These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Benefit of tanking the price of an item?

Author
Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
#41 - 2015-11-23 07:53:04 UTC
This thread is terrible, way off topic.

@JerryTPepridge

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#42 - 2015-11-23 08:26:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Teckos Pech
Rhivre wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Rhivre wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:


And maximizing profits means you maximize your revenues less costs of everything you are selling. So that covers your example with X and Y. Yes, dump your stock of X and recover your investment and switch to Y.



Maximizing profit is not always better than fast turnover.


Why is fast turn over not consistent with maximizing profits? If you have little control over the price, then yeah...fast turn over. If there is a better option, yeah fast turn over.

Holy ****. Roll



I have control over whether I sell it instantly to a buy order, or sell it via sell order.

If I want maximum profit, I would use sells. If I want isk now, I will dump it to buys, or dump it low on the market. (also, depending how much I bought it for as well....not everyone dumping prices is buying it on the same station, or at the same time).


Oh FFS. Even if you dump to buy orders that indicates you have little control over the price.

Holy mother ******* ****. Roll

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Rhivre
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#43 - 2015-11-24 03:01:16 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:


Oh FFS. Even if you dump to buy orders that indicates you have little control over the price.

Holy mother ******* ****. Roll



Ok, lets roll it this way....

Say I have 3000 of a module sitting in my hangar.

The following are my options:

1) Dump to buy orders at my local trade hub

2) Dump to buy orders in Jita

3) Put up 1 order in my local trade hub

4) put up 1 order in Jita

5) put up stacks of 30 in my local trade hub, and play pat-a-cake with the guy who keeps undercutting me

6) Put up stacks of 30 in Jita, and play pat-a-cake with the undercutters. (Full screens of blue are fun!)


With 5 and 6, you also have the option of pulling the prices down as far as you want, then cancelling all your orders, leaving the guy following you now selling at or below the price he bought at. and you can either scoop up the cheap items now on the market, or let someone else get a bargain.

But, yes, you have no control over price in any way........


Usually I choose options 2 and 3 because they are the least hassle. and just require me making 1 jump in a shuttle after setting up the contract for moving the items.



Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#44 - 2015-11-24 04:50:47 UTC
Rhivre wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:


Oh FFS. Even if you dump to buy orders that indicates you have little control over the price.

Holy mother ******* ****. Roll



Ok, lets roll it this way....

Say I have 3000 of a module sitting in my hangar.

The following are my options:

1) Dump to buy orders at my local trade hub

2) Dump to buy orders in Jita

3) Put up 1 order in my local trade hub

4) put up 1 order in Jita

5) put up stacks of 30 in my local trade hub, and play pat-a-cake with the guy who keeps undercutting me

6) Put up stacks of 30 in Jita, and play pat-a-cake with the undercutters. (Full screens of blue are fun!)


With 5 and 6, you also have the option of pulling the prices down as far as you want, then cancelling all your orders, leaving the guy following you now selling at or below the price he bought at. and you can either scoop up the cheap items now on the market, or let someone else get a bargain.

But, yes, you have no control over price in any way........


Usually I choose options 2 and 3 because they are the least hassle. and just require me making 1 jump in a shuttle after setting up the contract for moving the items.





Okay, but why do you do that?

Roll

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
#45 - 2015-11-24 05:17:37 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:

Okay, but why do you do that?

Roll


to annoy you.

we spoke in a private backchannel, and i advised him to call you "the guy that shuts down the grid" on ghostbusters

@JerryTPepridge

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#46 - 2015-11-24 05:45:15 UTC
Jerry T Pepridge wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:

Okay, but why do you do that?

Roll


to annoy you.

we spoke in a private backchannel, and i advised him to call you "the guy that shuts down the grid" on ghostbusters



I don't believe you are seriously considering listening to these men. P

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Mindy Lelievre
The Canary - Ta-er al-Safar
#47 - 2015-12-22 14:37:43 UTC
I know this thread is way old but I thought I'd leave my 2 cents because I am guilty of doing this.... quite often...

and I do it because I know if I don't, someone else eventually will. They will bring it down within razor-thin margins between the buy/sell because that's what markets do. So, why not beat the herd and get the price it will eventually be but faster than everyone else :)
TheSmokingHertog
Julia's Interstellar Trade Emperium
#48 - 2015-12-22 17:38:42 UTC
HeXxploiT wrote:
It looks like the question you are asking is slightly different than what the thread title suggested but I will post this just because it's on the same topic.

Eve's market as realistic as it is tends to be exaggerated. There are a great many items where the bid and the ask have a significant spread.

If i decide a particular T1 item is going to increase in price in the future I begin putting buy orders in to acquire the item at the lowest possible price expecting to accumulate stock over an extended period of time.
Let's say I want to acquire 100,000 of an item where the ask is 400,000isk and the bid is 80,000isk.
I've comfortably picked up 20,000 of the item and unexpectedly over the course of a week five new buy orders have appeared driving the bid up to 250,000isk.

So the buy orders(bid) look like this;

Quantity---price
500---------250,000
500---------250,000
1000-------200,000
700--------150,000
750---------140,000
1000-------80,000

I have 20,000 of this item. Experience has taught me that if I can wipe out those top five bids I will then be able to begin buying the item back at a lower price and significantly increase my profits in the long run.

This is a commonplace trading tactic.


Crashing the price down like this is very nice to do, with current stock, if you see entering someone like this into your markets.

"Dogma is kind of like quantum physics, observing the dogma state will change it." ~ CCP Prism X

"Schrödinger's Missile. I dig it." ~ Makari Aeron

-= "Brain in a Box on Singularity" - April 2015 =-

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#49 - 2015-12-22 17:43:35 UTC
Mindy Lelievre wrote:
I know this thread is way old but I thought I'd leave my 2 cents because I am guilty of doing this.... quite often...

and I do it because I know if I don't, someone else eventually will. They will bring it down within razor-thin margins between the buy/sell because that's what markets do. So, why not beat the herd and get the price it will eventually be but faster than everyone else :)


Because it depends on the level of competition. A market where people can get in and out with considerable ease and there are low setup costs should be highly competitive and thus razor thin margins.

A market where entry is not quite as easy will likely have wider margins for the short run (the short run is not precisely defined here as it can vary from market to market). So by rushing right down to the razor thin margins you are in effect leaving money sitting on the table.

There a couple of reasons to drop the prices that I can think of:

1. You had a windfall of sorts, you ganked a freighter and a boat load, literally, of something of some value, but you don't want to play the 0.01 ISK game (because if you did you'd be a station trader and not out ganking). So you set the price low to move the product fast, hopefully.

2. You realize that your ISK, which is tied up in this product, could be much better used somewhere else. This is the time value of money that several other posters were commenting on. So you want to liquidate quickly to go take advantage of this other opportunity. These other commenters were too stupid to realize that this approach is still completely in line with maximizing profits.

Personally, in both situations I'd go for the bulk buy/sell mailing list in game. That way I don't risk dropping the price low and still being stuck with a 0.01 problem (or dropping the price lower again). Basically find somebody who doesn't mind the 0.01 ISK thing.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#50 - 2015-12-22 18:03:06 UTC
TheSmokingHertog wrote:
HeXxploiT wrote:
It looks like the question you are asking is slightly different than what the thread title suggested but I will post this just because it's on the same topic.

Eve's market as realistic as it is tends to be exaggerated. There are a great many items where the bid and the ask have a significant spread.

If i decide a particular T1 item is going to increase in price in the future I begin putting buy orders in to acquire the item at the lowest possible price expecting to accumulate stock over an extended period of time.
Let's say I want to acquire 100,000 of an item where the ask is 400,000isk and the bid is 80,000isk.
I've comfortably picked up 20,000 of the item and unexpectedly over the course of a week five new buy orders have appeared driving the bid up to 250,000isk.

So the buy orders(bid) look like this;

Quantity---price
500---------250,000
500---------250,000
1000-------200,000
700--------150,000
750---------140,000
1000-------80,000

I have 20,000 of this item. Experience has taught me that if I can wipe out those top five bids I will then be able to begin buying the item back at a lower price and significantly increase my profits in the long run.

This is a commonplace trading tactic.


Crashing the price down like this is very nice to do, with current stock, if you see entering someone like this into your markets.


This strategy depends on the constesability of the market.

Jita for example is a highly contested market for many items.

Now a NS market might be much, much less contestable. After all getting stuff there entails some extra level of risk and expense. So trying to price a guy out of your market might be a reasonable strategy....or it might not.

Notice from the link that there are three factors affecting contestability of a market.


  1. No entry or exit barriers
  2. No sunk costs
  3. Access to the same level of technology (to incumbent firms and new entrants)


The last one is true in game. Nobody has "better" technology in game. There also are not too many sunk costs in the game. About the only one I can think of is office rentals. So, markets in Eve are generally rather contestable with barriers to entry and exit being the most significant factor, IMO.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Paul Pohl
blue media poetry
#51 - 2015-12-23 03:01:31 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
Rhivre wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Rhivre wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:


And maximizing profits means you maximize your revenues less costs of everything you are selling. So that covers your example with X and Y. Yes, dump your stock of X and recover your investment and switch to Y.



Maximizing profit is not always better than fast turnover.


Why is fast turn over not consistent with maximizing profits? If you have little control over the price, then yeah...fast turn over. If there is a better option, yeah fast turn over.

Holy ****. Roll



I have control over whether I sell it instantly to a buy order, or sell it via sell order.

If I want maximum profit, I would use sells. If I want isk now, I will dump it to buys, or dump it low on the market. (also, depending how much I bought it for as well....not everyone dumping prices is buying it on the same station, or at the same time).


Oh FFS. Even if you dump to buy orders that indicates you have little control over the price.

Holy mother ******* ****. Roll


That's just rubbish.

What do you need control over the price for?

In fact it's better if someone else is controlling the price, as that way you can set your margins before placing buy orders.
Amy Inhibenson
Living Off The Land
Intaki-Business Logistics Union
#52 - 2016-01-04 05:27:12 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
Mindy Lelievre wrote:
I know this thread is way old but I thought I'd leave my 2 cents because I am guilty of doing this.... quite often...

and I do it because I know if I don't, someone else eventually will. They will bring it down within razor-thin margins between the buy/sell because that's what markets do. So, why not beat the herd and get the price it will eventually be but faster than everyone else :)


Because it depends on the level of competition. A market where people can get in and out with considerable ease and there are low setup costs should be highly competitive and thus razor thin margins.

A market where entry is not quite as easy will likely have wider margins for the short run(the short run is not precisely defined here as it can vary from market to market). So by rushing right down to the razor thin margins you are in effect leaving money sitting on the table.


That's exactly right, and for 0.01-isking no-lifers (I've been known to dabble) this is where they sit. For the short run, they are exploiting the difference between the buy and sell in the station, or the sell from another station to the sell in the current station. They are usually not interested in high-competition items with thin margins because it requires another strategy to exploit the long-term fluctuations of a price (rather than arbitrage, as we are discussing here).

Traders like this aren't going to be "scared off" by you dramatically undercutting them and devaluing the sell price of the item. The narrowing of the margin and their loss of potential profit will be written off as an unfortunate event but one that is known to occur. If you trash the item then they move on to the other 100 items they are trading in. If you consider that a win, then good for you. But at the end of the day it's all about the ISK.
Chekov Nikahd
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#53 - 2016-01-04 05:57:26 UTC
Rhivre wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:


And maximizing profits means you maximize your revenues less costs of everything you are selling. So that covers your example with X and Y. Yes, dump your stock of X and recover your investment and switch to Y.



Maximizing profit is not always better than fast turnover.


I prefer turnover to maximized profit.

I don't 0.01isk; when I do change orders, it's by substantial amounts. Perhaps not 20% like in the OP, though.

My goal isn't to get rid of possible profit for others or myself - though I tend to close margins on items I trade fairly quickly. My intention is merely to increase the velocity of buy/sell, get my profit and move on. Occasionally the prices and 'market pvp' don't work in my favor and I'm faced with selling at a loss. I bite the bullet and keep going until the items are sold; I don't sit on the items waiting for a margin to grow again.

When the profit margin on a product disappears like that, I put it aside and check back later (assuming I liked trading in it). If the margin (and more importantly, the volume) looks decent, I might trade in it again.

From what I hear, the people who like to 0.01isk on an item with a 50% profit margin for three weeks absolutely hate it when people like me come along and reduce that margin to 5% in the course of two days. Pirate

Don't worry guys. I'm out of your item as quickly as I come into it! Just sit back and let me profit. Blink
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#54 - 2016-01-04 06:12:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Teckos Pech
Chekov Nikahd wrote:
Rhivre wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:


And maximizing profits means you maximize your revenues less costs of everything you are selling. So that covers your example with X and Y. Yes, dump your stock of X and recover your investment and switch to Y.



Maximizing profit is not always better than fast turnover.


I prefer turnover to maximized profit.

I don't 0.01isk; when I do change orders, it's by substantial amounts. Perhaps not 20% like in the OP, though.

My goal isn't to get rid of possible profit for others or myself - though I tend to close margins on items I trade fairly quickly. My intention is merely to increase the velocity of buy/sell, get my profit and move on. Occasionally the prices and 'market pvp' don't work in my favor and I'm faced with selling at a loss. I bite the bullet and keep going until the items are sold; I don't sit on the items waiting for a margin to grow again.

When the profit margin on a product disappears like that, I put it aside and check back later (assuming I liked trading in it). If the margin (and more importantly, the volume) looks decent, I might trade in it again.

From what I hear, the people who like to 0.01isk on an item with a 50% profit margin for three weeks absolutely hate it when people like me come along and reduce that margin to 5% in the course of two days. Pirate

Don't worry guys. I'm out of your item as quickly as I come into it! Just sit back and let me profit. Blink


Good God...maybe you should re-read that and rethink what it means to maximize profit.

Hint: Maximizing profits does not mean maximizing price.

Can't believe I had to point that out. Roll

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Chekov Nikahd
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#55 - 2016-01-04 06:56:01 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:

Good God...maybe you should re-read that and rethink what it means to maximize profit.

Hint: Maximizing profits does not mean maximizing price.

Can't believe I had to point that out. Roll


Don't get all offended m8
I'm just talking about increasing velocity and selling/buying quickly in exchange of maximizing the potential profit of an individual item with 0.01 isk orders that barely move the price around.

My post wasn't even directed at you Lol
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#56 - 2016-01-04 07:36:13 UTC
Chekov Nikahd wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:

Good God...maybe you should re-read that and rethink what it means to maximize profit.

Hint: Maximizing profits does not mean maximizing price.

Can't believe I had to point that out. Roll


Don't get all offended m8
I'm just talking about increasing velocity and selling/buying quickly in exchange of maximizing the potential profit of an individual item with 0.01 isk orders that barely move the price around.

My post wasn't even directed at you Lol


My point is that maximizing profit is not maximizing price.

Or to put it differently...you are still maximizing profit.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Odav Klaskion
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#57 - 2016-01-07 02:06:22 UTC
Thanks for all the insight and banter folks. Basically I was trading in Hek when I dealt with this issue. I've since moved to regional trading and found a nice station to set up shop with little competition (1-2 sellers per item) that is slower but my mark ups are 20%+ and still sell just fine.
Fin Udan
Doomheim
#58 - 2016-01-07 09:19:39 UTC
You have buy orders, sell orders and inventory not on sale. You just need to balance the aggressiveness of your buy orders with the aggressiveness of your sell orders to minimize(or eliminate) inventory not on sale.
Previous posters have correctly characterised this as generating profit by maximising turnover.

Having said all that the main reason for tanking a price is to persuade a competitor to go away. A buy order you don't have to babysit is worth it's weight in gold

I trade Eve Mogul

Sir SmashAlot
The League of Extraordinary Opportunists
Intergalactic Conservation Movement
#59 - 2016-01-10 16:56:30 UTC
1. Liquidity

Cannot hold onto assets forever

2. See 1

If the best bid is large enough and is at a price above manufacturing cost it can be strategically better to just dump assets for a -20% difference from the best asking price. 0.01 isking a large stack of items will generally lead to the best bid being brought below manufacturing cost before you exhaust your inventories.
Previous page123