These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Public Journal and Witness of Shaddam Daphiti

Author
Alizebeth Amalath
Doomheim
#61 - 2015-08-29 17:17:13 UTC
Shaddam Daphiti wrote:


They claim this is not heretical on the basis that the Theology Council has not declared it so. Ridiculous and fallacious!
By such reasoning I could preach that God saves only those who wear tritanium laced robes!..
it's not heretical.. the Theology council has not declared it so!

Even if they have not been so labeled, this teaching is dangerous! In this the age of clones one need only a sample of Her Holiness' DNA to prop up a false leader which this cult's descendants would flock to like meat-stock to the slaughter!

"13 Then Molok the Deceiver sundered the lands and the people suffered floods and plagues conjured by him. Molok turned the people against the sefrim and people who once sang their praise now abhorred them. " - Chapter I of the Epitoth in the Book of Scriptures


Every new theology, belief or revelation is subject to scrutiny. I welcome your skepticism and relish the chance to demonstrate the righteousness of my beliefs.

When Her Majesty returned previous, there was a clear sign of God's favor and will: the Bright Star, the need of the Empire for Salvation from the blooder chamberlain and the Elder fleet, and the lack of an Emperor. And so again, will it be. The coming of the Ark, the end of days, the Empire's need, evidence of God's will and favor will all be signs of her return. The Amarr are not a people of blind faith and neither are the Jamylites.
Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#62 - 2015-08-29 17:19:15 UTC
There is nothing in Scripture to say that Her Imperial Majesty will return a second time. The Ark will come, but there is no basis for believing that it will carry Her Majesty.
Goldfinch
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#63 - 2015-08-29 17:42:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Goldfinch
Mr. Daphiti, we do not know if this is the correct title to address you by. We apologize if it is not.

We and you are both flagellants, believers in walking the straight and narrow line of Faith with any deviations punishable not only by spiritual censure, but through physical castigation and punishment. If you meet us face to face, we can share with you our scars and bruises. We have no pride for any such marks, for each represents a personal failure of Faith.

To imply that Sacred Flesh can simply be cloned is a grave sin. Any such attempt would most certainly be met by retribution from God. Sacred Flesh is peerless and Divinely Blessed and no manmade process can make it or unmake it. As people of the Faith, we Jamylites practice great Vigilance against treachery and deception.

If Jamyl were to return, the Order of Jamyl would not be body to declare her authenticity. That responsibility would be the Theology Council's and the Emperor's. Who are you to doubt their word, in such an event?

We are not deceived by Molok or any such constructions of sophistry. Your accusations are divisive to Amarr. If you would like to take our hand, we offer it to you. You need not share our adoration for the Once and Future Empress. We can join hands as Amarr and surrender together to God as we do at the Call to Prayer.

And as always, \J/. Hands up for Jamyl.

\J/

veiled and bound

my origin story (on eve-backstage)

Nicoletta Mithra
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#64 - 2015-08-29 21:42:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicoletta Mithra
The idea that the late Empress - may she rest in peace - will return a second time is not only not supported by scripture, it's also not supported by reason. And for something to qualify as theology it doesn't merely need to be a belief, it also needs to be in accord with reason.

The resurrectionist belief, given the lack of any evidence - scriptural or otherwise - is based in the fallcy that attempts to deduce a 'will' from a 'could': As such it is irrational and unreasonable and can't be theological in nature. It is in nature more close to wishful thinking, if not the same, probably born out of the certainly traumatic experience of seeing the late Empress - God bless her soul - die without being able to intervene against the dreadful Drifters.

In fact, to believe that God will send His servant, Jamyl Sarum, a third time (one time by birth, two times by miraculous means) in the end times seems to conflict with established theology:

God for certain is not bound to send her for the salvation of mankind, he sure can effect that by other means. 'Resurrectionism' is narrowing our view of God, where it should be wide. It distracts attention from God and places Jamyl Sarum at the center of the misplaced attention, something that she certainly wouldn't condone herself. The Empress herself gave no indication whatsoever that she will return a second time, either.

It is falsehood to teach a mere possibility, which is just a little drop in the vast ocean of possibilities, as fact.

Furthermore, a defective understanding of 'salvation' is at work here. While in colloquial speech 'salvation' can denote 'being saved or protected from harm' or 'being saved or delivered from some dire situation', which the late Empress did, 'slavation' denotes in the strict soteriological meaning the 'saving of the soul from sin and its consequences' and thus 'eschatological unity of the soul with God'. The 'ressurectionists' seem to fail to distinguish between the former and the latter and thus make an illicit connection between the two, talking about them as if they were one.

It is falsehood to teach that two different things, though same in name, are one.

Only in God can we thrive and grow.
Only in God.
Goldfinch
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#65 - 2015-08-29 22:13:40 UTC

We will address your statements point by point.

Nicoletta Mithra wrote:
The idea that the late Empress - may she rest in peace - will return a second time is not only not supported by scripture
.
.
In fact, to believe that God will send His servant, Jamyl Sarum, a third time (one time by birth, two times by miraculous means) in the end times seems to conflict with established theology

We are unable to locate the complete and unabridged Amarr Scriptures. Have you studied every verse personally and come to this conclusion? Would you forward us all the verses you used for your determination, so that everyone here can be satisfied you are not just making conclusions based on a few verses only? When you mention "established theology" are you planning to present or quote said theology in a subsequent post?



Quote:
The resurrectionist belief, given the lack of any evidence - scriptural or otherwise - is based in the fallcy that attempts to deduce a 'will' from a 'could':

The Empress came back to life once, by the grace of God and only God. Do you disagree with this statement? You are treading on dangerous ground, here.



Quote:
God for certain is not bound to send her for the salvation of mankind, he sure can effect that by other means.

It truly sounds like you are speaking for God now. This seems like inappropriate conjecture.



Quote:
It is falsehood to teach a mere possibility, which is just a little drop in the vast ocean of possibilities, as fact.

You can tell that to everyone who believes the Holy Amarr Empire will come victorious against the Drifter threat. Hope is not conjecture. Hope is not an enemy of Faith.

Regarding ‘salvation’, it’s quite possible you’re reading into things too far. We are of the Amarr faith. We believe what you believe. We hold Jamyl in great esteem because the Scriptures tell us we should. Her position is always subservient to God.

The Mercy of our Emperor is Limitless. His Rule is Benign and Righteous. His Love is Perpetual.
--The Scriptures, Book I, The Code of Demeanor



You will never see any criticism of the Faith, of the Empire, or any of the Faithful from Jamylites. Our enemy is at our gates, and our divisiveness will only feed them. We offer you our hand as well, so that we may pray together to God.



\J/ Hands up for Jamyl.

\J/

veiled and bound

my origin story (on eve-backstage)

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#66 - 2015-08-29 22:22:58 UTC
Remember your place, Mrs. Rkard. Dangerous ground is being tread here, but it's not by Ms. Mithra. Instead of putting your hands up for Jamyl, you should be putting them together for God.

Idolatry is a sin.
Goldfinch
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#67 - 2015-08-29 22:44:28 UTC

Lieutenant Kernher, we have an immense amount of the respect for you. Perhaps you know a bit about us as well.

You have decided to level an unprompted accusation at us, and worse, attacked our fidelity to God. We turn the other cheek to you. Feel free to strike it. We will not fight you.

We hope your hand grows tired before we are unable to stand again, but we bear no ill will in being the loser of this fight.

\J/

veiled and bound

my origin story (on eve-backstage)

Shaddam Daphiti
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#68 - 2015-08-30 05:20:40 UTC
Goldfinch wrote:
Mr. Daphiti, we do not know if this is the correct title to address you by. We apologize if it is not.

We and you are both flagellants, believers in walking the straight and narrow line of Faith with any deviations punishable not only by spiritual censure, but through physical castigation and punishment. If you meet us face to face, we can share with you our scars and bruises. We have no pride for any such marks, for each represents a personal failure of Faith.

To imply that Sacred Flesh can simply be cloned is a grave sin. Any such attempt would most certainly be met by retribution from God. Sacred Flesh is peerless and Divinely Blessed and no manmade process can make it or unmake it. As people of the Faith, we Jamylites practice great Vigilance against treachery and deception.

If Jamyl were to return, the Order of Jamyl would not be body to declare her authenticity. That responsibility would be the Theology Council's and the Emperor's. Who are you to doubt their word, in such an event?

We are not deceived by Molok or any such constructions of sophistry. Your accusations are divisive to Amarr. If you would like to take our hand, we offer it to you. You need not share our adoration for the Once and Future Empress. We can join hands as Amarr and surrender together to God as we do at the Call to Prayer.

And as always, \J/. Hands up for Jamyl.


Mr. Is fine, I am not Nor do I claim any further rights or titles.

Your devotion to mastering the wayward flesh is commendable, but not really relevant to this matter.

I imply nothing of the sort, you know perfectly well The Faith and Science walk hand in hand. Sacred Flesh does not make DNA any more or less than DNA.

It is doctrine that an Heir and thereby any Emperor respect God's gift of their corporeal vessel by NOT cloning it.

If my pet furrier begins singing psalms it will be the Provence of the same to verify that as well. That fact does not make any such event likely or supported by Scripture, Reason, or experience.

You seem to misunderstand my recitations of scripture, I am not given to hyperbole. Never the less, like Molok decieved the masses an other Decievor could lure away resurrectionists very easily. Therefore I call such teachings dangerous.
Kairelle
Raven.Syndicate
#69 - 2015-08-30 06:07:15 UTC
Shaddam Daphiti wrote:

If my pet furrier begins singing psalms it will be the Provence of the same to verify that as well. That fact does not make any such event likely or supported by Scripture, Reason, or experience.



You have a pet furrier?
Always thought about getting one of those....what are they like?

Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu.

Shaddam Daphiti
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#70 - 2015-08-30 06:29:18 UTC
Kairelle wrote:
Shaddam Daphiti wrote:

If my pet furrier begins singing psalms it will be the Provence of the same to verify that as well. That fact does not make any such event likely or supported by Scripture, Reason, or experience.



You have a pet furrier?
Always thought about getting one of those....what are they like?



On of God's more pleasant creations, if you have the right temperament for their personality.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#71 - 2015-08-30 09:39:59 UTC
I was... not really enthusiastic in taking part in this discussion though...

I would tend to agree with Ms Mithra on the principles and theological theory... But I just feel that believing in Jamyl I return is akin to believing in God. It can not be proven or denied by available facts and Reason, and even if it proves to me as improbable as God being some kind of cosmic anthropomorphic figure, it still lies in the realm of possibilities, and thus, Faith...

And when Reason will disprove it, then it will disappear from Faith, as it should.

Or when Reason will make it true, then it will be incorporated into Knowledge, which intersects both Faith and Reason, like Scripture does.
Shaddam Daphiti
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#72 - 2015-08-30 14:11:50 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
I was... not really enthusiastic in taking part in this discussion though...

I would tend to agree with Ms Mithra on the principles and theological theory... But I just feel that believing in Jamyl I return is akin to believing in God. It can not be proven or denied by available facts and Reason, and even if it proves to me as improbable as God being some kind of cosmic anthropomorphic figure, it still lies in the realm of possibilities, and thus, Faith...

And when Reason will disprove it, then it will disappear from Faith, as it should.

Or when Reason will make it true, then it will be incorporated into Knowledge, which intersects both Faith and Reason, like Scripture does.


I cannot and will not tell you what to believe and what not to believe. That is the role of the Theology Council.
I can and must give warning when I see a teaching that I perceive as dangerous and unsupported by Scripture, Reason, and Experience.
That is also the limit of my role.
Nicoletta Mithra
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#73 - 2015-08-30 23:54:51 UTC
Quote:

Goldfinch: We will address your statements point by point.

Nicoletta Mithra: The idea that the late Empress - may she rest in peace - will return a second time is not only not supported by scripture
(...)
In fact, to believe that God will send His servant, Jamyl Sarum, a third time (one time by birth, two times by miraculous means) in the end times seems to conflict with established theology


Goldfinch: We are unable to locate the complete and unabridged Amarr Scriptures. Have you studied every verse personally and come to this conclusion? Would you forward us all the verses you used for your determination, so that everyone here can be satisfied you are not just making conclusions based on a few verses only? When you mention "established theology" are you planning to present or quote said theology in a subsequent post?

I'm quite sure it'd have been noted if the Scriptures would speak of a second return of Jamyl Sarum: They didn't even speak of the first, which would have quite surely been made known when she did return for the first time. But feel free and show me the passage where a second ressurrection of Jamyl Sarum is foretold in the Scriotures: After all it's you who's putting forward this idea, so the burden of proof rests with you.

Quote:
Nicoletta Mithra: The resurrectionist belief, given the lack of any evidence - scriptural or otherwise - is based in the fallcy that attempts to deduce a 'will' from a 'could'.

Goldfinch: The Empress came back to life once, by the grace of God and only God. Do you disagree with this statement? You are treading on dangerous ground, here.

I don't need to question that at all to point out that a second return is a possibility but not a fact. You're just treating my comment out of context - which you probably must to have any leverage against it. But please, show me how a second return of the late Empress follows logically from the first - or does at least confer on it with logical necessity a higher probability.

Quote:
Nicoletta Mithra: God for certain is not bound to send her for the salvation of mankind, he sure can effect that by other means.

Goldfinch: It truly sounds like you are speaking for God now. This seems like inappropriate conjecture.

When I say that God is not bound to your predictions of s second return of Empress Jamyl Sarum I am supposed to sound like I'm speaking for God? I'm pointing out that you shouldn't say what God will or won't do, except if in possession of good reason to do so. Which you lack entirely in the case of a second resurrection and return of the late Empress.
So, it's more like you're saying what God will do. I'd rather leave to God what He will do and I advise you to do the same.

Quote:
Nicoletta Mithra: It is falsehood to teach a mere possibility, which is just a little drop in the vast ocean of possibilities, as fact.

Goldfinch: You can tell that to everyone who believes the Holy Amarr Empire will come victorious against the Drifter threat. Hope is not conjecture. Hope is not an enemy of Faith.

Again you treat what I say entirely out of context: It's not about victory over the Drifter threat, it is about your 'resurrectionist' ideas. While it is a possibility that Lord God will ressurrect the late Empress a second time at the eschaton, it remains a possibility: Not a fact. Also, there is no hope needed in a second resurrection of the late Empress here, only hope and faith in salvation through God.
Anyway: In teaching the second resurrection as a fact, you're making an error, because you teach a falsehood.

Goldfinch wrote:
Regarding ‘salvation’, it’s quite possible you’re reading into things too far. We are of the Amarr faith. We believe what you believe. We hold Jamyl in great esteem because the Scriptures tell us we should. Her position is always subservient to God.
(...)
You will never see any criticism of the Faith, of the Empire, or any of the Faithful from Jamylites. Our enemy is at our gates, and our divisiveness will only feed them. We offer you our hand as well, so that we may pray together to God.

Then how do you connect the 'salvation' that Empress Jamyl Sarum's return provided from the Elder fleet with the soteriological salvation at the end of times, arguing that because the late Empress provided the former, she will clearly be connected to the latter? One has not much to do with the other and most certainly you can't deduce the latter from the former - that's the point here. Yet you claim that they do.

And really, I don't believe that Empress Jamyl Sarum will be resurrected a second time, while you, apparently, do. Nor have I a vested belief that she won't. I believe that it is unnecessary to have any vested belief one way or the other and that any belief in the matter is more harmful than not believing.
So we don't believe the same things - despite (hopefully) great overlap in our beliefs.

Also, you don't need to voice criticism to commit to false or dangerous beliefs. Your 'resurrectionsim' is the source of divisiveness, if anything. The late Empress deserves our respect, but to idolize her as you do is going too far.

Only in God can we thrive and grow.
Only in God.
Nicoletta Mithra
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#74 - 2015-08-31 00:24:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicoletta Mithra
Lyn Farel wrote:
I was... not really enthusiastic in taking part in this discussion though...

I would tend to agree with Ms Mithra on the principles and theological theory... But I just feel that believing in Jamyl I return is akin to believing in God. It can not be proven or denied by available facts and Reason, and even if it proves to me as improbable as God being some kind of cosmic anthropomorphic figure, it still lies in the realm of possibilities, and thus, Faith...

And when Reason will disprove it, then it will disappear from Faith, as it should.

Or when Reason will make it true, then it will be incorporated into Knowledge, which intersects both Faith and Reason, like Scripture does.

Even though God is beyond being strictly proven or disproven, that doesn't mean there are no reasons to believe in the existence of God (in fact, there are). I won't go into the details of fundamental theology and apologetics here, so indicating those two filed which deal with such reasons and the defense of them on rational ground has to suffice.

So, believing in the second return of Jamyl Sarum I - God bless her soul - might be akin to believing in God, but that's just another reason to repudiate it. Jamyl Sarum is a human person, she is dependant on a first, uncaused cause and so would be a second ressurrection of her - just as the first. So, if one poses the same reasons for believing her second resurrection as for believing in the existence of God (that is: the first, uncaused cause), one is only getting deeper into the dangerous territory of idolatrism and away from monotheism. Furthermore justifying two things with the reasons to assume a first, uncaused cause would be rather self-contradictory: This is due to making the category mistake of giving the resons for belief in a first, uncaused cause to (also) justify belief in a caused thing.

Also, I don't know how you come to the idea that "Knowledge intersects both Faith and Reason". Honestly I'm not even quite sure what you mean by that. I suppose you refer to the idea in epistemology that knowledge is the intersection of belief and truth. That position doesn't work though as a premise for whatever argument you want to give there.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#75 - 2015-08-31 20:09:11 UTC
Praefecta, I never said that God has yet to be proven...

I was pretty sure to have equated it to certain representations and interpretations of said God. To my knowledge, those are shared even today by most of Amarr, and are certainly not apocrypha.

I was even scolded by Amarrians once to have criticized them for being improbable.
Lunarisse Aspenstar
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#76 - 2015-09-01 01:22:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Lunarisse Aspenstar
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:

Even though God is beyond being strictly proven or disproven, that doesn't mean there are no reasons to believe in the existence of God (in fact, there are). I won't go into the details of fundamental theology and apologetics here, so indicating those two filed which deal with such reasons and the defense of them on rational ground has to suffice.


The Blessed Amarr know God is proven through his active involvement in our history. From the very earliest days from the journey of the Blessed Dano Gheinok to Athra the assistance and guidance of the Sefrim in the days of Amash-Akura and the signs therewith, the physical gifts of the Sefrim in the form of the Ametat and the Avetat, the witness of St. Junip of Aerui and the Prophet Anoyia and his other multitudes of Saints and Prophets - who we venerate but do not worship - miracles over the ages all the way through to the Divine Miracle where the late and Blessed Empress Jamyl I returned in the time of her people's greatest need to dispatch the Elder Fleet with a weapon that, much like the Hand of God, needed only one sweep. To trust and hope that the Living God will act with his Hands once more does not strike me as heresy so long as the Faithful also do their own share and work in furtherance of his ends and do not fall into complacency or error from established Scriptures and precepts of the Faith.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#77 - 2015-09-01 01:28:10 UTC
Tell me, do you consider the Elder Fleet to have been more powerful than the Drifters? Able to field more firepower? Strike in a more unpredictable manner? Absorb hundreds of losses with no visible loss of OpTempo?

If not, I question 'the time of her people's greatest need'.
Alizebeth Amalath
Doomheim
#78 - 2015-09-01 01:36:54 UTC
The issue of her return is that she will be able to do something due to her Divinely appointed position that we will not be able to do for ourselves. We can defeat the drifters, with effort and God's grace.
Shaddam Daphiti
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#79 - 2015-09-01 01:50:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Shaddam Daphiti
Alizebeth Amalath wrote:
The issue of her return is that she will be able to do something due to her Divinely appointed position that we will not be able to do for ourselves. We can defeat the drifters, with effort and God's grace.


So this prophesy, has no source.. and relates to a threat which cannot be described?

The Danger of this teaching but grows by the minute, now not only can a false Messiah be raised, she can create
from whole cloth a custom fit 'threat' to rally the blind followers towards!
Rook Moray
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#80 - 2015-09-01 01:51:59 UTC
Life is an endless cycle of birth, life, death, rebirth.

Of course she will be reborn.

Nothing says she'll be reborn an Amarr.

“When you want to know how things really work, study them when they're coming apart.” -Guristas Proverb.