These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

[IG-CVA] Encyclical on Singularity and the One True Empire of the Lord

Author
Honorius Vitellius
Exit-Strategy
Unchained Alliance
#1 - 2015-07-20 11:21:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Honorius Vitellius
On the eve of the unnecessary deaths of millions, a clear response to some of the ideas put forth by Maximilian Singularity is necessary. At the present juncture, my words will do nothing to prevent the carnage soon to come, but I present them as a continued confession of faith, a declaration of Amarr identity in the face of an assault that seeks to destroy it. This attack upon what it is to be Amarr seeks to substitute the clarity of God, Scripture, and history for the glory of one man and the expediencies of one moment. This attack must be resisted. This attack is a test, and in this test the Faith will find strength but not in the way Singularity expects.

The great danger of this attack and how it is clearly opposed to God can be most easily seen in the organization and the individual who leads it. The assault upon the Empire and the Faith has been described as a cleansing “inquisition” and the action of a “Sixth Empire,” under the direction of a “pope” who would be an emperor if he could. I will first respond to what Singularity describes his so-called “Sixth Empire” to be. I will then describe what this organization actually is.

Singularity’s Empire makes no mention of the Lord, but many references to both himself and to capsuleers as if they were gods. Regard how he has described the “Sixth Empire” to me:
“The Sixth Empire is not a thing you can join, nor quit. It is not a thing that is united, in fact, it excels when it is divided. It can not fall, it can only rise. It is the very thing that has made CVA, The Imperium and all the alliances stronger over the years. It is the exclusive realm of Capsuleers where we strengthen by our divided adversity. It is a realization. An idea. A bad idea, a good idea both in one where duality of confusion leads only to the infusion of STRENGTH.”

These notions make little logical sense and even less sense when an attempt is made to reconcile them with the Lord’s Scriptures and the Amarr tradition. Even the most unlearned seminary student can see these flaws, and I apologise for rehearsing basic elements of Amarr doctrine in my response to them. The duty of the Reclaiming is unity. This unity is the goal of the Lord, who wishes that all of His creatures be returned to Him. Singularity says that his “empire,” in contrast thrives on permanent division: “It is not a thing that is united, in fact it excels when it is divided.” In these words, he seems to suggest that the final goal of the “empire” is not a Reclaiming to God but endless division, death, and self-glory. Where is any reference to God? Where is any reference to the Scriptures? This is not a faithful “empire” it is something else.

In addition, Singularity calls for legal inquest while breaking the law. Amarr law is based on the Lord and His Scriptures. Singularity cites none of these. What law does he claim to enforce? If one enforces notions born from one’s own mind outside of any tradition or legitimate government, this is not law. It is pure tyranny, a farcical pantomime of legitimacy. He promises you freedom and an end of slavery, as long as you submit to his novel notions and all his demands. To all others he offers only death, with endless contempt for the rest of humanity. He participated in what his band of terrorists called “Burn Amarr” feeling “no pity” for the countless thousands killed (even the crews of merchant ships whose “crime” was travelling in a system he had chosen to indiscriminately attack for the promulgation of terror). He does all these actions to underline the Empress’ supposed wickedness and his own supposed nobility. Judging by their evident fruits, which is the more poisoned? Indeed, far from heaping scorn on the Empress, he exalts her by comparison.

Singularity appears to discount that capsuleers are involved with and, in fact, servants to the Lord. Our role is to further His plan for all of humanity, not just ourselves. An exclusive “empire” of capsuleers is an offense against this basic truth. We are servants of the Lord, even those of us who do not know it. What singularity outlines is not the Amarr faith; it is a capsuleer-centred death cult. Indeed, the so-called “Sixth Empire” resembles more a monument of homicidal vanity, a twisted idolatry of the self to the expense of God. As I have argued before, submission to the Lord above all else is the essence of Amarr (https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5831129). Singularity promises you a slavery to the self, rather than submission to God that will make you free. The Lord’s true Empire is for all of humanity. It is the destination of all peoples. Let us, faithful, re-affirm our ultimate allegiance to the Lord, to His plan and to his one, only, holy, Amarr Empire. Amarr Victor! Faithful to God forever!

Given by Brother Honorius, Lord and Holder of the Vitellius Family, Servant of God and His Empire
Utari Onzo
Escalated.
OnlyFleets.
#2 - 2015-07-20 11:29:41 UTC
You speak with clarity, my Lord, and hit the nail on the Coffin of any of Maximillian's claims to being a True Amarr of the Faith. This so called Empire is indeed a Death Cult, unfit for the betterment of humanity as a whole. Further, it seems Maximillian claims to be 'pope' of New Eden, yet he has no support from the very people he has come from, The Amarr! A nullsec coalition and a few rag tag outlaws and other ignorants does not the support of an entire cluster make.

Thank you for this post, God's blessings be upon you. Amarr Victor.

"Face the enemy as a solid wall For faith is your armor And through it, the enemy will find no breach Wrap your arms around the enemy For faith is your fire And with it, burn away his evil"

Jenshae Chiroptera
#3 - 2015-07-20 13:57:32 UTC
Fear not. The Goon puppet is hollow. Amarr victor!

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#4 - 2015-07-20 15:05:02 UTC
The servants of God and Amarr reject the Harbinger of Blasphemy and his Cult of the Capsuleer.

By His light and His will. Amarr Victor.
Mizhara Del'thul
Kyn'aldrnari
#5 - 2015-07-20 15:18:03 UTC
Add some jello to this and we could charge admission for this show.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2015-07-20 15:51:09 UTC
So am I to take it that CFC is invading CVA space?

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#7 - 2015-07-20 16:05:27 UTC
I'm fairly sure that Singularity is a Blood Raider. His philosophy is certainly pretty close to a Raider's ideals of personal glory, hierarchy of power, blood sacrifice wherein Capsuleers are the most worthy targets for bloodletting, and strength through conflict.

I wonder what Old Omar thinks of this?
Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#8 - 2015-07-20 16:20:50 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
So am I to take it that CFC is invading CVA space?


They've claimed they would.

Nothing's been sighted yet.
Lunarisse Aspenstar
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#9 - 2015-07-20 16:24:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Lunarisse Aspenstar
Scherezad wrote:
I'm fairly sure that Singularity is a Blood Raider. His philosophy is certainly pretty close to a Raider's ideals of personal glory, hierarchy of power, blood sacrifice wherein Capsuleers are the most worthy targets for bloodletting, and strength through conflict.

I wonder what Old Omar thinks of this?


Thank you Dr. Scherezad for this insight. I admit I was mulling over Equilbrium of Mankind leanings for him given his fixation on the various types of deaths, but this may be closer to the mark as to the underlying and to date undisclosed sources of his heresy.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#10 - 2015-07-20 17:21:12 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Fear not. The Goon puppet is hollow. Amarr victor!


Hang on, I thought we were supposed to be his puppets. It's really not fair of you all to keep rewriting our org chart like that, you know.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#11 - 2015-07-20 17:24:36 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
So am I to take it that CFC is invading CVA space?


They've claimed they would.

Nothing's been sighted yet.


It's my understanding that we've slowly been marshaling fleets of our new Type-D Rifters in previously unknown wormho-... hang on, excuse me...


... actually, that's something else completely. Carry on! I was wondering how they got a doomsday on a frigate...
Trii Seo
Goonswarm Federation
#12 - 2015-07-20 17:30:30 UTC
Arrendis wrote:

... actually, that's something else completely. Carry on! I was wondering how they got a doomsday on a frigate...


Top secret duct tape.

It's top secret. Sh.

Proud pilot of the Imperium

Arek'Jaalan: Heliograph

Arrendis
TK Corp
#13 - 2015-07-20 17:52:12 UTC
Brother Honorius, as an avowed heretic who finds the Amarr faith to be strange, alien, and frankly completely devoid of moral worth, I will admit that you and I will have our differences of opinion. Also, apologies in advance, as I may display a tendency to become a bit wordy and long-winded in expressing my thoughts, and slightly prone to focusing on tangential minutiae, eh, little fi-er... Dr. Scherezad?

As... I seem to have already done. Right then. Back to the point. With that stipulation, I was hoping you might entertain a question I have concerning the very doctrine of unity that you have espoused in your encyclical. Unity, as you may have heard, is held to be one of the primary virtues of the Imperium, as well as a watchword of the Amarr faith, and so there may be some common ground to build from on that particular front. However - so as not to get side-tracked again....

You have stated:

Honorious Vitellius wrote:
These notions make little logical sense and even less sense when an attempt is made to reconcile them with the Lord’s Scriptures and the Amarr tradition. Even the most unlearned seminary student can see these flaws, and I apologise for rehearsing basic elements of Amarr doctrine in my response to them. The duty of the Reclaiming is unity. This unity is the goal of the Lord, who wishes that all of His creatures be returned to Him. Singularity says that his “empire,” in contrast thrives on permanent division: “It is not a thing that is united, in fact it excels when it is divided.” In these words, he seems to suggest that the final goal of the “empire” is not a Reclaiming to God but endless division, death, and self-glory. Where is any reference to God? Where is any reference to the Scriptures? This is not a faithful “empire” it is something else.


Reclaiming has been used as the justification for slavery throughout the history of the Amarr. To many, however, the moral burden of the Reclaiming is that it is not slavery for the sake of maintaining personal wealth in the form of chattel property, but rather a way to bring the wayward and the heretical into the fold under the care of those of true faith. The purpose of this caretaking is to guide and instruct the benighted souls into greater communion with your god. In this, the physical aspects of the Reclaiming are subordinate to the spiritual aspects.

This approach - that the physical aspects of Unity and Reclaiming are not the important ones - can be best seen in the continued relationship between the Amarr and the Khanid, despite the latter's secession from the Empire and brief but bloody civil war. The Khanid continue to practice the Amarr faith in their way, and as far as I am aware, there have not been popular outcries for a forceful Reclaiming of the Khanid for at least the length of my lifetime.

Given that, is it not reasonable to say that there can be temporal conflict among the faithful, and that unity with your God does not necessarily require unity with your political apparatus?

Similarly, one does not redirect a moving starship by ramming it into a station and expecting it to bounce in the right direction, with no harm or damage inflicted or taken. You set your planned heading, and turn the ship slowly, through a constant curve. Is it not also reasonable to think that Maximilian Singularity may be attempting to guide capsuleers by degrees? To first harness their energy in a way that will later allow him to introduce them to concepts from the Amarr faith and scriptures, rather than attempt to stand in front of them and yell out scripture verse now in a gesture that would surely be almost completely ignored and ineffective?
Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#14 - 2015-07-20 18:25:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
Arrendis wrote:
Reclaiming has been used as the justification for slavery throughout the history of the Amarr. To many, however, the moral burden of the Reclaiming is that it is not slavery for the sake of maintaining personal wealth in the form of chattel property, but rather a way to bring the wayward and the heretical into the fold under the care of those of true faith. The purpose of this caretaking is to guide and instruct the benighted souls into greater communion with your god. In this, the physical aspects of the Reclaiming are subordinate to the spiritual aspects.


The physical aspects serve the spiritual aspects. It is a common belief of many liberal Amarr to think that simple acceptance of the faith is all that is required. Slavery is about conversion, but it is also about working off the sins of generations through service to God's Chosen. Emancipation is not a result offered simply for conversion and acceptance of God's light, it is a result offered for cleansing one's family line through service and proving that your lineage is able to be trusted with the responsibility of freedom.

Quote:
This approach - that the physical aspects of Unity and Reclaiming are not the important ones - can be best seen in the continued relationship between the Amarr and the Khanid, despite the latter's secession from the Empire and brief but bloody civil war. The Khanid continue to practice the Amarr faith in their way, and as far as I am aware, there have not been popular outcries for a forceful Reclaiming of the Khanid for at least the length of my lifetime.


The Khanid were declared heretics up until the reunion a few years ago. And we have been working on Reclaiming them, just not by war. Like with the Caldari, diplomacy is a tool of Reclamation.

Quote:
Given that, is it not reasonable to say that there can be temporal conflict among the faithful, and that unity with your God does not necessarily require unity with your political apparatus?


Unity with God does require service to Amarr. Amarr is the Chosen Empire of God.

The great Amarr Empire was founded to cultivate the spirit of man.
- Book I, 1:14

And the Lord spake, and said, Lo, my people,
Witness, for I have made the worlds of Heaven;
And these worlds I give to you, My Chosen,
So Amarr shall rule the worlds of the Heavens.

None shall stand higher than you save the Sefrim,
Who serve Me as others shall serve you,
For all things under Me serve one higher;
So Amarr shall rule the worlds of the Heavens.

As Garrulor rules the skies; as Frisceas rules the sea;
As Emperor rules Holder; as Holder rules Serf;
Yet all under Heaven serve Me;
So shall Amarr rule the worlds of the Heavens.

- Reclaiming 3.19 - 3.21


There cannot be a sixth empire. There cannot be a second, third, fourth, or fifth. There is only one Empire of God, and it is our duty to bring all others into that one Empire.

Quote:
Is it not also reasonable to think that Maximilian Singularity may be attempting to guide capsuleers by degrees? To first harness their energy in a way that will later allow him to introduce them to concepts from the Amarr faith and scriptures, rather than attempt to stand in front of them and yell out scripture verse now in a gesture that would surely be almost completely ignored and ineffective?


Singularity has demonstrated multiple times that he neither understands nor follows the Amarr faith. He cannot hope to teach others or be an example for them to follow if he refuses to submit himself to it. He has identified himself as a reformer, an abolitionist, a radical liberal who decries and denies our traditions.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#15 - 2015-07-20 19:02:15 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:
There cannot be a sixth empire. There cannot be a second, third, fourth, or fifth. There is only one Empire of God, and it is our duty to bring all others into that one Empire.


To be fair, as Brother Honorius has said, Max hasn't said a 'Sixth Empire of God'. In that parlance, there are already five commonly-held 'Empires' - the Amarr, Gallente, Caldari, and Minmatar are the first four - despite, strictly speaking, three of them not being Empires - and the fifth is (was?) the Jovians. Though of course, something may have happened to the Jove. It's in that context that the capsuleers would represent a 'Sixth' empire.
Odelya d'Hanguest
Order of St. Severian
#16 - 2015-07-20 20:02:55 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Samira Kernher wrote:
There cannot be a sixth empire. There cannot be a second, third, fourth, or fifth. There is only one Empire of God, and it is our duty to bring all others into that one Empire.


To be fair, as Brother Honorius has said, Max hasn't said a 'Sixth Empire of God'. In that parlance, there are already five commonly-held 'Empires' - the Amarr, Gallente, Caldari, and Minmatar are the first four - despite, strictly speaking, three of them not being Empires - and the fifth is (was?) the Jovians. Though of course, something may have happened to the Jove. It's in that context that the capsuleers would represent a 'Sixth' empire.

To be fair, even this does not make any sense, given the Talocan and Yan Jung Empires (basic questions of chronology put aside)... But I suggest each criminal organisation needs an empty catch phrase for seducing the mentally unequipped—however ahistorical it may be.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#17 - 2015-07-20 20:06:18 UTC
Odelya d'Hanguest wrote:
To be fair, even this does not make any sense, given the Talocan and Yan Jung Empires (basic questions of chronology put aside).


True, but CONCORD generally holds to the 'four empires' outlook, and the Jovian Empire, by virtue of its undeniable (if possibly already extinct) military prowess cannot be ignored. The others... even CONCORD doesn't often seem to acknowledge that they've ever existed.
KuroVolt
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2015-07-20 21:12:30 UTC  |  Edited by: KuroVolt
Max Singularity is obviously a Bloodraider attempting to gain more power for his sickening cult. It is very apparent in his death cult like philosophies and the fact that he socialises with the Goonswarm Federation, who are most likely just a capsuleer based splinter of the Bloodraiders themselves. (Why else would they give some of their subgroups names like "reavers")

He is a heretic and if it was not for his capsuleer status, he would have been persecuted for his unholy crimes long ago.

Neither the Curatores Veritatis Alliance nor the Providence coalition will put our lips anywhere near the ring on his disgusting bloodstained fingers. Our loyalty is with God and his empire, not to some heretic and his gaggle of death cultists!

BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty.

Arrendis
TK Corp
#19 - 2015-07-20 21:21:38 UTC
KuroVolt wrote:
Why else would they give some of their subgroups names like "reavers"


Generally speaking, because we've found overdoing it on propaganda really does seem to get folks like you worked up.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2015-07-20 22:49:40 UTC
My advice to people is simply not to talk to members of Goonswarm. As Alizabeth Vea aptly demonstrated, they are of little intellectual worth and make mistakes that geometrically increase in severity the longer people don't pay attention to them.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

123Next pageLast page