These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Should High sec go away?

Author
Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#81 - 2015-08-10 22:45:05 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Sgt Ocker wrote:
** I got camped into a nulsec station yesterday by a gang of 5, simply because none of the other 19 people who were in station were willing to undock and engage.
Talk about risk averse - These guys live in nulsec, scream about lack of content but stay docked when it is taunting them in local.



and what, exactly, were they to gain by engaging a gang of 5?

They would get to see explosions in space.

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Dave Stark
#82 - 2015-08-11 05:33:32 UTC
Vincent Athena wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Sgt Ocker wrote:
** I got camped into a nulsec station yesterday by a gang of 5, simply because none of the other 19 people who were in station were willing to undock and engage.
Talk about risk averse - These guys live in nulsec, scream about lack of content but stay docked when it is taunting them in local.



and what, exactly, were they to gain by engaging a gang of 5?

They would get to see explosions in space.


exactly; nothing.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#83 - 2015-08-11 05:55:02 UTC
They were probably afk anyway

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#84 - 2015-08-11 06:43:21 UTC
I hope high sec doesn't go away, that's where I keep all my stuff.

That being said I wouldn't mind seeing a little bit of a shift here and there of the fringe systems to lower security levels as a result of empires grasp on them beginning to erode. Would be nice to see a few new islands of high and low form as a result, because well, content.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Lady Areola Fappington
#85 - 2015-08-11 07:24:26 UTC
ashley Eoner wrote:
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
I don't mind highsec existing. The original concept of Eve didn't involve a "highsec". New Edan was basically all 0.0, all the time. This became a problem when people who were not as "good" at Eve started getting ROFLStomped.

So yeah, there needs to be a little bit of a buffer to give us normal scrubs room to play alongside the leet MLG420noscope pros.


As for highsec being the most lucrative space in Eve...yeah, that needs a fixing. About the only "fair" way I could see that happening is to implement some sort of diminishing returns system on highsec living.

And by "not as good at Eve" he means "doesn't have 20 friends to back them up".





Actually, no. What I meant by "not as good at Eve" is exactly what I said.

People who, for whatever reason, aren't as good at playing Eve as other people. All jokes aside, the Concord mechanic is reasonable enough to protect the "not good" portion of the Eve playerbase from the MLGpro style types.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#86 - 2015-08-11 20:40:47 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
The original concept of Eve didn't involve a "highsec". New Edan was basically all 0.0, all the time.

Citation needed.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Sgt Ocker
What Corp is it
#87 - 2015-08-11 23:02:46 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Sgt Ocker wrote:


If Nulsec had anything to offer that was engaging, Code, New order and others like them would not exist. The members of those groups would be too busy with their mains in Nulsec to spend so much time in highsec with their alts.


I think this is fundamentally untrue. Null is plenty fun enough as it is, even with fozzie sov. The kinds of people who populate the groups you mention would be in high sec regardless of anything else, because that's where their preferred content is.

The idea that people from null are in high because they are bored is pure nonsense.

So by that logic - the thousands who have let nul toons unsub, did it because they were having too much fun?
Tell me, if living in, defending and or taking sov kept you busy and was engaging content - Would you have time to log in an alt and go ganking?
I personally know a few nulsec players who have alts in ganking corps, they do it - because nul is boring 99.99% of the time. Not because "they would be in highsec regardless" - These guys (and at least 2 RL girls) live in nul and gank (play) in empire some of the time.
(Do you really think people give you "all" their API keys when they apply to corp, having toons in different groups is, I find, a good way to find something to do)
Do you know the name of the character I have in Test? Do you know the name of my character in Marmite?

Unless you enjoy spending 90% of your time chasing un-catchable ceptors or trying to convince 19 others undocking to kill the 5 guys camping the undock (instead of complaining about being camped in) would be good. Your options in nul are fairly limited.

But of course you do have the 40 man Rupture fleet that runs away from a fleet its own size because they are only there to engage small gangs of miners and solo pilots.. Or the 2 Legions with a Sabre who really want content and are there to pvp (they said so in local), as long as it only comes to them 1 ship at a time. (No amount of taunting in local from 2 prots and a flycatcher could get them to engage.)


-- - -- - -- - -- - --
Freya Sertan - Where did you get "trying to get rid of highsec ganking"?
Spending time in nul on my main but logging in highsec ganking alt for fun - Sort of says a lot, does it not?
NB; might be best not to respond with a comment that backs up what i said if your trying to disagree with me.


Ishtars online is all but gone (thank Bob)
But was replaced with
Ceptors online (curse Fozzie)

My opinions are mine.

  If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care

It really is getting harder and harder to justify $23 a month for each sub.

Panthe3 Black
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#88 - 2015-08-11 23:19:44 UTC
high sec is a training ground for later game stuff. should it go away, NO. we need it to get players into the game and it is a good place to take a break.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#89 - 2015-08-11 23:22:11 UTC
Market McSelling Alt wrote:
Damien Power wrote:
Lol look at it this way!

If there isn't a high sec then all the so called pirate/ merc corps will be free fire and you can get rid of having to wardec them if you want to kill them . it will make all of eve a rich pvp area :-)



Yeah, because PVE never happens in 0.0

You know, the place in eve with the most PVE per capita.


Actually more people do pve in highsec, we just kill more things because you can do it almost entirely afk in super-tanked Ishtars.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Freya Sertan
Doomheim
#90 - 2015-08-11 23:26:26 UTC
Sgt Ocker wrote:

-- - -- - -- - -- - --
Freya Sertan - Where did you get "trying to get rid of highsec ganking"?
Spending time in nul on my main but logging in highsec ganking alt for fun - Sort of says a lot, does it not?
NB; might be best not to respond with a comment that backs up what i said if your trying to disagree with me.


Says WAY more about you than me, bro.

And they're called "apostrophes". Please use them.

New Eden isn't nice. It isn't friendly. It isn't very hospitiable. Good thing there are people here to shoot in the face.

Want to make New Eden a nice place? Try this out.

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#91 - 2015-08-11 23:52:58 UTC
Panthe3 Black wrote:
high sec is a training ground for later game stuff. should it go away, NO. we need it to get players into the game and it is a good place to take a break.

Not sure why people claim this. It does terrible in any capacity as a training ground beyond learning the basic mechanics of flying a ship and using mods. Those aspects aren't unique to highsec and beyond that it doesn't offer any preparation. It does offer different effective rules of engagement which benefit the new and old alike.
Freya Sertan
Doomheim
#92 - 2015-08-11 23:55:59 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Panthe3 Black wrote:
high sec is a training ground for later game stuff. should it go away, NO. we need it to get players into the game and it is a good place to take a break.

Not sure why people claim this. It does terrible in any capacity as a training ground beyond learning the basic mechanics of flying a ship and using mods. Those aspects aren't unique to highsec and beyond that it doesn't offer any preparation. It does offer different effective rules of engagement which benefit the new and old alike.


I disagree. Highsec can be used to teach personal safety, smart piloting, gank avoidance and how to pay attention to your ship and it's entire surroundings.

Null and low can be used for them as well but in highsec there is a modicum of safety in CONCORD since you only have to last until they show up. However, highsec can also be used to teach entitlement, carebear mentalities and risk-aversion; none of which are good for the game or its players.

New Eden isn't nice. It isn't friendly. It isn't very hospitiable. Good thing there are people here to shoot in the face.

Want to make New Eden a nice place? Try this out.

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#93 - 2015-08-12 00:12:27 UTC
Freya Sertan wrote:
I disagree. Highsec can be used to teach personal safety, smart piloting, gank avoidance and how to pay attention to your ship and it's entire surroundings.

Null and low can be used for them as well but in highsec there is a modicum of safety in CONCORD since you only have to last until they show up. However, highsec can also be used to teach entitlement, carebear mentalities and risk-aversion; none of which are good for the game or its players.
It doesn't accomplish this well if at all. Highsec tactics for gank avoidance tend to revolve around simply not being the most attractive or soft target, not being in the hotzone in a ship larger than a BS and/or not taking the flashy bait.

On the other hand, viewing highsec through the lens of a training space we can see it's failure in that those same tactics lack meaning in any other area of space. A gank in low or null won't be deterred by another 10k or 20k EHP. Highsec doesn't mirror the realities of neuts in local being threats in other areas of space. Bait tactics go out of the window completely for those not looking for prey. You just get directly aggressed.

It's quite easy to see how highsec lessons don't progress you like a training area would/should. Rather, the specific lessons you learn are often uniquely applicable to highsec alone.
Mephiztopheleze
Laphroaig Inc.
#94 - 2015-08-12 00:27:22 UTC
I like the idea of slowly eroding the Empire borders and leaving 'puddles' of HiSec, rather than a contiguous blob of it in the center of the map.

Occasional Resident Newbie Correspondent for TMC: http://themittani.com/search/site/mephiztopheleze

This is my Forum Main. My Combat Alt is sambo Inkura

Market McSelling Alt
Doomheim
#95 - 2015-08-12 00:34:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Market McSelling Alt
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Market McSelling Alt wrote:
Damien Power wrote:
Lol look at it this way!

If there isn't a high sec then all the so called pirate/ merc corps will be free fire and you can get rid of having to wardec them if you want to kill them . it will make all of eve a rich pvp area :-)



Yeah, because PVE never happens in 0.0

You know, the place in eve with the most PVE per capita.


Actually more people do pve in highsec, we just kill more things because you can do it almost entirely afk in super-tanked Ishtars.



I didn't say more people PVE in null... I said per capita you guys out there by and far take the cake. You kill 22% less NPCs than highsec players while having 1/6th the numbers of players.

Which means roughly you carebear 3x more per player than High sec.

Oh and by the way. Since Fozzie sov your PVP numbers have fallen off the map. You are now killing far less than High Sec while carebear activity is equal. Whatever that means in terms of your agenda I don't know.

CCP Quant: Of all those who logon in Eve, 1.5% do Incursions, 13.8% PVP and 19.2% run Missions while 22.4% mine.

40.7% Join a fleet. The idea that Eve is a PVP game is false, the social fabric is in Missions and Mining.

Gallowmere Rorschach
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#96 - 2015-08-12 00:43:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Gallowmere Rorschach
It means that Aegis sov has had the opposite effect of it's stated intentions.
Far less pvp, far more wallet stuffing.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#97 - 2015-08-12 00:51:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Mallak Azaria
Market McSelling Alt wrote:
Oh and by the way. Since Fozzie sov your PVP numbers have fallen off the map. You are now killing far less than High Sec while carebear activity is equal. Whatever that means in terms of your agenda I don't know.


There is no one left to challenge us, so people are just making money in preparation for the next sov change in 5 or 6 years. Maybe by then a new threat will have emerged.

We don't really have an agenda anymore.

Also by region northern nullsec regions kill more rats than any other region.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Market McSelling Alt
Doomheim
#98 - 2015-08-12 01:41:05 UTC
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
It means that Aegis sov has had the opposite effect of it's stated intentions.
Far less pvp, far more wallet stuffing.



Seriously you have to drop corp... It is doing something seriously wrong to my mental state to keep agreeing with a goon... A GOON!

CCP Quant: Of all those who logon in Eve, 1.5% do Incursions, 13.8% PVP and 19.2% run Missions while 22.4% mine.

40.7% Join a fleet. The idea that Eve is a PVP game is false, the social fabric is in Missions and Mining.

Tiddle Jr
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#99 - 2015-08-12 04:26:06 UTC
We should have some kind of Middle Sec.

as well as 0.5 systems should be more interactive but removed from the major trading routes.

"The message is that there are known knowns. There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know" - CCP

Sgt Ocker
What Corp is it
#100 - 2015-08-12 11:23:14 UTC
Freya Sertan wrote:
Sgt Ocker wrote:

-- - -- - -- - -- - --
Freya Sertan - Where did you get "trying to get rid of highsec ganking"?
Spending time in nul on my main but logging in highsec ganking alt for fun - Sort of says a lot, does it not?
NB; might be best not to respond with a comment that backs up what i said if your trying to disagree with me.


Says WAY more about you than me, bro.

And they're called "apostrophes". Please use them.

LOL.. You didn't read back over what you said previously?
You did bold the right part - It is you all over I am afraid. Meaningless comments with no backbone to back them up
Try reading my original post and YOUR reply

A dumb blonde analology comes to mind here but,..,apostrophes, .. , really?
Are your eyes not open, do you not remember what you posted, or do you simply think my not highlighting the response with a second set of apostrophes makes it less valid.

NB; You didn't actually respond to my post.. Just crudely threw off - Freya, I am afraid - Troll and sadly not a very good one.

My opinions are mine.

  If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care

It really is getting harder and harder to justify $23 a month for each sub.