These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[AEGIS] The Hecate

First post First post
Author
Winter Archipelago
Autumn Industrial Enterprises
#21 - 2015-06-22 00:59:43 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
I can't wait. I can't remember but don't the other D3s only have 4 hardpoints for 2 utility slots?

Svipul and Confessor do after their balance pass, but the Jackdaw has 5&1.
Sean Parisi
Blackrise Vanguard
#22 - 2015-06-22 01:01:16 UTC
I get the feeling this will be very strong with its sheer amount of HP from damage control in both hull and armor supplemented by armor reps to keep things topped off.
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
#23 - 2015-06-22 01:05:47 UTC
dps does seem a little high..

T3's need to be versatile so no rigs are necessary ... they should not have OP dps and tank

ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 HS for droneboats

Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using

Iyacia Cyric'ai
Lai Dai Counterintelligence
#24 - 2015-06-22 01:25:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Iyacia Cyric'ai
Is the base speed meant to be that low? The Confessor and Svipul have max velocities of 235 and 230 respectively. While being 10ms faster than the Jackdaw and having a 66% bonus rather than a 33% to MWD makes the Hecate significantly faster than the Jackdaw, I still feel that it's going to be easily avoidable if someone doesn't want to fight it. If the base speed is intended, then what's the justification for the Confessor and Svipul having such high base speeds by comparison?
TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc
Shadow Cartel
#25 - 2015-06-22 01:31:57 UTC
hull tanking is pretty stupid. AAR tristans/comets were already the best frigates for solo type stuff, and then they got most of their AAR hitpoints replaced by a larger amount of hull buffer.
it's not exactly stimulating gameplay - no powergrid usage, no mobility or sig penalties, it's buffer so you can't alpha it, it's capless and it has omni resists. I sure do love flying minmatar and dictating range, choosing damage types and neuting people out.
everyone seems to think it's really hilarious and amazing for some reason, but I don't see that hull tanking adds anything of value to the game. if the only downside is 'can't be remote repped', then I guess buffer shield/armour tanking is only so you can receive remote reps?
Chance Ravinne
WiNGSPAN Delivery Services
WiNGSPAN Delivery Network
#26 - 2015-06-22 01:33:46 UTC
TrouserDeagle wrote:
hull tanking is pretty stupid. AAR tristans/comets were already the best frigates for solo type stuff, and then they got most of their AAR hitpoints replaced by a larger amount of hull buffer.
it's not exactly stimulating gameplay - no powergrid usage, no mobility or sig penalties, it's buffer so you can't alpha it, it's capless and it has omni resists. I sure do love flying minmatar and dictating range, choosing damage types and neuting people out.
everyone seems to think it's really hilarious and amazing for some reason, but I don't see that hull tanking adds anything of value to the game. if the only downside is 'can't be remote repped', then I guess buffer shield/armour tanking is only so you can receive remote reps?


The fact that it's "stupid" is why people like it! Plus because it's looked so down on, you get a huge ego boost for using it.

If you lose, you can tell yourself, "Well I hull tanked, what did I expect?"
If you win, "LOL HULL TANK SUPREMACY!!!"

You've just read another awesome post by Chance Ravinne, CEO of EVE's #1 torpedo delivery service. Watch our misadventures on my YouTube channel: WINGSPANTT

Elenna Twin
LP Store Social Club
#27 - 2015-06-22 01:36:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Elenna Twin
Agreed about the speed being really low. A higher base speed with a lower bonus from Prop Mode would be better imo.
Everything else seems really cool, though.

Can't wait !
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#28 - 2015-06-22 01:39:09 UTC
Yikes that is a low speed. Couldn't bump that up to 185? Brick tanked cruisers can outrun this thing.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
#29 - 2015-06-22 01:55:43 UTC
will the cycle time of the repper change if you switch modes during a cycle or will it be effective with the next cycle after mode switch?

how to fix eve: 1) remove ECM 2) rename dampeners to ECM 3) add new anti-drone ewar for caldari 4) give offgrid boosters ongrid combat value

Evan Giants
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#30 - 2015-06-22 02:36:50 UTC
Drones (bandwidth / bay): 0 / 0

why not 5/5? i mean it's gallente cmon
Azami Nevinyrall
172.0.0.1
#31 - 2015-06-22 03:04:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Azami Nevinyrall
CCP Fozzie wrote:
hull resistance bonus.


Give that to Capital Industrial Ships please....!



Looks like it might replace the Sniping Cormorant...

...

Wild Things
Wilderness
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
#32 - 2015-06-22 03:16:28 UTC
Sard Caid wrote:
Given the tracking bonus and and dedication to armor / hull tanking, why not swap a midslot to a lowslot? For active tanking the Hecate would see better gank / tank potential while paying cost in tackle capacity, a blow softened by the tracking bonus. Swapping a midslot for a lowslot would favor hull buffer tanking which is a Hecate hallmark, or gank potential to Eris levels DPS levels.

I doubt there would be a need to adjust fitting, given typical midslot / lowslot module type CPU needs have similar requirements.



Or better yet remove a midslot entirely.

In this moment, I am euphoric.

Wild Things
Wilderness
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
#33 - 2015-06-22 03:27:12 UTC
Chance Ravinne wrote:


The fact that it's "stupid" is why people like it! Plus because it's looked so down on, you get a huge ego boost for using it.

If you lose, you can tell yourself, "Well I hull tanked, what did I expect?"
If you win, "LOL HULL TANK SUPREMACY!!!"



C'mon Chance, you know he meant stupid as in imbalanced. Don't be dense.

And he's right. not only is hull tanking dreadfully boring, hull tanking is by far the most fitting-efficient tanking method in the game. The fact that it's encouraged so heavily for gallente ships only adds to their dominance (the other part being that drones are strong), which results in the meta being as stale as it is currently.

In this moment, I am euphoric.

elitatwo
Zansha Expansion
#34 - 2015-06-22 03:57:34 UTC
...anyhow I am of to probe myself back to Empire to get one of the Gallente destroyer books- weeeeeeh.

Eve Minions is recruiting.

This is the law of ship progression!

Aura sound-clips: Aura forever

Terra Chrall
Doomheim
#35 - 2015-06-22 04:36:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Terra Chrall
Very interesting, I look forward to playing with this beastly ship. You really are taking things in a polarizing direction making this D3 a little less versatile then the other 3, yet powerful in its own ways.

The only thing I don't like is it seems to have no viable AB option, low base speed and no bonus in prop mode. Since no sig reduction in any mode and MWD being the hulls designed prop mod, I would add a MWD sig reduction bonus in somewhere.
FT Cold
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2015-06-22 04:43:51 UTC
I do like that it's strengths are more offset in some ways than the others. Having a MWD bonus and low base speed is a good way to counter such incredibly powerful brawling ability. The rep speed bonus is a nice touch too, good burst, while burning through nanite paste will keep the EHP gains down to a tolerable level. It might make brawling worthwhile again. We'll see.
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
Sending Thots And Players
#37 - 2015-06-22 05:27:14 UTC
I don't know what meth you people are smoking when you say hull tanking is "stale' or "lame" or OP. It is buffer tanking, where you trade off DPS for EHP. It doesn't matter if you have hull buffer, armour buffer or shield. It is no worse a strategy than anything else.

That said, some of the input on balancing this ship has been...typical for those commenting. Balancing ships based on "LOL I DIEDED" is handy.

I think this will be a pretty powerful ship, but with very limited capabilities. Around 24K EHP in defensive mode, a stonking active armour burst tank but not really a great sustained one with the AAR's. It wont be that great for kiting, because small rails suck and your mbility is balls outside of prop mode.

If the jackdaw experience is anything to go by, you'd have a great ship if it could run all 3 modes at once, but the choice of mode is a problem so it is meh. Like...slow but good proection in sharpshooter, and you get run down and ganked. Kitey but no DPS with prop mode and rails. Stronk tank, but slow and poor projection in defensive mode.

So i think it's going to purely be buffer gank, MWD scram-web blaster mode. Which is fine - a gank Catalyst with steroid tank.
Market Wizard
Doomheim
#38 - 2015-06-22 05:34:46 UTC
Destoya wrote:
Airi Cho wrote:
Jayne Fillon wrote:
this looks like it'll be the highest dps destroyer in the game if I'm not wrong


even more than the 800 dps eris from Suitonia?


859 DPS with 3x T2 MFS (no gun rig), 810 with 2x MFS and a burst aerator including the double 3% hardwirings

Suitonia's video is a bit outdated since they nerfed t2 gun rigs since then if I remember right, DPS is only ~750


A max skills polarized Eris can reach 1006 dps, which has actually been proven effective in PvP in low sec against the other D3s and an assortment of other ships. I fully expect the Hecate to reach 1200+ easily with the same fit and a little more buffer tank due to the extra rig slot and the extra two mids to control range.

This ship is the final piece in a circle that is called Tactical Destroyers whose mission is to completely obsolete everything and anything underneath T3 destroyers. Once this gets let lose there will no longer be any need to fly smaller ships.
Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc
Tactical-Retreat
#39 - 2015-06-22 05:54:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Altrue
Looks fine to me Big smile

Its interesting that you go for the same approach that the jackdaw with the agility, but not a bad choice in my opinion. Again, strong strengths and strong weaknesses.

Way clearer design than the jackdaw which weaknesses kind of impair its strengths.

Signature Tanking Best Tanking

[Ex-F] CEO - Eve-guides.fr

Ultimate Citadel Guide - 2016 EVE Career Chart

HiddenPorpoise
Jarlhettur's Drop
United Federation of Conifers
#40 - 2015-06-22 05:59:03 UTC
So, heavy cruiser dps, light cruiser tank, destroyer sig, and heavy frig speed? That's balanced.