These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[news] Vigilant Tyrannos assault on Safizon

Author
Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#101 - 2015-08-02 21:22:10 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
As for 'They attacked first'. Need I remind people of the Seekers that were slaughtered that DIDN'T EVEN FIRE BACK IN SELF DEFENCE. If that's not attempting diplomacy may I ask what is, when you are so passive as to not even defend yourself. Yet capsuleers continued to kill them despite no Concord bounties and no valuable items. Just for the fun of it.


No. We killed them because they were conducting unauthorized surveillance of our technology and infrastructure. They were, and are, unregistered, unlicensed intruders engaged in spying on our sovereign territory.

How many times do I have to say that there are more methods of attacking someone than simply hitting them in the head with a club?
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#102 - 2015-08-02 21:34:20 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:

No. We killed them because they were conducting unauthorized surveillance of our technology and infrastructure. They were, and are, unregistered, unlicensed intruders engaged in spying on our sovereign territory.

How many times do I have to say that there are more methods of attacking someone than simply hitting them in the head with a club?

Right.... yet they are the ones at fault for not exercising diplomacy? Sure, make a fuss about their scans, I'm not saying they weren't scanning people though we have no clue what they actually were scanning with said scans. My point was that we attempted no diplomacy at all, we saw them in space and we SHOT THEM.
As a collective, we didn't observe first, we didn't question, we simply opened fire on them. When it comes to diplomacy they are actually far more diplomatic to us than we are to them.
Not to mention the hypocrisy of claiming that their scans mean we can kill them, yet all the people who raised a fuss about the Jamyl taking action on a scan.

Lets stop pretending we are the ones standing on moral high ground here, and stop pretending that this is all a matter of self defence which we are simply innocent people in.
Even assuming the reports on who fired first are correct, with the people claiming the drifters did have a very vested interest in making the drifters the bad guys, the Drifters would not be changing their behaviour and focusing on Amarr without a very good reason. Hard questions about what the Amarr Navy has been up to, what secret operations they have run against the drifters, what kind of weapons testing or other testing they have been doing are in order.
Deitra Vess
Non-Hostile Target
Wild Geese.
#103 - 2015-08-02 21:38:56 UTC
Whether we are the aggressors or the victims is irrelevant.They are now shooting at us. Hindsight is 20/20. How is us allowing ourselves to be shot at even on the table?
Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#104 - 2015-08-02 21:41:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
Amarr is under obligation to engage in diplomacy with CONCORD signatories. We have no such obligation to engage in diplomacy with groups outside of CONCORD. If unregistered groups violate our sovereign space, they'll be treated as hostile.

If they want to talk, then they can leave our space, and then ask us to talk. Until they do that, they're our enemies.


Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Not to mention the hypocrisy of claiming that their scans mean we can kill them, yet all the people who raised a fuss about the Jamyl taking action on a scan.


Hypocracy? Those loyal to Amarr have maintained the same position on both. Her Imperial Majesty and her escorts had every right to fire on Elder Raish's vessel after he refused orders to withdraw.

Amarr is our space, and occupants have to abide by our rules.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#105 - 2015-08-02 21:45:41 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Samira Kernher wrote:

No. We killed them because they were conducting unauthorized surveillance of our technology and infrastructure. They were, and are, unregistered, unlicensed intruders engaged in spying on our sovereign territory.


Right.... yet they are the ones at fault for not exercising diplomacy?


Actually... yes. I don't know what part of space you're from, but where I'm from, if someone's conducting espionage on you, you are within your rights to blow up those espionage assets. They're considered an aggressive act. It's pretty universal.
Matar Ronin
#106 - 2015-08-02 22:17:27 UTC
If the condition of the Jove Observatories is any indication of how long the Drifters have engaged in espionage we are all in deep yogurt here. They could by now have mutli-giga-terabytes of data about us and we know almost nothing about them.

Sure I'd love to see them take on and kick the pants off the demonic slavery cultists, but when a new entity picks a fight with one of the toughest kids on the block, unless he is a hero what does that bode for everyone else?

I am not feeling a hero vibe emanating from anything I've seen them do in high sec or in Anoikis. My concern is how little we do know about them. Based on the size of their structures in Anoikis if they have the equivalent of capital ships they can deploy in high sec we are in for a huge fight.

We shot their Cruisers to bits and Battleships showed up, now we are shooting their Battleships to bits, albeit with great difficulty, how do you suppose they will counter that move?

We are on a slippery slope if they expand their hostile activity outside of the cult's realm, or it's only ally, then we will know we are all in for a fight. I for one am keeping my eye on Caldari space to see if they are watching who is allied with jamyl whom they seem to have a problem with.

Any increase in activity of Seekers and Drifters being reported in Caldari space anyone?

‘Vain flame burns fast/and its lick is light/Modest flame lasts long/and burns to the bone.’

" We lost a war we chose not to fight." Without a doubt this is the best way to lose any war and the worst excuse to explain the beating afterwards.

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#107 - 2015-08-02 23:35:29 UTC
Matar Ronin wrote:
If the condition of the Jove Observatories is any indication of how long the Drifters have engaged in espionage we are all in deep yogurt here. They could by now have mutli-giga-terabytes of data about us and we know almost nothing about them.

Are the Observatories not most likely Jove Directorate structures, rather than Drifters?
Though the Drifters certainly got some records from them and possibly more that we have from them, but certainly not the complete take.
Matar Ronin
#108 - 2015-08-03 00:56:16 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Matar Ronin wrote:
If the condition of the Jove Observatories is any indication of how long the Drifters have engaged in espionage we are all in deep yogurt here. They could by now have mutli-giga-terabytes of data about us and we know almost nothing about them.

Are the Observatories not most likely Jove Directorate structures, rather than Drifters?
Though the Drifters certainly got some records from them and possibly more that we have from them, but certainly not the complete take.
Quite correct we do call them Jove Observatories, but we have as yet been able to gather little information them and the Drifters do not seem so encumbered. If they are accessing records of observations going back years or decades or longer what little we know of them pales in comparison.

It is the fact that we do not know that is so worrisome.

‘Vain flame burns fast/and its lick is light/Modest flame lasts long/and burns to the bone.’

" We lost a war we chose not to fight." Without a doubt this is the best way to lose any war and the worst excuse to explain the beating afterwards.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#109 - 2015-08-03 02:21:29 UTC
The problem is the connection between the Drifters and the Jove - as obviously extant as it might be - is unclear. CONCORD's database has this much to say:

Drifters wrote:
Emerging from the ruins of the Sleeper civilization spread throughout Anoikis - otherwise known as "W-space"- the Drifters represent a tremendous challenge and perhaps a dire threat to the empires and capsuleers alike. Seemingly the inheritors of a legacy left behind by some of the most ancient Jove, the Drifters are unafraid to wield tremendous power in response to any who get in their way. In this regard, the Drifters are a very different conundrum than the relatively benign presence that was the Jove Empire.


Vigilant Tyrannos wrote:
CONCORD intelligence reports indicate that Drifter military formations are operating under a single command structure represented by an enclave level organization with the designation 'Vigilant Tyrannos'. Despite monitoring the movements of ships broadcasting the identifier of this organization, no further information as to the motivation or goals of this force has been gleaned.


Let's leave aside for a moment the question of how precisely CONCORD managed to assemble this information given that the Drifters never talk and are, in fact, incapable of speech. I'm not sure I even want to know how we know the designators Apollo, Artemis and Hikanta.

Clearly, the Drifters are some sort of bizarre synthesis of Jovian and Sleeper technology, but it's unclear who's wearing the pants in this relationship. We haven't heard from the Jove Directorate proper since the beginning of the Empyrean War, and events such as the resurgence of Sansha's Nation and the collapse of their stargate network after the appearence of Caroline's Star has only furthered the concerning suspicion that they might all be dead. Did the Sleepers subsume the remains of the Jove Directorate without us realising?

I'd note at this point that it's of great interest that capsuleers have never found a single wormhole that leads to Jove space.

Alternatively, are we seeing the Jove co-opting Sleeper technology in an attempt to preserve or evolve their civilization? Certainly as we've seen from things like the smashed-open Sleeper enclaves, the Drifters are cannibalising Sleeper technology for their own ends - this isn't neccessarily completely incompatible with Sleepers evolving themselves but one would think if the Sleepers had access to their own technology they could do it in a more elegant and efficient fashion.

There does exist a third, more worrying possibility - the phrase "inheritors of a legacy left behind by some of the most ancient Jove" might seem to imply direct descent from the Jove, but needn't neccessarily do so. Those who inherit a legacy don't neccessarily need to be descendents, just beneficiaries. It's entirely possible what we're seeing here is a hithertofore unseen entity that's cannibalising both Jove and Sleeper technology.

We need more information.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Yockerbow
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#110 - 2015-08-03 05:54:31 UTC
Arrendis
What the screaming fark are capsuleers using our corpses for? And don't give me the trophy crap. That's sick, but this is literally [i wrote:
building their bodies out of our remains[/i]. What capsuleer group is doing that? They're not? Oh. Well, then I guess I meant DRIFTERS.

Is that enough times for a few sentences? Or when I'm talking about The Drifters should I always say The Drifters and never use pronouns when discussing THE MOTHERFRAKKING DRIFTERS?


You seem a bit angry. Partly my fault for not specifying - your words mirror those said by non-capsuleers about us. As for using corpses, the source of biomass for our clones is obvious enough if conveniently overlooked.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#111 - 2015-08-03 06:01:46 UTC
Yockerbow wrote:
As for using corpses, the source of biomass for our clones is obvious enough if conveniently overlooked.


You mean rapid-growth cloning from digitally-encoded stem cell blanks in a nutrient and amino bath? Yeah, that is obvious.

Honestly, why you would think it takes less money, time, and effort to reprocess human remains, given all of the issues of decomposition, potential infections, mutual autoimmune rejection reactions, and so on down the line, than just growing a new one is beyond me.
The Golden Serpent
A Drunken Squirrels' Conspiracy for Revenge
#112 - 2015-08-03 21:17:13 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Yockerbow wrote:
As for using corpses, the source of biomass for our clones is obvious enough if conveniently overlooked.


You mean rapid-growth cloning from digitally-encoded stem cell blanks in a nutrient and amino bath? Yeah, that is obvious.

Honestly, why you would think it takes less money, time, and effort to reprocess human remains, given all of the issues of decomposition, potential infections, mutual autoimmune rejection reactions, and so on down the line, than just growing a new one is beyond me.


You are right! Our family has been involved in genetics and cybernetics for over a thousand years. You can't make a healthy clone from a dead body.

I don't know what they are doing with the bodies but they are not using them to reproduce.

I am sorry I yelled at you you seem pretty smart.

-:¦:-•:'":•.-:¦:-•* K H A N I D •-:¦:-•:''''*:•-:¦:-

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#113 - 2015-08-04 09:42:29 UTC
Listen, completely off-the-wall idea here, but does anyone know what the Drifters do if they see you in a Gnosis? They seem to dislike capsuleers using Entosis technology - would they also get upset at other Jovian artifice?

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Aeon Amadii
#114 - 2015-08-04 12:25:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Aeon Amadii
Arrendis wrote:
Yockerbow wrote:
As for using corpses, the source of biomass for our clones is obvious enough if conveniently overlooked.


You mean rapid-growth cloning from digitally-encoded stem cell blanks in a nutrient and amino bath? Yeah, that is obvious.

Honestly, why you would think it takes less money, time, and effort to reprocess human remains, given all of the issues of decomposition, potential infections, mutual autoimmune rejection reactions, and so on down the line, than just growing a new one is beyond me.


Interesting. Maybe we should see what happens when the Drifters have access to Infantry clones that have been subjected to Uplink Irradiation.

For those that don't know, whenever we deploy to the frontlines via Drop Uplink (Amarrian tech, for the record) we're exposed to a lethal amount of radiation that accelerates cellular decay. Not to mention it's probably the single worst pain you'll ever experience apart from having a G75-VLB go off in your hands... s'like hellfire...

Point is, those clones are done for the instant you utilize the technology. Offer up a few of them to the Drifters, see what they do. If they're uninterested then we can safely assume that they're using healthy clones for their uhh.. "reproduction", even if it isn't optimal. But if they don't ignore these ill-fated clones than it might offer up a bit more evidence that they're using the bodies for something a bit more nefarious.

... alternatively, we could just do what I wanted to do in the first place and strap a bunch of F/41 remote explosives to the dead clones and seeing how well Drifter shielding holds up from the inside.

(This character is the Eve version of Aeon Amadi since there is no cross-forum support)

Member of CPM 2

Jandice Ymladris
Aurora Arcology
#115 - 2015-08-04 20:17:01 UTC
With the recent attack on Safizon, I decided to check for past aggression by the Drifters, I managed to find 3 attacks by the Drifters, two in Amarr space, both with an armada of their battleshipos & a small attack on Yulai. So while they seem to have a preference for the Amarr Empire, they're not above lashing out to others if they have cause to do so.

I published a more in detail overview of notable aggression involving Drifters in my latest news article: The rising threat of the Drifters

I do believe the time of diplomacy has sailed for now & that we have to ready ourselves to defend against the Drifters. So far they haven't shown signs that they desire peace. At least the Sleepers remain in their Wormholes & the Seekers only act in self defense, while the Drifters have initiated an attack on at least 3 encounters, 2 of them without any direct or clear provocation.

Providing a new home for refugees in the Aurora Arcology

Silvox Lunae
Perkone
Caldari State
#116 - 2015-08-04 20:28:43 UTC
Jandice Ymladris wrote:
With the recent attack on Safizon, I decided to check for past aggression by the Drifters, I managed to find 3 attacks by the Drifters, two in Amarr space, both with an armada of their battleshipos & a small attack on Yulai. So while they seem to have a preference for the Amarr Empire, they're not above lashing out to others if they have cause to do so.

I published a more in detail overview of notable aggression involving Drifters in my latest news article: The rising threat of the Drifters

I do believe the time of diplomacy has sailed for now & that we have to ready ourselves to defend against the Drifters. So far they haven't shown signs that they desire peace. At least the Sleepers remain in their Wormholes & the Seekers only act in self defense, while the Drifters have initiated an attack on at least 3 encounters, 2 of them without any direct or clear provocation.


As one who has been maintaining a personal record of the events surrounding the Drifters, I am appreciative of your compilation of information into a single location as it has proven very useful. In light of this, I must comment on your claim that two of the instances of Drifter aggression were without clear provocation. I assume you are referring to the two most recent engagements at the Imperial Celebration and at Safizon.

Before both instances, I would remind you that the Empress had made statements in the cluster news networks about how the Drifters are viewed as invading sovereign Amarr space and must be regarded as an emergent threat. She set a clear political stance about her views on the Drifters, who have demonstrated a clear ability to monitor our information networks given their aggression against the autopsy at Yuali. In both instances, large fleet movements involving the Amarr Navy were coordinated to various staging grounds along with loyalist capsuleer forces. If viewed from a military perspective, which the Empress seems eager to do so, these would be considered mobilizations for war.

Once more, I will urge the capsuleers of New Eden to consider the situation in which Drifter "aggression" is being presented. I stand by my stance that they have only initiated aggression when threatened. They do not demonstrate a "clear threat to New Eden", but rather specifically to the Amarr Empire headed by an Empress who has as of yet unknown reasons to engage in conflict with a clearly superior foe who could have targeted and removed the Amarr Empire's assets long before now. Capsuleers at large need not do anything beyond remaining observant and as neutral as possible. For those of you with loyalties to the Amarr Empire, I understand you are bound by obligation, but for those who are not please do not bring about unnecessary conflict to the cluster.
Aeon Amadii
#117 - 2015-08-05 00:11:42 UTC
Silvox Lunae wrote:
Jandice Ymladris wrote:
With the recent attack on Safizon, I decided to check for past aggression by the Drifters, I managed to find 3 attacks by the Drifters, two in Amarr space, both with an armada of their battleshipos & a small attack on Yulai. So while they seem to have a preference for the Amarr Empire, they're not above lashing out to others if they have cause to do so.

I published a more in detail overview of notable aggression involving Drifters in my latest news article: The rising threat of the Drifters

I do believe the time of diplomacy has sailed for now & that we have to ready ourselves to defend against the Drifters. So far they haven't shown signs that they desire peace. At least the Sleepers remain in their Wormholes & the Seekers only act in self defense, while the Drifters have initiated an attack on at least 3 encounters, 2 of them without any direct or clear provocation.


As one who has been maintaining a personal record of the events surrounding the Drifters, I am appreciative of your compilation of information into a single location as it has proven very useful. In light of this, I must comment on your claim that two of the instances of Drifter aggression were without clear provocation. I assume you are referring to the two most recent engagements at the Imperial Celebration and at Safizon.

Before both instances, I would remind you that the Empress had made statements in the cluster news networks about how the Drifters are viewed as invading sovereign Amarr space and must be regarded as an emergent threat. She set a clear political stance about her views on the Drifters, who have demonstrated a clear ability to monitor our information networks given their aggression against the autopsy at Yuali. In both instances, large fleet movements involving the Amarr Navy were coordinated to various staging grounds along with loyalist capsuleer forces. If viewed from a military perspective, which the Empress seems eager to do so, these would be considered mobilizations for war.

Once more, I will urge the capsuleers of New Eden to consider the situation in which Drifter "aggression" is being presented. I stand by my stance that they have only initiated aggression when threatened. They do not demonstrate a "clear threat to New Eden", but rather specifically to the Amarr Empire headed by an Empress who has as of yet unknown reasons to engage in conflict with a clearly superior foe who could have targeted and removed the Amarr Empire's assets long before now. Capsuleers at large need not do anything beyond remaining observant and as neutral as possible. For those of you with loyalties to the Amarr Empire, I understand you are bound by obligation, but for those who are not please do not bring about unnecessary conflict to the cluster.


So let me intervene here and ask you this, from a tactical and militaristic standpoint. Let's assume we consider Drifters peaceful, let's assume the most optimistic of views in that they are non-aggressive and want to be left alone.

How many lives are you will to put at risk and how much are you willing to sacrifice for what is essentially a theory with incredibly limited evidence? Even if we don't take an aggressive stance here, and operate on a purely defensive basis, we're much better off than assuming that Drifters are naturally non-violent.

(This character is the Eve version of Aeon Amadi since there is no cross-forum support)

Member of CPM 2

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#118 - 2015-08-05 00:17:54 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Let's leave aside for a moment the question of how precisely CONCORD managed to assemble this information given that the Drifters never talk and are, in fact, incapable of speech. I'm not sure I even want to know how we know the designators Apollo, Artemis and Hikanta.



Actually it's generated from the Drifters' own IDENT systems.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#119 - 2015-08-05 00:19:43 UTC
I'm getting very tired of drifter sympathizers.
Aeon Amadii
#120 - 2015-08-05 00:24:39 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:
I'm getting very tired of drifter sympathizers.


It makes me curious as to where all the Serpentis and Angel sympathizers are. Afterall, human opinions are like spiders - if you see one, there's bound to be ten more in the vicinity. So, if there are people that will sympathize with what is essentially a mindless, murderous drone that has shown no other intent but to kill us, then surely there are those that would sympathize with murderous, booster fiends with no regard for civility.

(This character is the Eve version of Aeon Amadi since there is no cross-forum support)

Member of CPM 2