These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

A New Logotype

Author
Leto Aramaus
Frog Team Four
Of Essence
#21 - 2015-07-17 17:52:47 UTC
I'd like my game to be stable 100% of the time.

I'd like ships and modules to be balanced well. *coughT3scough**

I would love if the game engine was updated or re-built to be modern.

I would just love if the visual scale of EVE ships::structure was made immersive and realistic.

But yea sure, re-branding is important t... NOPE. Wait. Nevermind. No it isn't. Who cares about a logo when T3 cruisers still exist?
Tiberius Heth
Doomheim
#22 - 2015-07-18 00:29:11 UTC
Maldiro Selkurk wrote:
Tiberius Heth wrote:
Maldiro Selkurk wrote:
Tiberius Heth wrote:
The only people who state that having a new logo is good and useful are people who make logos (or folks who think that everything new is always good). Not saying yours is bad (although there's too much emphasis on the V) but it's not needed.


So you think that corporations spend millions having new logos made for them do so because they think everything new is automatically better?

Im pretty sure corps dont spend a penny without regards to the cost benefit analysis. "We want a new logo just because we like new stuff", is a hard sell to investors.

please at least remotely have a clue before you post senseless crap.


So you're saying that management, in general, consists of capable people who know how stuff really works and aren't at all hilarious clowns making a mess of it, for their own short term benefit?

My post is pretty clear and accurate.


Too bad that there's tons and tons of failing companies due to failing management all over the globe, making bad decisions, spending money head over heels on projects going WAY over their projected cost and timeframe where sane people go "really, you didn't see that coming?". So your "this won't happen, companies know that they're doing dontyouknow" is factually wrong, on a massive scale.
Previous page12