These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

UAxDEATH's removal from CSM
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Asl Yotosala
The First Foundation
Legion of xXDEATHXx
#21 - 2015-10-06 15:52:36 UTC
a rare collection of dissatisfied players.
I prepared with beer and popcorn.
jita burn and more others...............
UAxDEATH
The xDEATHx Squadron
Legion of xXDEATHXx
#22 - 2015-10-06 15:57:03 UTC
Warmeister wrote:
Etana Kryvidus wrote:

Of course, I understand that CSM membership is completely voluntary, and the CSM whitepaper does not restrict in any way nor sets a minimum level of communication between Council member and community. But a good representative is expected to be sort of a public person and somewhat talk with the playerbase, don't you agree?

In summary, recent actions (or rather lack of actions) of UAxDEATH let Russian community consider him as inactive CSM member. So I ask the Council of Stellar Management consider the possibility of removing UAxDEATH from the Council and re-running the election script once again.


i think u misunderstand the meaning of 'representative'.

representative usually represents the views of part of the community who voted for him.
given that trolls from eve-ru overwhelmingly voted against him, he's not your representative, so stop whinging




Just sums, what I wanted to say here.

Bunch of trolls, who were recently stimulated by a war that just waged by me (XIX) against RA and co, who happens to be in same time and pretty much active troll group in eve-ru.
Bombardier Harrison
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#23 - 2015-10-06 16:34:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Bombardier Harrison
UAxDEATH wrote:
Warmeister wrote:
Etana Kryvidus wrote:

Of course, I understand that CSM membership is completely voluntary, and the CSM whitepaper does not restrict in any way nor sets a minimum level of communication between Council member and community. But a good representative is expected to be sort of a public person and somewhat talk with the playerbase, don't you agree?

In summary, recent actions (or rather lack of actions) of UAxDEATH let Russian community consider him as inactive CSM member. So I ask the Council of Stellar Management consider the possibility of removing UAxDEATH from the Council and re-running the election script once again.


i think u misunderstand the meaning of 'representative'.

representative usually represents the views of part of the community who voted for him.
given that trolls from eve-ru overwhelmingly voted against him, he's not your representative, so stop whinging




Just sums, what I wanted to say here.

Bunch of trolls, who were recently stimulated by a war that just waged by me (XIX) against RA and co, who happens to be in same time and pretty much active troll group in eve-ru.


Really? So you haven't been absent for three weeks, without letting anyone from CCP know about the planned absence?

Because CCP Leloo directly confirms your inactivity, lack of communication with developers etc for at least that time.
Vedja Scrappy
anti s0cial s0cial club
Emotionally. Unstable
#24 - 2015-10-06 16:48:31 UTC
Quote:
Just sums, what I wanted to say here.

Bunch of trolls, who were recently stimulated by a war that just waged by me (XIX) against RA and co, who happens to be in same time and pretty much active troll group in eve-ru.

Of course. But xxxDeathxxx did not tell the community about their work because that the RED SPY can find out what is unnecessary
Vadrus
#25 - 2015-10-06 16:49:36 UTC
UAxDEATH wrote:
Warmeister wrote:
Etana Kryvidus wrote:

Of course, I understand that CSM membership is completely voluntary, and the CSM whitepaper does not restrict in any way nor sets a minimum level of communication between Council member and community. But a good representative is expected to be sort of a public person and somewhat talk with the playerbase, don't you agree?

In summary, recent actions (or rather lack of actions) of UAxDEATH let Russian community consider him as inactive CSM member. So I ask the Council of Stellar Management consider the possibility of removing UAxDEATH from the Council and re-running the election script once again.


i think u misunderstand the meaning of 'representative'.

representative usually represents the views of part of the community who voted for him.
given that trolls from eve-ru overwhelmingly voted against him, he's not your representative, so stop whinging




Just sums, what I wanted to say here.

Bunch of trolls, who were recently stimulated by a war that just waged by me (XIX) against RA and co, who happens to be in same time and pretty much active troll group in eve-ru.

Of course it is always about poor UAxDeath being attacked by trolles. There is never anything wrong with him being mostly offline for the last three years. But what about that time when UAxDeath asking his friend (Who as i know now is the CEO of XIX) and CCP Leloo to damage control the critique of UAxDeath ignoring community and being offline when he was trying to get back to CSM. Who was XIX and Co at war at that time? (Other than Rogue Drones of course)
UAxDEATH
The xDEATHx Squadron
Legion of xXDEATHXx
#26 - 2015-10-06 17:29:27 UTC
Bombardier Harrison wrote:
UAxDEATH wrote:
Warmeister wrote:
Etana Kryvidus wrote:

Of course, I understand that CSM membership is completely voluntary, and the CSM whitepaper does not restrict in any way nor sets a minimum level of communication between Council member and community. But a good representative is expected to be sort of a public person and somewhat talk with the playerbase, don't you agree?

In summary, recent actions (or rather lack of actions) of UAxDEATH let Russian community consider him as inactive CSM member. So I ask the Council of Stellar Management consider the possibility of removing UAxDEATH from the Council and re-running the election script once again.


i think u misunderstand the meaning of 'representative'.

representative usually represents the views of part of the community who voted for him.
given that trolls from eve-ru overwhelmingly voted against him, he's not your representative, so stop whinging




Just sums, what I wanted to say here.

Bunch of trolls, who were recently stimulated by a war that just waged by me (XIX) against RA and co, who happens to be in same time and pretty much active troll group in eve-ru.


Really? So you haven't been absent for three weeks, without letting anyone from CCP know about the planned absence?

Because CCP Leloo directly confirms your inactivity, lack of communication with developers etc for at least that time.


Mommy, I'll keep in mind next time, I'll have to ask for permission to do so. Thank you.

and where, did I say I didn't absent?
UAxDEATH
The xDEATHx Squadron
Legion of xXDEATHXx
#27 - 2015-10-06 17:30:39 UTC
Vadrus wrote:
UAxDEATH wrote:
Warmeister wrote:
Etana Kryvidus wrote:

Of course, I understand that CSM membership is completely voluntary, and the CSM whitepaper does not restrict in any way nor sets a minimum level of communication between Council member and community. But a good representative is expected to be sort of a public person and somewhat talk with the playerbase, don't you agree?

In summary, recent actions (or rather lack of actions) of UAxDEATH let Russian community consider him as inactive CSM member. So I ask the Council of Stellar Management consider the possibility of removing UAxDEATH from the Council and re-running the election script once again.


i think u misunderstand the meaning of 'representative'.

representative usually represents the views of part of the community who voted for him.
given that trolls from eve-ru overwhelmingly voted against him, he's not your representative, so stop whinging




Just sums, what I wanted to say here.

Bunch of trolls, who were recently stimulated by a war that just waged by me (XIX) against RA and co, who happens to be in same time and pretty much active troll group in eve-ru.

Of course it is always about poor UAxDeath being attacked by trolles. There is never anything wrong with him being mostly offline for the last three years. But what about that time when UAxDeath asking his friend (Who as i know now is the CEO of XIX) and CCP Leloo to damage control the critique of UAxDeath ignoring community and being offline when he was trying to get back to CSM. Who was XIX and Co at war at that time? (Other than Rogue Drones of course)



You are so well informed, why aren't you run for president ??
Bombardier Harrison
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#28 - 2015-10-06 17:36:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Bombardier Harrison
UAxDEATH wrote:
Bombardier Harrison wrote:
UAxDEATH wrote:
Warmeister wrote:
Etana Kryvidus wrote:

Of course, I understand that CSM membership is completely voluntary, and the CSM whitepaper does not restrict in any way nor sets a minimum level of communication between Council member and community. But a good representative is expected to be sort of a public person and somewhat talk with the playerbase, don't you agree?

In summary, recent actions (or rather lack of actions) of UAxDEATH let Russian community consider him as inactive CSM member. So I ask the Council of Stellar Management consider the possibility of removing UAxDEATH from the Council and re-running the election script once again.


i think u misunderstand the meaning of 'representative'.

representative usually represents the views of part of the community who voted for him.
given that trolls from eve-ru overwhelmingly voted against him, he's not your representative, so stop whinging




Just sums, what I wanted to say here.

Bunch of trolls, who were recently stimulated by a war that just waged by me (XIX) against RA and co, who happens to be in same time and pretty much active troll group in eve-ru.


Really? So you haven't been absent for three weeks, without letting anyone from CCP know about the planned absence?

Because CCP Leloo directly confirms your inactivity, lack of communication with developers etc for at least that time.


Mommy, I'll keep in mind next time, I'll have to ask for permission to do so. Thank you.

and where, did I say I didn't absent?


You didn't, I presumed so from your "tralls tralls" answer to the OP, which (the OP, obviously) stated your (now confirmed by CCP) inactivity and requested you to either be removed or for you to start being active.

So I'll presume again that you wouldn't want to be removed and suggest you get active with the developers, mate, unless you exceed some sort period of inactivity that others exceeded before you. Pip pip cheŠµrio!
Etana Kryvidus
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#29 - 2015-10-06 18:00:31 UTC
So he is alive. At least someone log in under that account. I can consider a part of the job is done (although a really small one).

The main question still remains: will you, UAxDEATH, be active at CSM and inform players of your activities?
Roudzik
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#30 - 2015-10-06 19:35:49 UTC
UAxDEATH wrote:
Warmeister wrote:
Etana Kryvidus wrote:

Of course, I understand that CSM membership is completely voluntary, and the CSM whitepaper does not restrict in any way nor sets a minimum level of communication between Council member and community. But a good representative is expected to be sort of a public person and somewhat talk with the playerbase, don't you agree?

In summary, recent actions (or rather lack of actions) of UAxDEATH let Russian community consider him as inactive CSM member. So I ask the Council of Stellar Management consider the possibility of removing UAxDEATH from the Council and re-running the election script once again.


i think u misunderstand the meaning of 'representative'.

representative usually represents the views of part of the community who voted for him.
given that trolls from eve-ru overwhelmingly voted against him, he's not your representative, so stop whinging




Just sums, what I wanted to say here.

Bunch of trolls, who were recently stimulated by a war that just waged by me (XIX) against RA and co, who happens to be in same time and pretty much active troll group in eve-ru.

I glad to see you back, and what you already do something as CSM attendee.
Just one question: why you need this "CSM member" status, if you was totally inactive for at least three weeks, and came to us only after little storm?
Vollhov
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#31 - 2015-10-06 19:43:07 UTC
Yes, yes to blame RA
We believe in a fairy tale.

End of Time. I'm not fanatic, I'm just a servant by Her Majesty the Empress Jamyl Sarum I. It's time to leave this world to me. YC111 to YC117.12.10 20:00
Vadrus
#32 - 2015-10-06 20:00:12 UTC
UAxDEATH wrote:


You are so well informed, why aren't you run for president ??

Why don't you stop trying to derail the topic, stop trying being sarcastic and start answering the questions the community has about your activity?
Whitmore
Lowlife.
Snuffed Out
#33 - 2015-10-06 21:27:02 UTC
CCP employee confirms that he is inctive, he claims that all accusations are just trolling. 10/10 CSM member
Talvorian Dex
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#34 - 2015-10-07 03:14:34 UTC
Etana Kryvidus wrote:
Dear CSM,

[Drivel, redacted for brevity.]

A russian version of the petition is available here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6080550#post6080550


I refuse to give credence to a post by a throwaway character in an NPC corp. Grow a pair and post under your main, or keep your fingers off the keyboard keys.

Writer of Target Caller, an Eve Online PvP blog, at http://targetcaller.blogspot.com
Bombardier Harrison
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#35 - 2015-10-07 04:06:02 UTC
But then again who cares about the credence that you refuse (or otherwise) to give, when we had a CCP representative confirming the motive of the OP and even had the *man himself* crawling back from inactivity to report in with the developers.
Sarmatiko
#36 - 2015-10-07 04:42:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Sarmatiko
Talvorian Dex wrote:
Etana Kryvidus wrote:
Dear CSM,

[Drivel, redacted for brevity.]

A russian version of the petition is available here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6080550#post6080550


I refuse to give credence to a post by a throwaway character in an NPC corp. Grow a pair and post under your main, or keep your fingers off the keyboard keys.


OP is known in Russian speaking community (and gaming communities like EVE-RU, Goha) for his english-russian translations of various official devblogs, newsmaking and other related stuff.
In a sense, he is more useful to the game than your "main" or your petty alliance. Bear
Escuro
SUN PRAISING INTENSIFIES
DarkSide.
#37 - 2015-10-07 10:46:22 UTC
oh c'mon. UAx is sitting in CSM only to have timely intel on sov changes and attempts to keep sov useful for current empires. I believe CSM in it's current state is awful overall, not only due to UAx
Savant Alabel
Phoenix Tag.
GF Company
#38 - 2015-10-07 17:33:38 UTC
Talvorian Dex wrote:
Etana Kryvidus wrote:
Dear CSM,

[Drivel, redacted for brevity.]

A russian version of the petition is available here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6080550#post6080550


I refuse to give credence to a post by a throwaway character in an NPC corp. Grow a pair and post under your main, or keep your fingers off the keyboard keys.



Okay. As former X.I.X member and UAxDEATH voter(yes, i'm really vote for UAxDEATH, blame meLol) I support topic starter's question: "will you, UAxDEATH, be active at CSM and inform players of your activities?"
Xenuria
#39 - 2015-10-09 07:27:16 UTC
Every time I turn around somebody is either leaving or being kicked from the CSM. Maybe it's time for somebody consistent to have a seat at the table. It's time for Xenuria.

CSM 12 Candidate
Warmeister
Tactical Farmers.
Pandemic Horde
#40 - 2015-10-09 13:37:14 UTC
Whitmore wrote:
CCP employee confirms that he is inctive, he claims that all accusations are just trolling. 10/10 CSM member

last i checked CSM members aren't paid by CCP. so they aren't employees
Previous page123Next page