These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

An open letter to CCP.

First post
Author
Cyborg Girl86
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#201 - 2015-06-23 00:47:07 UTC
Terranid Meester wrote:
Someone tried to gank me once in high sec, they failed.

Then again, I take care to transport any expensive stuff in decent ships and not while autopiloting. I take care to transport [usually] in a time and place where I deem it to be the most feasible at reducing risk to my cargo [and by extension myself]. My stupid losses tend to be in direct fighting.

Adapt, survive. Those that don't are condemned in history.


^This.

+1 From me Smile
Eldwinn
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#202 - 2015-06-23 00:55:00 UTC
Totally did not read through all those tears. I saw, "I am quitting EVE" and all I though about while struggling to read the rest was can i have your stuff (because this is all I was thinking about at this stage).
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#203 - 2015-06-23 01:27:21 UTC
Despite what most everyone else is saying, the issue they all have missed is the fact that a group of players have made it their mission in game to discriminate, harass and grief others who engage in a specific type of play-style. Definitely goes against the ToS.

Yeah, I said it and I stand by my statement.

By the way, I agree with the OP.



DMC
0bama Barack Hussein
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#204 - 2015-06-23 01:35:00 UTC
Guy throw his hands already up at page 2, give him some break already....
Red Rox
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#205 - 2015-06-23 01:42:09 UTC
I don't really get what all the fuss is about. If I wanted to make 2 bill in a hurry I could probably do it in a couple of weeks on by myself. And I am a solo explorer with only 10 million skill points. Sure I wouldn't super pleased with that kind of loss but it would hardly be game breaking or disastrous.
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#206 - 2015-06-23 01:46:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
By the way, I agree with the OP.

DMC, the OP doesn't even agree with his initial post anymore. He already acknowledged that it was made while he was still emotional following the gank.

He's kind of totally turned around and sees the positive aspect of learning from this now. His attitude is great and if we all had his attitude, the relevance of CODE and other ganking groups would be significantly less than it is. They don't have power in this game because they take it. They have it because lots of people give it to them.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#207 - 2015-06-23 02:08:03 UTC
Azda Ja wrote:
Salah ad-Din al-Jawahiri wrote:
Did I see a whimpering carebear turn into a GD troll overnight? Marvellous! I have always said that all that some players need is just one little gank.

Queue feel good 80s movie music and high fives all around. Go team!


Don't forget this part. No inspirational 80s movie is complete without it. Cool
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#208 - 2015-06-23 02:09:13 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
By the way, I agree with the OP.

DMC, the OP doesn't even agree with his initial post anymore. He already acknowledged that it was made while he was still emotional following the gank.

He's kind of totally turned around and sees the positive aspect of learning from this now. His attitude is great and if we all had his attitude, the relevance of CODE and other ganking groups would be significantly less than it is. They don't have power in this game because they take it. They have it because lots of people give it to them.

Yeah about the OP, it's simply amazing to see a majority of people all gang up and sway the viewpoint of a single person.

As for the relevance of CODE and other ganking groups, I still stand by my original statement in my previous reply.



DMC
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#209 - 2015-06-23 02:20:15 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:

Yeah about the OP, it's simply amazing to see a majority of people all gang up and sway the viewpoint of a single person.


This is the power of delusion. A group of people telling a guy how the situation he have voluntarily chosen to take part in (EVE Online) actually works is somehow 'ganging up' on someone. The guy in question showed great maturity in demonstrating he understood the folly of his original emotional outburst. You could learn something from him.

You won't of course.

Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#210 - 2015-06-23 03:01:56 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Despite what most everyone else is saying, the issue they all have missed is the fact that a group of players have made it their mission in game to discriminate, harass and grief others who engage in a specific type of play-style. Definitely goes against the ToS.

Yeah, I said it and I stand by my statement.

By the way, I agree with the OP.



DMC

*grabs some popcorn and prepares to be amused*

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#211 - 2015-06-23 03:11:36 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:

Yeah about the OP, it's simply amazing to see a majority of people all gang up and sway the viewpoint of a single person.


This is the power of delusion. A group of people telling a guy how the situation he have voluntarily chosen to take part in (EVE Online) actually works is somehow 'ganging up' on someone. The guy in question showed great maturity in demonstrating he understood the folly of his original emotional outburst. You could learn something from him.

You won't of course.



There is nothing to learn in there except the obvious lesson that ganking is free, ******-proof easy, and as such, will be the activity of choice for everyone who couldn't do anything else in eve, until rightfully nerfed.

In the meantime eve is going to bleed subs with every stupid griefing act of suicide wanking.

Remove free catalyst from the gank setups. Remove tags-for-sec from the gankers. Remove 0-skill requirement of N+1 ganking. And there we go, ganking which actually requires brain, execution, and has a cost, instead of bringing 32 alts in catalysts and overkilling everything while salivating the area in process of rolling face on keyboard.
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#212 - 2015-06-23 03:21:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Orca Platypus wrote:
Remove free catalyst from the gank setups. Remove tags-for-sec from the gankers. Remove 0-skill requirement of N+1 ganking. And there we go, ganking which actually requires brain, execution, and has a cost, instead of bringing 32 alts in catalysts and overkilling everything while salivating the area in process of rolling face on keyboard.

If ganking currently requires no brain, what does that say for the people that get ganked?

Surely an activity so simple as to be for people who've failed everything else, should be trivially easy to avoid. Why are there so many successful ganks?

AFK I can understand. There's clearly not a brain even present at all. Maybe that would help. If people engaged their brain or even just had it at the computer, there would be fewer successful ganks.
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#213 - 2015-06-23 03:49:01 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
If ganking currently requires no brain, what does that say for the people that get ganked?

Ganking is unescapable, uncounterable, and the whole notion that you won't be ganked if you carry less is the same kind of stupid as as claiming you won't be robbed if you put less money in your wallet and put it on display.

Scipio Artelius wrote:
Surely an activity so simple as to be for people who've failed everything else, should be trivially easy to avoid. Why are there so many successful ganks?

Scouting does not avoid ganking because all you see is neutral alst. Even if you see a gank party, there is still no way around it, so you have to dive into it and be ganked. Webbing never worked because if you're scanned and decided to be worth, your webber will be blapped anyway. Autopilot or not, genius or not, gank is unavoidable, free, and ******-proof.

Scipio Artelius wrote:
AFK I can understand. There's clearly not a brain even present at all. Maybe that would help. If people engaged their brain or even just had it at the computer, there would be fewer successful ganks.

Oh great brain, show me the counter to bumping... what, you can't? Then screw off, dumbface.
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#214 - 2015-06-23 03:56:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Orca Platypus wrote:
Oh great brain, show me the counter to bumping... what, you can't? Then screw off, dumbface.

Jump Freighter. Works perfectly everytime.

Aside from that, there is a tonne of information out there on how to minimise the risk of bumping - scouting ahead, not freighting when machs are on your intended route, webbing alts and minimising cargo all work.

Ganks are only unavoidable for the people who don't engage their brain. So dumbface doesn't matter in the slightest. It's the matter behind it that counts.

If anything, highsec pvp could do with some buffs to favour all groups, not more nerfs just because we don't agree with someone else's playstyle.
Shederov Blood
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
#215 - 2015-06-23 04:04:55 UTC
Orca Platypus wrote:
Remove 0-skill requirement of N+1 ganking.
That would remove 99% of all pvp combat, not just ganking.

Who put the goat in there?

Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#216 - 2015-06-23 04:09:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Orca Platypus
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Orca Platypus wrote:
Oh great brain, show me the counter to bumping... what, you can't? Then screw off, dumbface.

Jump Freighter. Works perfectly everytime.

Aside from that, there is a tonne of information out there on how to minimise the risk of bumping - scouting ahead, not freighting when machs are on your intended route, webbing alts and minimising cargo all work.

Ganks are only unavoidable for the people who don't engage their brain.


Jump Freighter takes years to train into, and doesn't make ganks impossible, just harder. 32 catalysts would still easily overpower it, and chain tackle would work too.

But ok, let's say it "counters" dumb bumping (at insane cost of jump freighter and year of training), despite not actually countering anything because you have to jump out and not haul, what can people without JF do?
Scouting ahead does next to nothing, all you're going to see is neutral alts, even imbeciles would keep their mach and gank alts logged off.
Webbing does nothing except adding a loss of webber to loss of freighter.
Minimising cargo never worked, even empty freighters are ganked, since ganking in catalysts is free, nobody is bothered about the cost.

The only counter to gank is "not freighting" aka "not playing eve". Great counter!
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#217 - 2015-06-23 04:09:42 UTC
Shederov Blood wrote:
Orca Platypus wrote:
Remove 0-skill requirement of N+1 ganking.
That would remove 99% of all pvp combat, not just ganking.


Which would be considered a bonus to the kinds of people you are talking to lol.
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#218 - 2015-06-23 04:12:01 UTC
Shederov Blood wrote:
Orca Platypus wrote:
Remove 0-skill requirement of N+1 ganking.
That would remove 99% of all pvp combat, not just ganking.

There are ways to do it without affecting PvP. Just make CONCORD react faster when there's 10 criminal acts on the same grid, viola, stacking catalysts en masse doesn't work anymore, PvP not affected.
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#219 - 2015-06-23 04:13:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Orca Platypus wrote:
Jump Freighter takes years to train into, and doesn't make ganks impossible, just harder. 32 catalysts would still easily overpower it, and chain tackle would work too.

What? lol

You asked for a counter to bumping. JFs are a 100% counter to bumping.

Ganks against jump freighters are impossible if the JF pilot is smart.

Haha in relation to logged off machs. If they are logged off and you have a webbing alt, then nothing at all to worry about. By the time they are logged in and warped back to gate, you're gone.

But your trolling is quite entertaining. Perfect motivation for gankers to do what they do because it's also so effective as the tears some of them look for.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#220 - 2015-06-23 04:19:56 UTC
Orca Platypus wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Orca Platypus wrote:
Oh great brain, show me the counter to bumping... what, you can't? Then screw off, dumbface.

Jump Freighter. Works perfectly everytime.

Aside from that, there is a tonne of information out there on how to minimise the risk of bumping - scouting ahead, not freighting when machs are on your intended route, webbing alts and minimising cargo all work.

Ganks are only unavoidable for the people who don't engage their brain.


Jump Freighter takes years to train into, and doesn't make ganks impossible, just harder. 32 catalysts would still easily overpower it, and chain tackle would work too.

But ok, let's say it "counters" dumb bumping (at insane cost of jump freighter and year of training), what can people without JF do?
Scouting ahead does next to nothing, all you're going to see is neutral alts, even imbeciles would keep their mach and gank alts logged off.
Webbing does nothing except adding a loss of webber to loss of freighter.
Minimising cargo never worked, even empty freighters are ganked, since ganking in catalysts is free, nobody is bothered about the cost.

The only counter to gank is "not freighting" aka "not playing eve". Great counter!


Sigh.

This is what happens when you have a "professional victim" playing a video game. They spend soooo much time being a victim (and then bypassing common sense and individual responsibility in favor or running straight to the highest available authority crying for "fixes") that very simple and OBVIOUS solutions...

... Like using a Jump Freighter in LOW SEC to Jump AROUND high sec thus preventing gank squads from even getting on to the same grid with you.

That's the problem with high sec, it doesn't foster the kind of creative sense the other 87% of EVE (that isn't high sec) does, it's safety creates helpless victims.