These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!!

First post
Author
Portmanteau
Iron Krosz
#2321 - 2015-10-17 14:21:32 UTC
Divine Entervention wrote:
What's more important to the populace?

A populated game with people who haven't played as long as the bitter vets flying around in ships those veterans feel the noobs shouldn't have a right to pilot?

Or an unpopulated game with the few remaining actives station spinning in their titans and carriers with nothing to shoot at because they refuse to change the game to allow new people to access available content faster?

Like I'm really sorry the world has reached this point where we're not as patient as you wish we would be. But are you willing to punish yourselves by driving new players from the game by holding them back from all the neat things you show them you can do thanks to the simple choice of starting the game earlier?

Nice false dichotomy you have there. How about dealing with the NPE and perceived/real barrier of entry in a way that all players can access not just rich in game vets and rich in real life new guys ?
k Rose
Aeon Interstellar Conglomerate
#2322 - 2015-10-17 14:22:29 UTC
Incursions, Worm Holes and Anomaly's made EVE ONLINE ****
Colonel Midnight
blingdenstone
#2323 - 2015-10-17 14:43:14 UTC
Problem with EVE now is that there's too much content.

Markus Reese
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#2324 - 2015-10-17 15:00:41 UTC
Colonel Midnight wrote:
Problem with EVE now is that there's too much content.



And content is never really interconnected. Wormholes was one of the better content adders since it was fitted well into known space. The fact you never have control of the way in and need to work through other systems eliminated any full play disconnect.

Rest of it is just a carnival minigame. Most of the existing content could be dramatically improved just by adding small tweaks to integrage playstyles. Any new content should tie these together, not be stand alone.

Drifter incursions potentially have this, at least the pve vs pvp community. If they spread over time, pies might not have the tools to counter them. Will need to give pass to pvers to eliminate, if the pies cared about pve peeps becoming pvp, then would use that to entice em to join up in low and null?

To quote Lfod Shi

The ratting itself is PvE. Getting away with it is PvP.

Artemis Ellery Sazas
Shock and Awe Inc.
#2325 - 2015-10-17 16:13:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Artemis Ellery Sazas
Sorry guys, but the problem with EVE subs right now is PLEX prices. I don't PLEX myself, but know plenty of guys that do and they have either left completely or dropped extra accounts because of high prices. It seems the "breaking" point was somewhere around 750 mill for PLEX and as PLEX rises, subs have gone down.

Jump fatigue and the new sov system have also contributed to the decline in numbers, but I would say overall, especially in high sec, PLEX prices are the main issue for declining numbers.

If PLEX went back to 750 mil, I bet EVE subs rise 25%.
Indahmawar Fazmarai
#2326 - 2015-10-17 16:26:43 UTC
Artemis Ellery Sazas wrote:
Sorry guys, but the problem with EVE subs right now is PLEX prices. I don't PLEX myself, but know plenty of guys that do and they have either left completely or dropped extra accounts because of high prices. It seems the "breaking" point was somewhere around 750 mill for PLEX and as PLEX rises, subs have gone down.

Jump fatigue and the new sov system have also contributed to the decline in numbers, but I would say overall, especially in high sec, PLEX prices are the main issue for declining numbers.

If PLEX went back to 750 mil, I bet EVE subs rise 25%.


Except that CCP has stated openly that they do track PLEX prices and subscriptions, and they intervene to regulate PLEX prices whenever it threatenss subscriptions.

They also have acknowledged that the people leaving the game are highsec players.
Singur Augurao
Mohist Army
Mohist Alliance
#2327 - 2015-10-17 17:47:28 UTC
CCP should sell PLEX at a steady price of ~900 mil in just a few stations located in high sec.
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#2328 - 2015-10-17 17:55:46 UTC
Singur Augurao wrote:
CCP should sell PLEX at a steady price of ~900 mil in just a few stations located in high sec.


why does it have to be highsec, why not low or nullsec? silly idea anyway

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Singur Augurao
Mohist Army
Mohist Alliance
#2329 - 2015-10-17 18:13:37 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
Singur Augurao wrote:
CCP should sell PLEX at a steady price of ~900 mil in just a few stations located in high sec.


why does it have to be highsec, why not low or nullsec? silly idea anyway

Because of the suicide gankers focusing on the antrepreneurs that will eventualy try to move some PLEX to low/null. This way newb just like miself won"t be so dissapointed because losing ships so often to a 5 yo char while minibg or doing missions.This is just one of the good things that can happen for this game subs numbers.
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#2330 - 2015-10-17 18:21:43 UTC
Singur Augurao wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
Singur Augurao wrote:
CCP should sell PLEX at a steady price of ~900 mil in just a few stations located in high sec.


why does it have to be highsec, why not low or nullsec? silly idea anyway

Because of the suicide gankers focusing on the antrepreneurs that will eventualy try to move some PLEX to low/null. This way newb just like miself won"t be so dissapointed because losing ships so often to a 5 yo char while minibg or doing missions.This is just one of the good things that can happen for this game subs numbers.


dont know why people need to move plex they can be activated anywhere

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Singur Augurao
Mohist Army
Mohist Alliance
#2331 - 2015-10-17 18:26:31 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
Singur Augurao wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
Singur Augurao wrote:
CCP should sell PLEX at a steady price of ~900 mil in just a few stations located in high sec.


why does it have to be highsec, why not low or nullsec? silly idea anyway

Because of the suicide gankers focusing on the antrepreneurs that will eventualy try to move some PLEX to low/null. This way newb just like miself won"t be so dissapointed because losing ships so often to a 5 yo char while minibg or doing missions.This is just one of the good things that can happen for this game subs numbers.


dont know why people need to move plex they can be activated anywhere

I understand that many players can*t go to highsec ?
Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#2332 - 2015-10-17 18:27:25 UTC
heh, 12 thrashers and 2 catalysts tried ganking my tengu in inaya last night.

didn't work because they're bad and I'm better than them at EvE.

There are very very few times you'll die in this game where it was unavoidable.
Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#2333 - 2015-10-17 20:20:45 UTC
Singur Augurao wrote:
CCP should sell PLEX at a steady price of ~900 mil in just a few stations located in high sec.

You are making the mistake of thinking that plex exists so you can play the game for free. It does not. It's primary purpose is to combat RMT. For this purpose, the case could be argued that a higher price is better.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Mira Stargazer
Epic Warfare
#2334 - 2015-10-18 01:00:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Mira Stargazer
I think the reason is a bit more complex than just looking at the PLEX prices.

Personally I lost a bit of interest lately with all the fixes of non-broken things without adding to the gameplay. For example the new map, colorless GUI, the overview icon madness. And at the same time broken things, like the launcher, seemed to never get attention.

Of course these things didn't make me angry enough to quit playing, but I'm sure such things can contribute if you are not very dedicated to the game.

I have feelings, I can smile - and murder while!

Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#2335 - 2015-10-18 03:58:37 UTC
I like EvE because it's like Elite:dangerous except alot easier.
Colonel Midnight
blingdenstone
#2336 - 2015-10-18 04:55:05 UTC
moved into a wh, was either that or leaving the game... :(

Artemis Ellery Sazas
Shock and Awe Inc.
#2337 - 2015-10-18 11:58:20 UTC
I don't know what CCP's policies are about PLEX, but with all due respect, I think they may be in a bit of denial. I am just going by what I hear in chat and on comms, players like idea of "playing for free". When PLEX becomes too much of a grind for these players to afford, they feel like their time is wasted and are leaving the game. My old alliance have pretty much left the game, mostly due to the rising cost of "playing for free". Some of these guys were long time players and ran several accounts each, but ended up spending most of their time playing to PLEX.

Let's face it, who hasn't gone into a store and seen a sign buy 1 get 1 free? I bet some of you buy this item, not because you need it, but because you are getting an extra one for free. C'mon admit it, I work in retail, I know this is true! All I am saying is that players like the idea of "free", even though that PLEX was actually bought by someone else.

I am not sure a fixed price for PLEX is the solution, but it would take away the price uncertainty of "playing for free", even if it was 1 billion and maybe start to stabilize the dropping numbers.

I also agree the existing game needs some love, before adding major new stuff. I actually wouldn't mind a rewind of about 3 years and wipe out some of blunders that have been added as "content". The ongoing issue with sov would be one of these. It's sad that so much work was put into something this large, but the new sov system needs to go to the scrap heap.

Fix the in game glitches, add a few small items, do some ship rebalancing and let players create the content. I do believe the launch of Citadels are a step in the right direction for large content and am very excited and a bit scared about how it will be introduced to the game.




Carrie-Anne Moss
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2338 - 2015-10-18 12:24:47 UTC
.

I QUIT DURING INCARNIA. QUIT. SPACEBARBIES AND GREED IS GOOD CAN GO TO HELL FOR REAL.


I set a long skill queue with several cruiser 5s and some other good 5s.

SEE YOU IN A WHILE CCP IF YOU EVER GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASSES.


ILL BE FREAKING PLAYING WORLD OF WARSHIPS FOR THE TWITCH-PVP-NO-1-SEC-SERVER-TICK-TWOTCHY PVP
GOT 5MONTHS LEFT ON SUB. ILL PLAY WARSHIPS TIL XMAS THEN CHECK BACK TO SEE HOW PAY2WIN HAS RUINED GAME

AND IM SICK OF YOU CODDLING CAREBEARS AND NERFING CONTENT CREATORS.





(DO NOT WORRY EVE-O JUST CUZ PLAYING WORLD OF WARSHIPS AND SKILLQUEUE ONLINE I WILL STILL LONG IN TO POST ON FORUMS)
Joe Themachine
Sleeper Tech. Research Foundation
#2339 - 2015-10-22 05:55:44 UTC
Can I just say from this guy's unimportant perspective that maybe EVE as a game has been a let-down more recently?

Look I don't know how to fix it or whether game mechanics or sov warfare or anything else is the right move to fix the apparent lack of interest in EVE, but what I can say, is that I started playing eve because it gave me this vision of grand space, where I would be free to roam, and find interesting things that maybe no one else has found before, and that maybe I can cut out a little piece of EVE (like a planet or a system in the middle of nowhere) and be it's owner.

I came to realize that roaming and finding interesting things is super rare, and most of the time there's NOTHING unique about it, and the most troubling thing for me was that in order for me to cut that little piece of heaven out, the time, resources, and BS I had to go through was years-long, that's assuming I could understand the unnecessarily complex sov warfare bull**** I had to go through , convince like a hundred people to join me (so much harder than it seems), and deal with all sorts of other issues.

The recent changes have exasperated those issues for me. Once again I don't know what if anything needs to change, but what I know is that EVE does not let me escape into my vision, and I think so many people feel that same way too - so many of us are starting to look at other games that give this sensation of an infinite universe with infinite possibilities in which the underdog can still hold his own.

Here the underdog is sh** on, spit on, and made to walk back home with his tail in between his legs, and the only people that enjoy that are the people doing the **itting, and the numbers will fall until they're the only ones left on EVE (and then they'll leave as well because they'll be too old for this?)
Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
#2340 - 2015-10-22 06:36:05 UTC
I think part of the problem is that PLEX is seen as the only proper way to pay your account and players either cant or more likely refuse to pay a subscription fee any more. I cant be sure of this as obviously I'm not someone who thinks that's true but it seems the price of PLEX is a big part of most newbie focussed discussion these days.

My personal view on it is that if I feel like making the effort to PLEX my account I will, I very rarely do though, but I wont be a slave to it just to save a trifling amount of money every month.

Pirates - The Invisible Fist of Darwin

you're welcome