Intergalactic Summit

Investigating yourself is simply not good enough. That's much the same as me investigating my own arse and finding no turds.

Blessings Arrendis... for you speak with a clear mind, and that of no OTHER.

Singularity,

You have condemned millions to death through your atrocious vanity. Your accusations and methods are fundamentally flawed. I hope to respond more fully to your heresy in the future. At present, I will briefly outline some of the more grievous failures in your "inquisition."

Item 1: Inquisition is so called because it depends on the asking of questions in search of answers. As answers to these questions accumulate (this is called evidence), action is then taken based on these answers. You have begun with answers in search of evidence. This is not an inquisition, but rather a rebellion under a thin veneer of pseudo-sanctity.

Item 2: Your so-called "Sixth Empire" is a group largely composed of, and supported by, criminals and terrorists. You cannot declare the sitting government of the empire impure while you yourself dwell in a brothel.

Item 3: You have no legal right to "query" the accession of the Empress to power. The Theology Council accepted Her Majesty's position. Your duty as an Amarr citizen is to obey. Failure to obey the structures of the Empire is heresy. It is a rebellion against God whose order in human society takes the form of the Empire; as a result, your points 1, 2, 3, and 4 are baseless and should not be considered as written.

Item 4: What is a "crime against humanity?" What an absurd and heretical notion. Crimes are against God and His design. They are not against His creatures as if they have a moral nature beyond His existence and His plan; as a result, your points 5 and 6 are baseless and should not be considered as written.

Item 5: Charges of incompetence vs. the Sansha Incursions require evidence. I have seen no evidence that suggests that Her Majesty's response is lacking in comparison to that of other governments. Is the suggestion that the Empire should have placed the Navy at the service of your band of criminals?

Item 6: Your item 6 is a restatement of your above points, and as those points are dismissed it too must be rejected.

This leaves none of your statements remaining in a form that would be persuasive to the faithful or to the logical. Singularity, if you continue to kill based upon these demands, you cannot be anything other than a heretic and a terrorist. Return to the faith.

Sorry, yes, you're right. It's all pretty obvious, isn't it? She keeps on piling paragraphs onto subjects that can more clearly be dealt with by sentences. We've got a saying in the lab, "If you can't wow them with wisdom, baffle them with battleships."

(It's actually "baffle them with BS", but I've always assumed it stands for battleships. I should probably ask!)

Either way, it seems obvious to me that her goal is demoralization and defamation. I suppose that is to be expected!

Nonsense. I'm here for the relaxed conversation. And I'm waiting for Ansio to come back and tell me how his letter-writing campaign's going.

Mmmhm. You do realize, I've explicitly said everything I say here is my own opinion. And no, I don't hold any sub-director position. So you're full of... battleships, then, as the little fish might say. Or your source is as ill-informed as you are. Especially about participation numbers for waffe.

Eh, a typo born of utter disrespect. I'll cop to that. Heck, I'll even apologize for it. I won't mean it, but I'll apologize.

But no, my titles are 'POS Gunner, Hammerbee, Capital Pilot'. Notice the lack of 'Sub-director' in there. My duties, on the other hand, are fleet logistics, running the logistics wing of the fleet, and running the Imperial RepSwarm SIG, which trains fleet logistics pilots and anchors. Special Interest Group leadership is also not a sub-director position, as it conveys no special position within the Alliance. So clearly, if your source is calling me a 'sub-director', then they're either getting it wrong - and I won't speculate as to why - or they're intentionally misleading you.

Just as they did when they told you Amok, with fully 10% lower participation in strategic fleets than GEWNS, and just over half the participation of SNOOO, is the 'main combat wing' of the Alliance.

Oh shut up you wind bag. You were an N3 has been and now you're a CFC mascot.

Civility's mask is often borrowed by evil to present a pretty face.

We are each of us only small parts of larger things - and even those are tiny and insignificant against the scale of the cosmos. But I can't rule out the possibility that you're right. I did, after all, admit to the 'arrogant' and 'pompous' thing, now didn't I?

As for evil intent... that's why I acknowledged the insincerity of my apology. It's hard to be accused of hiding something when you tell someone your apology isn't meant!