These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Bann T3 Destoryer from Small FW Outposts

Author
Valkin Mordirc
#21 - 2015-07-18 05:41:06 UTC
Daniela Doran wrote:
FT Diomedes wrote:
While I support your idea, they could also just balance T3 Destroyers. If they were closer in power to T2 Destroyers, this would not be such an issue.

Crazy thoughts, I know.


They have been BALANCED enough as is, anymore BALANCING really will make them totally redundant.

I'm sure CCP is already aware of this and is getting ready to exile them from small plexes soonish. The whiners just have to keep their pants on a little longer.



You wear pants when you play EVE?


Weird.
#DeleteTheWeak
James Baboli
Warp to Pharmacy
#22 - 2015-07-18 06:10:19 UTC
Valkin Mordirc wrote:
Daniela Doran wrote:
FT Diomedes wrote:
While I support your idea, they could also just balance T3 Destroyers. If they were closer in power to T2 Destroyers, this would not be such an issue.

Crazy thoughts, I know.


They have been BALANCED enough as is, anymore BALANCING really will make them totally redundant.

I'm sure CCP is already aware of this and is getting ready to exile them from small plexes soonish. The whiners just have to keep their pants on a little longer.



You wear pants when you play EVE?


Weird.

Figured out why his t3D isn't as op as the rest. lowslot eaten by pants.

Talking more,

Flying crazier,

And drinking more

Making battleships worth the warp

Daniela Doran
Doomheim
#23 - 2015-07-18 07:00:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Daniela Doran
James Baboli wrote:
Valkin Mordirc wrote:
Daniela Doran wrote:
FT Diomedes wrote:
While I support your idea, they could also just balance T3 Destroyers. If they were closer in power to T2 Destroyers, this would not be such an issue.

Crazy thoughts, I know.


They have been BALANCED enough as is, anymore BALANCING really will make them totally redundant.

I'm sure CCP is already aware of this and is getting ready to exile them from small plexes soonish. The whiners just have to keep their pants on a little longer.



You wear pants when you play EVE?


Weird.

Figured out why his t3D isn't as op as the rest. lowslot eaten by pants.


I was at work and in a rush when I threw that in. Re edited for your eyes only JB.
Catherine Laartii
Doomheim
#24 - 2015-07-18 07:11:43 UTC
Sound reasoning; it's obscene that this hasn't been fixed sooner. +1
Angelica Dreamstar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2015-07-18 07:41:48 UTC
I'm for this. Everything that hinders the worthless isk farmers is a goos thing. These ships are OP as **** anyway.

bingo, his pig not being a goat doesn't make the pig wrong, just him an idiot for shouting at his pig "WHY ARENT YOU A GOAT!" (Source)

-- Ralph King-Griffin, about deranged people playing EVE ONLINE

Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#26 - 2015-07-18 12:33:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Zan Shiro
Daniela Doran wrote:
FT Diomedes wrote:
While I support your idea, they could also just balance T3 Destroyers. If they were closer in power to T2 Destroyers, this would not be such an issue.

Crazy thoughts, I know.


They have been BALANCED enough as is, anymore BALANCING really will make them totally redundant.

I'm sure CCP is already aware of this and is getting ready to exile them from small plexes soonish. The whiners just have to suck it up until then.


They aren't balanced if this is a problem.

You don't fix problems by banning ****. . Especially in this case. Yes we know you ship is OP....so the the only thing we will do is not allow it here. its still unabalanced....nothing is solved.

These plexes are meant to be run by dessies and frigates. The "noob" ships. T3C i can see vaguely the banning. A proper t3c is not a quick train. And the larger size. We start banning t3d....dessies are a lower sp ship ffs. This is what makes up FW...its what it tries to recruit from even Still not fixing underlying issues with the t3d.



how far will this go really. Ban pirate if THE fit is found that it owns, again.

For the years leading up to this when the dessie people whined about lack of a t2 combat dessie i said pulll the bubbles off a dictor and there you go. I was smart enough to train for sabres. You go guns only on these things....lets the good times f'ing roll really. If other races dic's sucked (bulletcatcher until ccp finally tweaked some things for example....took them friggin years to do so though)...that was a hey pimp my ride request thread to resolve the issue better..

Now we have the t3d....that surpass even pure damage (no bubble dictors). This was a benchmark ccp could have used to reign t3d in day 1.....and chose not too.
Caleb Seremshur
Bloodhorn
Patchwork Freelancers
#27 - 2015-07-18 19:05:21 UTC
Daniela Doran wrote:
FT Diomedes wrote:
While I support your idea, they could also just balance T3 Destroyers. If they were closer in power to T2 Destroyers, this would not be such an issue.

Crazy thoughts, I know.


They have been BALANCED enough as is, anymore BALANCING really will make them totally redundant.

I'm sure CCP is already aware of this and is getting ready to exile them from small plexes soonish. The whiners just have to suck it up until then.


Mate. Real talk time.

The svipul is the most brokenly OP piece of **** to ever come out of CCP. This one ship made every other dessy and below and half of the cruiser hulls completely irrelevant.

And some of that is due to CCP and their hard on for the 10mn AB being only 55grid while almost literally every single other medium module is 150+.

And the rest of it is due to OP sigradius/speed ratio and generous tank on a hull that doesn't/didn't deserve it.
Maldiro Selkurk
Radiation Sickness
#28 - 2015-07-19 02:57:43 UTC
Solarus Explorer wrote:
-1

T3Ds are just fine in smalls. They get killed easily in mediums, where cruisers with medium neuts abound.

Given choice between one ship cant find a place in mediums or smalls and one ship class owns smalls, ill take the former.

Yawn,  I'm right as usual. The predictability kinda gets boring really.

Ella Echerie
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2015-07-19 04:23:24 UTC
The meta in small plexes was pretty good before t3 destroyers came along - a place for t2 frigs and dessies to tangle.

+1
Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#30 - 2015-07-19 14:07:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Zan Shiro
Ella Echerie wrote:
The meta in small plexes was pretty good before t3 destroyers came along - a place for t2 frigs and dessies to tangle.

+1



psst...the t3 dessie is still dessie.

Why I said where do we stop this ban madness. Lets have for giggles ccp have lots of eve nerds cream themselves as they release....duh duh duh.....t3 frigates.


We'd be back here days after release going ban the t3F.


You got t3 cruisers banned because of size. Logically this flows. This is banning a dessie from dessie combat. And the start of a slippery slope really. Lets see this happen. Then some actually take my advice and run bubbleless dictors. Sabre I know is quite fun in this setup. Will that then be banned?


Its time for faction warfare to to face some realities. Some people will pay more isk for the performance. The want to run trash suicide trasher while old boy/girl wants to splurge on svipul. That's eve. Some aren't scared to cough up isk. Svipul I know why they do it. It tbh is the first ride that small arty truly shines on.

Svipul....was the arty boat minmatar was due for many many years. So not gonna fault people for spamming it. Its worth the cost of admission to actually enjoy any effort put into small arty training. Especially when runner up is a usually tankless (mine had cdfe....not very tank lets be honest), not properly bonuses arty wolf. Arty jag (which has bonuses for arty for the wtf moment) solid third place since it just lacks really in its ability to run them decent.
Max Deveron
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
Citizen's Star Republic
#31 - 2015-07-19 16:34:37 UTC
Im not FW, but lets face it here.

T3 cruisers are way OP against most ships in 1v1, which occurs at least 50% of the time in FW plexes.
So yeah they were rightly banned.

This is the same issue for the T dessies, they need to be banned.

Its either that or allow T3 cruisers back into the Plexes......and ban NON-MILITIA players from entering the plexes ever.
Tiberius Heth
Doomheim
#32 - 2015-07-19 17:02:12 UTC
I'd like to ban T3D from the game altogether, if that's alright.
Count Szadek
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#33 - 2015-07-19 17:51:29 UTC
+1 I agree
God's Apples
Wilderness
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
#34 - 2015-07-19 18:37:05 UTC
Zan Shiro wrote:

You got t3 cruisers banned because of size. Logically this flows.


Lmao what. T3 cruisers are considered bigger than cruisers and that's logical, but T3 dessies being considered that is not? You might be the dumbest person I have ever met on the Internet.

"Hydra Reloaded are just jealous / butthurt on me / us because we can get tons of PVP action in empire while they aren't good enough to get that." - NightmareX

Hauler Monkey
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#35 - 2015-07-19 21:24:23 UTC
Agreed.

I thought CCP might learn their lesson from the obscenely broken mess of T3 cruisers but no, they went and did the same thing and produced another line of arbitrarily overpowered ships.

Ban them from small plexes so they don't obsolete everything else smaller than a cruiser worse than they already do.
Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#36 - 2015-07-19 23:54:05 UTC
God's Apples wrote:
Zan Shiro wrote:

You got t3 cruisers banned because of size. Logically this flows.


Lmao what. T3 cruisers are considered bigger than cruisers and that's logical, but T3 dessies being considered that is not? You might be the dumbest person I have ever met on the Internet.



How so. the request is to ban a dessie from dessie content. this is more stupid imo.

BS level tank, bs level damage of t3c.....made sense. As a Band-Aid anyway. I am in the lets fix these damn things camp tbh. Hiding the issue by banning them only a Band-Aid and did not help to give motivation to fix them.

Also its more stupid to ban over better options. Hiding problems does not get them fixed. If the scourge of t3d that bad in fw....write a better idea explaining why. that has a premise better than well I can't take them on solo in a t1 dessie if all things relatively equal (skills, hell lets give both the perfect fleet booster even). Shall I fake surprise about that outcome?


this even easy....t3d has issues. Caleb above gave you all starter ideas for this. If the premise of this idea a trasher can't solo these and this the whole basis for change is just idiotic. making t1 look bad....not a good argument. T2 does this ffs. So does pirate/faction. T2 and t3 is supposed to be better than t1. Can't afford to roll out in it....welcome to isk war aspect of organized eve pvp. Get used to it....barring going piracy or RvB you will meet this again in WH and 0.0.


Lets stop the banning ideas basically and fix this crap. Hiding never works. the crap just festers really and gets worse.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#37 - 2015-07-20 01:54:25 UTC
Ban all T3s from Faction Warfare. Just saying...

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Previous page12