These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Lets fix the Ferox, Appeal to CCP

Author
erfta
State War Academy
Caldari State
#21 - 2011-12-13 22:07:17 UTC
vorneus wrote:
Lunkwill Khashour wrote:
Dors Venabily wrote:
Needs more speed

Needs more grid

Needs turret slot

it would be passable then



This and
- remove 1 slot from drake, harby, cane
- increase ac fitting


Less of a Ferox buff and more of a "change the nature of a huge part of the game".

What does increasing AC fitting have to do with revamping the Ferox's slots and bonuses? :P

-Ed

its to easy to just say aww hell and slap Ac's in every high slot

no one reads the TOS not even the guy that writes it. this is sig worthy http://massively.joystiq.com/2011/11/09/mortal-online-plagiarizes-eve-onlines-terms-of-service/1#c35015206

Liang Nuren
No Salvation
Divine Damnation
#22 - 2011-12-13 22:19:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Liang Nuren
I'm in favor of removing the tier system, but not of nerfing the hell out of Tier 2 BCs as a whole. Thus, I'd really like to see something like this (rough draft):
- Ferox, +1 mid, +1 High, +1 Turret. Bonuses Unchanged.
- Cyclone: +1 Mid. Bonuses Unchanged.
- Prophecy: +1 Low, +1 High, +6 Launchers [7 total], Cap Use Bonus -> HAM ROF
- Brutix: +1 Low, +1 High, +1 Turret. Bonuses Unchanged.

If that seems too difficult, just adding a turret and launcher slot to the Ferox would go a long ways - but really I lust after that extra mid.

-Liang

I'm an idiot, don't mind me.

Liang Nuren
No Salvation
Divine Damnation
#23 - 2011-12-13 22:21:01 UTC
erfta wrote:

its to easy to just say aww hell and slap Ac's in every high slot


People putting unbonused weapons on ships is hardly new or interesting. With the Hybrid changes I'm less sold than ever that this is a good idea.

-Liang

I'm an idiot, don't mind me.

Jaigar
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#24 - 2011-12-25 04:24:06 UTC
Xuse Senna wrote:
LolWut? You don't use it for Gas Mining?! :S

Cane is better, can hold 3100 m3.
Kietay Ayari
Caldari State
#25 - 2011-12-25 09:45:05 UTC
I think you know where I stand on this issue. At least up until the point where you suggested the Ferox needs to get a graphics revamp like the Raven.

Ferox #1

TheMahdi
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#26 - 2011-12-25 18:24:16 UTC
It's still not the worst tier 1 BC. I don't mind my 14 inch penis.
SpaceSquirrels
#27 - 2011-12-25 19:31:47 UTC
The t1s... minus a few should get a mini CS bonus to replace the cap/optimal/other not so great bonuses. Lot of em get a tank bonus so could be a stepping stone to field command ships.

Cheap so they actually go into a fight... (nerf OG bossting) But dont provide as good bonuses or advanced tank of the actual CS ships.


Though I do like the idea of the prof getting a ham bonus lol.
Raven Ether
Doomheim
#28 - 2011-12-25 21:44:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Raven Ether
Not just the Ferox, but its command ship hull the Nighthawk could use a decent powergrid boost.



And swap one optimal range on the Vulture for damage. Right now it has TWO x10% optimal range bonuses, totalling to a mind bogging 100% bonus to optimal.
Max Von Sydow
24th Imperial Crusade
Amarr Empire
#29 - 2011-12-25 22:54:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Max Von Sydow
Raven Ether wrote:
Not just the Ferox, but its command ship hull the Nighthawk could use a decent powergrid boost.



And swap one optimal range on the Vulture for damage. Right now it has TWO x10% optimal range bonuses, totalling to a mind bogging 100% bonus to optimal.


Are you sure it's calculated 50% + 50% and not 1.5x1.5.
cause then it would be a mind bogging 125% optimal bonus.
Worpout
Quafe Racing
#30 - 2011-12-26 02:15:52 UTC
Give the ferox armor reparir amount, and autonannon bons, if you want to make it a decent ship.
Previous page12