say so.


Not really. I'm not saying our activities aren't indirectly benefiting CONCORD and the Great Empires, or that CONCORD isn't still able to limit where our supercapital fleets go. But you've said every one of our conflicts directly plays into the Empires' and CONCORD's hands, and I'm still not seeing it. Other than as what can only be a drop-in-the-economic bucket, I don't see how a few billion ISK is directly playing into their hands - especially since it's not like CONCORD gets paid every time a system changes hands.

I don't see the direct benefit to the Empires that was derived Darkness' reconquista of Querious earlier this year, or of their loss of Delve two months before that. That's what I'm saying: that while sure, there are all sorts of indirect benefits, if you're going to claim "Every single one of [our] conflicts plays directly into their hand" then you have to show how each of these conflicts directly advances their agenda.

Because otherwise, if we're only talking about indirect economic benefits from Sov bills, or the destruction of a few thousand pirate ships every month, or that starbases require a moon's gravity well (which is a technical limitation, not a CONCORD ordinance), then I'm really not seeing how your statement lines up with the reality of capsuleers in null who have the economic power to move directly and noticeably manipulate commodity prices cluster-wide, or the military power to inflict trillions of ISK in losses in a few short days in high-sec while rendering CONCORD completely impotent in any attempts to stop them.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#90 - 2015-11-22 17:09:58 UTC
I already showed that, but it seems that no matter what I say, you will deny it, or not see it the same way.

I do not mind. Small truths I guess.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#91 - 2015-11-22 18:42:56 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
I already showed that, but it seems that no matter what I say, you will deny it, or not see it the same way.

I do not mind. Small truths I guess.


No, see, you've given examples of what sort of activities you say are directly feeding into their hands, but you haven't shown how.

Here, let me give you an example:

"You people spending all day destroying Guristas directly plays into the CONCORD and the Empires' hands because the Guristas are massing a force to attack the Empires. But by listing that space as 'unclaimed' rather than as claimed by the Guristas, CONCORD has convinced you all to act as a buffer state to keep the Guristas menace at bay."

See the difference? That doesn't just say 'you're doing X, and that plays into their hands', that actually elucidates how it plays into their hands.

What is the direct benefit to CONCORD and the Empires for X activity? What would be the cost to them if we were to stop?

So, since you say our 'every conflict' plays directly into their hands: What is the direct benefit to CONCORD and the Empires of our having evicted NCdot from Tribute three years ago? How would us having ignored NCdot's violation of OTEC and attack on our Technetium moons have harmed CONCORD or the Empires?

Or do the Halloween War. Or Fountain in YC115. Or the Fountain/Delve invasion/counterinvasion this past year.

But show how it plays into their hands, instead of simply listing an activity and claiming it does. Because the piddling little trifles that are sov bills can't be even a drop in the bucket of their economic activity. If it is, they're a lot weaker than we are, economically.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#92 - 2015-11-23 12:17:54 UTC
I already told you above in the first answer by listing what is.

You fuel the space economic bubble that happens to take place in high sec empire mostly. Every single thing that happens in null security falls in that category.

If that is not direct for you, then I am not sure what would constitute a direct link, especially in regards to the guristas example you gave above.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#93 - 2015-11-23 16:13:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Arrendis
Well, then yes, I'm going to have to disagree with you.

CONCORD is on-record as saying the massive explosion of capsuleer power is not something they like. Almost all of the trade we engage in, even in high-sec, is with other capsuleers, which means we're undercutting CONCORD's authority by producing the new class of (relative to what there was previously in high-sec) super-wealthy industrialists... who aren't producing for the Empires. Their products don't go, for example, to be used in the periodic maintenance and refitting of supercapitals, for example, or the maintaining of stargates in the State. The only benefit the Empires see - and it's a relatively small one - is the taxes on trading.

I mean, just really think about this for a moment here: do you think the Republic would rather have all those megatons of ore, planetary products, etc, being used to build capsuleer ships for them to make a nominal, largely insignificant, amount taxing... or going to build up the Republic's infrastructure, agricultural capacity, industrial capabilities. A lot gets made about the plight of the refugees in the Republic, but the only limiting factors on how much aid they can receive is supply. They'll certainly use anything you make available to them, and in doing so, they'll drive economic development further. But none of the billions of tons of livestock or water or any of the consumables, commodities, or construction materials going through Rens and Hek daily ever gets diverted to that.

So a massive growth of economic power that isn't being put to the ends the Empires would like, inside their own space, among a class of people they're already starting to get a bit paranoid about... no, I don't see how that plays directly into their hands. And that's not even taking into account the blatant undermining of CONCORD's legitimacy that happens during the 'Burn' events every year. CONCORD's supposed to stop that sort of thing from happening, and yet they're demonstrably powerless to do so.

And my example with the Guristas was facetious. They're not massing for an attack. If they were, they'd be doing it in the space they hold in Venal where they have stations, and we don't bother. Example: The Blood Raiders. Capsuleer pirate-hunting in Delve certainly didn't slow them down a bit, did it?
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#94 - 2015-11-23 19:56:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
All of your premises are totally wrong...

CONCORD on-record is PR. CONCORD have rules in high sec to prevent total chaos to gripe their own clockwork where capsuleers prove to be very productive little ants.

What industrialists produce do not go into empire infrastructure directly indeed, but the taxes, the work, and the general economical flow do, and they do largely.

What capsuleers inflict to pirate forces is colossal. Without it, their influence in space would be far stronger, and it would strain a lot on conventional militaries.

I think you fail to see the bigger picture here.
Mitara Newelle
Newelle Family
#95 - 2015-11-23 20:08:05 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:

I think you fail to see the bigger picture here.


I think both you and Ms Arrendis are failing to stay on the topic of this thread.

Lady Mitara Newelle of House Sarum, Holder of the Mekhios province of Damnidios Para'nashu, Champion of House Sarum, Sworn Upholder of the Faith, Divine Commodore of the 24th Imperial Crusade

Admiral of Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris

Arrendis
TK Corp
#96 - 2015-11-23 20:10:21 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
What industrialists produce do not go into empire infrastructure directly indeed, but the taxes, the work, and the general economical flow do, and they do largely.

What capsuleers inflict to pirate forces is colossal. Without it, their influence in space would be far stronger, and it would strain a lot on conventional militaries.


It's really cute that you believe these things. Really. If our activities were truly impacting the bottom-line of the pirate organizations, don't you think they'd have standing orders not to engage us?

As for the 'general economical flow' of capsuleer production - over 90% of the value and economic activity surrounding everything produced doesn't go anywhere near the Empires' pockets. The work on mining barges, or reaction pos's, or any of the processing in null that then gets shipped in (Ice, ores, modules) doesn't get touched by the Empires. At best, the PI production chains pay salaries that get taxed by the Empires, but even moving goods to and from the planets' surface no longer gets siphoned into the Empires' wallets, but into those of capsuleers.

If you're going to make the assertion that the larger part of the economic value of goods which aren't produced by the Empires, aren't sold to the Empires, and don't get transported by the Empires, actually goes to the Empires, then you're going to need to show your work there. Otherwise, the evidence available to the casual observer would strongly indicate otherwise.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#97 - 2015-11-24 12:57:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Cute??

I was having the courtesy not to tell you up front I find your typical nullsec centric views really naive, but I believe this is going nowhere in any case...

Mitara Newelle wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:

I think you fail to see the bigger picture here.


I think both you and Ms Arrendis are failing to stay on the topic of this thread.



Hasn't it run its course?
Tamiroth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#98 - 2015-11-24 13:21:06 UTC
Aldrith Shutaq wrote:
Ave Intergalatic Summit, Dam-Amarr, and the cluster at large:

Acting under the assumption that many of us would like to discuss the outcome of the Championships and its implications thus far, I have taken the liberty of hosting a thread where we might consolidate our congratulations, laments, and our visions for the future. We of the Empire, Kingdom and Mandate have been through a great ordeal during these Trials, and the times call for us to commune and accept God's will as it is made manifest. Let us come to terms with our losses, celebrate our victories, and submit to the guidance of the Lord's hand.

I ask that all communications be civil, forthright, and respectful to this solemn and sacred event. We should speak our hearts at this time but also restrain excessive anger, grief, or joy at the current state of things. Remember that while we are gaining a new ruler, we are also losing five great persons. Your cooperation is appreciated.

"Surround yourself with the faithful, Stand together, for there is no strength like it under the heavens."
- The Scriptures, Book of Missions 71:21


May the tribulations that were brought upon us during the interregnum and the last reign be left behind in the decades to come.

May the era of the new Emperor be long and blessed with peace, prosperity and cooperation for a better future.

Maria Daphiti
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#99 - 2015-11-24 13:53:57 UTC
While I was disappointed that the Sarum Champions lost, I hope the Kor-Azor team prevails in the end!

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#100 - 2015-11-24 17:51:43 UTC
Maria Daphiti wrote:
While I was disappointed that the Sarum Champions lost, I hope the Kor-Azor team prevails in the end!



Blonde is a nice look for you, Maria, although you're now very similar-looking to Lunarisse, which might prove confusing.

Honestly, though, the mother-daughter similarities are striking.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.