Crime & Punishment

GUYS IM GONNA TALK ABOUT A SUBJECT WE ALL LIK 2 AVOID. A WARM FEELING IN OUR PANTS WHEN WE SEE LADY SPANK IN LOCAL THEN IT GOES AWAY WHEN SHE AFK CLOAKIES. i WANNNA HERE ABOUT HOW IT IS WITH YOU CAUSE I THOUGHT I WAS ALONER LADY SPANK IS WATS WRONG AND EVE IS DIENG

In B4LOCK

Someone has a broken caps lock...and who the hell is Spruillo?

Have you considered adult diapers?

Blind security guard?

Being legally blind is the least of your problems tbh.

CAUSE I KNOW KUNG FU IRL AN DONT AFRid OF NOTHIN

In response to Mr. Spruillo's cajoleries, I would like to offer the following opposing points. Before I start, however, I should state that to understand what Spruillo's particularly thrasonical form of sectarianism has encompassed as a movement and as a system of rule, we have to look at its historical context and development as a form of vagarious politics that first arose in early twentieth-century Europe in response to rapid social upheaval, the devastation of World War I, and the Bolshevik Revolution. By reducing meaningful political discussions to “my team versus your team” identity-based politics, Spruillo has erected a monument to voyeurism. Only it does not seem proper to say that such a thing has been “created”. “Excreted”, “belched”, “spewed”, and “spat out” are expressions more appropriate to the object here described. You see, Spruillo must have some sort of problem with reading comprehension. That's the only explanation I can come up with as to why Spruillo accuses me of admitting that criminals are merely social rebels. What I actually said is that Spruillo likes malisons that leave behind a legacy of perpetual indebtedness in developing countries. Could there be a conflict of interest there? If you were to ask me, I'd say that in a vain effort to exculpate himself, he has been proclaiming to the world that he has done no wrong. Rather, it was his serfs who have been evading responsibility. I suppose the next thing he'll have us believe is that we're supposed to shut up and smile when he says uncouth things.

Spruillo's legates proclaim that a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance. Sorry, guys, but the inconvenient truth is that any benefit that happens to be gained from Spruillo's unsophisticated execrations is bound to be fugacious. How much more illumination does that fact need before Spruillo can grasp it? Assuming the answer is “a substantial amount”, let me point out that Spruillo has been trying desperately hard to make the case that truth is whatever your grievance group says it is. Sorry, Spruillo, but I must respectfully disagree. My counterargument is that once one begins thinking about free speech, about horny monomaniacs who use ostracism and public opinion to prevent the airing of views contrary to their own savage beliefs, one realizes that Spruillo arrogates to himself the right to stonewall on issues in which taxpayers see a vital public interest. So don't feed me any phony baloney about how newspapers should report only on items he agrees with. That's just not true.

Spruillo has been trying to raise funds for scientific studies that “prove” that the more strepitant the communication, the more perspicuous the message. This is what's called “advocacy research” or “junk science” because it's funded by egotistical self-promoters who have already decided that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all utterly justified. Too many drugged-out clinchpoops out there are looking for the quick and easy fix, for a great savior who will make it all right again so they can go back to sleep. They gather at the foot of the mount to herald the coming of Spruillo and neglect to notice that if we don't do something soon, there'll be no stopping Spruillo. To meet the challenges of this decisive hour we must build a better world, a cleaner world, a safer world, and a saner world. That's the best way to spread the word that someone has been giving his brain a very thorough washing, and now Spruillo is trying to do the same to us. That's all I have to say. Thanks for letting me express my feelings.

Lame before, lamer now

I've got nuthin' bros. this one is beyond the troll.