Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Overheating state remembered between jumps OR be able to overheat under cloak. Whichever is mechanically easier.

What about a grace period before removing people from fleets after disconnections?

This one has actually already been talked about afaik.

Be able to Copy/Select/ctrl-C (and Select-All) from character sheet Augmentations page. (Currently cannot select implants, for pricing or dragging - instead need to go to Info on each, one at a time.)

Would be great if I could toggle overload on for the next cycle I activate while a module is cycle-red - if that makes any sense. Currently, if I overload while cycle-red, the overload light flashes (as usual) but resets to off when cycle-red finishes. The current behaviour of active overloads resetting to off when module deactivates is fine, I'd just like to be able to pre-overload reps when quickly moving swapping cycles between targets.

You know - I'm probably dreaming here but some numbers and rationales in the feedback and balancing threads would be really useful to get context.

So I'm thinking along the lines of what happened in the jackdaw revision - scan res reduced. No clues as to why, or what the problem was with it marginally higher. I didn't see anyone complain about it previously. Now don't mistake this for a complaint about the change - it is a complaint about the lack of reasoning behind it.

Feedback is a two way street - if we are not privy to the numbers or reason behind decisions we cannot realistically offer targeted, useful feedback.

Likewise when feedback is generally all tending in a certain direction but they take a different steer (for example, missile rebalance, phoebe) it would be good to have a bit more explanation than "just because"; it disenfranchises people who think they are simply being ignored. Now sometimes that reason will be "just because" (see phoebe), not every change will be popular - but we currently lack this closure.

I appreciate they will never please everyone but taking a little time to explain the WHY behind various revisions would be really useful as well as help dispel the myth that feedback is ignored.

Ed: I don't even mind if it was edited minutes or a simple post. Something, anything to help get the community and the devs on the same page - even if they do not agree, at least they are all looking at the same damned thing from the same place.

Ed2: And earlier posts about upcoming balance changes - they're often posted right at the wire with little to no time to be reviewed. For example the BC tweaks....? Surely due soon, not a sight nor sound in here though.

I dont agree with changing how the watchlist works. Eve is a huge system and watchlist along with locator agents are exactly where they need to be. This is a PVP game so lets keep it that way

1. Persistent trade window location.

2. The "Unified Inventory" is not unified! When I fly up to some accessible object in space, be it a wreck, hacking can, mobile depot, etc., and open that remote cargo using any method (right click, overview, or radial menu) it opens a unified inventory window (cargo#1). From there, I can access my ship's cargo as well as whatever may be in the remote cargo. But, if I open my own cargohold (in space) by using the button next to my capacitor, it opens an entirely different cargo window (cargo #2). It would be much better if everything just opened in the same (persistently located) window.

3. Notifications about newly assigned contracts do not pop up on log in (like mails and other new notifications do), almost all of the time, that little ping! and notifications window only show up when I actually open the contracts window.

From what I know, this would only count as a "little thing" if CCP has finally sent some poor brave souls delving into the code to root out every instance where the game assumes that the active character is the one you initially logged in with. If so, it heralds a number of lovely changes, like the ability to swap characters without quitting and relaunching. If not, it's not really a "little thing."

I'm not fishing for an answer, honestly. (Well, OK, I'm not only fishing for an answer. ) This could be one of those "it sounds little, but it requires three people and six months" kind of things.

Similarly:



That sounds like the "brain in a box," whose last public status was "we're working on it," with--understandably!--no ETA.



Yes, please. But how will you handle the existence of huge legacy watch lists? Wipe them out? (Stealth buff to supers!)



This sounds suspiciously like the guy in GD who believed that he was entitled to the loot dropped by the people he killed in duels. There are no tears like the hot, bitter tears of rage shed by people who have exerted themselves only to see their prizes vanish before their eyes. It's not like the current ability to self destruct within POS shields has prevented evictors from making off with tens and hundreds of billions of ISK in loot.

a new type of slot on select ships for purely esthetic bling, like hood ornaments with corp logos

25km micro jump drive for t2 cruisers

better unbonused armor reppers for more effective spider tanking

fewer and less bonuses for logi (disclaimer: i love logi and fly logi in most fleets i'm in)