These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Vanguard Skill Point Changes

First post First post
Author
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#301 - 2015-09-27 18:49:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Teckos Pech
Vortexo VonBrenner wrote:
I suspect Malcanis' Law might apply to the situation the OP describes. Not sure exactly how...but EvE players will find a way... That being said, *shrug*, CCP will do whatever they feel is best for their game I suppose. Adapt and let them worry about it, OP. Time to play Disney princess and "let it go".


On a more important note: Starship Troopers is one of the best books ever written. Too bad the "movie" was so excruciatingly bad as an adaptation. With current CGI capabilities, an actual movie adaptation of the book could be made. A guy can dream , eh?



Actually, I believe Malcanis himself noted that the removal of learning skills was one of the few changes that actually violated the law,

Quote:
First and most famous: the removal of Learning Skills and the refund of the SP invested into the Learning Skills. This unquestionably benefitted new players, as it removed a huge section of skill training that was required early in a characters career. These meta-skills didn't do anything in themselves, but allowed you to acquire other skills faster. CCP actually didn't so much remove them as simply give them fully trained to everyone. In fact, at the time, I thought this change did follow the Law, because all the old players received a lump sum of refunded skillpoints that they could immediately invest in whatever skills they wanted, allowing them an instant gain of up to 5,400,000 instantly applicable SP, and of course their disposable alts would now all have a +15 SP/minute training bonus, reducing the gameplay/interaction niches available for "real" new players. Additionally, older players who had already got their core skills with friendly stat requirements trained up could use those SP for skills with awkward stat combinations, saving further training time and increasing their effective advantage over the new players. Mathematically speaking I was correct, but in practice I had lost sight of the fact that not everyone is as patient (and mildly OCD) as me, and that removing the learning skills was such a vast improvement in the quality of life for genuine new players that even the very considerable bonus to older players was overshadowed. (This was one of the incidents that gave me the insight that EVE is about people first, numbers second.)--Malcanis

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Josef Djugashvilis
#302 - 2015-09-27 18:54:50 UTC
As a fairly long time Eve player - early 2007 I have tried to worry about CCP giving new players a bit of a leg-up so to speak.

Nope, just cannot see what the problem is.

If giving new players a few more skill points at the start of their Eve career will help with player retention, I am all for it.

This is not a signature.

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#303 - 2015-09-27 18:58:04 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
As a fairly long time Eve player - early 2007 I have tried to worry about CCP giving new players a bit of a leg-up so to speak.

Nope, just cannot see what the problem is.

If giving new players a few more skill points at the start of their Eve career will help with player retention, I am all for it.


Considering new players now get far less than you got...that is right, IMO.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Josef Djugashvilis
#304 - 2015-09-27 19:01:26 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
As a fairly long time Eve player - early 2007 I have tried to worry about CCP giving new players a bit of a leg-up so to speak.

Nope, just cannot see what the problem is.

If giving new players a few more skill points at the start of their Eve career will help with player retention, I am all for it.


Considering new players now get far less than you got...that is right, IMO.


I cannot for the life of me remember what I got, but I do remember 'training skills to train skills' I hated it, but just accepted it as part of the game.

This is not a signature.

Jim Coal
Doomheim
#305 - 2015-09-27 19:02:27 UTC
Ima go ahead and awares anyone not knowing why the hot heat up everytime someone talks about sp and new players.

Guys it ain't hard. It's all about dem char bazaars.

Most of the rich mofos got a ton of that cheedah riding on chars be worth like 100bil isk maybe even more. You turn out dat new player makin his way not needin no skill trained up and dat rich mufugga is out a whole damn lot of dat bread.

Strait up tho. If da game turn around and be like "we need dem new boyz," tomorroh and gave all that skill out these dudes gunna burn it down like woah.

Much respect for da vets in here talkin for the new players tryina git us some more of what we need but CCP aint bettin on gettin dem new guys, they bettin on keepin all these rich old segregationist dudes with a plantation full of new players, house full of old characters n money, and alliance more inbred than queen of england.
Johnny Riko
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#306 - 2015-09-27 19:02:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Johnny Riko
Vortexo VonBrenner wrote:
I suspect Malcanis' Law might apply to the situation the OP describes. Not sure exactly how...but EvE players will find a way... That being said, *shrug*, CCP will do whatever they feel is best for their game I suppose. Adapt and let them worry about it, OP. Time to play Disney princess and "let it go".


On a more important note: Starship Troopers is one of the best books ever written. Too bad the "movie" was so excruciatingly bad as an adaptation. With current CGI capabilities, an actual movie adaptation of the book could be made. A guy can dream , eh?





I hope your comments on starship troopers were just jokes.


To whomever says that they aren't removing anything...

I'm utterly amazed at how people cannot understand this basic concept. If you give every single player a skill that gives a 8% boost to turret dps, then they have effectively removed the skill and raised the dps of all turrets by 8%, with an option to train for 2% more. There will be effectively 1 skill level of gunnery, the other 4 are redundant and removed.

To put it even simpler, if CCP made everyone have every skill to V, the the skill system would effectively be removed. Is that really THAT difficult to understand?

I wanna join up. I think I got what it takes to be a Citizen.

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#307 - 2015-09-27 19:06:27 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Teckos Pech wrote:
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
As a fairly long time Eve player - early 2007 I have tried to worry about CCP giving new players a bit of a leg-up so to speak.

Nope, just cannot see what the problem is.

If giving new players a few more skill points at the start of their Eve career will help with player retention, I am all for it.


Considering new players now get far less than you got...that is right, IMO.


I cannot for the life of me remember what I got, but I do remember 'training skills to train skills' I hated it, but just accepted it as part of the game.


You are few months older than I am. I actually still have my first character (thought I'd try mining...ugghhhh). That character has 821,817 SP. You probably started with something similar.

Yeah, the learning skills sucked. Once they were trained it was awesome, but waiting for them to finish was a horrible stretch where you just didn't get much new stuff to do. Their removal was overall a good thing for the game.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Jim Coal
Doomheim
#308 - 2015-09-27 19:07:26 UTC
Naw main, ain't hard to understan that at all. Hard part is gettin them old money boys to not get mad when someone talkin about what everyone know is right. Tippia like that boy down at the country club don't want no brothers to play golf. Sayin' we gotta take lessons and all that. Aint nobody ever asked no ol money to take no golf lesson, but he gunna ask us to cuz he don't want no young hungry boys out there gettin his bread.
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#309 - 2015-09-27 19:14:08 UTC
Johnny Riko wrote:
Vortexo VonBrenner wrote:
I suspect Malcanis' Law might apply to the situation the OP describes. Not sure exactly how...but EvE players will find a way... That being said, *shrug*, CCP will do whatever they feel is best for their game I suppose. Adapt and let them worry about it, OP. Time to play Disney princess and "let it go".


On a more important note: Starship Troopers is one of the best books ever written. Too bad the "movie" was so excruciatingly bad as an adaptation. With current CGI capabilities, an actual movie adaptation of the book could be made. A guy can dream , eh?





I hope your comments on starship troopers were just jokes.


To whomever says that they aren't removing anything...

I'm utterly amazed at how people cannot understand this basic concept. If you give every single player a skill that gives a 8% boost to turret dps, then they have effectively removed the skill and raised the dps of all turrets by 8%, with an option to train for 2% more. There will be effectively 1 skill level of gunnery, the other 4 are redundant and removed.

To put it even simpler, if CCP made everyone have every skill to V, the the skill system would effectively be removed. Is that really THAT difficult to understand?


This is what happend with learning skills. Not only were the skills removed, EVERYONE had their attributes adjusted as if they had trained all the learning skills to 5. This provided the benefit of the learning skills to the new players without the horrible period of actually having to do it. Those who already had them trained received those SP back and were allowed to "spend" them on new skills they had yet to train or were training.

FYI, lots of good info here. Examples,

Quote:
In Apocrypha the New Player Experience was extensively overhauled, with new characters receiving only 50k SP compared to the approximately 800k previously, but with a bunch of free skill books from the revamped tutorial missions. This was paired with a 100% skill training speed until the character reached 1.6m SP.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Jim Coal
Doomheim
#310 - 2015-09-27 19:18:13 UTC
Ain't that some hot **** then huh? Most these ol money aint even had it half as bad as a new player gunna have it with all this big help we gunna git. Then they gotta come up in this and talk about how everyone "entitled," like we aint payin. SMH
Johnny Riko
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#311 - 2015-09-27 19:33:56 UTC
Jim Coal wrote:
Ain't that some hot **** then huh? Most these ol money aint even had it half as bad as a new player gunna have it with all this big help we gunna git. Then they gotta come up in this and talk about how everyone "entitled," like we aint payin. SMH


You're my hero

I wanna join up. I think I got what it takes to be a Citizen.

Vortexo VonBrenner
Doomheim
#312 - 2015-09-27 19:45:20 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
Vortexo VonBrenner wrote:
I suspect Malcanis' Law might apply to the situation the OP describes. Not sure exactly how...but EvE players will find a way... That being said, *shrug*, CCP will do whatever they feel is best for their game I suppose. Adapt and let them worry about it, OP. Time to play Disney princess and "let it go".


On a more important note: Starship Troopers is one of the best books ever written. Too bad the "movie" was so excruciatingly bad as an adaptation. With current CGI capabilities, an actual movie adaptation of the book could be made. A guy can dream , eh?



Actually, I believe Malcanis himself noted that the removal of learning skills was one of the few changes that actually violated the law,

Quote:
First and most famous: the removal of Learning Skills and the refund of the SP invested into the Learning Skills. This unquestionably benefitted new players, as it removed a huge section of skill training that was required early in a characters career. These meta-skills didn't do anything in themselves, but allowed you to acquire other skills faster. CCP actually didn't so much remove them as simply give them fully trained to everyone. In fact, at the time, I thought this change did follow the Law, because all the old players received a lump sum of refunded skillpoints that they could immediately invest in whatever skills they wanted, allowing them an instant gain of up to 5,400,000 instantly applicable SP, and of course their disposable alts would now all have a +15 SP/minute training bonus, reducing the gameplay/interaction niches available for "real" new players. Additionally, older players who had already got their core skills with friendly stat requirements trained up could use those SP for skills with awkward stat combinations, saving further training time and increasing their effective advantage over the new players. Mathematically speaking I was correct, but in practice I had lost sight of the fact that not everyone is as patient (and mildly OCD) as me, and that removing the learning skills was such a vast improvement in the quality of life for genuine new players that even the very considerable bonus to older players was overshadowed. (This was one of the incidents that gave me the insight that EVE is about people first, numbers second.)--Malcanis


Interesting, thanks.
Vortexo VonBrenner
Doomheim
#313 - 2015-09-27 20:02:10 UTC
Johnny Riko wrote:


I hope your comments on starship troopers were just jokes.


Not at all. Great book, terrible movie adaptation of that book. If the movie had been a standalone work then it would have been ok. As it was the movie was very disappointing in that regard. Sorry, that's my opinion.


In the not-so-distant future you may be a bit embarrassed by this whole SP thread thing... You do come across as seeming a tad whiny. Sorry again.









Jim Coal
Doomheim
#314 - 2015-09-27 20:06:28 UTC
Yeh it do come across at cryin when ol money tells us we need to earn that bred they got strait up for starters. What you talkin' about after all this honda-man? You tellin me I gota pick up my sandwhich at the back door cuz you don't want no new players havin that 800k you got out with? Don't need to remind us ya'll dun got a few mil throw back atcha along the way. We know how yall do.
Salvos Rhoska
#315 - 2015-09-27 21:32:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Maekchu wrote:
...


The change is not intended to narrow the gap between new characters created after the date, and those before.
Its not to make them competetive with older characters.
Its to allow more immediate access to functionality/diversity.

Furthermore those new characters DO NOT EVEN EXIST yet, which makes the fixation you have on this false idea of narrowing a gap, even more ridiculous. Every single second that passes between now and some future created character, widens the gap that already exists, beyond the previous second. This change does nothing to countermand that.

You have utterly missed the point.

Furthermore, nobody is disputing adding 350k to new characters.

This is about adding it universally to all characters, in addition to that, in an opportunity that harms no one, and benefits everyone.
Jim Coal
Doomheim
#316 - 2015-09-27 21:43:46 UTC
Yeeh but da man don't want none of that. He dont care bout nobody but himself and fuk all dem newboys wanna play wit they own. Dis game got worse than that countrycub i been talkin abou. You gun hafta make demboys mad as hell fo dis game is gittin a bunch of new blood.
Vortexo VonBrenner
Doomheim
#317 - 2015-09-28 02:03:08 UTC
Jim Coal wrote:
Yeh it do come across at cryin when ol money tells us we need to earn that bred they got strait up for starters. What you talkin' about after all this honda-man? You tellin me I gota pick up my sandwhich at the back door cuz you don't want no new players havin that 800k you got out with? Don't need to remind us ya'll dun got a few mil throw back atcha along the way. We know how yall do.

Oh brother. I don't care if CCP decides to start new players out at 0 or 3 million SP, I'm just not going to whine about it either way. Knock yourself out, w/e.

Glathull
Warlock Assassins
#318 - 2015-09-28 02:29:30 UTC
When did we decide that it was okay to let someone troll around as an 1880s wannabe Jamaican house servant?

This is beyond nuts.

Someone needs to shut that **** down. In 8 years of EvE that's the first thing Ive seen that i thought was offensive.

I honestly feel like I just read fifty shades of dumb. --CCP Falcon

Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#319 - 2015-09-28 02:37:02 UTC
Glathull wrote:
When did we decide that it was okay to let someone troll around as an 1880s wannabe Jamaican house servant?

This is beyond nuts.

Someone needs to shut that **** down. In 8 years of EvE that's the first thing Ive seen that i thought was offensive.


Racist.
Glathull
Warlock Assassins
#320 - 2015-09-28 02:49:00 UTC
Divine Entervention wrote:
Glathull wrote:
When did we decide that it was okay to let someone troll around as an 1880s wannabe Jamaican house servant?

This is beyond nuts.

Someone needs to shut that **** down. In 8 years of EvE that's the first thing Ive seen that i thought was offensive.


Racist.



Oh, I'm sorry, did you not understand what I meant? No. Of course you didn't.

The person posting what I quoted above is not an actual Jamaican person. Let me spell it out for you: that's a person who
is exploiting false stereotypes to create a racist persona.

**** you calling me racist. I'm calling out racism. For real.

I honestly feel like I just read fifty shades of dumb. --CCP Falcon