Out of Pod Experience

Try not to pretend you are amongst the uegenics-minded elites. Chances are you didn't get any memos not to drink the flouride and take the vaccinations, so you are not one of them.

Off topic posts removed. Please stay on topic, thank you.

You know, sexism works in both directions.

Think of an obnoxious man who's trying to reason with you why he thinks men are superior. That's you right now.

I am not interested in being drawn into an emotional debate. We as a species don't need so many men, it is in fact detrimental to our world now.

Let us go over a few things. Men's brains are larger than women's getting close to the size that a Neanderthal had. Women's on the other hand are closer to the size of a gorilla. Woops! Am I being sexist against women now? Which side am I playing for?

No. I am as ever stating what I have read and applying it to my own thoughts, which I try to keep within logical bounds. Now, the phenomenon of the corpus callosum is rather an interesting one. The male's is thinner than the woman's, thus they tend to have things divided in their minds as an example of this, ask a women how they are feeling and they can telling you, "I am frustrated because of the system as work but I am feeling a bit depressed because of the weather while I am feeling some anticipation towards tonight's supper, my significant other is making it!" while a man will respond, "I am fine." Why? Their speech centres are on one side and the emotional ones are on the other.
Results of this are that a man when under intense emotions will act out, throw a punch, yell, be unable to enunciate properly, hoot with joy and for the more subtle sort, such as feeling depressed, down trodden and such, they might go on EVE and gank someone to express how screwed up they are feeling inside.
Is it all bad? No. How many women physicist, composers, mathematicians and so forth can you name? Maybe 5? Maybe 10? (There is an explanation for even those few that supports all this but it is many more steps than I am willing to type out at this juncture)
Why is that? Why are there so many more men that can do all that deeply abstract thinking? Their smaller link between the hemispheres of their brain allows for their frontal lobes to specialise.
Mean while, women tend to make better social workers, managers, human resources and even advertising personnel because they can empathise and multi-task so much better.

Now, next time you go pointing the finger, do consider that it might be a reflection on how you are reading it and how you feel, projecting a meaning and innuendo that isn't there.

I am talking to the level of my audience and if that is landing at a pre-school level ... well then ...

I must ... I must ... I must resist!


*Hides the troll food.*

Ok, here comes some ingenious razzle dazzle to counteract some of the uneducated half baked opinions here.




We do not die because we have to, we die because we evolved to do so. If you work in the medical field you will understand what happens to a large portion of the human population as they age. Even if our cells were not hard coded to stop dividing, each and every human being would amass a wealth of their own personal body changing events. Take for example a simple toe corn. It is a simple enough of an example, life creates it and makes it grow, much like the force only much more disgusting. It gets to a certain size in a human lifetime if left unchecked, but think what would happen if that person lived many times longer?

Cavities, infection, injury, U.V damage to the eyes,Auto-immune diseases, environmental toxins, (did you know your bones never stop growing like fingernails) or simply a Q-tip put to deeply into an ear that results in a small measure of hearing loss. Each and every tiny infraction would culminate until the host body would be unrecognizable in comparison to a second host body. Each exceedingly long lived human would would become it's own unique version of itself, as it collected anomalies over long periods of time. The longer the lifespan of said organism the greater this divergence would be.



Biology has two choices...

1. Create a functionality that is capable of repairing and restoring itself indefinably
2. Create organic function that commits seppuku after it has created the next generation that starts from scratch.




Aspect 1. cannot exist because our biological make up is simply not intelligent enough to do this. If it was, people would not be born with so many genetic anomalies and diseases. If the body was smart, then the body of a type 1 diabetic would be able to look into it's own genetic make up and say "hey I am not making insulin? Lets generate some beta cells so I can live a normal healthy life" This never happens because the body is stupid. It has the genetic code, it has the stem cells and it has everything it needs to do this... but it does not.


Aspect 2. by hard coding biology to destroy itself after so many cellular divisions, evolution ensures that a species remains uniform by constantly starting from scratch, over and over again, in the next generation. Reproducing in mass makes this process more effective (not smart mind you, very very stupid and blind but effective none the less) and so humans are doing what their evolution has always dictated them to do.



So you see, your biology is 100% capable of being mostly immortal and regenerating itself indefinitely. But this requires far to much effort and intelligence then it is capable of. So like so many humans who choose the easy paths in their existence in order to "get by" in life, evolution has done the same for you. You are in a form that will deliberately destroy itself in order to maintain the symmetry of it's species.

While I prescribe to the "non-sexist" camp, I'll head off the sexists out there by asking the question that I know they will ask:

"How do you know that the chemical signal that causes changes in one's genitalia do not also affect the brain? It's clear that these signals affect other parts of the body, giving a man broad shoulders and a woman curvy hips. It's also clear that a woman's mood is affected by her menstrual cycle. People who take testosterone pills become very aggressive. etc. etc."

Sebastian LaFleu, your well reasoned and thought out post is a rare find on these forums and so i shall endeavor to do the same.



This strongly suggests that with a little evolutionary incentive, all lifeforms on earth could extend their current life expectancy. How much is unknown, but it is not a far reach to say that it could be doubled throughout the animal kingdom. Perhaps multiplied many fold. This incentive however does not exist because evolution instead favored the recipe of the multiplication of offspring, in place of longer lived parents.





Thx for this I totally forgot these little gems existed






I don't think this pertains to my post, but for the sake of intelligent debate...

What I meant was this. If you keep walking barefoot and develop a calsie you assume it can only get so big because you can only live so long. Extend the amount of time involved and it gets bigger and then it gets infected. That does not seem like much until you realize that your walking funny and now your knees and back start to hurt. Arthritis and degeneration sets in and soon these joints are changing shape, all the while the skin on your foot is getting thicker because of the calise that just wont heal. When arthritis sets in this starts to happen


(here is where the forums ate the rest of my post so I will bridge )


.......the result is that beings with a longer life expectancy will become unrecognizable vs their original blueprint, in the vast majority of the population. This process is amplified the longer that said being exists, and is compounded by each associated living being comprising it's race.


The body is not "smart enough" to eradicate this process
So it instead eradicates the parent being in favor of offspring that will start at ground zero, or from the original blueprint.







Proof That Human Genes Could Probably Live Forever

The genetic code carried in your sperm will have so little degradation over centuries that it can sire thousands of years of descendants. The code in your sperm, bonded with the code in an human egg has no life expectancy. It can regenerate itself forever without any noticeable decay that would interfere with the creation of another human being.


So if your sperm can?
Then why can't any of your other cells?


The answer is cancer cells can too... and every cell in your body could also if the had the inclination to do so. But death and procreation in mass, is simply an easier way to get things done. It is also the path of least resistance, which is a whole diff evolutionary debate altogether.

All these intelligent replies I failed to notice this idiot.



If this fool bothered to keep up 2 date with lol genetics, he might know that science is beginning to discover that those "useless strands" that he is referring too convey things like instincts and genetic memory. Not to mention it has been common knowledge for a long time that it functions as an evolutionary library of all that preceded you.


LoL people who think they understand genetics... and think that they have it all figured out in their tiny little minds.
Here is laughing at you kid.



Eternum Hijacks page 2!!!!!!!