These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Think less and do more

Author
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#41 - 2015-07-31 15:03:58 UTC
Hello OP

As a New Order threat assessment officer I am interested to hear more about your operation. It is often hard for us to track this kind of rebellions because the vanish so fast or never take off in the first place.

It seams like your character did not biomass yet, so it is not too late to ask some questions if I may:

- Is there a deeper purpose to this rebellion and if yes, what is this purpose?

- Will this endeavour be financed by you or a third party or do you prefer the popular "bring your own ship" model?

- At what time in the future can we expect some first ingame interactions with you or one of your associates?

- Where there any particular antimatter related incidents in the past that fuelled your desire to start this rebellion?

I hope to hear back from you and I am looking forward to all the content you will provide once this rebellion takes off. Also, please make sure you always follow the Code when operating in our territory as it is required since CodeSov was established. Mining permits can be acquired for the price of 10mil ISK per year if you don't have one already.
Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#42 - 2015-07-31 15:21:43 UTC
Serendipity Lost wrote:
Leto Thule wrote:
Meh. Truths.



Speaking truths..... I got the photo hard copies of you at the beach house.

Was he wearing the assless chaps?

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin

Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#43 - 2015-07-31 15:42:16 UTC
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
Serendipity Lost wrote:
Leto Thule wrote:
Meh. Truths.



Speaking truths..... I got the photo hard copies of you at the beach house.

Was he wearing the assless chaps?


Is there any other kind?
Leto Thule
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#44 - 2015-07-31 15:43:17 UTC
Uh, its creepy seeing as how I actually just got back from the beach house....

Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#45 - 2015-07-31 15:47:46 UTC
Serendipity Lost wrote:
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
Serendipity Lost wrote:
Leto Thule wrote:
Meh. Truths.



Speaking truths..... I got the photo hard copies of you at the beach house.

Was he wearing the assless chaps?


Is there any other kind?

He could have been wearing that golden speedo he always packs

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin

Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#46 - 2015-07-31 15:49:09 UTC
Leto Thule wrote:
Uh, its creepy seeing as how I actually just got back from the beach house....



It's like I'm sharing your chaps isn't it.
Xeno Szenn
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#47 - 2015-07-31 18:03:48 UTC
Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
Xeno Szenn wrote:
Serendipity Lost wrote:
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
I'm curious to know exactly what a kitchen sink fleet of NPC corp characters would do against a Merc corp. Unless they themselves intend to take to suicide ganking they won't even be able to shoot the mercs in question.

White knights are going to have to stick to whoring on CODE. Catalyst kills.



I'm curious as to wether or not you are going to accept or decline my 1v1 thunderdome challenge.

Since you're a merc, I'll talk in you terms. I'd like to hire you for 100 mil isk to compete with me in a 1v1 thunerdome match.


1v1 has a place in eve but not in eve warfare. If it's for fun sure but if the Op is going to war then 1v1's have no business in it.

Sush you this is forum drama spread across 3-4 posts now. Read more forums. Also where do snigg hang out again?


Wherever we want to and were Waffles friend. Also Noragen come back to real pvp high sec pvp is so boring no cap kills to be had.
Anyanka Funk
Doomheim
#48 - 2015-07-31 18:10:28 UTC
Serendipity Lost wrote:
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
Serendipity Lost wrote:
I just want the 1v1 with Vimsy. It's a side thing. I've been chasing her across several threads. When she talks like a hard core mercanary - she gets invited into thunderdome. She can either accept or bleed credibility until there isn't any left. I just want the thrill of solo combat with a true professional. It's just that simple.


Sorry, but I just plain don't do honor duels as a matter of principle. All forms of space honor exist entirely to benefit the person in the weaker position either to help protect their ego ("I was defeated by dishonorable means so I am still better than the person who beat me.") or to negate their inability to win under normal conditions ("If you do not agree to single combat under a set of arbitrary conditions you are the lesser warrior.").

I wouldn't stand to gain anything by accepting your challenge because I don't share that belief system. In fact I'd be undermining my own position and lending yours credibility by doing so.

You are welcome to try and violence my boats at ay time through whatever means you have at your disposal and I won't begrudge you for being successful, however I'm not going to actively waste my time and effort to satisfy your sense of e-honor, sorry.


This isn't about honor. This is about me wanting to blow you up in 1v1 combat. Then I want to dance all around your destroyed ship. There is no honor or moral thread to my desires. Mostly I'm using my lack of risk aversion to highlight yours.

You're not dumb, so you will twist and slink in any number of clever ways to avoid an even fight. I'm just highlighting the two opposing play styles. I knew how you would play this from the start. If I had honor I wouln't have called you out. If I had scruples I would have let it drop 3 threads ago. I have neither.

This is not about honor - this is about you being a risk averse merc bear and me not being risk averse. This is about highlighting the two play styles in hopes that a few more pilots will see the light... turn down their kb stat luv and turn up the fun. This is about making eve a better place. I love this game and your risk averse bearness is killing it. I'm just trying to save it.

If you're so non-risk-averse, why not just go negative ten and shoot whoever you want?

Demerius Xenocratus
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#49 - 2015-07-31 18:32:24 UTC
Anyanka Funk wrote:
Serendipity Lost wrote:
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
Serendipity Lost wrote:
I just want the 1v1 with Vimsy. It's a side thing. I've been chasing her across several threads. When she talks like a hard core mercanary - she gets invited into thunderdome. She can either accept or bleed credibility until there isn't any left. I just want the thrill of solo combat with a true professional. It's just that simple.


Sorry, but I just plain don't do honor duels as a matter of principle. All forms of space honor exist entirely to benefit the person in the weaker position either to help protect their ego ("I was defeated by dishonorable means so I am still better than the person who beat me.") or to negate their inability to win under normal conditions ("If you do not agree to single combat under a set of arbitrary conditions you are the lesser warrior.").

I wouldn't stand to gain anything by accepting your challenge because I don't share that belief system. In fact I'd be undermining my own position and lending yours credibility by doing so.

You are welcome to try and violence my boats at ay time through whatever means you have at your disposal and I won't begrudge you for being successful, however I'm not going to actively waste my time and effort to satisfy your sense of e-honor, sorry.


This isn't about honor. This is about me wanting to blow you up in 1v1 combat. Then I want to dance all around your destroyed ship. There is no honor or moral thread to my desires. Mostly I'm using my lack of risk aversion to highlight yours.

You're not dumb, so you will twist and slink in any number of clever ways to avoid an even fight. I'm just highlighting the two opposing play styles. I knew how you would play this from the start. If I had honor I wouln't have called you out. If I had scruples I would have let it drop 3 threads ago. I have neither.

This is not about honor - this is about you being a risk averse merc bear and me not being risk averse. This is about highlighting the two play styles in hopes that a few more pilots will see the light... turn down their kb stat luv and turn up the fun. This is about making eve a better place. I love this game and your risk averse bearness is killing it. I'm just trying to save it.

If you're so non-risk-averse, why not just go negative ten and shoot whoever you want?



Because suicide ganking isn't viable against someone that flies 1600 plated ships with HG slaves and neutral logi on stand-by?

Also, ganking is not risky. It's done on dedicated alts, so the consequences of being -10 are limited to characters who aren't really affected by it.


If you really want to mess with CODE, you need to join them and gain enough trust to start identifying the mains and PvE alts linked to the ganking toons, and go after the ones not in Deklein. Make them pay for the crimes they've thus far committed in safety with their anonymous alts. It would be a fun side project for someone to take on.



Anyanka Funk
Doomheim
#50 - 2015-07-31 18:51:08 UTC
Demerius Xenocratus wrote:
Anyanka Funk wrote:
Serendipity Lost wrote:
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
Serendipity Lost wrote:
I just want the 1v1 with Vimsy. It's a side thing. I've been chasing her across several threads. When she talks like a hard core mercanary - she gets invited into thunderdome. She can either accept or bleed credibility until there isn't any left. I just want the thrill of solo combat with a true professional. It's just that simple.


Sorry, but I just plain don't do honor duels as a matter of principle. All forms of space honor exist entirely to benefit the person in the weaker position either to help protect their ego ("I was defeated by dishonorable means so I am still better than the person who beat me.") or to negate their inability to win under normal conditions ("If you do not agree to single combat under a set of arbitrary conditions you are the lesser warrior.").

I wouldn't stand to gain anything by accepting your challenge because I don't share that belief system. In fact I'd be undermining my own position and lending yours credibility by doing so.

You are welcome to try and violence my boats at ay time through whatever means you have at your disposal and I won't begrudge you for being successful, however I'm not going to actively waste my time and effort to satisfy your sense of e-honor, sorry.


This isn't about honor. This is about me wanting to blow you up in 1v1 combat. Then I want to dance all around your destroyed ship. There is no honor or moral thread to my desires. Mostly I'm using my lack of risk aversion to highlight yours.

You're not dumb, so you will twist and slink in any number of clever ways to avoid an even fight. I'm just highlighting the two opposing play styles. I knew how you would play this from the start. If I had honor I wouln't have called you out. If I had scruples I would have let it drop 3 threads ago. I have neither.

This is not about honor - this is about you being a risk averse merc bear and me not being risk averse. This is about highlighting the two play styles in hopes that a few more pilots will see the light... turn down their kb stat luv and turn up the fun. This is about making eve a better place. I love this game and your risk averse bearness is killing it. I'm just trying to save it.

If you're so non-risk-averse, why not just go negative ten and shoot whoever you want?



Because suicide ganking isn't viable against someone that flies 1600 plated ships with HG slaves and neutral logi on stand-by?

Also, ganking is not risky. It's done on dedicated alts, so the consequences of being -10 are limited to characters who aren't really affected by it.


If you really want to mess with CODE, you need to join them and gain enough trust to start identifying the mains and PvE alts linked to the ganking toons, and go after the ones not in Deklein. Make them pay for the crimes they've thus far committed in safety with their anonymous alts. It would be a fun side project for someone to take on.




Also, mining is not risky. It's done on dedicated alts, so the consequences of being ganked are limited to characters who aren't really affected by it.
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#51 - 2015-07-31 22:02:22 UTC
Demerius Xenocratus wrote:
If you really want to mess with CODE, you need to join them and gain enough trust to start identifying the mains and PvE alts linked to the ganking toons, and go after the ones not in Deklein. Make them pay for the crimes they've thus far committed in safety with their anonymous alts. It would be a fun side project for someone to take on.

You know, i'm never sure if this is funny or sad. You carebaers are so focused on ISK printing you can't possibly imagine that someone would not mindlessly grind to PLEX their account. So you have to invent some myth about CODE. mains.

I just pay my subscriptions and my income actually comes from ganking, which isn't much, but it's positive and it allowed me to not think about ISK efficiency anymore and just kill stuff. Every now and then some faction module will drop from a miner and pay for all the other ganks. My actual "main", or the character I once started with is in CODE. as well and he acts as my scout and everything else I need. Feel free to come after him.
John E Normus
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#52 - 2015-07-31 22:59:23 UTC
Demerius Xenocratus wrote:
If you really want to mess with CODE, you need to join them and gain enough trust to start identifying the mains and PvE alts linked to the ganking toons, and go after the ones not in Deklein. Make them pay for the crimes they've thus far committed in safety with their anonymous alts. It would be a fun side project for someone to take on.


Yes, if we had a weak spot this is it! Join us, gain our trust, and while you bathe in the tears and pod goo of non-compliants, hunt our elusive non-Deklein alts. If you roll a gank alt and get to -10 with it I'll tell you where you can find all of mine...

Please app into New Order Logistics when ready.

Between Ignorance and Wisdom

Paranoid Loyd
#53 - 2015-07-31 23:16:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Paranoid Loyd
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
You carebaers
While I don't agree one bit with Demerius' statement or idea of a strategy to mess with you, he is far from a carebear.

Whinebear, sure, no question about that, but definitely not a carebear.

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Alana Charen-Teng
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#54 - 2015-07-31 23:19:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Alana Charen-Teng
The title of this thread is, strangely, "think less and do more". But we all know that the OP's target demographic, the disgruntled carebears of highsec, have never been good at doing, much less thinking.

Ozzie Udan wrote:
So to my plan , form a group that operates as code do and start ganking back, all in cheap ships and easy to train alts.
So if you want pay back or want to try out this elite PvP or just want to **** a Goon off mail me in game .

Please remember our targets are some of the lowest forms of life known to man , just be careful what you say in open channel.

It's time to act, stand with me and let's bring in a new chapter to Eve online


Your movement will never gain traction or legitimacy because:

1) We have the Supreme Protector and his blessings
2) We have the popular support of the Highsec community
3) We have the Elite PvP skills
Karla the Careless
Beyond Reproach
#55 - 2015-08-01 01:05:24 UTC
Alana Charen-Teng wrote:
The title of this thread is, strangely, "think less and do more". But we all know that the OP's target demographic, the disgruntled carebears of highsec, have never been good at doing, much less thinking.

Ozzie Udan wrote:
So to my plan , form a group that operates as code do and start ganking back, all in cheap ships and easy to train alts.
So if you want pay back or want to try out this elite PvP or just want to **** a Goon off mail me in game .

Please remember our targets are some of the lowest forms of life known to man , just be careful what you say in open channel.

It's time to act, stand with me and let's bring in a new chapter to Eve online


Your movement will never gain traction or legitimacy because:

1) We have the Supreme Protector and his blessings
2) We have the popular support of the Highsec community
3) We have the Elite PvP skills


#3 Most notably in evidence by your outstanding performance in past Alliance Tournaments, I am sure........
Avi Shekelstien
Doomheim
#56 - 2015-08-01 17:45:06 UTC
Ozzie Udan wrote:
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
I'm curious to know exactly what a kitchen sink fleet of NPC corp characters would do against a Merc corp. Unless they themselves intend to take to suicide ganking they won't even be able to shoot the mercs in question.

White knights are going to have to stick to whoring on CODE. Catalyst kills.



I'm pleased you put your thoughts down, thxs for the reply, so many have understood already but I will spell it out for you "yes we will be ganking".

Just like to add I'm not talking about real merc that do a job, just the one's that hide under that title ,so if we get this group together I'll look forward to seeing youCool

Well you better be quick because faction police will pew pew us within 15 seconds of undocking.
Avvy
Doomheim
#57 - 2015-08-03 11:55:35 UTC
Ozzie Udan wrote:

Please remember our targets are some of the lowest forms of life known to man , just be careful what you say in open channel.





So you think that and you want to emulate them, doesn't that strike you as odd?




Maybe high-sec should have viable PvP, might get rid of all the ganking nonsense.
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#58 - 2015-08-03 15:36:09 UTC
Karla the Careless wrote:
#3 Most notably in evidence by your outstanding performance in past Alliance Tournaments, I am sure........
We won that tournament over a year ago without a single loss and people are still butthurt about it. Flawless victory! As always!
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#59 - 2015-08-03 18:53:11 UTC
Ozzie Udan wrote:
It's time to act, stand with me and let's bring in a new chapter to Eve online


I love a man an NPC with a plan. I'm sure you'll be as memorable as those who have gone before you, like... ummm, errr, wait a minute, it's on the tip of my tongue. Nope, I can't remember any of them, honestly. I wonder why?

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

admiral root
Red Galaxy
#60 - 2015-08-03 19:06:03 UTC
Serendipity Lost wrote:
CODE... they are doing more harm than good (this box has already been checked).


I know we shouldn't feed trolls but seriously, in what twisted version of reality is this the case?

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff