Intergalactic Summit

Still a correct answer. Perhaps the teacher shouldn't be so sloppy, and should instead say 'Students, 'c' is the mathematical shorthand in physics for the speed of light in a vacuum. Can anyone tell me what the value of 'c' is in meters/second?'.

Perhaps goons should have less thick foreheads and obtain ability to understand jokes and ideas.


No, you didn't, goon. It's ridiculous when someone of your level of intelligence claims other to be bad at math, really. I don't know how to explain it easier... should I speak slower or call a nurse who speaks fluent moron?

Okay, I'll try one more time. Just out of curiosity.
I am not asking to visualize you anything of value pi, for Maker's sake. I am asking you to conceive NUMBER pi. Numerical relation of square to circle.

For others:
Please excuse for my language, I am really annoyed at goon level of stupidity. Thanks.

Trust me, we all know you're a joke, Diana.



You're simultaneously claiming that you can conceive of the number two - but doing so via objective representation. So my point is, you sanctimonious idiot, that no, without the objective representation, you can't. Further, by using objective representation, conception of pi is just the same as conception of one, two, .3, etc, from which you are specifically claiming it is completely different.

Which means you are wrong. Not only are you wrong, but you are so amazingly bad at conceptual logic that you cannot even comprehend how you are wrong. You are effectively arguing that conception of motion is possible by moving your arm, but conception of speed is impossible because speed is relative. Furthermore, you attempt to declare that the conception of abstract concepts isn't only impossible, but that it holds the key to some boneheaded form of apotheosis that exists only in your own head.

Here's a clue: abstract concepts can obviously be conceived of, because if they couldn't, they wouldn't be concepts, you unctuous moron. Also, pi isn't the relation of 'square to circle', it's the relationship of the circumference of a circle to its own diameter. To get from the diameter of a circle to a square, you have to add in the requirement for additional lines at specific angles to one another along the surface of the circle - angles (90 degress, obviously) that are in no way mandated by the mere existence of the circle. Pi, by comparison, is the quotient of the circumference of a circle, divided by the direct distance between any point on the circle and the point directly opposite that point - no additional lines required. Just the circle.

Because not knowing your maths is bad. I once accidently divided by 0. Now all the Jovian stargate are broken..... (to the Jove, I'm really sorry about that whole "exploding-your-empire" thing...)

Because it is basis of everything. Everything around us is working according to laws of mathematics. Everything can be countered and measured. We are surrounded by operators and operands. Geometries, probabilities, groups and sets.
And this example - just a number pi contains infinity of numbers. In each tiny grain of sand there are universes and infinities, spreading away like infinity of space of our universe.

I said I was sorry.....

What's the matter, Kimmie, was that the only sentence in there you understood?

She doesn't know we don't have to leave Nullsec to mock her, does she?

I don't think anyone here is concerned with your perception of stupidity, as I'm sure that the majority of us don't share it and your opinion is virtually worthless.