These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The PR is getting old

First post First post First post
Author
Memphis Baas
#141 - 2015-09-24 20:56:04 UTC
Permanently, or like in 2010, when (looking at your posting history) CCP lost your respect because (looking at your killboard stats) you lost your battlecruiser to a player in wormhole space?
Marsha Mallow
#142 - 2015-09-24 20:59:34 UTC
Kazini Jax wrote:
4 accounts permanently closed. RIP Eve.

Hand over the Fedos

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day

Dominous Nolen
The Graduates
The Initiative.
#143 - 2015-09-24 21:01:08 UTC
CCP Ytterbium wrote:

To be blunt, I didn't have your specific little special feelings in mind when I wrote the blog.



http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100622142514/xorviel/images/d/d0/Orson_Welles_Citizen_Kane_clapping_.gif

@dominousnolen

"Fly dangerously, Fly safe, Fly whatever, just keep Flying." - Lee Blackwood

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#144 - 2015-09-24 21:11:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Kazini Jax wrote:
4 accounts permanently closed. RIP Eve.
The collective IQ just went up.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Kazini Jax
Starlight Operations
#145 - 2015-09-24 21:15:49 UTC
Memphis Baas wrote:
NOOOO! Please don't go; your respect, we can't live without it. CCP can't do anything without your respect! And your $15/mo. It's the end of the world for them.



3 years ago they averaged 28,000 years online at any time, now they average 19,000. You can be hyperbolic all you want, but the truth is they are bleeding users and this is one of the reasons.
Kazini Jax
Starlight Operations
#146 - 2015-09-24 21:23:13 UTC
Memphis Baas wrote:
Permanently, or like in 2010, when (looking at your posting history) CCP lost your respect because (looking at your killboard stats) you lost your battlecruiser to a player in wormhole space?



Actually, the two are not connected in any way. I don't have a problem losing ships. Then I left cause of CCPs over use of the word 'sandbox'. It's not a sandbox. But I've also monitored there changing as I am willing to give a second chance if earned. I just returned to give them that chance. They failed. It's permanent this time.

Nice try (not really, it was sad and lame)
Frostys Virpio
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#147 - 2015-09-24 21:24:25 UTC
Kazini Jax wrote:
Memphis Baas wrote:
Permanently, or like in 2010, when (looking at your posting history) CCP lost your respect because (looking at your killboard stats) you lost your battlecruiser to a player in wormhole space?



Actually, the two are not connected in any way. I don't have a problem losing ships. Then I left cause of CCPs over use of the word 'sandbox'. It's not a sandbox. But I've also monitored there changing as I am willing to give a second chance if earned. I just returned to give them that chance. They failed. It's permanent this time.

Nice try (not really, it was sad and lame)


You quit because they overused a word?
Giaus Felix
Doomheim
#148 - 2015-09-24 21:30:46 UTC
Kazini Jax wrote:
4 accounts permanently closed. RIP Eve.
I have no doubt that panda-verse awaits your arrival with bated breath.

Please make sure to biomass each and every one of your characters before you quit, but not before you've given me your stuff.

I came for the spaceships, I stayed for the tears.

xxxTRUSTxxx
Galactic Rangers
#149 - 2015-09-24 21:43:24 UTC
Kazini Jax wrote:
4 accounts permanently closed. RIP Eve.


Kazini Jax wrote:


Well, that's it for me. You are a joke, CCP. There really is no point in playing a game that can be won by the person who has the most money to buy PLEX and turn it into ISK (I might as well play RL). But when incompetent programming and logic causes **** like this to repeatedly happen, **** it. No point.

Oh, and CCP, quit calling your joke a 'sandbox'. It MAY be a sandbox relative to other games out there, but a TRUE sandbox is a game where ONLY the physics of the universe is programmed into it. So to call this game a sandbox is a serious fail.. much like your programming!

Bye New Eden



3 years ago you said this. nobody believes you.

biomass and youtube it. all 4 of them or it never happened. just like 3 years ago.Roll
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#150 - 2015-09-24 21:48:57 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
You have no idea how disheartening this kind of message can be after you've spent months trying to come up with the best possible option.
Out of curiosity, if you don't like getting bad feedback (who does?) why don't you listen to the constructive feedback that is given before you make design decisions that annoy people. Most of the problems occurring with the sov system were predicted quite publicly long before the system was introduced.


Wait, you mean why didn't they listen to a bunch of players who's alliances would be negatively impacted by the proposed changes?

Man its such a mystery!

I mean we both know that EVE players would never go out of their way to try and save their own ass right? They were obviously all only acting in the games best interest and not collectively trying to hold on to the pie they'd created right?

Lucia Denniard wrote:
Sibyyl wrote:


Occupancy based SOV is what the blocs told CCP they wanted, and this is what CCP provided.



We asked for occupancy sov, we didn't ask for EHP-free occupancy sov.


Actually a pretty good portion of the game agree'd that shooting **** that didn't have a player in it and couldn't shoot back was really terrible game play, thanks for being an active part of the community and noticing

Honestly the amount of garbage you've dumped into this thread while sitting in one of the most active regions in the game (a fact that you can thank Aegis Sov for) is simply amazing. Its like you eat paint or something.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
#151 - 2015-09-24 22:06:20 UTC
Kazini Jax wrote:
4 accounts permanently closed. RIP Eve.


Good riddance. Please use your abundance of new spare time to do something constructive with your hitherto worthless existance, personally I would recommend some form of education to correct your lack of knowledge and atrocious debating skills. Of course that's doing you the courtesy of assuming you actually did leave this time and are not just carrying on pretending you did because you think it somehow makes your point any less stupid.

Pirates - The Invisible Fist of Darwin

you're welcome

Amyclas Amatin
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#152 - 2015-09-24 22:22:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Amyclas Amatin
Markus Reese wrote:
Amyclas Amatin wrote:
The only thing I really hate about fozziemechanics is the timezone ****.

I used to reave in one region for 25 and half hours a day for nine days a week.

Now when I get home at odd times, I sometimes end up relegated to strategic ratting duty!


That is the one part that did have me scratching my head. It makes sense for reinforcement timers to have it so a person can set what time zone it comes out of reinforcement. Really basic stuff, in event of a fuel infusion, why can the computer in the pos do that? For entosis, it is something i didn't look enough into. They should always be vulnerable initially.


Now only POSes are vulnerable at all times. Entosis things are subject to timezone apartheid. I can't quite spend all day dropping and watching SBUs like before, instead I have to play "fun with indexes" during off-times, either ratting, or denying other people the chance to rat, in order to raise and lower indexes to gain entosis advantages during the "prime" time.

I cringe when I hear that they want Citadels to become "weekends online".

For more information on the New Order of High-Sec, please visit: http://www.minerbumping.com/

Remember that whenever you have a bad day in EVE, the correct reponse is "Thank you CCP, may I please have another?"

Silence Dubensky
Doomheim
#153 - 2015-09-24 23:05:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Silence Dubensky
Kazini Jax wrote:
Memphis Baas wrote:
Permanently, or like in 2010, when (looking at your posting history) CCP lost your respect because (looking at your killboard stats) you lost your battlecruiser to a player in wormhole space?



Actually, the two are not connected in any way. I don't have a problem losing ships. Then I left cause of CCPs over use of the word 'sandbox'. It's not a sandbox. But I've also monitored there changing as I am willing to give a second chance if earned. I just returned to give them that chance. They failed. It's permanent this time.

Nice try (not really, it was sad and lame)



It appears that you're in a less than satisfactory state of mind. Perhaps if would help if you understood that no one cares in the slightest about one butthurt player with four whole accounts quits (ouch, looks like the end is nigh).

The playercount drop is largely attributed to the ISBoxer changes, and has actually been holding relatively steady recently.

No more tears, only dreams now.
Memphis Baas
#154 - 2015-09-25 01:01:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Memphis Baas
So, for how long will your remaining subscription give us the pleasure of hearing the phrase "permanently, this time" being repeated?
sixteen 64
1664.
#155 - 2015-09-25 01:22:04 UTC
This thread would have generally been locked, but no, CCP calls out a paying customer as a "special snowflake" and the rest of GD trolls and hypocrites come out to give CCP a reach around

GeeGee

******* hilarious
Orabi Deninard
STK Scientific
The Initiative.
#156 - 2015-09-25 01:26:20 UTC
BWAAAAHAHAAHHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAHH


......aaaaaaaaaHhaahahahaahahaahahahaahaahaa

Fuggin REKT son. Rock on CCP.
Memphis Baas
#157 - 2015-09-25 01:32:55 UTC
Can you imagine this in a restaurant setting, with Ytterbium as a server and the OP as the ******* customer? Maybe Ytterbium would give a polite response instead of his (now famous) quote, but the guy's 4 accounts would be so messed with back in the kitchen...
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#158 - 2015-09-25 01:41:38 UTC
Quote:

Forum rules

23. Post constructively.

Negative feedback can be very useful to further improve EVE Online provided that it is presented in a civil and factual manner. All users are encouraged to honestly express their feelings regarding EVE Online and how it can be improved. Posts that are non-constructive, insulting or in breach of the rules will be deleted regardless of how valid the ideas behind them may be. Users are also reminded that posting with a lack of content also constitutes non-constructive posting.


Due to continually offtopic posting, I'm going to close the thread now. Thank you.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department