Intergalactic Summit

Not right in the head, immature, thin-skinned, probably hates herself, thinks the universe revolves around her (har har har), in denial, projects herself onto people alot, probably has self-image issues and hates herself, can't comprehend the Pi, flies Atrons and Tristans and Confessors and Daredevils than bona-fide Caldari vessels and is terrible with whatever Caldari vessel she CAN fly.....

Just look around, search through publicly available records, and you can see exactly what I am talking about.

She's tries to be Heth v 2.0 but she's so much less effectual about it.

I'd love to use gank Cruors, but thrashers are just better. Don't hate the pilot, hate the proverbial game.

I don't always fly Guristas ships, so does that make me a bad Guristas Pirate?

I thought so too!

My humble opinion Matari ships are the best. That doesn't mean that other races' ships don't have their place and thus should be ignored. What my wolf excells at my slicer wouldn't last very long in. I still prefer my wolf but having something designed to act as heavy tackle (my usual load out anyways) would generally lose against something designed to stay out of my range, like most slicera I face are. Either way I don't see how just because, for anyone who mainly flies in combat situations, they would limit them selves because "this ship I'm flying which is not designed for what I'm trying to do is better because its Matari designed in origin." Again I'm not saying your other points are invalid, just that that particular one is more less clutching straws.

Mm. I'd only hoped to pull existing discussions into this thread, so the other topics could get back on track.

It lasted a little while.

At least you tried Miss Priano! It was a good effort.

Maybe now things can go back to what they used to!

No, my logic about your superiority goes this way instead:

I declare A is superior.

I use products of A and lose them constantly. I use B.

So tell me now. Can you still declare that A is superior if your ACTIONS doesn't prove it? If A is superior you would be using A almost exclusively.

I had explained to her exactly why I criticise your usage of those ships instead of exclusively Caldari ship as below:



Don't even think to try to quote things out of context, because I will look back and set the records straight.

Come on now. Change the subject. I know you want to.



It's all about 'fit for purpose'. Being a privateer, I need a ship that's agile, survivable and hits hard. As it turns out, Matari vessels happen to tick all three boxes.

Though some ships do have inherent flaws in their design.

Take for example the Rifter. The Rifter is currently in a strange place. She can't quite scram-kite as well as a Breacher due to the Breacher's faster natural speed and stable damage application up to 10km if rockets. She can't quite signature-tank as well as a Slasher, which has a smaller signature radius and a much better speed, plus improved tracking. Thus, unless the pilot plots deceit, there really isn't a compelling practical reason to fly a Rifter.

You sound remarkably like Kim.

Which is not my problem. I just find some other employer or move into a different profession.

I feel like someone attempted to cast as spell to bring Heth back, but all we got were these fizzled imitations.