These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

New Trasher a joke?

Author
Zimmy Zeta
Perkone
Caldari State
#101 - 2015-06-22 09:06:29 UTC
Carmen Electra wrote:
Looks nice to me. Just a shame you really never get to appreciate any of these details in the course of normal gameplay.


>> implying ship spinning is not normal gameplay.

I'd like to apologize for the poor quality of the post above and sincerely hope you didn't waste your time reading it. Yes, I do feel bad about it.

Doctor Knuckles
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#102 - 2015-06-22 09:11:53 UTC
I love it.

It looks like a random bunch of scrap parts from different spaceship duct taped togheter

10/10 would minmatar
Varathius
Enlightened Industries
Goonswarm Federation
#103 - 2015-06-22 13:20:34 UTC
does the new version come with a lipstick holder?
Delt0r Garsk
Shits N Giggles
#104 - 2015-06-22 14:27:24 UTC
Varathius wrote:
does the new version come with a lipstick holder?

Apparently, due to CSM shenanigans, it comes with only a hat holder.

AKA the scientist.

Death and Glory!

Well fun is also good.

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#105 - 2015-06-23 02:01:28 UTC
Regarding the new change, cast my vote for a big NO.

Seriously.



DMC
Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
#106 - 2015-06-23 02:20:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Khergit Deserters
But seriously--- Please don't change the Thrasher. It's one of the art design things that made EVE not Jumpgate, Earth and Beyond, or anything else way back in MMO pre-history. The dark, funky, Euro-ish aesthetic of EVE is what made this game stand out as so different. Maybe what put it in MoMA as well. Don't toss out that classic artwork, CCP!

Make a Thrasher Mk. II, maybe. Or make the old Thrasher a nerfed Thrasher Heritage Edition or something. Save the art, it's got a gazillion person-hours of people identifying with it. No use tossing it out, keep it and do some new art, eh?
Tyra Falco
Glasgow Kiss Enterprises
#107 - 2015-06-23 16:27:01 UTC
As much as I like the new Thrasher model (I'll get used to it), I would think both the Burst (a cardboard box with solar panels) and the Talwar (a brick with solar panels) need a once-over more than the Thrasher Straight
Why fix something that is not broken just for the sake of change?

Samoth Egnoled -'I like your Avatar alot! The facial tattoo's kinda give you that scary clown look, which suits you quite well.' Pepper Swift -'Fuckisn like not workign'

To mare
Advanced Technology
#108 - 2015-06-23 16:30:25 UTC
that thing look so bad, need more ducktape
Falken Falcon
#109 - 2015-06-24 06:02:31 UTC
Well the good part is that we don't need third party artists for r34 now.

Aye, Sea Turtles

d0cTeR9
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#110 - 2015-06-24 13:04:05 UTC  |  Edited by: d0cTeR9
New minmatar ships look GREAT.

They keep that 'older tech' look and 'mix-match' assembly. With the new 'rust' effect, Minmatar finally are getting good looking (but rusty/older) ships.

Been around since the beginning.

Skurja Volpar
Rattini Tribe
Minmatar Fleet Alliance
#111 - 2015-06-25 09:30:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Skurja Volpar
It looks more Caldari than Minmatar to me, like a cross between the new blackbird and the jackdaw. The front/bridge area in particular looks more in keeping with one of the new caldari designs.

The images in this post (C, D & E especially) retaining the chunky front end and keeping the ships silhouette intact are pretty promising.

Shederov Blood wrote:


The thrasher isn't a bad looking ship right now anyway, and that new rusty texture work looks ******* amazing. No need to throw the baby out with the bathwater when remodeling.
Anthar Thebess
#112 - 2015-06-25 10:36:09 UTC
Please use this model for a minmatar titan :D
Infrequent
Tidal Lock
Vapor-Lock
#113 - 2015-06-25 13:19:41 UTC
Since when were Minnie ships meant to look like anything other than trash put together for battle? They were not made to look good, they were made for use, simple as that.
Anslo
Scope Works
#114 - 2015-06-25 13:48:36 UTC
Looks cool. Doesn't look like a Thrasher, but looks cool. +1

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Ragged Starkiller
Minmatar Secret Service
Ushra'Khan
#115 - 2015-06-25 13:59:33 UTC
Old models are classic, but the new models looks awesome.

Still something bothers me. Remember there is no friction in space, so stop doing aerodynamic models!!

Nevil Oscillator
#116 - 2015-06-26 09:34:04 UTC
I've seen other designs that in my opinion are better. Someone posted them in a chat but I didn't save the link. There is more info out there somewhere.
Tisiphone Dira
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#117 - 2015-06-26 10:57:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Tisiphone Dira
Who among you has flown more thrashers than I? I am the most qualified to speak on this. Hear my words.

If so much as one rust flake is changed on my precious thrasher I WILL BURN HEK TO THE GROUND. No pod or shuttle will be safe.

There once was a ganker named tisi

A stunningly beautiful missy

To gank a gross miner

There is nothing finer, cept when they get all pissy

solrac lara
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#118 - 2015-06-26 13:39:27 UTC
The F one looks better

talwar
Bullet Anarchy
Venom and Bullet Corporation
Metropolis Defense
#119 - 2015-06-26 20:31:21 UTC
F sucks

B is the Thrasher

The shape should stay, the only thing they could do with Minmatar ships is make them all look more organic like the firetail, would work for the Talwar to be a death beatle

On Target

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#120 - 2015-06-27 00:45:31 UTC
Tyra Falco wrote:
As much as I like the new Thrasher model (I'll get used to it), I would think both the Burst (a cardboard box with solar panels) and the Talwar (a brick with solar panels) need a once-over more than the Thrasher Straight
Why fix something that is not broken just for the sake of change?




Imicus Imicus Imicus

Bring back DEEEEP Space!