These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

RMT legality.

First post
Author
Crimson Grimslow
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2015-05-15 06:13:48 UTC
Ok So first off im not sure if this is the right place to suggest this, so feel free to tell me if its not.

My idea. RMT has always been a topic of scrutiny. For as long as we have been playing MMOs RMT seems to have been a part of it. ts not going anywhere. CCP has made it slightly legal. But why not be fully legal?

CCP could easily act as a middle man. For example and to better explain.

Player A wants to acquire 20 Billion isk.

Player B has 20 Billion isk he is willing to part with.

Player A advertises on isk exchange forums.

Player B sets up trade. CCP oversees trade and takes a cut. Say 10% of the cash exchanged.

Boom everyone is happy. CCP gets its dues. A gets his riches and B gets to pay the rent.

In eve RMT is a generally accepted thing. reason being. It doesnt matter how fat your wallet is if you dont play the game your not gonna be any good. Now obviously there will be certain legal things that ccp will have to work out. And it will need more thought then the 10 minutes ive put into it.

But isnt that what lawyers are for?

Anyway thats my idea. Let me know what you think.
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2015-05-15 06:25:25 UTC
Quote:

CCP has made it slightly legal. But why not be fully legal?

When did this happen, CCP has always been against it.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Crimson Grimslow
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2015-05-15 06:27:11 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
Quote:

CCP has made it slightly legal. But why not be fully legal?

When did this happen, CCP has always been against it.

GTC is a form of RMT.
Haatakan Reppola
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#4 - 2015-05-15 06:33:06 UTC
Crimson Grimslow wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
Quote:

CCP has made it slightly legal. But why not be fully legal?

When did this happen, CCP has always been against it.

GTC is a form of RMT.


Can you use GTC to cash out all that ISK you will never use? If the answer is "no" then its not RMT (your not selling your ISK for RL money)

Crimson Grimslow
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2015-05-15 06:40:24 UTC
Haatakan Reppola wrote:
Crimson Grimslow wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
Quote:

CCP has made it slightly legal. But why not be fully legal?

When did this happen, CCP has always been against it.

GTC is a form of RMT.


Can you use GTC to cash out all that ISK you will never use? If the answer is "no" then its not RMT (your not selling your ISK for RL money)


That is why its not real RMT Im curios did you even read all of my post or did you stop at the half legal thing. GTC trading is RMT the same way plex trading is. Some one at some point paid RL money to get there hands on the currency. Its just instead of that guy farming isk in null getting to pay rent he gets to pay his eve bill. CCP is a corporation they want money. and they dont like RMT because it cuts into there profits my post is a simplified way for them to make money off of this.

Nothing more or less. GTC trading is defined legally as RMT trading whether you consider it that or not.
Haatakan Reppola
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#6 - 2015-05-15 06:46:07 UTC
You dont buy ingame currency, you buy an ingame item that have a fluid ISK value.
The only Real Money Trade involved is paying CCP for an ingame item, thats worlds apart from selling your ingame ISK.
Crimson Grimslow
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2015-05-15 06:51:31 UTC
Haatakan Reppola wrote:
You dont buy ingame currency, you buy an ingame item that have a fluid ISK value.
The only Real Money Trade involved is paying CCP for an ingame item, thats worlds apart from selling your ingame ISK.


What the hell do you think isk is? candy for litlle children? If you cant even tell That Intersteller Kredits is a form of CURRENCY then your hole argument on RMT is null ad void. Now unless you have an actual opinion on the IDEA I PROPOSED rather then arguing on a subject i don't give two ***** about then please just stop posting
Madd Adda
#8 - 2015-05-15 06:58:21 UTC
and if it was made legal? bot farming/incursion running would skyrocket , and shady scam sites would crop up constantly. I'm no lawyer but I'm sure there's some kind of liability issue for CCP if RMT between players is legalized.

Carebear extraordinaire

FireFrenzy
Cynosural Samurai
#9 - 2015-05-15 07:14:40 UTC
And player B is catered too.... he can just buy plex and sell them and player A can "cash out" by not paying for his subscription. Takes a little longer but...

Also how about we DONT add rmt? we finally have most of that **** OUT of this game...
Crimson Grimslow
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2015-05-15 07:19:33 UTC
Madd Adda wrote:
and if it was made legal? bot farming/incursion running would skyrocket , and shady scam sites would crop up constantly. I'm no lawyer but I'm sure there's some kind of liability issue for CCP if RMT between players is legalized.

read my original post. If ccp writes up a proper document which any multinational corporation will do then they wont be held liable.
Further more If they oversee said transactions instead of handing it over to third partys then those scam sights would be illegal either way. CCP would be the licensed broker and therefore these sights would hold no meaning. Its not hard to set up a few guidelines the first of which would simply state that ccp is not liable for scamming done outside of the network. And would add a safety net. Such as the offending player being banned and the scamed player being compensated(if done in network) and both partys being banned if done out of network..

in addition its not uncommon for brokers to act as holders aswell. For example

Party a wants to buy say a 2 bill.

Party b wants to sell 2 bill for 20 dollars.

Part c the broker(CCP) would then take 2 billion from the seller and then 20 dollars from the buyer. And proceed with swapping. The buyer would get 18 dollars . 2 dollars would go to ccp for the brokers fee. And then any scam or problem that would emerge would then be at ccps fault. Which is a risk. But no more a risk then buying plex and then them charging twice what you authorized.
Fourteen Maken
Karma and Causality
#11 - 2015-05-15 07:37:50 UTC
Crimson Grimslow wrote:


Player B sets up trade. CCP oversees trade and takes a cut. Say 10% of the cash exchanged.
.


I buy ISK with real money as it is through the plex market and 100% of the proceeds go to CCP... which they then use to hire unprofessional, under qualified, role playing game devs who troll me with every other patch that comes out... so +1 from me but for all the wrong reasons Twisted

Seriously though you're asking turkeys to vote for Christmas, this thread will be locked and you'll probably be warned for even suggesting it.
Madd Adda
#12 - 2015-05-15 07:39:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Madd Adda
Crimson Grimslow wrote:
Madd Adda wrote:
and if it was made legal? bot farming/incursion running would skyrocket , and shady scam sites would crop up constantly. I'm no lawyer but I'm sure there's some kind of liability issue for CCP if RMT between players is legalized.

read my original post. If ccp writes up a proper document which any multinational corporation will do then they wont be held liable.
Further more If they oversee said transactions instead of handing it over to third partys then those scam sights would be illegal either way. CCP would be the licensed broker and therefore these sights would hold no meaning. Its not hard to set up a few guidelines the first of which would simply state that ccp is not liable for scamming done outside of the network. And would add a safety net. Such as the offending player being banned and the scamed player being compensated(if done in network) and both partys being banned if done out of network..

in addition its not uncommon for brokers to act as holders aswell. For example

Party a wants to buy say a 2 bill.

Party b wants to sell 2 bill for 20 dollars.

Part c the broker(CCP) would then take 2 billion from the seller and then 20 dollars from the buyer. And proceed with swapping. The buyer would get 18 dollars . 2 dollars would go to ccp for the brokers fee. And then any scam or problem that would emerge would then be at ccps fault. Which is a risk. But no more a risk then buying plex and then them charging twice what you authorized.


you go on a lot of assumptions on whether CCP can even get those multinational corporations to consent to these agreements (or even want to), without any issue. the broker would need access to the player account to get at the money, that's access to the game server. I doubt CCP would allow outsiders, even if they are contracted, access to their property. How can the player retrieve the money? How about sending the money to the broker for the transactions? How about stuff like taxation? There is bound to be a lot of red tape to go through to get things going, and more just to get it going smoothly.

RMT would only cause people to make their job to farm isk for money (something i suspect you are steering towards)
and cause more bot like behavior.


This isn't even going into what can go wrong: the allegations of fraud/fraudulent behavior ,theft of game accounts and selling off liquid assets while posing as the account owner, the in game scamming that is already allowed treading on illegal activities, etc.

There is too much that can go wrong and CCP could easily wind up losing everything. I see no benefit in this that warrants this kind of risk.

Carebear extraordinaire

Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#13 - 2015-05-15 07:54:16 UTC
Serious issues
1 CCP allow this they are ceding ownership of virtual assets to the players. Scamming could become a real life crime. As is CCP own it all you just get to play with it

2 all money transfers currently have to 100% go into CCP's wallets. Making rmt legal means some of this won't wind up in ccp's wallets.

Minor issues
1 there is so much isk in the game right now isk would be as worthless as gold was in diablo 3 overnight

2 hacking attempts would skyrocket in attempts to generate isk as it could be easily transfered to real money forcing CCP to spend more of its reduced profits on security

3 every single incursion site would be 100% full of bots and until it was worthless every asteroid belt

4 the resulting inflation would mean anybody not buying isk wouldn't be able to compete

In closing I'm 100% against rmt being anything other then a real life crime and perma ban offence.

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin

Noragen Neirfallas
Emotional Net Loss
#14 - 2015-05-15 07:59:18 UTC
Also CCP acting as brokers? Now they have to hire more staff to do this with reduced profits from plex sales. Is would struggle to monitor the bot posts in market place. God this would wreck so much so quickly. If you were sitting on a trillion isk it would be worthless overnight... oh also nullsec would be a big blue farmers paradice overnight...

Member and Judge of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Noragens basically the Chribba of C&P - Zimmy Zeta

Confirming that we all play in Noragen's eve. - BeBopAReBop

ISD Buldath favorite ISD

'"****station games" - Sun Tzu' - Ralph King Griffin

Mag's
Azn Empire
#15 - 2015-05-15 08:11:11 UTC
Crimson Grimslow wrote:
GTC trading is defined legally as RMT trading whether you consider it that or not.
No it's not, whether you consider it is or not.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

HiddenPorpoise
Jarlhettur's Drop
United Federation of Conifers
#16 - 2015-05-15 08:12:25 UTC
Crimson Grimslow wrote:
Madd Adda wrote:
and if it was made legal? bot farming/incursion running would skyrocket , and shady scam sites would crop up constantly. I'm no lawyer but I'm sure there's some kind of liability issue for CCP if RMT between players is legalized.

read my original post. If ccp writes up a proper document which any multinational corporation will do then they wont be held liable.
Are you a child? If they fomalize RMT they are legally a bank (they've said that's why they wouldn't if they want to). Writing "we aren't liable" doesn't magically make that true.

They don't want to be a launderer.
Yun Kuai
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2015-05-15 08:41:32 UTC
You know, for a Russian bot, your English is really good. I'm quite surprised actually.

This is quite possibly the dumbest idea you could propose in this game. The trillionaires that are board with EvE would just sell all of their isk for hundres, maybe even thousands of dollars, and then quit the game for good. Also, lets no forget how much illegal stuff in RL would be happening through this "free" laundering service.

-1 Russian bot, go back to your creator and work on a better program.

--------------------------------------------------------::::::::::::--:::-----:::---::::::::::::--------------:::----------:::----:::---:::----------------------:::::::-------:::---:::----::::::-------------------:::-----------:::--:::----:::---------------------::::::::::::----:::::::----:::::::::::::-------

Infrequent
HotSpot.
#18 - 2015-05-15 08:46:58 UTC
No, just no.
Iroquoiss Pliskin
9B30FF Labs
#19 - 2015-05-15 09:27:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Iroquoiss Pliskin
Are you nuts?

So that people could farm 23.5/7 now overtly for RMT, while "playing" Eve? A large portion of the population will convert to this, and then it will attract other sholupen, just like ISBoxer did.

Farmers would then undercut the concept of PLEX, or Aurum, and your peasant 10% won't make up the difference. Lol

Nope.

NOPE.

Noragen Neirfallas wrote:
Serious issues
1 CCP allow this they are ceding ownership of virtual assets to the players. Scamming could become a real life crime. As is CCP own it all you just get to play with it


This.

ISK doesn't have full convertibility, if it did - prepare for a can of worms that you've never ever seen in the history of online gaming.

It tells you how successful the economy and the concept of the game is in general, when "ideas" like these come up!
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
#20 - 2015-05-15 09:50:18 UTC
CCP wouldn't have as much cash from it as they do from it now. And it becomes a RL sandbox where crimes are crimes and that's no fun.

EvE-Mail me if you need anything.

12Next page