These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Overheating Ice/Gas/Ore Havesters.
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Iain Cariaba
#41 - 2015-05-30 19:50:46 UTC
Panty Stocking wrote:
yessssss, give those in null more ability to control/destroy markets while still mining in relative safety. there needs to be additional clauses to malcanis law:

1) any changes to mining providing more yield/hr will have a negative effect on the market

2) any changes to mining providing more yield/hr becomes competitively mandatory, mining is a minimax game

3) any mining changes meant to increase risk will have little to no effect to bears in sov space, making clause 1 more pronounced, and reinforcing clause 2

more clauses welcomed from informed individuals. its not just about noobs, in fact the "noob" player description of malcanis' law can easily be replaced by "highsec bears"

You forgot to grr goons.

Additionally, part one doesn't need to be added, because it already exists in the form of basic economics.
Panty Stocking
Doomheim
#42 - 2015-05-30 20:01:01 UTC
I should have mentioned i have no beef with nullbears and market manipulation, it is part of what makes eve so awesome.
what other game could have something like the ice interdict or otec for reference. the devs applauded efforts to destroy the markets, i can hardly do less.

yes, #1 is redundant truism, but still needs to be driven home constantly, as OP has proven time and time again. too bad sticky threads are just skipped by, even though their titles are quite concise.
Deep Nine
Vigilante Carebears
#43 - 2015-06-04 12:45:04 UTC
It's a good thing the Devs can make up their own minds.
Previous page123